• Home
  • Politics
  • Media
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  •  Comedy
  • Business
  • Living
  • Style
  • Green

Obama on Abortion Amendment: Don't Want to Change "Status Quo" (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama on Abortion Amendment: Don't Want to Change "Status Quo" (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11- 9-09 02:24 PM   |   Updated: 11- 9-09 07:18 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Obama

UPDATE: In an interview with ABC News's Jake Tapper, President Obama said he did not support any change in current abortion laws through the health care bill -- an implicit rebuke to the House for passing an amendment that could considerably restrict women's access to abortions. The president said that he doesn't want to change "the status quo" one way or another.

TAPPER: Here's a question a lot of Senate Democrats want to know. You said, when you gave your joint address to Congress, that under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions. This amendment passed Saturday night which not only prohibits abortion coverage in the public option, but also prohibits women who receive subsidies from taking out plans that -- that provide abortion coverage. Does that meet the promise that you set out or does it over reach, does it go too far?


OBAMA: You know, I laid out a very simple principle, which is this is a health care bill, not an abortion bill. And we're not looking to change what is the principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize abortions. And I want to make sure that the provision that emerges meets that test -- that we are not in some way sneaking in funding for abortions, but, on the other hand, that we're not restricting women's insurance choices, because one of the pledges I made in that same speech was to say that if you're happy and satisfied with the insurance that you have, that it's not going to change. So, you know, this is going to be a complex set of negotiations. I'm confident that we can actually arrive at this place where neither side feels that it's being betrayed. But it's going to take some time.

TAPPER: Do you think that amendment is status quo or does it lean a little bit in one direction or the other?

OBAMA: I think that there are strong feelings on both sides. And what that tells me is that there needs to be some more work before we get to the point where we're not changing the status quo. And that's the goal. The goal here is to make sure that people who have health insurance have greater stability and security, people who don't have health insurance get the ability to buy it affordably and that we're driving down costs.

And, you know, I think everybody understands that there's going to be work to be done on the Senate side. It's not going to match up perfectly with the House side. But obviously, it was a historic night for the House. We've never been this far. And I'm very confident that my colleagues in the Senate are going to say to themselves that we've got to get this done.

Watch:


* * * * * *

EARLIER STORY (2:24 PM ET): Despite pledging during the presidential campaign to protect a woman's right to choose, the Obama White House is refusing to weigh in on an amendment that represents perhaps the most restrictive anti-abortion measure introduced in a generation.

Story continues below

Press Secretary Robert Gibbs was pressed on four separate occasions to discuss the House of Representatives' passage of legislative language that would restrict a private insurer's right to cover abortions if they received public money -- even from a separate pool. On each occasion, he punted.

"I wish we were having this conversation at the last part of this process but as your network and others have pointed out: there are miles to go before we sleep," said Gibbs.

"Ask me that right before Christmas and the end of the year," he offered at another point.

"I'm not going to get deeply into this except to say we will work on this and continue to seek consensus and common ground," he declared later.

"I'm going to leave it at the earlier answer that we are going to continue to work and make progress," he concluded towards the end of the 45-minute long session.

The evasiveness wasn't unexpected. Gibbs had been pressed for the past several weeks to weigh in on the debate surrounding Rep. Bart Stupak's (D-Mich) now-passed amendment. He never did.

On a broader level, however, the briefing was yet another demonstration of just how little footprint the White House is hoping to leave on the health care debate. The legislative process truly is being left in Congress's hands -- whether on abortion or the public option. The only line in the sand the president has drawn is that the bill not violate his pledge to not tax families earning less than $250,000. Other than that, the Senate and House have been told to find the votes needed for passage and keep moving the ball forward.


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

UPDATE: In an interview with ABC News's Jake Tapper, President Obama said he did not support any change in current abortion laws through the health care bill -- an implicit rebuke to the House for pa...
UPDATE: In an interview with ABC News's Jake Tapper, President Obama said he did not support any change in current abortion laws through the health care bill -- an implicit rebuke to the House for pa...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
7,005
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next ›  Last »  (91 pages total)
- johninak I'm a Fan of johninak permalink

" We are already giving money to companies that provide that right to women."

women have the right to obtain one not have one provided for or paid for. I work for a non-profit Catholic Hospital who does not perform abortions based on conscience. Nothing wrong with that. A local for profit Hospital has been told by the State that they MUST provide them even though the board of their Hospital would rather not. If ANY Healthcare provider refuses to perform one ( I'm talking about one from choice not medical nescessity ) that should be THEIR right as it is not a nescessary procedure. It's not. I'm not a pro lifer but this whole entitlement thing is bull......

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 11/24/2009
- BKFactor I'm a Fan of BKFactor 14 fans permalink

“The Stupak-Pitts Amendment was crafted (written) by two men. Two men who sought to restrict a woman's rights and freedoms and you know this to be true.

"It is rare for another woman to form a group or start a movement meant to interfere with her own rights and freedoms as a woman. If there was such a woman, I would think you would agree, that something is wrong with her ... that perhaps she is psychologically damaged in some way.

I want you to think about who is at the forefront of almost every group or movement to restrict or interfere or strip away a woman’s rights and freedoms. ... They are almost always men. They are the Randall Terry’s’; they are the "Men Against Abortion" kind of groups; they are the sex slave traders, the rapists, the men who like to abuse women; they are the men who want to control women; they are the cold blooded killers like Scott Roeder; and now the Ben Nelson's, and Bart Stupaks and Joe Pitts of this world.*** "

Read my entire post at: http://clevelandssecretclub.blogspot.com/2009/11/stupak-pitts-amendment-should-strike.html

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 11/14/2009
- drricklippin I'm a Fan of drricklippin 272 fans permalink
photo

Hey "faux pro-lifers"-

To be REALLY pro-life is to provide at least BASIC health care to all American citizens

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 11/12/2009
- alwqb I'm a Fan of alwqb 23 fans permalink
photo

We are all missing the fact that we subsidize the Health Insurance Industry that already covers abortion in some plans. We are already giving money to companies that provide that right to women.

Should we stop all subsidies to the Health Insurance Industry now? Hardly.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 11/11/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 85 fans permalink

yes

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 11/11/2009
- Lizaxyz I'm a Fan of Lizaxyz 26 fans permalink
photo

Nope

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 11/12/2009
- johninak I'm a Fan of johninak permalink

" We are already giving money to companies that provide that right to women."

women have the right to obtain one not have one provided for or paid for. I work for a non-profit Catholic Hospital who does not perform abortions based on conscience. Nothing wrong with that. A local for profit Hospital has been told by the State that they MUST provide them even though the board of their Hospital would rather not. If ANY Healthcare provider refuses to perform one ( I'm talking about one from choice not medical nescessity ) that should be THEIR right as it is not a nescessary procedure. It's not. I'm not a pro lifer but this whole entitlement thing is bullshit.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 11/24/2009
- alwqb I'm a Fan of alwqb 23 fans permalink
photo

We had all better keep an eye on this. Language in the Healthcare Bill that the anti-choice bunch is trying to include will lead to ending a woman's right to choose. I wish they would give it up, this 36 year old law will not change because women everywhere will fight for choice. Some guy is not going to tell me what I should do when it is none of his business.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 11/11/2009
- wdw505 I'm a Fan of wdw505 85 fans permalink

i will tell you what i will not pay for..........a lot of things are not covered the my insurance plan for my EMPs by my choice.........see choice it is working.....you should be happy now

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 11/11/2009
- johninak I'm a Fan of johninak permalink

" Some guy is not going to tell me what I should do when it is none of his business."

so then if some guy knocks you up and you chose to keep the baby but he wants you to get an abortion can he have the choice to not let you soak him for child support?

didn't think so

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 11/24/2009
- NOPARTYOFNO I'm a Fan of NOPARTYOFNO 3 fans permalink

Hey leave President Obama alone! Why dont you pick on someone YOUR OWN SIZE!

We need to let the man work! Have you guys all forgotten from the campaign? Yes We Can! Let's get to work cleaning up this mess the Repuggies left America!

-NOPARTYOFNO
"this mom is fired up and ready to go! yes we can!"

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 AM on 11/11/2009
- AnotherAngle I'm a Fan of AnotherAngle 46 fans permalink
photo

Women have always told us to stay out of their wombs. Then when they get something in there they don't want, they want us to help pay to get it out.

What say you ladies? In or out?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 AM on 11/11/2009
- JIzin I'm a Fan of JIzin 3 fans permalink

Ummm, it takes two to tango. Would you rather pay $300 for an abortion she wants, or half your paycheck until the kid is 18??
Are you In or Out?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 AM on 11/11/2009
- AnotherAngle I'm a Fan of AnotherAngle 46 fans permalink
photo

If I was the father, I would own up to my responsibility. If I didn't think I could be a responsible adult, I would make sure there was protection so this would be a non issue.

New concept for you?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 11/11/2009
- janedarcy I'm a Fan of janedarcy permalink

They want us to help pay? We are the majority, it is our body...WE decide.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 11/11/2009
- AnotherAngle I'm a Fan of AnotherAngle 46 fans permalink
photo

You decide you pay.

You can't have it both ways.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 11/11/2009
- Kassandra I'm a Fan of Kassandra 130 fans permalink
photo

Out, definitely OUT

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 11/11/2009
- alwqb I'm a Fan of alwqb 23 fans permalink
photo

Guess who helps put something in? Men, and they leave after they came. Women pay for their own health concerns out of their pockets anyway. How many times has a woman asked you to pay for half of the procedure?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 11/11/2009
- AnotherAngle I'm a Fan of AnotherAngle 46 fans permalink
photo

If the men in your life "leave after they came", I would have to question the type of men that are making deposits.

I mean, whose fault is that, really?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 11/11/2009
- sense oar sheep I'm a Fan of sense oar sheep 37 fans permalink
photo

Our President

is

President

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 11/10/2009
- Kassandra I'm a Fan of Kassandra 130 fans permalink
photo

A rose is a rose is a rose is a rose? is that what you're saying?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 11/11/2009
- sense oar sheep I'm a Fan of sense oar sheep 37 fans permalink
photo

fair

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 11/10/2009
- Marcospinelli I'm a Fan of Marcospinelli 365 fans permalink
photo

"It is quite clear that private supplemental coverage for abortions is allowed as long as it is not paid for by federal funds. The amendment states such funding can come from individuals, local and state governments (as long as it is not from Medicaid which receives federal matching dollars.)"

================================

That's hospitals and all facilities that receive Medicaid funding, like Planned Parenthood.

I've never seen such open h@tred for women than those who are commenting here in favor of Stupak and anti-choice. To see so much of it coming FROM women means we have a very cr@zy and sick nation.

It's an outrage that the original commenter thinks that women should have to buy riders to cover gynecological care. Where is their activism then about requiring men to have to get riders to cover vasectomies, p3nile implants, Vi@gra, treatment for erectile dysfunction, etc.? How about riders to cover automobile accident injuries, since men so disproportionately wreck their cars?

When women find themselves in a position of needing an abortion, it's nothing that they planned. It's either an accident (and one that doesn't happen frequently or seldom more than once) or becomes necessary because something has gone horribly wrong with a wanted pregnancy.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 11/10/2009
- patricklee5150 I'm a Fan of patricklee5150 3 fans permalink
photo

No, with this amendment that was added to the House Bill, not even those who pay into private insurance will be allowed to get an abortion.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 11/11/2009
- johninak I'm a Fan of johninak permalink

so you're saying that women should have things paid for them? hmm? who's anti woman?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 11/24/2009
- Marcospinelli I'm a Fan of Marcospinelli 365 fans permalink
photo

"It is quite clear that private supplemental coverage for abortions is allowed as long as it is not paid for by federal funds. The amendment states such funding can come from individuals, local and state governments (as long as it is not from Medicaid which receives federal matching dollars.)"

================================

That's hospitals and all facilities that receive Medicaid, like Planned Parenthood.

I've never seen such open h@tred for women than those who are commenting here in favor of Stupak and anti-choice. To see so much of it coming FROM women means we have a very cr@zy and sick nation.

It's an outrage that the original commenter thinks that women should have to buy riders to cover gynecological care. Where is their activism then about requiring men to have to get riders to cover vasectomies, p3nile implants, Vi@gra, treatment for erectile dysfunction, etc.? How about riders to cover automobile accident injuries, since men so disproportionately wreck their cars?

When women find themselves in a position of needing an abortion, it's nothing that they planned. It's either an accident (and one that doesn't happen frequently or seldom more than once) or becomes necessary because something has gone horribly wrong with a wanted pregnancy.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 11/10/2009
- Marcospinelli I'm a Fan of Marcospinelli 365 fans permalink
photo

I support single payer universal health care, Medicare For All, and it should include 100% coverage of abortions, and it's for the benefit of all of us. But that's not in any of the legislation so Stupak's amendment was a 'Hail Mary'-pass to get something extra for those who are anti-choice.

What could that be?

The Stupak amendment prevents insurance companies that receive federal money from offering coverage for abortion which they do now.

Women spending their own money on insurance policies can NOT get their insurance companies, if those insurance companies are receive ANY public funds (and this goes for hospitals, too) to cover their costs.

How much clearer does anyone need it?

The Hyde amendment has prevented public money going to fund abortions since 1976. Nothing else is needed.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 11/10/2009
- AnotherAngle I'm a Fan of AnotherAngle 46 fans permalink
photo

The dems had to get something done because their constituency was getting impatient. It's not good when you have the presidency, house and senate and still can't pass something you campaigned on.

This was a desperate attempt to appease the masses.

Read it and weep.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 11/11/2009
- Marcospinelli I'm a Fan of Marcospinelli 365 fans permalink
photo

The Stupak amendment prevents insurance companies that receive federal money from offering coverage for abortion which they do now.

Women spending their own money on insurance policies can NOT get their insurance companies, if those insurance companies are receive ANY public funds (and this goes for hospitals, too) to cover their costs.

How much clearer do you need it?

The Hyde amendment has prevented public money going to fund abortions since 1976. Nothing else is needed.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 11/10/2009
- DEXTERMORGAN I'm a Fan of DEXTERMORGAN 37 fans permalink
photo

Tr0lls are making an early appearance tonite.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 11/10/2009
- johninak I'm a Fan of johninak permalink

isn't abortion ( with rare exception ) an elective procedure?

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 11/10/2009
- DEXTERMORGAN I'm a Fan of DEXTERMORGAN 37 fans permalink
photo

what is your point? cuz if you are going dow the road I think you are stop.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 11/10/2009
- johninak I'm a Fan of johninak permalink

I'll go down any road I see fit. I've despised insurance a lot l onger than this debate HOWEVER I don't think they should be forced to cover most " elective" procedures.The only exceptions in my opinion should be braces and certain cosmetic surgery. Don't like your nose? Pay for a new one yourself. Don't like your nose because of a huge mole with hair growing out of if - well that's a pretty bad genetic hand and no one should have to go through that. Abortion? You had unprotected sex or your birth control failed? YOU pay for it. It's not that much. If the insurance companies choose to pay then that's their business but if it's taxpayer funded then all that is going to do is make things uglier. Women have the right to OBTAIN an abortion, not to have someone provide it for them and certainly not a right to have it paid for.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 11/24/2009
- BurtonOerney I'm a Fan of BurtonOerney 48 fans permalink
photo

...and now all we've ever asked of this president is that he make sure that all abortions are covered in a public insurance plan. Is that so much to ask? I can't afford to pay $500 for EVERY abotion I'm planning. The cost would be astronomical! Besides, I prefer to have abortions in the second trimester and that's a lot more expensive... but that's my choice.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 11/10/2009
- Kassandra I'm a Fan of Kassandra 130 fans permalink
photo

WOW, if you're THAT prolific, you better have yourself checked for STDs. Maybe that's what's wrong with your brain.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 11/10/2009
- MossyOak I'm a Fan of MossyOak 72 fans permalink
photo

Try some fertility drugs, that way you can get a volume discount.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 11/10/2009
- Chad Krossber I'm a Fan of Chad Krossber 2 fans permalink
photo

I love the scarcasm and your picture. Gay marraige support at its finest. Educational and entertaining. Proof that same-sex marraige benefits everyone.

    Reply     Favorite     Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 11/10/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next ›  Last »  (91 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with