Breaking News:
Economy grew at 2.8% pace in 3rd quarter, slower than first thought.
Get Breaking News by Email

SEC's Madoff Report: Madoff Was Amazed Regulators Repeatedly Failed To Detect His Fraud

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - SEC's Madoff Report: Madoff Was Amazed Regulators Repeatedly Failed To Detect His Fraud stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MARCY GORDON | 10/30/09 11:17 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Madoff

WASHINGTON — Bernard Madoff was apparently convinced that it never even occurred to Securities and Exchange Commission staff he was running a Ponzi scheme, despite the agency's numerous probes of his business.

A document released Friday details a prison interview conducted on June 17 by the SEC inspector general in which Madoff says he had the impression that "it never entered the SEC's mind that it was a Ponzi scheme."

There were some shades of boasting even as Madoff sat in jail a few months after pleading guilty to fraud. The only problem with officials at the SEC's Washington headquarters, Madoff said, is that he had "too much credibility with them and they dismissed" the idea of a Ponzi scheme.

The disgraced financier confided that he didn't bring an attorney with him when he testified in an inquiry by the SEC's enforcement division because he believed he didn't need one – and he was trying to fool the government investigators into thinking he had nothing to hide.

The details emerged in a summary of Inspector General David Kotz's interview with Madoff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, released along with hundreds of other documents related to Kotz's extensive investigation of the SEC's stunning failure to detect Madoff's fraudulent scheme for 16 years.

As the SEC inspectors carried out probe after probe of his business, Madoff said in the interview he was "worried every time" that he'd be caught. "It was a nightmare for me," he said. "I wish they caught me six years ago, eight years ago."

Madoff, 71, a former Nasdaq stock market chairman, pleaded guilty in March to charges that his secretive investment-adviser operation was a multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme that destroyed thousands of people's life savings and wrecked charities. It was possibly the largest-ever Ponzi: the classic scheme in which investors are paid with other investors' money rather than actual profits on their investment.

He is serving a 150-year sentence in federal prison in North Carolina.

Story continues below
advertisement

Kotz also issued a statement Friday saying his probe found no evidence to support Madoff's claim of having a "close relationship" with SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, who previously headed the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the brokerage industry's self-policing organization.

In the interview, Madoff called Schapiro a "dear friend," saying she "probably thinks, I wish I never knew this guy."

Like the SEC, FINRA made periodic exams of Madoff's brokerage operation, which functioned separately from his investment business hidden from regulators' view.

An internal review by FINRA found a regulatory breakdown on the part of the organization in the Madoff case.

The new details from Kotz's inquiry came the same day as word that Madoff's longtime auditor is expected to plead guilty next week in a cooperation deal. Prosecutors told a federal judge in New York that accountant David Friehling was expected to offer a guilty plea at a conference Tuesday to revised charges that accuse him of securities fraud, investment adviser fraud, making false filings to the SEC, and obstructing or impeding administration of the Internal Revenue laws.

The charges carry a prison term of up to 108 years, though significant cooperation with prosecutors can bring leniency.

In his interview with Kotz, Madoff said the SEC never asked him about his tiny accounting firm. It seemed incongruous that, with more than $65 billion in private investments he claimed he oversaw for thousands of people, Madoff used what seemed to be a small-time auditor with a minuscule office in suburban New City, N.Y. Authorities say that Friehling appeared to have rubber-stamped Madoff's records.

Kotz's report of his investigation, made public in early September, painstakingly detailed how the agency's investigations of Madoff were bungled, with disputes among inspection staffers over the findings, lack of communication among SEC offices in various cities and repeated failures to act on credible complaints from outsiders forming a sea of red flags.

An inspection of Madoff's operation in 2003-04, for example, "was put on the back burner" even though the exam team still had unresolved questions, Kotz found.

Madoff said in the interview that the SEC examiners "never asked" for basic records to corroborate his operations.

Madoff's former finance chief, Frank DiPascali, is cooperating with prosecutors after pleading guilty in August to helping Madoff carry out his fraud. Madoff was asked in the interview whether he was concerned about DiPascali's testimony. His answer: "No, he didn't know anything was wrong, either."

WASHINGTON — Bernard Madoff was apparently convinced that it never even occurred to Securities and Exchange Commission staff he was running a Ponzi scheme, despite the agency's numerous probes o...
WASHINGTON — Bernard Madoff was apparently convinced that it never even occurred to Securities and Exchange Commission staff he was running a Ponzi scheme, despite the agency's numerous probes o...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
118
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- brady61995 I'm a Fan of brady61995 41 fans permalink
photo

really he was amazed? haha thats funny. stevie wonder could regulate better than the ones we have now.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 11/02/2009

Economic policy needs to change. We need policies and programs that will hlpe low and middle income people. More shovel ready projects. Universal health care

good articles; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 11/02/2009

detect. and being told to look the other way,,,,,,,,,are two different things.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 11/02/2009
- Clayton139 I'm a Fan of Clayton139 25 fans permalink
photo

Mary Schapiro and
Arthor Levitt names just went South in the Investment World !

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 11/02/2009
- Wiseronenow I'm a Fan of Wiseronenow 111 fans permalink
photo

For all of Madoff's wheeling and dealing throughout the years, one would have thought he would have been smart enough to realize when to cut his losses and change course. I guess, greed does that to a person.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 11/02/2009
- deli lama I'm a Fan of deli lama 8 fans permalink

alas ponzi schemes allow no exit. there's no way to pay, bernie's only choice would be the lam, and where would he hide? north korea? he took money from the rich and powerful, not the poor and powerless. that was bernie's big mistake. unlike reagan and the republicans, bernie didnt seem to understand that the poor can't afford to get even, but the rich certainly can. revenge costs money.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 11/02/2009
- sposton I'm a Fan of sposton 164 fans permalink
photo

Wall Street with the Fed is one huge Ponzi scheme. Anyone investigating? Nope! ;-)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 11/01/2009

NO economic recovery. REAL unemployment is DOUBLE the 'official' statistics. Government has been playing major games with all stats for a while now - both parties are to blame.

good articles http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 11/01/2009

what SEC regulators? no one was watching anything going on or we wouldn't be in the mess we were in.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 11/01/2009
photo

would you trust your government to run the military?

the comparison is really not a good argument.

the argument SOUNDS Good, but it just isn't so.

i don't trust health care companies, for profit doctors run amuck, nor do i trust pharmaceutical companies who fudge the statistics and hide the bad news.

greed has been the diet for the last 40 years, meanwhile we build new stadiums and arenas, while our infrastructure is crumbling.

what a country. it started out with good intentions, but than fell apart when capitalism and greed became the game.

greed and corruption is a virus infiltrating every institution in america.

one thing you can do....is be a good human being, and hope that others follow your lead.

don't be corrupt like others. it hurts everybody!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 AM on 11/01/2009

This is a great example of the incompetence in government. Would you trust the government to run your health care?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 10/31/2009
- J-Rome I'm a Fan of J-Rome 18 fans permalink
photo

This is a great example of an incompetent administration (i.e., the Bush administration) failing to employ competent individuals at the SEC. This is also an example of the extreme corruption that exists in the private sector. This isn't an example of why the private sector is so good and government is so bad - as so many mindless worshippers of mammon would have people believe. This is a classic case for why it is necessary to elect competent people to serve in government, and for government to enact and enforce laws/regulations designed to prevent the corruption that exists in the private sector from destroying lives - as Madoff did.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 10/31/2009

Madoff was doing his scheme for many years, even before Bush was in office. Seriously, you libs may want to get past the "blame Bush" game. It is so March 2009. Most of the corruption exists in government. A good example is the current administration. Most of the members are corrupt in some fashion.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 10/31/2009

Lets just assume what you say is true (it's not), what's going to happen to a universal healthcare system when we get another Bush in office?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 PM on 10/31/2009
- Flavor I'm a Fan of Flavor 63 fans permalink

No, this shows the incompetance of men. Now I know why the good word says (trust no man).

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 AM on 11/01/2009
- Flavor I'm a Fan of Flavor 63 fans permalink

Mr. Madoff is a prime example of what goes around will eventually come back around to you, and the hole you dig for others dig it big enough for yourself because you will be the one who falls in it. Well, he has a lot of time to think and I don't think any of his victims could care, less. This man,knew he was defrauding many people and he is right about one thing, they never suspected and this because they did not want to see it. Sometime, we can see something off track and second guess ourselves into thinking, this could'nt be what i think it is, and we move right along, until it's too late and damage has been done. Clearly, this was the biggest ponzi scheme anyone has ever pulled, not that he could not have been caught but because no one wanted to catch him. People were making money they thought, but this man was fooling them all, but he managed to live large he and his family off of other investors money, a disgrace to the human race. If it quacks like a duck it's a duck, if it's too good to be true then it isn't true, the clues were there but we have become a society that loves money and won't question how one is making the money.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 10/31/2009
- xilduq I'm a Fan of xilduq 2 fans permalink

Madoff's ponzi scheme is nothing compared to the Great American Ponzi Scheme. Madoff is but a drop in the bucket.

I do agree with you about the ostrich like behavior of people though.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 10/31/2009

Are you referring to Social Security or something else? Please advise.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 AM on 11/01/2009
- deli lama I'm a Fan of deli lama 8 fans permalink


"Taking money to invest without ever making any investments is fraud."

sounds simply enough, but.

no doubt bernie "invested" most if not all that money somewhere and/or somehow. i'd imagine some part was expended as "dividends" and to cover withdrawals demanded before the music sadly stopped. in the meantime bernie and co. were only human, and therefore, they had to eat.

"Thou shalt not muzzle the ox when he treadeth out the corn..."

;)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 10/31/2009
photo

Glass-Steagall.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 10/31/2009
- J-Rome I'm a Fan of J-Rome 18 fans permalink
photo

Nuff said!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 10/31/2009
- Balzac I'm a Fan of Balzac 117 fans permalink
photo

It's cynical to imply that Madoff Securities LLC never could have turned a profit. All he needed was to get that multi-billion dollar bailout, then maybe another and another like AIG or Meryll Lynch. He could have paid everyone cash and had enough for bonuses for his whole staff. Apparently these other businesses were insolvent too, or else they wouldn't have had their hands out for federal bailouts.

The lesson is, don't burn a few people, burn the tax payers instead. Distribute the weight of your ponzi scheme evenly and no one or few victims can call you out. They'll say "get in line with the other 200,000,000 fraud victims".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 10/31/2009
- blastocyst I'm a Fan of blastocyst 27 fans permalink

"...Bernard Madoff was apparently convinced that it never even occurred to Securities and Exchange Commission staff he was running a Ponzi scheme..."

My conclusion: There's a 90% probability that Bernard Madoff is a Jedi Knight. Or is, in fact, Lamont "The Shadow" Cranston. In keeping with Halloween.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 10/31/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect