Ford Posts $1B Profit In Third Quarter, Forecasts A "Solidly Profitable" 2011

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Ford Posts $1B Profit In Third Quarter, Forecasts A "Solidly Profitable" 2011 stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DEE-ANN DURBIN and TOM KRISHER | 11/ 2/09 06:32 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Earns Ford

DEARBORN, Mich. — One of the troubled Detroit Three automakers, Ford, is making money again and looking for better times in no more than two years.

Emerging from a three-year makeover with popular cars and trucks, Ford said Monday it earned nearly $1 billion in the third quarter and will be solidly profitable by 2011, a more optimistic forecast than earlier.

While heavy debt and lean times for American car shoppers threaten the comeback, the report puts Ford in a far better position than General Motors or Chrysler, which are still finding their bearings after emerging from bankruptcy.

Ford's cars are winning popular and critical acclaim, like the Fusion midsize sedan and more gas-efficient Focus compact. And years of painful cost-cutting, which have halved its work force, have looked prophetic since the recession struck, hurting demand.

Even in North America, the company's biggest market, Ford turned a profit after losing money there for four years.

GM and Chrysler, meanwhile, are still trying to cut jobs and win back customers, many of whom are steering toward their healthier rival.

Three years ago, Ford was considered in the worst shape of the Detroit Three after posting what was at the time the worst annual loss in its history. The big quarterly profit is the fruit of changes Ford has been making for several years.

At the end of 2005, then-CEO Bill Ford Jr. and two other Ford executives developed a plan to shut down factories, slash the work force and speed the development of cars and trucks.

Story continues below
advertisement

A year later, Bill Ford left the CEO job and installed Alan Mulally, a former Boeing executive, who further honed the plan and made a key decision – mortgaging assets like its blue oval logo to raise $23.4 billion.

When the economy faltered last year and took auto sales down with it, Ford had the cash to weather the storm.

"GM and Chrysler still have quite a bit of restructuring to do and simply don't have the product competitiveness across their lineup that Ford does," said Mark Oline, auto industry analyst for Fitch Ratings.

Ford has gained a full percentage point of U.S. market share so far this year, the equivalent of selling about 100,000 cars and trucks. GM and Chrysler combined have lost 4.5 percentage points, mostly to foreign competitors like South Korea's Hyundai.

Ford didn't have one vehicle that was a silver bullet, like the Ford Taurus was in the early 1990s, said Erich Merkle, president of the industry consulting firm autoconomy.com in Grand Rapids, Mich.

Instead, it relied on several strong vehicles spread across its lineup, including the Fusion, a restyled Focus and the Escape, a small SUV.

"In today's market, you can't tie success to one or two vehicles, given the fragmentation of the marketplace," he said. "You need to have a multi-hit strategy."

Just last week, Consumer Reports magazine named 46 of 51 Ford, Lincoln or Mercury models as average or better in reliability, a far better track record than either GM or Chrysler.

But Ford still faces an uncertain future. Mulally wouldn't forecast a profit for 2010 because the company is concerned about low consumer confidence and high unemployment, which could hold down demand.

"We're just not that sure about the strength of the recovery," he said.

Still, the results were a good sign. The Dearborn-based company reported overall net income of $997 million, or 29 cents per share, an improvement of $1.2 billion from a year ago.

In North America alone, Ford made $357 million before taxes, its first quarter in the black since early 2005. Ford said its controlled production and a string of new products, including the F-150 pickup and Taurus sedan, have allowed it to command higher prices. This summer's Cash for Clunkers government rebate program also gave the company room to drop costly discounts.

It's a far cry from Ford's biggest years. Ford made $22 billion in 1998, and it controlled about a quarter of the U.S. market. By last year that market share was down to about 14 percent.

The company's debt remains a concern. It rose by $800 million from the second quarter to $26.9 billion. And it will grow again as Ford contributes to the United Auto Workers-run health care plan for retirees. GM and Chrysler were able to shed much of their debt in bankruptcy court.

Ford hopes to improve its balance sheet by restructuring some of its debt.

Ford also has been unable to cut its labor costs. On Monday, the UAW said its members overwhelmingly rejected a new contract that would have lowered benefits and wages.

But industry analysts say the disadvantage won't be large enough to hinder Ford's recovery efforts.

Where Ford would be at a big disadvantage is how it classifies jobs. GM and Chrysler reduced the number of skilled job classifications from around 20 to three or four, meaning tradesmen such as electricians or pipe-fitters can now do multiple jobs. Without the concessions, Ford will need more people on an average shift than GM or Chrysler.

Ford's success also puts the UAW in an awkward position. If Ford takes too much market share, it could hurt Chrysler, which is 55 percent owned by the UAW's retiree health care trust fund.

___

Associated Press writer Stephen Manning in Washington contributed to this report.

DEARBORN, Mich. — One of the troubled Detroit Three automakers, Ford, is making money again and looking for better times in no more than two years. Emerging from a three-year makeover with popu...
DEARBORN, Mich. — One of the troubled Detroit Three automakers, Ford, is making money again and looking for better times in no more than two years. Emerging from a three-year makeover with popu...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
97
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
photo

Ford supported the bailouts of GM and Chrysler not because they wanted the competition but because they used the same supplier base for many of the parts necessary to build cars. The suppliers could not have survived if GM and Chrysler had gone out of business and Ford would be left without parts resulting in their failure as well.

Ford made the hard restructuring decisions that led to its survival and current profit. It wasn't easy and it has been extremely painful, closing plants and cutting jobs. GM and Chrysler didn't take action to change until it was too late. GM went through 3 "reorganizations" since the late 1990s but never really changed anything. Chrysler was crippled by the Daimler takeover and lost all of the momentum they had in the early 1990s. Ford was generally thought to be in the worst shape in 2000 and so it made the changes out of necessity.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 11/03/2009

WHERE ARE THE JOBS YOU PROMISED, OBAMMI?

good articles: http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 11/03/2009

Conservative business owners shipped them overseas.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 11/03/2009

Economic policy needs to change. For the past 30 years only the top 1% of earners have been the major beneficiaries of economic recoveries while everyone else lags. We need policies and programs that will hlpe low and middle income people. More shovel ready projects. Universal health care

good articles; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 11/02/2009
- DFL I'm a Fan of DFL 36 fans permalink
photo

I have always had cars from the big 3 and never had one yet I didn't like, no way will I buy a foreign brand where the profits go overseas, you will never ever ever see any foreign brand car in my garage!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 11/02/2009

good for you !! Thankfully though we live in a country where others are free to choose what they want to buy, "patriotic pitch" or not !!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 AM on 11/03/2009
- jsarets I'm a Fan of jsarets 166 fans permalink

Foreign BRANDS don't have American shareholders? They're just brands. The corporations are multinational joint-stock companies.

GM sells rebranded Daewoos produced in Korea. Ford sells rebranded Mazdas. Ford used to own Jaguar, a British brand, which is now owned by Tata, an India-based corporation.

Your nationalist sentiment is woefully outmoded. These corporations are citizens of the world. They don't recognize geopolitical borders the way you do, and neither do their investors.

Branding is just a marketing tool. The American brands are influenced by a pre-adolescent male fantasy inclined toward all things big, cheap, and unsophisticated. Like fake boobs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 AM on 11/03/2009
- Avanti2 I'm a Fan of Avanti2 6 fans permalink

I find it interesting that Americans are voting with there dollars by purchasing Ford's and not GM brands or Chrysler's.

Do you suppose that people don't like the idea of purchasing a car from a Government Owned company? Especially after what the Government ordered to happen to local, privately owned dealerships of GM and Chrysler products ?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 PM on 11/02/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 203 fans permalink
photo

I find it interesting that conservatives are still waging war on the America worker.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 11/02/2009
- DFL I'm a Fan of DFL 36 fans permalink
photo

Conservatives think we can't make anything in america.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 11/02/2009

A few years ago, the pilots were negotiating with the company I was working for. They were told that they could not afford to pay them more, however, while negotiations were still going on, the board gave the executives raises and bonuses. Later, when the company filed chapter 11, there was a PBS program which quoted one of the execs as saying that the bankruptcy was "a business decision". Basically, that means that they want to reduce their expenses so that they can continue to get raises and bonuses and maybe have something left over for the stockholders. I know I've posted this before, but prior to Reagan, the US CEOs were making 40 times the average workers pay.... now it's anywhere from 400-800 times. And who is at the top, but our favorite ...Wal-Mar­t...

It's not the unions.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 11/02/2009

correction­.... a "business strategy"

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 11/02/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 203 fans permalink
photo

'Ford Posts $1B Profit In Third Quarter, Forecasts A "Solidly Profitable" 2011'

And yet they are STILL trying to screw over their workers.

Typical Goopers- union busting is more important than even staying in business.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 11/02/2009
- jordan327 I'm a Fan of jordan327 56 fans permalink

Typical unions- run company in the ground. See gm and chrysler.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 11/02/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 203 fans permalink
photo

Typical conservatives- always blaming their failed ideology on someone else.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 11/02/2009
- RSKaz I'm a Fan of RSKaz 35 fans permalink
photo

Obama made Ford an offer it couldn't refuse: either clean up its act or face government intervention. Ford blinked and has now turned a profit. I'd count that as a win-win for everyone.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 11/02/2009
- Servility I'm a Fan of Servility 12 fans permalink

GM and Chrysler were supposed to be the Win:Win...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 11/02/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 203 fans permalink
photo

And yet Ford is STILL trying to screw over their workers.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 11/02/2009
- jordan327 I'm a Fan of jordan327 56 fans permalink

If the workers don't like their wage .....quit.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 11/02/2009

Where did ford blink? They told the govt. they didn`t need their money and made it without govt. help.Maybe you should worry about how much money gm and chrysler get.They will be drawing money from our govt. for years. While ford will continue to grow and make money! I work for ford and i`m i proud of it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 11/02/2009
- jordan327 I'm a Fan of jordan327 56 fans permalink

He's just trying to make obama look good.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 11/02/2009
- RSKaz I'm a Fan of RSKaz 35 fans permalink
photo

Ford wisely didn't take the gov. money for fear of its strings. The realization was changing its outdated business model or go bankrupt. Good on them for turning things around. However, it was Obama who gave Ford the nudge.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 PM on 11/02/2009
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 128 fans permalink
photo

I noticed the new ford taurus looks a lot like the Toyota Camry.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 11/02/2009

Awesome !! Now if it starts to run like Camry and have a high resale value like Camry after 120K miles, people might buy the Taurus too !!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 AM on 11/03/2009

According to Consumer reports, Toyota should want the Camry to run like a Ford. Ford beat the Camry and Accord for most reliable sedan two years in a row.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 11/04/2009
- bannorhill I'm a Fan of bannorhill 31 fans permalink

The only US car company not under government control is the only one making money. How ironic!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 PM on 11/02/2009
- jackiero I'm a Fan of jackiero 18 fans permalink
photo

I applaud Ford for this effort, and that is why I haven't dumped my F stock, but I sure hope they don't give in to the union. The company has to remain stable before they can boost salaries and benefits again. The unions will still fight hard for them once Ford is stable for more than just ONE quarter.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 11/02/2009
- sarabono I'm a Fan of sarabono 18 fans permalink

Looking at Ford's results vs those of GM and Chrysler, it appears to me that the American Public have voted with there feet and decided to purchase vehicles from a private investor owned firm vs a Obama government owned firm. It appear Capitalism is still alive and well in at least a part of the automotive industry.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 11/02/2009
- jsgaetano I'm a Fan of jsgaetano 203 fans permalink
photo

Looks to me like conservatives are still hating America as much as they always have.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 11/02/2009
photo

Do you have anything of value to add to this news piece?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 PM on 11/02/2009

And here I was prepared to come on here to respond to a bunch of tr0lls. Looks like I don't have to now... haha

Good Job Ford!! I'm thinking about buying a mustang GT, although that decision has nothing to do with you earnings reports..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 11/02/2009
- rkimball I'm a Fan of rkimball 4 fans permalink

finally, one usa auto maker becomes profitable again & the unions reject the latest contract offer. the unions deserve to die a slow death. all usa auto plants may end up in mexico after all.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 11/02/2009
- DRaymond I'm a Fan of DRaymond 65 fans permalink
photo

The unions had already made concessions during the bad times. Their bigger issue is going to be to get back the concessions that they had to make to keep GM and Chrysler afloat rather than help a race to the bottom.

Remember that the biggest threat to United States manufacturing is health care costs, in particular legacy health care costs to retired workers. If you care about keeping manufacturing in the US you should be focusing on efforts to reduce health care costs, not bashing the workers.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 11/02/2009
- MajorKong I'm a Fan of MajorKong 386 fans permalink
photo

They won't be happy until we're all working for Mexican-level wages.

Or better yet, Chinese-level wages. Because that Mexican labor is so expensive.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 11/02/2009
- DennyCrane I'm a Fan of DennyCrane 24 fans permalink

Maybe they can use that money to buy GM and Chrysler.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 11/02/2009
- sarabono I'm a Fan of sarabono 18 fans permalink

Why bother? I thought Obama and the UAW liked owning and running GM. (Chrysler is owned by the Italians now. The Gov. just financed the sale.)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 11/02/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect