More

Democrats: Overdraft Fees Must Be Curtailed

ANNE FLAHERTY   10/30/09 02:48 PM ET   AP

Dodd

WASHINGTON — Senior congressional Democrats say legislation is still needed to limit how lenders charge customers who overspend on their accounts, even though some big banks have already curbed high-fee overdraft programs.

Rep. Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, on Friday joined Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., in calling for legislation that would require banks to ask customers whether they want overdraft protection.

"Don't do favors for people without asking them," said Frank, D-Mass., at a hearing on a House overdraft bill introduced by New York Democratic Rep. Carolyn Maloney.

Most banks automatically allow customers to overdraft their accounts, then charge them $25 to $35 per infraction. Banks say that customers want the protection, rather than being denied a purchase at the cash register.

In recent weeks, several major U.S. banks, including Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co., have said that they will allow customers to "opt out" of their overdraft programs.

The House and Senate bills under consideration would go further by requiring that fees be proportional to the cost of the overcharge. The legislation also would prohibit banks from imposing more than one overdraft fee a month, or six per a year.

The recently announced policies by banks seemed too little, too late for federal regulators and lawmakers who say tougher rules should be imposed.

By the end of the year, the Federal Reserve is expected to issue new regulations on overdrafts. Congressional Democrats say they want new rules codified into law.

During Friday's hearing, consumer advocates hailed the proposed law while bank representatives said it was unnecessary.

Michael Menzies, president of Maryland's Easton Bank and Trust Company, said eliminating overdraft protection for many customers will mean denying charges and embarrassing customers or forcing them to rely on high-cost payday lenders.

"While community banks always seek to treat customers honestly, the same expectations must hold true in reverse: customers should not – and generally do not – expect a free pass when a bank covers their overdrafts," Menzies said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — Senior congressional Democrats say legislation is still needed to limit how lenders charge customers who overspend on their accounts, even though some big banks have already curbed ...
WASHINGTON — Senior congressional Democrats say legislation is still needed to limit how lenders charge customers who overspend on their accounts, even though some big banks have already curbed ...
Filed by Grace Kiser  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 181
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dlo2
07:12 PM on 11/03/2009
Did we forget about the usurious practices of the banks? Let's return to that issue please.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxygen
love is like oxygen
12:13 AM on 11/06/2009
Loss of prey species may lead to coextinction of their predator. In addition, because predators are found in higher trophic levels, they are less abundant and much more vulnerable to extinction......

in other words bye bye banco de americas
10:18 AM on 11/02/2009
I wonder if congressional republicans will start talking about how much they enjoy the protection of overdraft fees.
10:02 AM on 11/02/2009
need to stop the admixure of money & politics. Time 4 the peopel to get the reform they need. heath care, education, a stable well paying job, and housing.

good articles; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

Lets hope Obama will succeed
03:19 AM on 11/02/2009
I love the banks pretending they are "protecting the customer" by allowing this "protection."

Most banks now debit your account not in the order transactions hit your account but rather highest to lowest dollar value at the end of the day.

Why do they do this? This is why:

Let's say you have $200 in your account. You buy a $15 item, then a $5 one, then another $5 one, then a $50 one, then lastly a $150 one. You overdrew your account by $25. You messed up, true. But...

If they processed it in that order you only overdrew on that final $150 purchase and would get one $35 or so fee.

But that's not enough for them so they hit you with the $150 one first, then the $50 one and then the other three. Now you owe them $105 in fees.

And the more small purchases you made, the worse. Even if you barely overdraw you'll get smacked with a lot of fees, even if you actually only overdrew once.

I watch my account like a hawk to avoid this. But it is easy to see how one small screw up can slam you with a ton of fees quickly.

They don't offer this as "protection" they offer it as a quick way to make money.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
04:10 AM on 11/02/2009
The other way the milk the system for all the OD fees possible is crediting deposits. Take a cash deposit to your bank window at 9. Go back at 11 and write a check at the same window. See which one posts first.
09:31 PM on 11/01/2009
The Terrible Two. Chris Dodd adn Barney Frank. These two should be put in jail for what they did to our banking system.
04:21 PM on 11/02/2009
Wow - a photo of the two crooks together!
12:47 PM on 11/01/2009
NO economic recovery. REAL unemployment is DOUBLE the 'official' statistics. Government has been playing major games with all stats for a while now - both parties are to blame.

good articles http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
09:10 AM on 11/01/2009
The purpose of banks is to separate the consumer from his money. On second thought, that is the purpose of most businesses. On one hand, congress is doing all they can to help the banks stay in business and be profitable, on the other hand, they are imposing restrictions that prevent them from making money. Don't get me wrong. Sometimes I hate the banks. I call them evil all the time. But....There is no way congress can micro manage the banks. Where ever congress plugs a hole, the banking industry will find away to make another. Ending the high over draft charges will shift the fees to the more responsible customers. Thats me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:43 PM on 10/31/2009
So much duplicity is proof of conflicted self.
A dilemma and conundrum that is difficult to correct.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjb5406
03:57 PM on 10/31/2009
PNC Babnk and National City (their subsidiary) just raised their overdraft fees to $36 each and charge $8 for each additional day (per item) that the account is overdrawn. They have no plans in place to opt-out of overdraft "protection". The only thing it protects is their profits.
03:51 PM on 10/31/2009
Great story Eaglebenny.
In NH we have TD Banknorth
free unlimited checking including checks
$15 bounced check fee. checks are withdrawn in the order they are received.
09:06 AM on 10/31/2009
3.5%GDP growth cruses estimates, but the GOP talking heads will try to downplay it this weekend.

good articles http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mcmutter
I'd rather burn in at 200 mph than eat it in a car
06:51 AM on 10/31/2009
HELP YOURSELVES !!!! USE A CREDIT UNION !!!

Just say fu to all the major banks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjb5406
04:08 PM on 10/31/2009
Unfortunately, CUs also charge high overdraft fees, and the proposed legislation will only extend to banks, so if a bank can only charge you one overdraft fee per month, the credit unions can do it over & over again. So, for example, if Bank of America will be able to charge you one NSF fee per month at $35 and 6 per year (total of $210), Patelco Credit Union can charge you as many of its $28 NSF fees as it wants in a month. And they also will not be forced to adjust their fees to reflect the amount of the overdraft, so if you're overdrawn by a penny, you'll be hit with $28 in fees. CUs are fine, but because they are not being included in this legislation, either they will have to voluntarily agree to the same regulations, or they will lose their advantage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
10:40 PM on 10/31/2009
Overdraft Fee legislation is Overdraft Fee legislation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
06:48 AM on 10/31/2009
Why has our President who promised the people he would "PROTECT OUR INTERESTS" NOT DONE SO on Health Care, Regulations, and Foreclosures?

Could it be that this happened to him soon after the Election like it has to other Presidents in other countries?

In walks a representative of the Corporatocracy who says:

"Congratulations Mr. President!

(Quietly) And now I just want to tell you that in this pocket I have Several Hundred Million Dollars if you play the game our way.

(even more Quietly) And in this pocket I have a gu_n with a bu11et with your name on it in case you decide to keep your campaign promises."

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man (jump to 4:25 mark for above quote - but entire video is valuable):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAqG51uwzMI&feature=PlayList&p=CFC50000766B264E&index=10&playnext=2&playnext_from=PL
photo
LunaPark
Don't believe it until it's officially denied
12:11 AM on 10/31/2009
Ron Paul says his HR 1207 audit the Fed bill was gutted by Mel Watt, a Democrat from North Carolina. Turns out Watt’s district includes Charlotte, headquarters of Bank of America Corp.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrizzlyBowman
Undergrad Psych Student
10:22 PM on 10/30/2009
Nooo don't lighten overdraft penalties! It's the free market; you don't have a right to wear a shirt on your back! What? "People, are, by the unalterable indefeasible laws of God and nature, as well intitled to the benefit of the air to breathe, light to see, food to eat, and clothes to wear, as the nobles or the king"? Never mind. Take that shirt off their back. It was just the howling of some old windbag Founder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EagleBenny
Food Blogger, Liberal to a point...
11:59 PM on 10/30/2009
Wtf are you talking about? Seriously