Scott Hawkins: $29,000 For 5 Minutes In The ER

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Scott Hawkins: $29,000 For 5 Minutes In The ER stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11- 9-09 04:58 PM   |   Updated: 11- 9-09 08:42 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Scott Hawkins

McClatchy:

SACRAMENTO -- For five desperate minutes, emergency room doctors at UC Davis Medical Center frantically tried to revive Scott Hawkins.

Read the whole story: McClatchy

SACRAMENTO -- For five desperate minutes, emergency room doctors at UC Davis Medical Center frantically tried to revive Scott Hawkins.
SACRAMENTO -- For five desperate minutes, emergency room doctors at UC Davis Medical Center frantically tried to revive Scott Hawkins.
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
48
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Suppose I should be glad my last ER visit, I mostly waited for about 5 hours, and the bill was smaller. So, when will the detailed itemized bill in this case be available for review?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 AM on 11/10/2009

I think if everyone canceled their healthcare insurance and paid out of pocket we could get universal insurance. I have no healthcare I'm middle-aged I pay for my doctor visits at the time of service, I go twice a year and pay $57 a visit. If your paying over $5000.00 a year for premiums and then your co-pay and you go to 2-3 $60.00 doctor visits that year you are a fool. I know you pay the insurance premiums just in case but even then you have no real guarantees your covered. If one person can go without so can we all. If the insurance companies had no customers we could drive them out of business. Healthcare is not the same as buying a couch it should now and forever be a non-profit business. I would tell anyone who is sick and their insurance is covering the bills to stay but all healthy people should stop paying until we get this into non-profit universal healthcare which is good for all.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 11/09/2009
- efmo I'm a Fan of efmo 7 fans permalink

I come back to the same question I asked a few months ago - what is the real cost of these services & how to find out? The uninsured get charged $29 k for this work, the insurance company would reimburse the hospital a heck of a lot less. You can't comparison shop if you don't know the real cost of health care (which is a plan suggested by many republicans), though I know it would not be realistic in a case like this. Still, If I worried about needing heart attack care in the future, how do I decide what hospital to go to? The insurance exec who went on Bill Moyers talked about the kind of plans we will have more of in the future (regardless of health insurance reform) will force more of us to be "informed" consumers of health care & pay for more of it ourselves so we will need to comparison shop. But how?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 11/09/2009
photo

This is another reason why we need Public Option in the Health Care Bill. The family should not
pay this Bill....I'm sure Canada and Europe don't even have this issue.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 11/09/2009
- UncleJimbo I'm a Fan of UncleJimbo 176 fans permalink
photo

Hospitals can Bill the De@d all they want....But you can't make them Pay! And you can't MAKE anyone else Pay!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 11/09/2009

They may be able to take it from their estate.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 11/09/2009
- LCLA I'm a Fan of LCLA 20 fans permalink
photo

I have a hunch that the late 23 year old college student did not have a significant estate.
And if he did, he won't be needing it anymore.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 11/09/2009
- texhall00 I'm a Fan of texhall00 12 fans permalink
photo

Greed

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 11/09/2009

And the willing fools who pay so that the greed just grows and grows.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 11/09/2009
- Rosewren I'm a Fan of Rosewren 22 fans permalink
photo

A hospital billed my insurance company for $2800 for an MRI and a mammogram about 5 years ago. My insurance paid $800 for the tests but if I had been uninsured I would have owed the whole $2800. All I could think was, who is really paying for the insurance that people have? It looks like the hospitals and doctors are using the uninsured to subsidize the insured to the tune of about 70%. I have no idea how much would be charged today, 5 years later but I'm sure it has really gone up.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 PM on 11/09/2009
photo

And one hears from the re thugs that the uninsured have medical care namely they can use emergency rooms.....­.........s­o that they can add to the growing number of people to file for bankruptcy because of medical costs. Perfect solution :-(

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 11/09/2009
- nopilikia I'm a Fan of nopilikia 4 fans permalink

America's new health care slogan: "If you have to ask, you can't afford it

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 11/09/2009
- Andman0121 I'm a Fan of Andman0121 22 fans permalink

hm, yeah, best in the world? We are broken

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 11/09/2009

they should be happy it is not $2.9 million; you got love them super greedy doctors...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 11/09/2009

Yeah, blame the doctors, cause, you know, they are the ones filling out the billing info and mailing that stuff out. Think about things before you post please.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 PM on 11/09/2009
- LCLA I'm a Fan of LCLA 20 fans permalink
photo

"What's more, the Hawkins case may be a dramatic and brutal example of the wide disparities in the sticker price for medical care provided to those with insurance and those without it.... Part of the outrage is that those with the least are charged the most."

This is a huge problem, and it is NOT confined to dramatic cases like this.
Those without insurance coverage are discriminated against by pharmacies every day.
With insurance your total cost (copay + benefit) will be a whole lot less then your cost without insurance coverage.
And pharmacies and drug companies are unapologetic about this discrimination.
This is yet another reason why passage of significant health care reform is so important.
Under the current system, most insurance is available through employment.
If you lose your job, then chances are that you lose your insurance benefits. Sure, you can buy COBRA benefits for 18 months... if you can afford to pay the much higher premiums without your paycheck.
What a tangled web has been woven in this complex universe of health care. Some people complain that the House bill was 2000 pages. I find it a wonder that they could limit it to 2000 pages.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 11/09/2009

Yup, those who can least afford it are charged the most.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 11/09/2009

{{The providers of care and big pharma have to be addressed as well as insurance. Doctors are way overpaid and part and parcel the reason why health care costs are so high, of marginal quality, and difficult to get}]

that is so NOT true. The doctors fees are always cut down so they have to see more patients and do more surgeries. There is an imbalance in what they should be paid and what they are paid. On the other hand, the hospital fees are not cut down. The insurance and hospitals have big lobbies and are part of increasing costs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 PM on 11/09/2009

{{Yet everyone blames the insurance companies, it is an all around scam on both sides.

Why not reform this? Instead of spending billions covering people who could pay for themselves without these exorbitant costs of care?}}

exactly!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 11/09/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect