Federal Reserve: Weak Recovery Means High Unemployment For Several Years

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Federal Reserve: Weak Recovery Means High Unemployment For Several Years stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JEANNINE AVERSA | 11/10/09 09:07 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Unemployment

WASHINGTON — Unemployment likely will remain high for the next several years because the economic recovery won't be strong enough to spur robust hiring, Federal Reserve officials warned Tuesday.

The cautionary note struck by the presidents of regional Fed banks were the first public remarks by Fed officials since the government reported last week that the nation's jobless rate bolted to 10.2 percent in October. It marked only the second time in the post-World War II period that the rate surpassed 10 percent.

In separate speeches, Janet Yellen, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, and Dennis Lockhart, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, warned that rising unemployment could crimp consumers, restraining the recovery. Consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of economic activity.

"With such a slow rebound, unemployment could well stay high for several years to come," Yellen said. "In other words, our recovery is likely to feel like something well short of good times."

Yellen envisions the shape of the recovery kind of like an "L" with a gradual upward tilt of the base.

Lockhart said "very slow net job gains" may occur "sometime next year."

Troubles in the commercial real estate market and the plight of small businesses also will weigh on the recovery, they said.

Small businesses – which held up reasonably well in the 2001 recession – have been clobbered by the downturn, accounting for about 45 percent of net job losses through the end of 2008, Lockhart said. During the last two economic recoveries, small businesses contributed about one-third of net job growth. Lockhart said he doubted that would be the case this time.

Story continues below
advertisement

That's because many small businesses rely on smaller banks for credit. But troubled commercial real estate loans are concentrated at those banks, hobbling the flow of credit. Lockhart said he is "particularly concerned" about that linkage.

Meanwhile, Eric Rosengren, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, weighed in on a different hot-button issue for Congress: how best to handle huge financial companies whose failure could endanger the economy.

Rosengren endorsed "living wills" that outline wind-down arrangements in the event of failure, rather than having the government restrict the size or activities of financial firms. "I am skeptical such dramatic action would significantly limit systemic risk," he said in a speech in London.

The Obama administration has called on Congress to set up a mechanism to safely dismantle failed financial companies – along the lines of what the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. does for collapsed banks. Although key legislative proposals revamping the nation's financial rules contain such a provision, some lawmakers and others have expressed interest in limiting the size of colossal firms or breaking them up if they get too big.

Richard Fisher, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, told an Austin audience Tuesday evening that consumer spending is growing, but that he doubts it will recover its pre-recession vigor "for some time to come." He also said there is no imminent willingness by businesses to rehire or expand capital expenditures during the recovery.

"It may be some time before significant job growth occurs and it'll be even longer before a meaningful decline in unemployment takes place," Fisher said.

"It will take some time, in my opinion, to get back on a steady pathway to a pace of growth that will result in significant job creation for Americans. We are in for a very slow slog and a long slog," he said. "We have too much of everything in America, and we over-consumed," he added, saying it's not surprising there has been a contraction.

Fisher added that he believes inflation is likely to remain subdued and that the Federal Reserve's current monetary policy is appropriate.

___

Associated Press Writer Kelley Shannon in Austin, Texas contributed to this story.

WASHINGTON — Unemployment likely will remain high for the next several years because the economic recovery won't be strong enough to spur robust hiring, Federal Reserve officials warned Tuesday.
WASHINGTON — Unemployment likely will remain high for the next several years because the economic recovery won't be strong enough to spur robust hiring, Federal Reserve officials warned Tuesday.
Report Corrections
 
Comments
53
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

BOY OH BOY NOT TOO !!! MANY CONFLICTING STATEMENTS FROM THE FED HUH WHAT A JOKE !!!!!

AUDIT THE FED FULLY!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!

GET MY PINK SLIPS ??
ELECTION DAY IS COMING

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 11/25/2009
- aspelling I'm a Fan of aspelling 5 fans permalink

Some think that we are overpaid:
http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/11/news/international/global_american_wages.breakingviews/index.htm
This is actually true: to employ Americans profitably something have to go - either wages go down or outsourcing of production to China/India should stop. My bet is on wages going down three-four times. May be not in dollars but in purchasing power. Americans are not competitive in the global economy because the cost of living almost everywhere else is much lower. And we grew accustomed to cheap imports in big marts while American made goods will be significantly more expensive.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 11/11/2009
photo

For the amount we funneled to AIG's crooked counterparties via the Credit Default Swap HOAX, we could have actually created some REAL JOBS!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 11/11/2009
- ClarcKing I'm a Fan of ClarcKing 26 fans permalink

This is the best our public servants, our elected political leadership is willing to do; Organize, and manage an economic and population contraction policy. All the financial resources of the United States is dedicated to bailing out the bankrupt monetary financial system that is killing the economy/population. Insanity.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 11/11/2009

Stock market surging while main street keeps getting squeezed

good articles: http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

It looks like 9-8% unemployment is the new normal since the govt. wants ppl to be unemployed. Otherwise we would have REAL shovel ready projects and green jobs instead of the BS we have now.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 11/11/2009
- Atra I'm a Fan of Atra 10 fans permalink
photo

I ceased listening to the FR when Greenspan uttered his little monologue about how he never foresaw the behaviour that would ensue if regulation was eased off. A blind monkey with earplugs, on crutches with a broken arm and leg could have predicted this. It's a pity my small circle of friends never yielded a monkey that I could use.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 AM on 11/11/2009
- RandVictims I'm a Fan of RandVictims 111 fans permalink
photo

LOL!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 11/11/2009

These guys probably still think that the trade deficit will be solved by exchange rate changes. We need to focus on bringing manufacturing back (keeping what is left, too). Playing with finance won't cut it. Your blind monkey probably has figured that out, too.

Of course, some Fed Governors hold to the ideology (failed) that government can't and shouldn't pick winners and losers. The Fed can't and isn't the right place to do it anyway. And Treasury doesn't get manufacturing either. Include Summers in that. Countries that are being successful have industrial policies and Ministries of Industry that might not be quite as powerful as their finance folks but are in the same weight class.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 11/11/2009

Good info on employment at recessioninfocenter.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 AM on 11/11/2009

Wow. What is Obama going to do about this? Unemployment in excess of 10% for the next several years? Where is the CCC or the other programs that aided the unemployed during the 1930's? This is BS.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 11/11/2009
- pup sydney I'm a Fan of pup sydney 12 fans permalink

You mean that when sarah will be president there still will be unemployment? You biased liberal media...
At any rate: do you all think the of the 100 Americans (100%) 90% deserve a job 95% 100%? or would be better to keep the not so sharp knives at home for a while?
It is a fair question: I am for 100% employment but do we really want a completely unqualified worker monitoring the safety of others, directing kids across a working area or guaranteeing the plumbing in a school park or getting your phone call or whatever? Isn't it true that many people we meet in our lives should really not be doing what they are doing because they suck at it?
What is the physiologic rate of unemployment in the USA with the kind of worke force we have created?
After all in Europe Uratehas been higher than ours for decades: I do not see a tragedy there.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 11/10/2009
photo

What? Whatever happen to those "green shoots" Mr. Geithner told us about?
You mean that line was the complete and utter bu||sh|t we knew it to be??

"The BIS explains:
[T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporatio­ns.”

The full article "The Economic Recovery is an Illusion" explores current global economic realities: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15501

Particularly nauseating is this reality that we have come to realize in our everyday lives:

"After two years of government support for the financial system, we now have a set of banks that are even bigger - and more dangerous - than ever before,” which also, “has been argued by Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund,” who “says that

THE FINANCE INDUSTRY HAS IN EFFECT CAPTURED THE US GOVERNMENT,” and pointedly stated:

“recovery will fail unless we break the financial oligarchy that is blocking essential reform.”

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 11/10/2009

And the good news just keeps on coming and they are wondering why people are suicidal. You think anybody now who is barely hanging on can wait two years for job recovery?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 11/10/2009
- wendynyc I'm a Fan of wendynyc 11 fans permalink

Well we have Republican version of short sighted CAPITALISM to thank for this!

China - Unemplyment 4%

USA - Unemploment 10.4%

After shipping all jobs to Chna, killing research and technology budgets, underfunding education, giving our tax surplus money to the ultra rich - what do you expect!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 PM on 11/10/2009
- skymuffin I'm a Fan of skymuffin 19 fans permalink
photo

How about next time, you quit this in.ces.tuo­us relationship with the financial industry and government and make these failing companies go to bankruptcy court, where there will be oversight. How about enforcing existing laws and regulating and investigating white collar crimes so that it doesn't take 30 years to discover Ponzi schemes?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 PM on 11/10/2009
photo

Now there's an idea,eh? Surely the last one they will be willing to entertain.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 11/10/2009

On top of it dividing up the remaining assets to pay off debt you owe. Hey you can always start a new business again anyway right after you close the doors of the old one with your hidden assets.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 11/10/2009

This more than anything else is why I don't trust Obama anymore.

The moment it became clear he wasn't going to fight to actually clean up the financial industry is the moment it became clear that the hope and change rhetoric was just that, rhetoric. All he cares about is keeping corporate money in dem hands, he doesn't dare anger his corporate sponsors.

good articles 4 slow news day: http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

the system needs to be overhauled cuz nothing seems to change .

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 11/10/2009
photo

As soon as he appointed Summers and Geithner, the writing was on the wall - in flashing neon lights!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 11/10/2009
- DASChicago I'm a Fan of DASChicago 11 fans permalink
photo

But, what about the Depression Guru Bernake...­what the heck does he really know?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 11/10/2009

Time to thin the herd in 2010 and 2012.....v­ote the incumbents out! Do not vote party line....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 11/10/2009
- alreadybad I'm a Fan of alreadybad 2 fans permalink

Solid!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 11/11/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect