Housing Market Buoyed By $300 BILLION In Government Aid: CBO

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Housing Market Buoyed By $300 BILLION In Government Aid: CBO stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11- 4-09 01:27 PM   |   Updated: 11- 4-09 02:14 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Housing Market

A new report from the Congressional Budget Office attempts to put a number on the amount of money the government has poured into the housing market. Considering the complexities associated with the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, this actually isn't as easy as it sounds. But, the final -- and rather disturbing -- tally for 2009 is $300 billion.

Unfortunately, only $60 billion of that amount was dedicated to helping renters. Here's the CBO:

Most of the federal government's support for housing is provided for homeonwership (see Figure 1). In 2009, the federal government devoted almost four times the amount of budgetary resources to homeownership (about $230 billion) as it devoted to improving rent affordability ($60 billion). The government supports home ownership by subsidizing the costs of owning a home (reducing down payments, mortgages insurance costs, and tax liability) and increasing the availability of mortgage loans. Until recently, the bulk of federal support for homeownership took the form of tax expenditures, which make it less expensive to own a home by reducing taxes for homeowners and investors.

All of this massive housing aid, coupled with the takeover of Fannie and Freddie, means the federal government is now the world's biggest real estate investor. From the CBO's report: "Now that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are in conservatorship, the federal government is effectively assuming the risk on the mortgages that they guarantee."

Worse, the CBO finds, that long-term pattern of the government's housing aid hasn't made homes any more affordable:

Federal housing policy has long aimed to increase the rate of homeownership and, to a lesser extent, make rental housing affordable for low-income families. The nation has made more progress on the former goal than on the latter. Homeownership rates increased steadily throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, peaking in 2004 at just under 68 percent of all households ... However, the proportion of households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing--an amount that is often categorized as unaffordable in light of households' other needs--increased steadily from 1997 to 2007. The burden of housing's costs is more pronounced among renters than among owners: In 2007, 45 percent of renters (compared with 30 percent of owners) paid more than 30 percent of their income for housing.


Justin Fox at Time puts it this way: "So by turning homeownership subsidies into another middle class entitlement, we've actually made housing less affordable for lots of Americans. Brilliant!"

READ THE REPORT:


11-03-HousingPrograms -


A new report from the Congressional Budget Office attempts to put a number on the amount of money the government has poured into the housing market. Considering the complexities associated with the ba...
A new report from the Congressional Budget Office attempts to put a number on the amount of money the government has poured into the housing market. Considering the complexities associated with the ba...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
44
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
photo

According to Dizzy Lizzy, the Obama administration has left the bottom half to fend for itself, so surely the CBO has this all wrong. It could not be 300 billion. Surely it's more like 300 dollars.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 11/06/2009

If the Gov. wanted to make houses more affordable they would stop throwing money at it and let the real estate market crash.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 AM on 11/06/2009
- MIKEBC I'm a Fan of MIKEBC 25 fans permalink
photo

This money is being used to benifit america and not for another rightwing conservative party war!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 11/05/2009
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 18 fans permalink

A major reason people pay more for their homes is because they're bigger and better.

The size of the average home is substantially bigger than it was 10, 20, and 30 years ago.

The size of the average new home was 2,629 square feet in Q2 of 2008, 2,496 sq ft in 2006, 2000 sq feet from 1990-1993, about 1650 sq in 1985, and about 1,400 square feet in 1970.

http://www.zillow.com/blog/images/householdsizegraph1.gif

Homes are also of much higher quality than ever before. They more often have a deck. They have more bathrooms, better appliances, bigger garages (which aren't included in square footage), etc. etc.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 11/05/2009
- Solja I'm a Fan of Solja 107 fans permalink
photo

What are they going to do when all of the unemployed who are still in their homes can't pay their property taxes? Many have been unemployed for over a year and property taxes will go unpaid, which puts a strain on the states. People don't have it, and frankly, I wrote the administration about this several times before Obama even took office. They were soliciting ideas and that was mine. Nothing has happened on that front that I can tell. More will lose their homes, not because of mortgage payments, but basically for property taxes, which is a shame. A lot of folks where I live actually own their homes because they are so cheap to purchase.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 11/05/2009

Due to Obama's inability to create an effective jobs program the only beneficiaries of this recovery is Wall Street- the same it's been since the 80's. FDP knew how to make work, but Obama doesn;t or chooses not to.

good articles; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com
because of this he may lose in 2012.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 11/05/2009
- IGGHY I'm a Fan of IGGHY 4 fans permalink

Wall st and real estates markets get huge help from Gov. It's laughable that they made such big deal bailing out auto industry for only a few billion. Why is that?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 AM on 11/05/2009
- Robert59 I'm a Fan of Robert59 10 fans permalink

United Auto Workers is the only reason why.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 11/05/2009
photo

Wall Street and Real Estate are non-union. Anything related to a union is a big target for the right-wing corporate media.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 11/05/2009
- yappnmutt I'm a Fan of yappnmutt 69 fans permalink

nothing has been done to help homeowners or the middle class during the solution phase.

everything has been done to help bakns and billionaires.

let's not be mistaken.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 PM on 11/04/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 68 fans permalink

no bailouts should have occurred..­.......inc­luding homeowners

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 AM on 11/05/2009
- Robert59 I'm a Fan of Robert59 10 fans permalink

What we should have done is let the bubble burst and prices drop as dramatically as they rose. As for help to homeowners the current policies are prolonging the problem, house prices out of whack with incomes.
The one idea I still like is to grant bankruptcy judges the power to arrive at a new price. The bank could then accept the new price and the homeowner stay in his house or reject it followed by repossession and eviction. The banks don't like it because they would have to declare the loss instead of doing what they are doing now, dragging their feet, hiding the losses, hoping if they wait long enough prices will soar again.

They'll go up again, but not anytime soon.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 11/05/2009
photo

That's because the U.S. is a socialist republic for big corporations and the wealthy. The rest of us are under a system of cold hard capitalism.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 11/05/2009
- iplaw I'm a Fan of iplaw 27 fans permalink

The brilliant logic of giving money to the banks thinking this would somehow help anyone making less than a million dollars a year? Maybe the rich will hire more gardeners with that extra cash?

The actual effect, which anyone with a high school diploma should have predicted was that banks would buy up distressed assets for quick profiteering in a depressed economy. Great. Do you really think Paulson and Geithner did not see this coming?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 PM on 11/04/2009



ha, ha....most housing will be affordable because the market it glutted. and prices are falling everywhere. what crap!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 11/04/2009
- schatsie I'm a Fan of schatsie 72 fans permalink

Let me get this straight...300 billion for 100 milllion households....got it?

3,000 per household and where is it? ok it went to 1 million households or 300,000 per household...what is the matter with this picture?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 11/04/2009
- iplaw I'm a Fan of iplaw 27 fans permalink

You think that is bad. Do the math on the jobs saved by the stimulus. Comes out to $350,000 per job.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 11/04/2009
photo

Assuming 30 year rate is 5.250%

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 11/04/2009
photo

Housing is such a joke.....When people started buying homes they were never $200-800k for the average family. They were $15-75k.

You buy a home for $280k pay on a 30 year fixed, you will end up $589,000 for that home!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 11/04/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 68 fans permalink

then rent while your landlord laughs at you

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 AM on 11/05/2009
photo

Then buy and have the banks laugh at you (as you work for 30 years to pay 70+% of what you pay to them).
And being a landlord is no picnic either.....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 11/05/2009
photo

Started by Bush, but until middle class-paying jobs return - or if $12/hr is the new good wage, then the cost of living must follow suit (think the numbers for 1979 - $12 wage, $2.90 minimum wage, $00.60 loaf of bread, $5000 car...), or else our economy will plummet again and the banks (but not the people who pay them) will get bailed out again.

Trickle-up. Pay the working class and that's when the banks get the money back... assuming they didn't make fraudulent loans and such to begin with... the truth is in the middle.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 11/04/2009

The TRUE cost of a home is equal to the sum of the following, cost to aquire the land at market rates, cost of Design, materials, construction, finishing and a REASONABLE profit for all of the above. BUT in this day and age it is based on WHAT can a hard working family of 2 can afford PLUS some insane profit for the REalTOR can squeeze out of them. PLUS some more BS.....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 11/04/2009
photo

Realtors work hard for thier money just like anyone else.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 11/04/2009
- LeFish I'm a Fan of LeFish 5 fans permalink
photo

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 PM on 11/04/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect