iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Health Care PASSES: The Scene In The House When It Happened

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:35 PM ET

Health Care

CORRECTION: From my vantage point in the press gallery, it looked as if Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) was leaning on Cao to oppose the bill. But according to a local Alaska paper, Young, who himself has often bucked the GOP party line, was in fact urging him to do what he needed to do for his district, which is overwhelmingly Democratic. Young was by Cao's side the entire time and as the critical moment approached, Young sat to Cao's left, with an arm draped on his leg; Cantor sat to his right.

From the Alaska Dispatch, which a reader sent in:

So Saturday night, our own Young, with all of his glowering presence, stood next to Cao during the whole vote and worked to protect him and keep the party leaders at bay. It worked. Cao reportedly didn't want to be the deciding vote, but once it was sure to pass, with Young on one side, and another protectorate Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.), on the other, Cao was free to be the lone Republican to vote 'aye.'

Young had an active Saturday night on the floor. He shouted at Pelosi as she announced the historic vote total. Earlier, as Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Iowa) spoke in opposition to a GOP amendment involving trial lawyers, Young repeatedly shouted "trial lawyer!" him. Young was apparently moved by the irony that Braley is a former trial lawyer himself.

But Young's irony-detection abilities failed him when he shouted at Braley: "They have been lining your pocket!" Young, of course, is under federal investigation for the allegedly ample lining of his own pockets.

-----------------

The House floor erupted in one of the loudest cheers the chamber has heard in years when Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), an hour before midnight, cast the 218th and deciding vote on landmark health care reform.

There were still six minutes and fifty-two seconds on the clock and the chair made a move to gavel the vote closed.

Democrats waived their opposition, keeping the vote open.

Almost every eye in the chamber darted to the far end of the GOP side, where the last possibility for a bipartisan bill sat wedged between Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska), both of whom were leaning on him, both literally and figuratively. [See the correction below; it turns out Young was defending Cao from Cantor.]

The White House, two sources told HuffPost, had been working hard to win the vote of Rep. Joseph Cao (R-La.), a freshman in a strongly Democratic district. The pro-life Cao's vote came into play when an amendment from Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) passed overwhelmingly, greatly restricting reproductive rights.

After several minutes, Cao cast a yes vote from his seat, making the bill bipartisan. Reps. Jim Oberstar (D-Minn.) and Mike Honda (D-Calif.) waded into the Republican side of the aisle to get to Cao, rub his shoulders and slap him on the back.

Cantor stormed out as the Democrats applauded their defector.

The majority party had seen plenty of defections earlier. A stunning sixty-four Democrats joined with the GOP to pass Stupak's amendment, 240-194.

Stupak, during the vote on the final bill, didn't stick around long. He cast his vote quickly and shook the hand of Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), then headed over to the GOP side, where he was warmly welcomed.

Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), a strident partisan, was the first to greet him, shaking his hand and slapping him on the back. Stupak then found Cantor and Young, shook their hands, and retired from the floor to the Republican cloakroom.

Cao's vote was a mere bonus for Democrats, whose spontaneous floor celebration radically outdid the reaction of the Yankees to winning the World Series recently. The normally stoic Pelosi had tears streaming down her cheek. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) bent over and vigorously pumped her fist. Arms were thrown in the air; hugs all around.

As the clock hit ten seconds, Democrats counted down the time, finishing with an even louder cheer as Pelosi read out the tally: 220-215.

Not even the extreme pro-life amendment could dampen enthusiasm. "We'll live to fight that battle," said Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), a passionate supporter of reproductive freedom. "It took a hundred years to do health care. Nothing can dim that."

Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) said it was the hardest vote he'd ever whipped. "We crossed a threshold tonight," he said. "This was a tough deal."

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), who'd fought for a stronger public option, was fired up, too. "I'm ecstatic. I think it was great," he said, before adding that he wasn't happy with the Stupak amendment or the weaker public option.

As he spoke, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) walked by, handing reporters a statement explaining why he'd been the only liberal to oppose the bill.

Would you have changed your vote if yours was the deciding tally?

"No," said Kucinich. He then added cryptically: "I could've been, but that would've been up to the White House." Kucinich is pushing for inclusion of an amendment that would allow individual states to implement single-payer health care without being sued by insurance companies.

His measure and others, as well as the surprisingly strong showing by pro-life Democrats and the ever-looming immigration issue, threaten the fragility of the bloc of 220.

But for now, Democrats were basking in the moment.

As Speaker Pelosi walked with her leadership team to a press conference, a reporter asked her how she felt as she passed by.

Her eyes filling with tears, she turned and slowed her walk. "I feel great," she said.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

CORRECTION: From my vantage point in the press gallery, it looked as if Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) was leaning on Cao to oppose the bill. But according to a local Alaska paper, Young, who himself has o...
CORRECTION: From my vantage point in the press gallery, it looked as if Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) was leaning on Cao to oppose the bill. But according to a local Alaska paper, Young, who himself has o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,665
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (40 total)
05:10 AM on 12/24/2009
While you are Washing hair wigs, Never wring a wig and Remove all the shampoo carefully.

http://www.theheadshoponline.com/Jon-Renau_bymfg_5-1-1.html
12:38 AM on 11/11/2009
I think Stupak and his ilk should be thrown aout of the Democratic party along with whiney Joe. Not just because of the abortion amendment which is an abortion of the Hyde amendment in and of itself, but because Stupak is part of the C St. cabal which is being funded to turn what we have left of Democracy into a theocracy. Put Stupak and his croniies right beside Palina dn the rest of the fundie teabaggers and get rid of them all.
03:33 PM on 11/10/2009
One step forward for men in America, and giant leap backward for woman.

"The Family" needs to be stopped. If anybody is wondereding what I'm talking about. Then go to MSNBC, Rachel Maddow then get the transcript of : Jeff Sharlet, author of "The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power." He's also a contributing editor to Harpers magazine.

This is evil stuff going on and I think this the tip of the iceberg, we should know which politicans belong to this CLUT!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevendedalus3
01:19 PM on 11/12/2009
"One step forward for men in America, and giant leap backward for woman."
Great line.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lightfoot Letters
02:03 PM on 11/12/2009
.This not just an issue for women. This is health care rationing; who gets care and who does not, decided by the Federal Government. Get used to it.
12:01 PM on 11/10/2009
Sometimes as a foreigner you just have to sit on the outside and be grateful...
01:23 AM on 11/10/2009
This bill needs to be fixed before it goes into law. One of the biggest problems is the limiting of a woman’s rights to get health care reform to this point.

A woman's right to an abortion should not be limited by balding fat white men, or by those who are consumed by religious dogma. Women pay taxes too! And for the men in public office to limit how tax money is spent on woman’s health care is absurd!

I remember when women had to go to underground clinics operated by butchers or take coat hangers into their own hands.

Our fore fathers had the wisdom to set up a form of government separating church and state. Ever since Reagan got into office I have noticed the separation start eroding and under the last administration’s policies the separation has became even less clear.

It is disgusting to see our public representatives consulting with clergy or other religious fanatics on how to impose religious dogma under the guise of morality. It is unpatriotic to use the power of the federal government to limit women’s rights in the way they are being limited/destroyed by this health care bill.

Women are voting tax payers too and to say that tax dollars will be used to limit women’s rights is appalling and immoral.

It is time we identify the unpatriotic religious fanatics who have been elected to public office and replace them with people who can keep their religion and politics separate.
01:47 PM on 11/10/2009
Very well said. You should run for office and make these ideals a reality!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mercury613
In the blue TV screen light
04:03 PM on 11/10/2009
I wholeheartedly agree.

Another disturbing part of this legislation: a provision that would require insurers to consider covering Christian Science prayer treatments as medical expenses -- putting prayer on the same footing as clinical medicine.

http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-na-health-religion3-2009nov03,0,2239900.story?page=1

Surprisingly, not many people are aware of this. Please spread the word.
photo
cholden
A fact is ....well factual!
11:24 PM on 11/10/2009
You have got to be kidding! People actually have to pay to have people pray for them? What has become of us? I can only assume that there are actual clinical studies that are peer published to prove it's effectiveness. Not!

What really pi*****es me off is that people who really need health care can't get it or their insurance won't cover it. But they will cover prayer.

My daughter was recently diagnosed with breast cancer. She is starting chemo in a couple of weeks. She is a professional woman who plans to continue working as much as her illness permits during her treatments. I'm in charge of wigs. A decent looking wig costs around $250. Her insurance company will NOT cover a wig. They suggested scarves. I realize that a wig is not life saving but it is emotionally saving. The $250 won't break me but it's just another thing that my daughter does not need right now.

The irony of this is that she is in education and has a so called Cadillac plan. Breast cancer has become a chronic illness. She is only 39 and already wondering if her lifetime cap will be enough. She now has a pre-existing condition so she is pretty much restricted from changing jobs.

At least, all of the people that love her, pray for her for free.
07:33 PM on 11/09/2009
There is so much wrong with what passes for health care in the U.S., not the least of which is the fundamental idea on the part of conservatives that good health is a privelege and not a human right. The passage of the House bill is a solid step toward correcting this erroneous idea. Yet because it's a congressional bill that passed, one can bet it is flawed. Why wouldnt it be flawed when you have hundreds of electeds working on it? My hope is that the Senate will pas a bill and the two versions will be reconciled to the benefit of the American people. My further hope is that if and when glitches begin to show up, over the years, Congress will step up and make the necessary adjustments and refinements.

If I'm allowed yet further hope, it would be that revamped health care brings an end to the for-profit insurance companies for once and for all. As vampires they have no place in human society.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:35 PM on 11/09/2009
about your "hope" as old saying goes... IF wishes were horses then begger;s would ride".. THERE is ZERO hope for much coming out of this bunch that will improve USA HC. The only solution is to quite "hope(ing) and start firing at election time. Until the public gets head out of esoteric sand and startes to demand rather then hope and reelect, nothing will change and as this fiasco proves, "HC for citizens is NOT going to happen.. my God the lobby money is going into DC at $1-3 MILLION PER DAY and their big spending has yet to start, you expect integrity from DC., .. the USA has been bought or sold out, depends on your perspective.. citizen or upper 1-3% income.. Want change, give up on hope and demand .. CHANGE.
05:40 PM on 11/10/2009
After reading your reply i was tempted to abandon all hope. But then I remembered that hope is about all one has at this point in time. Hope that in the alternate universe inside the D.C. beltway something good WILL come of the health care hysterical brou-ha-ha. If it doesnt there WILL be the ballot box as you've suggested. Except, the 2010-2012 election results will probably follow the pattern all elections follow nowadays: The red states will reelect their congressional delegations while the blue states will reelect theirs. And the American people will continue to hold the short end of the stick. Then it will be business as usual.

You're right after all, there is no hope.
07:29 PM on 11/09/2009
I thought it was interesting how Republican Rep. Don Young supported Rep. Joe Gao in voting in support of the bill though he opposed it himself. It is refreshing to know that there are some people out there who are willing to help others do what's right, even when they don't want to themselves.
06:20 PM on 11/09/2009
I will say it again...................if you don't put the hospitals in check with their RIDICULES bills for almost doing nothing, the problem will never go away. They are guilty of robbing insurance companies and insurance companies then rob US!
06:03 PM on 11/09/2009
I almost get free healthcare! Well not exactly...
03:47 PM on 11/09/2009
As the Wicked Witch said in the Wizard of Oz, "My little Pretties" this cannot be sustained by the American People.
Insurance is still a very simple equation; Premiums in minus Benefits Paid = X. When X is greater than premiums paid, IT IS UNPROFITABLE. When you include pre-existing conditions, abortion, illegal aliens, X will always be a loss. Those wicked insurance companies cannot operate at a loss, and your government is now broke, so they don't have the money. Your beloved "Public Option" will only survive with HUGE tax increases as infusion of capital to keep them afloat. You are running out of "rich" people to tax, and they are going to take their investment dollars overseas to find better oportunities for their money, leaving you in the HOLE.
I am continually amazed and mostly dumbfounded at how little people understand the basic premise of business. Without profit, there is no investment in infrastructure, no research, no growth in companies, no equipment purchases and no jobs created. Profit is not your enemy, as most of you apparently believe. Profit is what gives you jobs, is the match in your retirement accounts and pays health insurance premiums from your employer.
This is not health insurance reform. There is no reform in it whatsoever. It is simply the Nationalization of the Health Insurance Industry and the creation of another enttilement program. In the end, you lose.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:28 PM on 11/09/2009
There are examples of health care systems in other countries and studies that prove you wrong. We, Americans, have all been indoctrinated to believe the superiority of our capitalist system since childhood. Unfortunately, we have closed our minds to alternative ways of thinking.
Holland and Japan both have highly regulated private health care systems. Their premiums are kept low and they have universal coverage with superior outcomes. Japan has developed an MRI at about 1/5 the cost of ours. France has socialized medicine and I heard that if you are walking around on artificial joints, you can thank the french engineers.
Studies show that 31 cents of every health care dollar in America goes to administrative costs. Our system cost 2x as per person as other countries. And we are ranked about 37th by the WHO. Our premium dollars are going toward egregious salaries, advertising, administrative costs (cost associated with denying care), and lobbying against reform. These costs are not related to innovation. Health care should not be about profits. Similar to public education, affordable health care is about keeping America strong and competitive.
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
05:59 PM on 11/09/2009
I'm afraid it's your mind that's closed. This post shows there's alot of things you have no idea about. Please research. For example those myths are not myths. I know, I experienced them & more.
04:49 PM on 11/09/2009
No disrespect because I agree what you say about without profit.

Lets say the Wicked Witch has 30 flying monkeys, she also has about 1000 different sources of funds to play with,,,,,, she spends about a third of her fortune on health care, she gives this money to the Lollipop guild that has a very standard way of doing things, they don't want you to know or understand what they do, they trumpet the right of the free market for them to make a profit,

In the meantime many flying monkeys get sick and the Lollipop guild refuses to treat them,
No along comes a girl from Kansas and she says that she can take care of all the monkeys. She will need money for things that Lollipopers say will make the Witch bankrupt

Well, the truth is that one third of the Witches fortune will pay for everything, more monkeys will get treatment, and the profits that you are so worried about will be replaced by using thousands of more efficient ideas

Yes we all love the Lollipop guild and we love watching them get rich while our Flying monkey brothers and sisters die ..... but we can all make a profit with what the Kansas girl is telling us,,,,

Start with stop being afraid, then start to see the economics of shifting expenses, then you will see that your beloved Lollipop guild will still get a piece of the action and you can sleep well tonight my friend
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peacegurl48
02:35 PM on 11/09/2009
Now it is time to really go after the Insurance Cartel, in addition to this bill, and stop their abusive practices once and for all. Progressives need to fill in the gaps in the bill by reining in corporate greed.
Despite the shortcoming of the bill it was great to see this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JazzyJim
Nuzis stay to the Right
04:52 PM on 11/09/2009
Exactly. We need to stop the theft from the Insurance Companies to the RNC against the people - at our expense.
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
06:01 PM on 11/09/2009
Huh? What difference do you think there is between Dems & Repubs.?
01:41 PM on 11/09/2009
It is taxation without representation. Get the Unions and their Corporate partners with special interests out of our government now!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Buddy McCue
03:48 PM on 11/09/2009
You have no representative?

Do you live in D.C.?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JazzyJim
Nuzis stay to the Right
04:53 PM on 11/09/2009
Sounds like someone's lost the White House has problems with the rest of the Country fixing the Republican mess - boo hoo.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Chernynkaya
01:10 PM on 11/09/2009
"The bills appear to explicitly prohibit an insurer in the individual marketplace from denying you coverage because of your health status, regardless of whether you have been denied coverage in the past.

Of course, the bills do not guarantee you will be able to find an affordable policy.

And under the bills as they stand now, insurers will still be able to price policies based on your age or past tobacco use."

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-healthcare-qa26-2009oct26,0,3532196.story

You cannot be denied coverage if you have a pre-existing condition, BUT the insurer can charge you whatever they want. If they decide your pre-existing condition will cost them money, they can charge you thousands extra in premiums.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:04 PM on 11/09/2009
Affordability credits are available to American citizens and legal residents whose employers do not offer coverage or whose share of employer-sponsored health insurance costs more than 12 percent of their family income. HR3962 caps out-of-pocket for individuals at 5,000, families at 10,000

Prohibits insurance rating based on health status or pre-existing conditions, and
limits age rating to 2:1.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
12:49 PM on 11/09/2009
Something is amiss. Bush and his evil puppet master – Dick Cheney – lie to manipulate American patriotism to justify invading Iraq, and conservatives are silent. Bush inherits, then squanders a $759 billion surplus, and conservatives are silent. Bush appoints a horse trader to head FEMA, thousands die in the aftermath of Katrina, and conservatives are quiet. Bush guts the Geneva Conventions, authorizes torture, and conservatives are silent. Bush ignores risky subprime mortgage derivatives, America dances on the precipice of economic annihilation, and conservatives are silent. Bush guts the Fourth Amendment, authorizes warrantless eavesdropping, and conservatives are silent. Bush signs $1.2 trillion Prescription Drug Bill, a federally subsidized give-away which balloons the deficit, and conservatives are silent. Bush diverts $1 trillion from the counter-terrorism struggle in Afghanistan, Osama escapes, and conservatives are silent. Bush signs unfunded NCLB legislation, the most intrusive Federal law in history, and conservatives are quiet. Bush sends troops to war with no body amour, hundreds die, and conservatives are silent. Bush deregulation exposes 2.5 million children to toxic toys from China, and conservatives are silent. Birthers delegitimize Obama, choosing instead to ignore 8 years of Bush inflicted plunder and ruination, and conservatives applaud. Bush frees 500 from Gitmo, and conservatives praise him. Obama talks to school children about being successful, conservatives cry foul. Bush restores cronyism in government, and republicans anoint him God. Racism, bigotry, and hypocrisy: cherished planks in the republican platform.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
12:46 PM on 11/09/2009
Tort reform is the republican answer to the health insurance crisis undermining America. Substandard doctors kill or injury thousands of people everyday, and the republican response to this spiraling epidemic is to place a cap on liability claims, which in their advanced state of delusion will reduce healthcare cost by reducing malpractice settlements. Making shoddy doctors less accountable will not lower healthcare cost, just their malpractice exposure. Like any profession, if greed-driven entrepreneurs masquerading as doctors want lower liability premiums, then they need to police and purge their ranks of those responsible for driving up the cost of malpractice insurance. While doctors will talk amongst themselves about lousy, incompetent and thieving doctors, they never report them to the Medical Board or police. Instead, they allow them to quietly relocate, so they can continue practicing. It’s no surprise why degenerate republicans silenced by medical cartel payoffs would push reform that punishes the victim and rewards the criminal. The military is notorious for commissioning doctors who have had their license revoked or suspended. Unlike civilians, military doctors are not required to have a license from the state where they practice; instead, they can shop around, conceal their malpractice history, and get licensed in less vigilant states, since the military does not require their doctors to carry liability insurance, and they can’t be sued for negligence. Being accountable to your patient and not your colleague will lower malpractice insurance. Public option now!
12:38 PM on 11/10/2009
I must say you too are under informed regarding the tort reform issue. Tort reform is lobbied by the med mal insurers who reap ridiculous profits. How big is your Lobby compared to these large profitable insurance and pharmaceutical companies that reap huge profits from Americans? Why do Americans continue to pay the salaries and bonuses of the paper pushers at hospitals, the insurance company CEOs and staff, and the dinner parties, golf outings and private parties organized for doctors (not for you even though you pay in the log run) by the pharm. companies? Stand up and just say no to frivolous spending. Solution - rid the country of insurance companies, let the CEOs who milked Americans for every hard earned penny run the Payment system (not insurance) for a push, not a profit and pay the ex CEOs the average American Salary. That's their punishment for the Raping of America.