Pinon Canyon Expansion: Are Nature Conservation Groups Helping The Army Secure More Land?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Pinon Canyon Expansion: Are Nature Conservation Groups Helping The Army Secure More Land? stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11- 6-09 05:07 PM   |   Updated: 11- 6-09 05:56 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Pinon Canyon

The Pueblo Chieftain:

Ranchers opposed to the Army's planned expansion of the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site are charging The Nature Conservancy environmental group with being the Army's silent partner, based on past and continuing agreements with Fort Carson to establish conservation easements around both the Mountain Post and the 238,000-acre Pinon Canyon training range.

Using documents obtained by Freedom of Information Act requests, the Not 1 More Acre! group released two Army reports Thursday showing a 2002 cooperative agreement with The Nature Conservancy to acquire easements around both installations - as well as a hefty 2006 confidential report called "Pinon Vision" that outlines step-by-step how the Army intended to acquire up to 1.1 million acres around the training range by 2017.

Read the whole story: The Pueblo Chieftain

Ranchers opposed to the Army's planned expansion of the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site are charging The Nature Conservancy environmental group with being the Army's silent partner, based on past and conti...
Ranchers opposed to the Army's planned expansion of the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site are charging The Nature Conservancy environmental group with being the Army's silent partner, based on past and conti...
Filed by Ethan Axelrod  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

It would be a far closer match for the Army to acquire training grounds in the deserts of Nevada, Arizona, or New Mexico, to the areas in the world where the politicians have decided to wage war. The land would probably be much cheaper and there would be fewer people living in the areas to contend with.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 11/08/2009

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect