House Panel Votes To Permanently Exempt Small Firms From Part Of Post-Enron Law

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - House Panel Votes To Permanently Exempt Small Firms From Part Of Post-Enron Law stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11- 4-09 12:12 PM   |   Updated: 11- 4-09 01:34 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Rahm

A House panel voted Wednesday to permanently exempt more than half of all publicly traded companies from a seven-year-old post-Enron measure designed to prevent fraud.

The vote came in the form of an amendment, offered by Reps. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.) and John Adler (D-N.J.), to the Investor Protection Act of 2009, a bill otherwise intended to protect investors from fraud and manipulation.

The amendment permanently exempts companies with a market value less than $75 million from a requirement mandating that outside auditors assess a firm's internal procedures to protect itself against fraud, waste and accounting errors. All publicly traded companies are required to comply, though smaller firms have been exempted for the last several years over cost concerns.

Smaller companies argue that the audits' cost is too high, and that money could be better used elsewhere, like hiring more employees. Investor advocates say the audits are particularly needed for smaller companies because they're more prone to fraud, due to the lack of oversight.

Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro said last month that smaller firms would be required to comply beginning next year. She also wrote a letter to Rep. Paul Kanjorski, a Pennsylvania Democrat, expressing concern about the efforts to undo provisions of the post-Enron law, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The White House supported the change. Adler said Tuesday that he had discussed his amendment with Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel three times.

The Huffington Post first reported the amendments and the ensuing battle. Adler's original amendment called for a temporary exemption from the audit requirement for four out of five public companies -- while the SEC worked to develop "less stringent requirements."

The Garrett-Adler amendment passed 37-32 despite vigorous opposition from consumer and investor groups, including unions, pension funds, and institutional investors. Business interests supported it.

Of the 42 Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee, 10 voted in support of the measure: Adler, Joe Baca of California, Steve Driehaus of Ohio, Suzanne Kosmas of Florida, Gary Peters of Michigan, Dan Maffei of New York, Melissa L. Bean and Bill Foster of Illinois, Travis Childers of Mississippi, and Walt Minnick of Idaho. The remaining Democrats -- including committee Chairman Barney Frank -- composed the 32 dissenting votes.

Former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt was among those opposed to the amendment, telling the Huffington Post: "This is something the Republicans could never have accomplished, and what a bitter irony it is that the Democrats...are emasculating the best piece of legislation of the past 20 years."

The bill to which the amendment is attached passed. It will now be sent to the House floor.

A House panel voted Wednesday to permanently exempt more than half of all publicly traded companies from a seven-year-old post-Enron measure designed to prevent fraud. The vote came in the form of an...
A House panel voted Wednesday to permanently exempt more than half of all publicly traded companies from a seven-year-old post-Enron measure designed to prevent fraud. The vote came in the form of an...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
118
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- studmoose I'm a Fan of studmoose 30 fans permalink
photo

It's funny, these two guys are both from New Jersey...

A state well known for its corruption.

A Democratic­-controlle­d state that just voted in a Republican governor because of the shenanigans.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 11/06/2009
- studmoose I'm a Fan of studmoose 30 fans permalink
photo

How many tens of thousands of other families will John Adler's new actions hurt?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 11/06/2009
- studmoose I'm a Fan of studmoose 30 fans permalink
photo

IT WILL BE AMENDED LATER ON TO ADLER'S $700 MILLION LEVEL!

Is this a repeat of 2004?

Back in 2004, NJ passed one of the toughest anti-predatory lending laws in the country. Shortly thereafter, then NJ State Senator Adler received $1,200 from special interests (Ameriquest). Working with another State Senator, Gerald Cardinale, Adler repealed many of the enforcements that helped fuel the Subprime Mortgage fiasco. It is rumored that this act directly aided in the failing of several NJ banks within months and others later on.

http://njrereport.com/index.php/2007/12/31/how-ameriquest-bought-nj-politicians/

There are numerous articles on this repeal of the NJ Predatory Lending Act of 2004, from The Philadelphia Inquirer (now you have to pay to read it on-line), and others, such as the Star-Ledger and NYT.

During his Congressional campaign, Adler barely won against his Republican opponent, just by 2 percentage points. His decisions as a State Senator were remembered by many - but not enough to overcome the urban 'Get Out To Vote' wave. The only reason why he won, was that he was riding on the coattails of President Obama. The areas around Camden NJ, which are underpriviledged, came to his support. Without that, he would have lost the election.

JOHN ADLER WILL NOT GET RE-ELECTED!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 11/06/2009
- factotem I'm a Fan of factotem 126 fans permalink
photo

Sure aren't very many Obama boosters in this conversation.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 11/06/2009

Goldman and Bank of America run the markets along with Geithner, and beagle boy Ben. There is no free markets, only welfare capitalism and socialism for capitalism.
http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 11/05/2009
- vlm1948 I'm a Fan of vlm1948 6 fans permalink

I for one will no longer be investing in these small companies. I have not invested since the collapse, but if I start investing again, it will probably be with Canadian companies.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 11/05/2009
photo

Gone are the senior sign-offs to guarantee the integrity of internal controls and the outside audits. Bye, bye, oversight. Hello, fraud.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 11/05/2009
- mjtaylor22 I'm a Fan of mjtaylor22 38 fans permalink
photo

GREAT JOB, I AM GOING INDEPENDENT ADVISOR NEXT YEAR, GONNA SET UP IN A RED DISTRICT
AND CONVINCE ALL TO FOX NEWS CHANNEL WATCHERS TO INVET INMY PONZI SCHEME.
no accounting rules for me. ha haaaa
i will be too small to tail....lmao....
adn I knwo the rush lixsteners wll love me i will sopout some obama hate speech form time to time. and give completely unsound advise and lets se eif the fed or sec even notices me esp since I will have no account regulations to abide by,

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 11/05/2009
- sposton I'm a Fan of sposton 166 fans permalink
photo

What is the upper limit size for a small firm?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 11/05/2009
- PocketWatch I'm a Fan of PocketWatch 130 fans permalink
photo

Simple question no one has asked... what DOES a SOX audit cost for a company with revenues of $75MM-$125MM?? Since I'm not familiar with the rules, also, how often is one needed? I'm curious.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 AM on 11/05/2009
- Chipher I'm a Fan of Chipher 20 fans permalink
photo

All this means is that corporations will spin off state and national subsidiary LLCs to hide transactions they don't want audited.

Halliburton Corporation (national financial holdings and cashflow/payroll)

Halliburto­nChile123L­LC, Halliburto­nChile124L­LC...(sepa­rate LLCs reporting net P/L without audit)

Halliburto­nNigeria12­3LLC, Halliburto­nNigeria12­4LLC ... (entities hiding bahkshish transactions w/a)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 PM on 11/04/2009
photo

Why is Rahm's visage featured in this post? Welcome to politics Chicago style - If they send one of your's to the hospital, send one of theirs to the morgue.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 PM on 11/04/2009
photo

Who knew a same business was 75 Million dollars and publicly traded. Now I see why those GOP'er were so keen on the Estate Tax and it's effect on small business owners. Is there any question as to who will be getting some nice campaign donations.

IMHO the DEM v. GOP canard is wearing thin and that was what the election was about on Tuesday and the predictions about the 6th Night of the Mayan's is right on point.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 11/04/2009

Believe me when I say this is a good thing. I live with the Sarbanes-Oxley debacle on a daily basis. Less widgets produced, more time filling out meaningless paperwork and dealing with endless audits. The red tape does nothing to protect investors. Sarbanes-Oxley was a legislative atrocity.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 11/04/2009
- FirstShirt I'm a Fan of FirstShirt 61 fans permalink

Now there is change you can believe in.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 11/04/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect