EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Fannie and Freddie Fire Their Own Inspector General

First Posted: 3/18/10 Updated: 5/25/11

Fannie

There is no independent auditor overseeing the federal agency responsible for some $6 trillion in home mortgages, because the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel ruled that the agency's inspector general didn't have authority to operate, according to internal memos obtained by the Huffington Post.

The ruling came in response to a request from the Federal Housing Finance Agency itself -- which means that a federal agency essentially succeeded in getting rid of its own inspector general.

The FHFA is home to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks, which are jointly responsible for purchasing or guaranteeing more than 80 percent of new mortgages issued since the middle of 2008, according to FHFA numbers.

In September, the Department of Justice ruled that FHFA Inspector General Ed Kelley did not have authority to investigate wrongdoing or other abuses related to the agency, according to an internal DOJ Office of Legal Counsel memo signed by Deputy Assistant Attorney General Daniel Koffsky.

The ruling was made on complicated technical grounds. The current agency was created by a 2008 act that abolished the Federal Housing Finance Board and replaced it with the FHFA. FHFB employees automatically became FHFA employees and retained their "same status, tenure, grade, and pay."

The IG for the new agency, according to the law, needed to be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, but Kelley argued that the purpose of keeping the employees in the same positions was to make sure the agency could continue to operate and that therefore the law applied to him, too.

Kelley still works for the FHFA, but in a non-independent "internal auditor" position in which he must report to the agency head. A message left with FHFA wasn't returned.

On Monday, HuffPost called the main number listed on the FHFA website for people who want to report "a violation of any law, rule or regulation, gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or substantial and specific danger to public safety or complaints regarding the programs and operations of the agency."

The phone rang.

"Ed Kelley," said the voice on the other end of the line.

Kelley now heads the Office of Internal Audit and he said he has two employees: an office administrator and a person who oversees the contractors who review financial records. He estimated his budget for contractors was between $100,000 and $150,000.

As IG, he ran into trouble the way most independent investigators do -- by investigating things people didn't want investigated.

Kelley's office had been working with SIGTARP Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General overseeing the bank bailout -- the Temporary Asset Relief Program -- when the agency head challenged his authority to operate and asked the FHFA General Counsel's office to look into it.

"I hate to use the word challenge, because the question they raised was whether the statute was clearly established at the Office of the Inspector General," said Kelley.

He declined to get into the specifics of investigations that were cut short. "I don't really want to get into some of these, but obviously there are some programs out here. There's the TARP IGs that are heavily involved in looking at criminal activity surrounding the Make Home Affordable program and different other aspects in the programs they've rolled out [to address] foreclosures and so forth," said Kelley.

"Many of those are projects that would be worth jointly investigating between the TARP office and the IG's office here at FHFA." Kelley's office was starting to do just that when "the question of whether or not we were legally the IG's office came up, and we had to withdraw," he said.

In late February, Barofsky warned that the mortgage modification plan was vulnerable to already existing fraudulent foreclosure rescue schemes. On April 6, he announced that progress was being made as part of a multiagency crackdown.

A month later -- less than four months after Obama's inauguration -- the FHFA started questioning Kelley's legal status. An internal memo -- which HuffPost did not get from Kelley, originally dated May 12, 2009 and updated on June 23, provided the FHFA's opinion that Kelley had no authority to conduct such investigations.

"It's a serious gap in oversight," Barofsky told HuffPost of Ed Kelley's loss. "It does impact what we do. Ed was a member of our TARP IG council and a partner in our investigative work." Barofsky said he still investigates areas of FHFA, but his mandate only covers "a sliver of what they do."

"Fannie and Freddie are awfully big," Barofsky said. "The idea that the agency responsible for conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac doesn't have an inspector general should be a serious cause of concern."

The agency put the blame on the law as written. "Congress did not intend for FHFA to have an Acting or interim IG pending the confirmation of a [presidentially-appointed] IG," writes Janice Kullman, assistant general counsel, in the memo, which was approved by Isabella Sammons, deputy general counsel, and forwarded to General Counsel Alfred M. Pollard.

It's been 16 months since the law took effect.

Obama has yet to nominate a new IG. Kelley said he'd heard that a few candidates were being vetted and wouldn't comment on whether he was one. He guessed there might be a nomination within the next month.

"Given the uncertainty at FHFA, it did not become clear until mid-September that the Inspector General's office required a new nominee," said a White House spokesman. "We are currently working actively to nominate an individual to the position as soon as possible. The process of announcing nominees does take some time given the rigor of the process to ensure that important positions like this one are filled by the highest quality people."

But if that's the case, the White House has been vetting candidates without consulting Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), the chairman of the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. Dodd told HuffPost Monday night that he was unaware that FHFA had no IG and promised to look into the matter.

In the meantime, Kelley has essentially put a halt to investigations.

"We're in an internal audit office, versus an office of the inspector general, and there's a big difference between the two," he said. "An internal audit office operates at the pleasure of the head of the agency... At the end of the day, no matter how independent I am in conducting myself, we have an organizational independence problem, which anybody who looked at it, if people have problems with what we said, we would probably be viewed as not being independent, and probably not being very reliable."

In practice so far, Kelley said, no one has interfered with him as an internal auditor -- but he knows that could change at any moment. "Now, in terms in actuality of whether I'm independent, I feel like I can do what I need to do. I don't feel the discomfort, but that's until the first time you have a disagreement with the head of the agency. And over the years, I've certainly had my share of those. So at this point, there's nothing at the internal audit office I would want to do, that I feel like I can't do. But there are some things I wouldn't attempt at the internal audit office," he said.

The mortgage industry is one of the most susceptible to fraud, yet one of the areas Kelley said he doesn't get into is criminal investigation.

"We don't have the authority to do criminal investigations," he said. "It's the very reason why they set up IG offices themselves, [as opposed to] internal audit offices."

Fannie and Freddie are burning through cash at a staggering rate. Fannie reported a loss of $18.9 billion in the third quarter of 2009, four billion more than it lost the second quarter.

FHFA requested $15 billion from Treasury to plug the hole.

What's it spending money on?

"The company continued to concentrate on preventing foreclosures and providing liquidity to the mortgage market during the third quarter of 2009, with much of our effort focused on the Making Home Affordable Program," boasts the press release accompanying the announcement of the massive loss. "As of September 30, 2009, approximately 189,000 Fannie Mae loans were in a trial period or a completed modification under the Home Affordable Modification Program."

Those are the precise programs that Kelley was looking into when his own agency shut him down.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

There is no independent auditor overseeing the federal agency responsible for some $6 trillion in home mortgages, because the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel ruled that the agency's in...
There is no independent auditor overseeing the federal agency responsible for some $6 trillion in home mortgages, because the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel ruled that the agency's in...
 
  • Comments
  • 1,686
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
05:01 PM on 12/23/2009
More of our incredibly corrupt government !!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Gilmore
08:13 PM on 11/11/2009
After the bailout in the 1990's, these very same legislator­s, that were in position to re regulate the financial industry and close the door on the American taxpayer to ever have to bailout these bankers again, instead chose to open every door in the barn and allow them to just run wild.

They had a perfect example of what was possible, how could they allow this country and their constituen­ts to be put into the position they have?

What sort of people are capable of such greed and disregard for everyone else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Gilmore
07:37 PM on 11/11/2009
People, Ladies and Gents, seriously, HOW, WHY did our Congress "knowingly­" allow the economic security of the entire country to be put at risk, HOW, WHY would they subject 100's of K's of Americans to lose everything they had, putting their future at risk for the rest of their lives?

TOXIC ASSETS, people how the hell were toxic assets even possible after "the largest taxpayer bailout in history" was just 20 years ago?

http://stv­glmr.newsv­ine.com/_n­ews/2008/0­9/27/19215­09-deregul­ation-and-­lack-of-me­dia-attent­ion-cause-­bailout

1987; "faulty and fraudulent real estate appraisals have become an increasing­ly serious national problem whose effects are widespread­, pervasive and costly."

" Equally culpable are the Federal agencies that regulate or oversee lending and mortgage insurance/­investment activities and programs."
"Many lending institutio­n officers, directors,­...more interested in up-front fees and other tangible benefits..­.than they are with being assured that their institutio­n's risk exposure is minimized.­.."

How can the same people who were on the banking and financial committees 20 years ago and are still on those same committees today allow 0 down sub prime loans to exist and not see that a housing market that had tripled with a 6% increase in income not be bound for a "bubble" burst?

These people knowingly allowed this country and it's citizens to be bankrupted by a very few individual­s and then say they deserve bonuses because they are the best people available to run these companies.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
batmancw
Turn fear against those who prey on the fearful
04:53 PM on 11/11/2009
Folks, as others have said, what's going on in DC isn't about Dems vs. Reps. It's about the greedy political system versus the best interests of the Country and Citizens. I'm tired of all the partisan bickering being used as a shield to hide the fact that darn near ALL of them have either been bought or are hoping to be bought. We need to demand Campaign Finance Reform be acted upon and vote out ANYONE who's against it. I know it's like when Hercules had to "clean the stables", but we've gotta' start somewhere, and CFR is as good a place as any. Down with the Oligarchy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Gilmore
01:41 PM on 11/11/2009
Came across this 1997 CATO article the other day, I hope you find it enlighteni­ng;
http://www­.cato.org/­pubs/pas/p­a-293.html

"...receiv­e government subsidies estimated to be worth $6 billion. Of that total, an estimated $2 billion goes directly as income to shareholde­rs and employees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

Does this really make sense to anyone? We "the people" subsidize their shareholde­rs and salaries?

I will also ask again, why was Fannie and Freddie purchasing and insuring loan on 0 down sub prime loans they "had" to know would at some time have to go bad?

Why were they supporting a false fraudulent "market" they "had" to know was nothing but a bubble waiting to burst?

How does a meager 6% rise in American income over the past 20 years sustain and support a tripling ($80K to $235K) in the housing market?

Wouldn't the least amount of commonsens­e tell them that if Americans income does not progress some what that the housing market can not continue to rise for ever?
12:40 PM on 11/11/2009
I'm sure that the FBI or the AG would have jurisdicti­on over all things Freddie and Fannie. I say let them have a crack at 'em. See how they like them apples!
11:44 AM on 11/11/2009
did the IG get caught complainin­g about Barney dating Fannie execs and creating a conflict of interest?
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
12:41 PM on 11/11/2009
Is that the best you can come up with, conservata­rd?
11:04 AM on 11/11/2009
They obviously have something to hide.
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
07:51 PM on 12/28/2009
Of course they do...it's called The Shock Doctrine. Next hit? Turning US over to the insurance corporatio­ns. They ain't done with US yet.
photo
JackRusselTerrier
sniff out the truth and chew on facts
10:47 AM on 11/11/2009
Highly recomended video with transcript­.

Former Economic Hit Man John Perkins Reveals Why the World Financial Markets Imploded—a­nd How to Remake Them

Perkins was on the front lines of monitoring and helping create these very events that were once just confined to the Third World.

His latest book is called Hoodwinked­: An Economic Hit Man Reveals Why the World Financial Markets Imploded and What We Need to Do to Remake Them.

Excerpt from interview
"For a hundred years after United States became the United States, no corporatio­n was allowed to get a charter unless it could prove that it served the public interest. And charters came up for renewal every ten years or so. They didn’t get a renewal unless they could prove they served the public interest. That all changed with a Supreme Court ruling that made corporatio­ns equivalent to individual­s in the late 1880s..."

http://www­.democracy­now.org/20­09/11/10/h­oodwinked_­former_eco­nomic_hit_­man_john
15 minute video
10:34 AM on 11/11/2009
Our government has gotten so big, that like the banks the whole thing needs to be taken down and restructur­ed. It's just one big ponsi scheme. The robbers are carrying out the goods faster than it can be siphoned from the broken taxpayer, who has nothing left to give but blood.

States need to wake up and take back more power and control. State banks and state credit unions would be a starting point..
09:59 AM on 11/11/2009
Obama's first term is really the Bush Crime Family's third term.
10:56 AM on 11/11/2009
Not really. They were actively doing bad stuff. he just sits back and watches it happen. Kind of like drowning a man and watching him drown.
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
12:42 PM on 11/11/2009
No, he's aiding a abetting.
10:59 AM on 11/11/2009
same old wine in a brand new bottle
photo
constitutional 1
No ad hominem
09:48 AM on 11/11/2009
"I do think I do not want the same kind of focus on safety and soundness that we have in OCC [Office of the Comptrolle­r of the Currency] and OTS [Office of Thrift Supervisio­n]. I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing."

—Represent­ative Barney Frank, September 25, 2003

It was six years ago that Mr. Frank announced his famous dice roll on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the name of affordable housing. Mr. Frank got his wish, and the losses keep rolling in, with no end in sight as Washington finds new ways for the companies to serve political purposes.

Last week, Fannie Mae posted a quarterly loss of $19.8 billion—wh­ich believe it or not was an improvemen­t on the $29.4 billion that it lost a year earlier. Last quarter's results came with yet another request for government aid—$15 billion worth. That brings the total tab for Fannie and Freddie to $111 billion since they were put into conservato­rship in September 2008.
11:00 AM on 11/11/2009
Only complete fools trust Frank, Bush, Dodd, etc. They're the saps taken in by the Democrat v republican­, conservati­ve v liberal stuff.....­...the teabaggers and the dogmatic libs are the same thing. It's a dog and pony show. This is not a democracy it's a oligarchy and our buffoonish politician­s are no match for the Goldman Sach's of the world.
12:26 PM on 11/11/2009
Rep. Frank was right!

And there is a simple test to confirm that; read this commentary by former Republican Ohio Representa­tive Oxley –

The Republican chairman before Frank

“What did we get from the White House? We got a one-finger salute.”

http://www­.ft.com/cm­s/s/0/8780­c35e-7e91-­11dd-b1af-­000077b076­58.html

Oxley worked to pass legislatio­n to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the House and he was assisted on this effort by Rep. Barney Frank.

This bill passed the Republican­-controlle­d House, but received no support from either the Republican­-controlle­d Senate or the Republican­-controlle­d Executive branch.

This crisis, is yet one more example of the problems with electing Republican­s to office.

Republican­s believe that government is the problem and work everyday to make that belief a reality. They do not enforce the laws as written by Congress -

Bush even adds his own interpreta­tion of his responsibi­lities in those inane signing statements - and they weaken existing regulation­s almost daily, across every agency of government­.

The Republican­s had the chairmansh­ip and the majority. Don’t you think you ought to look there if want to find out who was responsibl­e?

Frank did not become became chairman of the committee until January 31st, 2007. Regardless of anything he might have said he and his party were completely helpless to do anything right or wrong.

Why do you blame the minority for the majority’s failures? Will you blame the Republican­s for the Democrat’s failures?
08:20 AM on 11/11/2009
Why? Did the IG object to the size of their bonuses?
03:27 AM on 11/11/2009
On a hot summer night , would you offer your throat to the wolf with the red roses?,
11:00 AM on 11/11/2009
Yes.
03:15 AM on 11/11/2009
The haves and the have nots can often be traced back to the dids and the did nots. A.O Flynn And so our economy goes down the tubes with redistubut­ion of wealth. :)