Al Gore's Our Choice: Progressive Book Club Review

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Al Gore's Our Choice: Progressive Book Club Review stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11- 3-09 10:38 AM   |   Updated: 11- 3-09 12:02 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Gore

Bill McKibben
Progressive Book Club

Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis
By Al Gore
Rodale, 2009


There's been a certain amount of debate about whether Barack Obama deserved his Nobel Prize. About Al Gore there is no argument. He singlehandedly managed to wrest the topic of global warming on to center stage around the world. And frankly, he deserved his Oscar just as much, for figuring out a way to dramatize the sometimes complicated science of global warming. He did for climate what Mandela did for apartheid or Gandhi for colonialism--made it an inescapable part of our global political debate.

But if there was a single knock on An Inconvenient Truth, it was that it didn't offer enough in the way of solutions--that the section on What To Do ran hard into the closing credits, and that most of the ideas--lightbulb stuff--didn't rise to the challenge that had just been set out so vividly. That criticism always strikes me as a little dumb--diagnosis and prescription are different skills. But Gore, who is nothing if not dogged, took the criticism seriously, and convened a series of "Solutions Summits" in his Nashville home and elsewhere around the world. To judge from the acknowledgments in his new book, Our Choice, everyone who has ever had an idle thought about the question of how we'll solve the planet's greatest problem came to one of these sessions (me included). Simply the thought of sitting through them makes my rear end ache. But this book shows the effort was worth it. It's the grand compendium of all that we know about how to undertake this most difficult of transitions, from an economy that burns fossil fuels to an economy that lives mostly on the incoming power of the sun in its many forms.

There are extensive, deeply documented chapters on everything you need to know to make sense of our situation: on forests and soils and how they might be made to sequester more carbon. On wind turbines and solar power and geothermal energy (which intrigues Gore) and biomass. He's less sanguine about carbon capture from coal and about nuclear power, as much on the grounds of cost as anything else--but he's careful not to shut the door on any option, which is appropriate considering the scale of crisis we face.

He also writes straightforwardly about the political difficulties hobbling any real action (among other things, there is no Senator so singlemindedly interested in this topic--even John Kerry, whose staff wrote much of the climate change bill recently introduced in the Senate, divides his time between global warming and Afghanistan). He knows that true-cost accounting--making fossil fuel pay the price for the damage it does--will be crucial to finally bringing it under control: "our market economy can help us solve the climate crisis problem if we send it the right signals. We've got to tell ourselves the truth."

Gore has been engaged in that truth-telling for more than two decades, and one mark of his greatness is that he's kept up with the science. Twice in this volume he invokes the figure 350, as in parts per million co2, an inconvenient new truth that our best scientists have been setting forward as the maximum amount of carbon that the atmosphere can safely contain. It would have been easy for Gore to punt on the cutting edge stuff--easier to stick within the safe confines of the UN negotiation process. But he recognizes the need for active, dramatic campaigning on these issues--my only sadness with this book is that he doesn't bring more of that expertise to bear. A man who has run and won national campaigns (even if he didn't get the office to which he'd been elected) has much useful to say about how to drive these points home with ordinary voters.

Gore's new volume is the indispensable one-stop shop for the cutting edge thinking about how we're going to solve this problem. It is remarkably beautiful too--a kind of powerpoint on paper, with great photos and beautiful graphs (and even, for the wonk at heart, exploded diagrams showing how generators work, and so on). Gore has made this greatest of all challenges his life's work; if we're able in any way to slow down the momentum of onrushing climate change he will deserve a great share of the credit, and even if we fail it won't be for lack of his trying. The irony, of course, is that he's endlessly attacked as a political radical. This is a conservative book from a conservative man, who would like the world to remain in something approaching its current shape.

Bill McKibben is an American environmentalist and writer who frequently writes about global warming, alternative energy, and the risks associated with human genetic engineering. Beginning in the summer of 2006, he led the organization of the largest demonstrations against global warming in American history. He is the author of many books, most recently Fight Global Warming Now and Deep Economy.

Bill McKibben Progressive Book Club Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis By Al Gore Rodale, 2009 There's been a certain amount of debate about whether Barack Obama deserved his Nobel Priz...
Bill McKibben Progressive Book Club Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis By Al Gore Rodale, 2009 There's been a certain amount of debate about whether Barack Obama deserved his Nobel Priz...
Filed by Jessie Kunhardt  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
13
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- mravka I'm a Fan of mravka 40 fans permalink
photo

Why are Americans so blind? Is California not burning fast enough for you people? Climate change is real, the massive amount of scientific data supporting such claims by the overwhelming majority of climatologists and other related scientists is incontrovertible.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 11/04/2009
- Breakwind I'm a Fan of Breakwind 6 fans permalink
photo

The bottom line is, we wouldn't be in the mess we are in today if Gore hadn't been so wooden in 2000..

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 11/03/2009

There is not a chance that Gore deserved a Nobel, but maybe award for dramatic fiction. He is the posterchild for evil, lying for years about something not going to happen and made a fortune; he invested heavily in carbon trading and "green" technologies created by a false climate crisis.

"Beware prophets seeking profits!" And, no Al, the polar bears are not in danger.

He cannot afford to admit that he lies, as then his house collapses and loses value, and refuses to debate anybody on climate as he knows that he cannot win. A sign of a loser when they yell "The debate is over!" Real science is all about debate; consensus is meaningless.

Climate is the real world and described by science. Gore's new book admits that facts are not convincing people of the crisis (because his facts cannot stand up to real scrutiny), so he wants to go the ad hominem route, begging to the spiritual side of people since reality does not support him.

What kind of true charlatan is this man, who wants to sway people into bad decisions based on their emotions, knowing full well that what he wants them to do is not in their best interests and only serves him and his cadre who want to make a fortune off this false crisis and create the biggest shift in power and wealth in the history of the world?

I would not trust him to feed my cat.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 11/03/2009
- Philclock I'm a Fan of Philclock 36 fans permalink
photo

My cat agrees.

Well written.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 11/03/2009

Au contraire, philly. Your cat would allow anyone to feed him if he were hungry. You are a brown-nosing syncophant of the right wing loony tunes. I pity you for your lack of intelligence.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 11/03/2009

Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" has been so discredited as to be an embarassment if you propogate it as any basis in fact. He CONVENIENTLY left out the impact of the little ice age, medieval warming and he exaggerates modern warming. (page 68-69, Unstoppable Global Warming, every 1500 years). His famous "hockey curve" to major climatologists and eminent scienstist on global warming is a downright fraud. Don't listen to those who have a major political agenda. Read the above referenced book.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 11/03/2009
- lbsaltzman I'm a Fan of lbsaltzman 69 fans permalink

You have criticized Gore by referencing some of the most discredited denialist arguments. The scientific evidence that the little ice age happened is dubious (http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/11/little-ice-age-lia/)
and medieval warming period was a localized European phenomena of no significance.

Here is a link debunking the denialist myths about the hockey stick.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/myths-vs-fact-regarding-the-hockey-stick/

As for Vice-President Gore's new book I expect it to be as informative as the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 11/03/2009
- cframe423 I'm a Fan of cframe423 2 fans permalink

You need to look at real science, not so-called "science" from the right wing nuts and the corporate-paid hacks posing as scientists. What is wrong with you people? Seriously!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 11/04/2009

I beg to differ with the writer that says there is no argument that Gore deserved the Nobel prize. As evidence I offer the fact that he claims massive global warming, when we just had the coldest June and July on record in West Virginia. Tennessee also broke records with cold temperatures this year. The heaviest early snowfall on record just occurred in Denver, Colorado. The hottest year in the last 30 years was 1988 not 2009. Gore is also a hypocrite. He flies around in a private jet. His home uses more energy than 20 normal homes. On top of that he is a bald faced liar and a con artist. Gore knows just as much about global warming as he does about "inventing" the internet. Gore doesn't deserve anything other than scorn. He, like the Obamas, disparage America to the Europeans every chance he gets. He is an embarassment to real Americans.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 11/03/2009
- lbsaltzman I'm a Fan of lbsaltzman 69 fans permalink

The whole of the United States is about 4% of the Earth's surface. Local temperatures in parts of the South and Denver are insignifcant when compared to the overall warming of the planet.

I won't even dignify the ad hominem attacks you make on Gore with an answer. Like most denialists, you are confused about Al Gore. Mr. Gore simply reported what the conclusions of the scientific literature were. To criticize such strong scientific evidence you need to come up with equally strong peer reviewed scientific evidence that proves the opposite. Of course you won't, because it doesn't exist.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 11/03/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect