EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Federal Reserve: Weak Recovery Means High Unemployment For Several Years

JEANNINE AVERSA   11/10/09 09:07 PM ET   AP

Unemployment

WASHINGTON — Unemployment likely will remain high for the next several years because the economic recovery won't be strong enough to spur robust hiring, Federal Reserve officials warned Tuesday.

The cautionary note struck by the presidents of regional Fed banks were the first public remarks by Fed officials since the government reported last week that the nation's jobless rate bolted to 10.2 percent in October. It marked only the second time in the post-World War II period that the rate surpassed 10 percent.

In separate speeches, Janet Yellen, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, and Dennis Lockhart, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, warned that rising unemployment could crimp consumers, restraining the recovery. Consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of economic activity.

"With such a slow rebound, unemployment could well stay high for several years to come," Yellen said. "In other words, our recovery is likely to feel like something well short of good times."

Yellen envisions the shape of the recovery kind of like an "L" with a gradual upward tilt of the base.

Lockhart said "very slow net job gains" may occur "sometime next year."

Troubles in the commercial real estate market and the plight of small businesses also will weigh on the recovery, they said.

Small businesses – which held up reasonably well in the 2001 recession – have been clobbered by the downturn, accounting for about 45 percent of net job losses through the end of 2008, Lockhart said. During the last two economic recoveries, small businesses contributed about one-third of net job growth. Lockhart said he doubted that would be the case this time.

That's because many small businesses rely on smaller banks for credit. But troubled commercial real estate loans are concentrated at those banks, hobbling the flow of credit. Lockhart said he is "particularly concerned" about that linkage.

Meanwhile, Eric Rosengren, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, weighed in on a different hot-button issue for Congress: how best to handle huge financial companies whose failure could endanger the economy.

Rosengren endorsed "living wills" that outline wind-down arrangements in the event of failure, rather than having the government restrict the size or activities of financial firms. "I am skeptical such dramatic action would significantly limit systemic risk," he said in a speech in London.

The Obama administration has called on Congress to set up a mechanism to safely dismantle failed financial companies – along the lines of what the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. does for collapsed banks. Although key legislative proposals revamping the nation's financial rules contain such a provision, some lawmakers and others have expressed interest in limiting the size of colossal firms or breaking them up if they get too big.

Richard Fisher, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, told an Austin audience Tuesday evening that consumer spending is growing, but that he doubts it will recover its pre-recession vigor "for some time to come." He also said there is no imminent willingness by businesses to rehire or expand capital expenditures during the recovery.

"It may be some time before significant job growth occurs and it'll be even longer before a meaningful decline in unemployment takes place," Fisher said.

"It will take some time, in my opinion, to get back on a steady pathway to a pace of growth that will result in significant job creation for Americans. We are in for a very slow slog and a long slog," he said. "We have too much of everything in America, and we over-consumed," he added, saying it's not surprising there has been a contraction.

Fisher added that he believes inflation is likely to remain subdued and that the Federal Reserve's current monetary policy is appropriate.

___

Associated Press Writer Kelley Shannon in Austin, Texas contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — Unemployment likely will remain high for the next several years because the economic recovery won't be strong enough to spur robust hiring, Federal Reserve officials warned Tuesday.
WASHINGTON — Unemployment likely will remain high for the next several years because the economic recovery won't be strong enough to spur robust hiring, Federal Reserve officials warned Tuesday.
Filed by Gazelle Emami  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:54 PM on 11/25/2009
BOY OH BOY NOT TOO !!! MANY CONFLICTIN­G STATEMENTS FROM THE FED HUH WHAT A JOKE !!!!!

AUDIT THE FED FULLY!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!

GET MY PINK SLIPS ??
ELECTION DAY IS COMING
09:49 PM on 11/11/2009
Some think that we are overpaid:
http://mon­ey.cnn.com­/2009/11/1­1/news/int­ernational­/global_am­erican_wag­es.breakin­gviews/ind­ex.htm
This is actually true: to employ Americans profitably something have to go - either wages go down or outsourcin­g of production to China/Indi­a should stop. My bet is on wages going down three-four times. May be not in dollars but in purchasing power. Americans are not competitiv­e in the global economy because the cost of living almost everywhere else is much lower. And we grew accustomed to cheap imports in big marts while American made goods will be significan­tly more expensive.
09:30 PM on 11/11/2009
For the amount we funneled to AIG's crooked counterpar­ties via the Credit Default Swap HOAX, we could have actually created some REAL JOBS!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
07:01 PM on 11/11/2009
This is the best our public servants, our elected political leadership is willing to do; Organize, and manage an economic and population contractio­n policy. All the financial resources of the United States is dedicated to bailing out the bankrupt monetary financial system that is killing the economy/po­pulation. Insanity.
10:05 AM on 11/11/2009
Stock market surging while main street keeps getting squeezed

good articles: http://fin­anceopinio­nss.blogsp­ot.com

It looks like 9-8% unemployme­nt is the new normal since the govt. wants ppl to be unemployed­. Otherwise we would have REAL shovel ready projects and green jobs instead of the BS we have now.
05:16 AM on 11/11/2009
I ceased listening to the FR when Greenspan uttered his little monologue about how he never foresaw the behaviour that would ensue if regulation was eased off. A blind monkey with earplugs, on crutches with a broken arm and leg could have predicted this. It's a pity my small circle of friends never yielded a monkey that I could use.
09:24 AM on 11/11/2009
LOL!!
05:38 PM on 11/11/2009
These guys probably still think that the trade deficit will be solved by exchange rate changes. We need to focus on bringing manufactur­ing back (keeping what is left, too). Playing with finance won't cut it. Your blind monkey probably has figured that out, too.

Of course, some Fed Governors hold to the ideology (failed) that government can't and shouldn't pick winners and losers. The Fed can't and isn't the right place to do it anyway. And Treasury doesn't get manufactur­ing either. Include Summers in that. Countries that are being successful have industrial policies and Ministries of Industry that might not be quite as powerful as their finance folks but are in the same weight class.
12:42 AM on 11/11/2009
Good info on employment at recessioni­nfocenter.­com
12:33 AM on 11/11/2009
Wow. What is Obama going to do about this? Unemployme­nt in excess of 10% for the next several years? Where is the CCC or the other programs that aided the unemployed during the 1930's? This is BS.
pup sydney
needs of regular folks, Italy; cancer;
10:41 PM on 11/10/2009
You mean that when sarah will be president there still will be unemployme­nt? You biased liberal media...
At any rate: do you all think the of the 100 Americans (100%) 90% deserve a job 95% 100%? or would be better to keep the not so sharp knives at home for a while?
It is a fair question: I am for 100% employment but do we really want a completely unqualifie­d worker monitoring the safety of others, directing kids across a working area or guaranteei­ng the plumbing in a school park or getting your phone call or whatever? Isn't it true that many people we meet in our lives should really not be doing what they are doing because they suck at it?
What is the physiologi­c rate of unemployme­nt in the USA with the kind of worke force we have created?
After all in Europe Uratehas been higher than ours for decades: I do not see a tragedy there.
09:09 PM on 11/10/2009
What? Whatever happen to those "green shoots" Mr. Geithner told us about?
You mean that line was the complete and utter bu||sh|t we knew it to be??

"The BIS explains:
[T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reachi­ng aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conference­s. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for Internatio­nal Settlement­s in Basle, Switzerlan­d, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporatio­ns.”

The full article "The Economic Recovery is an Illusion" explores current global economic realities: http://www­.globalres­earch.ca/i­ndex.php?c­ontext=va&­aid=15501

Particular­ly nauseating is this reality that we have come to realize in our everyday lives:

"After two years of government support for the financial system, we now have a set of banks that are even bigger - and more dangerous - than ever before,” which also, “has been argued by Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund,” who “says that

THE FINANCE INDUSTRY HAS IN EFFECT CAPTURED THE US GOVERNMENT­,” and pointedly stated:

“recovery will fail unless we break the financial oligarchy that is blocking essential reform.”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ResearchtheFacts
09:09 PM on 11/10/2009
And the good news just keeps on coming and they are wondering why people are suicidal. You think anybody now who is barely hanging on can wait two years for job recovery?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wendynyc
Mitt CORPORATIST Romney!
09:05 PM on 11/10/2009
Well we have Republican version of short sighted CAPITALISM to thank for this!

China - Unemplymen­t 4%

USA - Unemplomen­t 10.4%

After shipping all jobs to Chna, killing research and technology budgets, underfundi­ng education, giving our tax surplus money to the ultra rich - what do you expect!!
07:06 PM on 11/10/2009
How about next time, you quit this in.ces.tuo­us relationsh­ip with the financial industry and government and make these failing companies go to bankruptcy court, where there will be oversight. How about enforcing existing laws and regulating and investigat­ing white collar crimes so that it doesn't take 30 years to discover Ponzi schemes?
08:15 PM on 11/10/2009
Now there's an idea,eh? Surely the last one they will be willing to entertain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ResearchtheFacts
09:07 PM on 11/10/2009
On top of it dividing up the remaining assets to pay off debt you owe. Hey you can always start a new business again anyway right after you close the doors of the old one with your hidden assets.
05:42 PM on 11/10/2009
This more than anything else is why I don't trust Obama anymore.

The moment it became clear he wasn't going to fight to actually clean up the financial industry is the moment it became clear that the hope and change rhetoric was just that, rhetoric. All he cares about is keeping corporate money in dem hands, he doesn't dare anger his corporate sponsors.

good articles 4 slow news day: http://fin­anceopinio­nss.blogsp­ot.com

the system needs to be overhauled cuz nothing seems to change .
09:12 PM on 11/10/2009
As soon as he appointed Summers and Geithner, the writing was on the wall - in flashing neon lights!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DASChicago
JOBS! JOBS! JOBS!
11:52 PM on 11/10/2009
But, what about the Depression Guru Bernake...­what the heck does he really know?
05:41 PM on 11/10/2009
Time to thin the herd in 2010 and 2012.....v­ote the incumbents out! Do not vote party line....
09:47 AM on 11/11/2009
Solid!