Ralph Cioffi, Matthew Tannin Verdict: Ex-Bear Stearns Hedge Fund Managers NOT GUILTY On All Fraud Charges

TOM HAYS | 11/10/09 05:48 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Ralp Cioffi Matthew Tannin

NEW YORK — Two Bear Stearns executives who ran hedge funds that collapsed after betting heavily on the shaky subprime mortgage market were acquitted Tuesday of lying to investors – a defeat in the government's bid to punish fraud exposed by the financial crisis.

A jury in federal court in Brooklyn deliberated about eight hours over two days before finding Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin not guilty of conspiracy and other charges in an alleged scheme that cost 300 investors about $1.6 billion and nearly caused the demise of Bear Stearns itself. The firm avoided bankruptcy in a rescue buyout by JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Both men had been charged with three counts of securities fraud and two counts of wire fraud. Cioffi was also charged with insider trading.

After the verdict, some jurors told reporters that they concluded the evidence against Cioffi and Tannin was flimsy and contradictory. Other suggested the pair were being blamed for market forces beyond their control.

"How much can two men do?" said Aram Hong.

Said Serphaine Stimpson: "They were scapegoats for Wall Street."

Tannin left the courtroom without comment. His attorney, Susan Brune, said, "We are thrilled for Matt and for his family." Cioffi said only, "I'm happy."

In a statement, U.S. Attorney Benton Campbell said, "We are disappointed by the outcome in this case, but the jurors have spoken and we accept their verdict."

Story continues below
advertisement

During a monthlong trial, prosecutors relied on a series of e-mails they alleged revealed behind-the-scenes alarm at the hedge funds as investments in complex, high-risk securities tied to the subprime market began to slide.

"The subprime market looks pretty damn ugly," Tannin wrote to Cioffi in April 2007. If Bear's internal reports were accurate, Tannin suggested, "I think we should close the funds now," and "the entire subprime market is toast."

The situation became so dire that Cioffi pulled $2 million of his own cash from the fund, but the pair still told investors that they should stay in and that the outlook was good, prosecutors said. He also was accused of hiding news that one worried investor had decided to pull out $57 million from the funds.

Based on a credit analysis, "there's no basis for thinking this is one big disaster," Cioffi told investors in a recorded conference call with investors that was played for jurors.

The defendants "lied to their investors. They defrauded their investors. The misled their investors," prosecutor James McGovern said in his closing argument. "And it's time for them to be held accountable."

Defense attorneys sought to convince the jury that the e-mails were taken out of context. Cioffi and Tannin, they said, had no motive to steer investors off a cliff, and were honest with them about the volatility of the market.

Prosecutors failed to show that the managers "knew what the future held and they hatched a criminal scheme to lie to investors," Brune said in closing arguments.

Added Brune: "This is a case that is built on hindsight bias."

NEW YORK — Two Bear Stearns executives who ran hedge funds that collapsed after betting heavily on the shaky subprime mortgage market were acquitted Tuesday of lying to investors – a defea...
NEW YORK — Two Bear Stearns executives who ran hedge funds that collapsed after betting heavily on the shaky subprime mortgage market were acquitted Tuesday of lying to investors – a defea...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
125
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

Prediction: Victims will start to take the law into their own hands.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 AM on 11/12/2009
photo

And what? Lynch the innocent?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 11/13/2009
photo

Being morally bancrupt is the name of the current game.

The options coming possibly out of this financial disaster are either fascism or enlightenment !

If we will come out of it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 PM on 11/11/2009
photo

Is there anything, ANYTHING that still functions properly in this country.

I mean, besides the great education system, the healthcare system, the veteran's care system, the housing system, the financial system....­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..........­..?????

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 11/11/2009
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 139 fans permalink

In this case I agree with the jurors.

Right now we are sitting in a great big jiggling bowl of unreality. "Rumpelstiltskin has left the building," and he has taken his paper-wealth with him while, all across the country, hundreds of thousands of factories stand idle. We stubbornly refuse to admit that wealth which exists only on paper does not exist at all. That a "priceless" tulip-bulb is little more than an onion.

Hedge funds are fundamentally "gambling," and it is only natural that a casino would want to keep its gamblers in their place. But, the doors to the casino are never locked. What keeps the gamblers sitting there is ultimately their own greed, not the free drinks and blinking lights.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 AM on 11/11/2009
- Jeff Kreisler - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Jeff Kreisler 11 fans permalink

See, I said you'd get away with it. Everyone's doing it, why not you?

GET RICH CHEATING - A Boston Globe Bestseller
"You'll be laughing all the way to the bank, assuming other cheaters haven't forced it into bankruptcy yet." - Rachel Maddow
"Catcher in the Rye for evildoers" - Penthouse Magazine
"A very funny book with a very timely message." - Terry Jones (Monty Python)
"Laugh out loud - roaring!" - CNBC
"A brilliant and brilliantly sustained satirical broadside." - Tony Hendra (National Lampoon)
http://GetRichCheating.com or http://tinyurl.com/ojfl3z

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 11/11/2009

Stock market surging while main street keeps getting squeezed

good articles: http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

It looks like 9-8% unemployment is the new normal since the govt. wants ppl to be unemployed

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 11/11/2009

Pick your jaws up off the ground people & remeber you live in AmeriKKKa......

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 AM on 11/11/2009

People who invest in hedge funds are sophisticated investors.

They know the state of the markets as well as the fund managers. They don't need advice from the fund managers. If they do, they shouldn't be investing in hedge funds.

There is nothing wrong with portfolio managers conversing about the state of the markets.

In this case justice was done.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 11/11/2009
- feyangel I'm a Fan of feyangel 24 fans permalink
photo

I think the jury was wrong. They pulled out their own money, saving their own butts, knew the market was "toast," but kept their investors' money in it and urged the investors to stay in the game. Hmmm-- may not be total fraud, but certainly they did not fulfill their fiduciary responibility. his kind of frivolousness with other people's money is not ok.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 11/11/2009
photo

He pulled 1/3rd of his investment out of the fund he managed and put it into another fund - that also collapsed. So 2/3rds of his money went kapoof in the fund he knew with absolute certainty was going to collapse and 1/3rd went kapoof in the fund he knew with absolute certainty was not going to collapse.

So much for him knowing the future with absolute certainty.

Innocent.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 AM on 11/12/2009
- AngusC I'm a Fan of AngusC 16 fans permalink
photo

The era of The Financial Felons continues...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 AM on 11/11/2009
- AngusC I'm a Fan of AngusC 16 fans permalink
photo

What a load of utter and complete BS.

Bought and Sold, the NY way.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 AM on 11/11/2009

Why don't you start learning how the financial markets actually work.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 11/11/2009
photo

You mean how it's "worked" .

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 AM on 11/11/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 254 fans permalink

I wonder how much this bs verdict cost?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 AM on 11/11/2009
photo

Nothing.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 AM on 11/11/2009
photo

Why?

Listen to her:

"Juror Serphaine Stimpson said afterwards she came into the case believing the pair was guilty. The more she heard, the more innocent they sounded.

“They were scapegoats for Wall Street,” she said she concluded. “All eyes were on the trial, it’s Bear Stearns we’re talking about,” the 27-year-old Brooklyn College office coordinator pointed out. ..."

Scapegoating and hindsight bias pretty much sums it up.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 AM on 11/11/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 254 fans permalink

They pulled their own money out. privately commented on how crappy the investment was, but just kept on recommending it.

Is that the way you do business?

I'm sure they did their best to befuddle the jury, and since no one with real financial knowledge was allowed in the jury pool,

it was easy.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 11/11/2009
photo

You know this how? I think there are pretty good odds they understood finance better than you do.

Jurors can be profoundly insightful. This case was built upon the silly notion that these two men knew the future with absolute certainty, and then lied about it. The jurors saw that was an idiotic contention, and no American should be convicted for knowing the unknowable with absolute certainty. Their emails, taken as a whole, prove they were very uncertain of the future. They did not know for certain that the credit crisis was going to happen.

If they had known the future with absolute certainty, they easily could have become multibillionaires.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 AM on 11/12/2009
photo

""The subprime market looks pretty damn ugly," Tannin wrote to Cioffi in April 2007. If Bear's internal reports were accurate, Tannin suggested, "I think we should close the funds now," and "the entire subprime market is toast."

The situation became so dire that Cioffi pulled $2 million of his own cash from the fund, but the pair still told investors that they should stay in and that the outlook was good, prosecutors said. He also was accused of hiding news that one worried investor had decided to pull out $57 million from the funds."

----

I don't understand why this would not be considered LYING to their investors.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 AM on 11/11/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 356 fans permalink
photo

The jurors like most of Americans obviously don't understand.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 AM on 11/11/2009
photo

Most Americans understand it better than you do.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 AM on 11/11/2009

It seems to me they understoodd all too well. I question your understanding.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 11/11/2009
- PlayTOE I'm a Fan of PlayTOE 22 fans permalink
photo

Did they buy the Jury ?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 AM on 11/11/2009
photo

The only paossibility you can imagine is somebody was bought off.

Maybe you are wrong.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 AM on 11/11/2009
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 132 fans permalink

Were they tried by a jury of their peers, or by human beings?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 AM on 11/11/2009
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 132 fans permalink

Ok, I've calmed down a bit.
I have been on juries, and one thing I have learned is not to jump to conclusions. The jury, not us, was given the facts, and there is at least a 50/50 chance that they came to the right verdict.
Having said that, this is one trial that I would have loved to follow as a juror.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 11/12/2009

...and justice for all in obama land.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 AM on 11/11/2009
- RasAlula I'm a Fan of RasAlula 5 fans permalink

huh? what does a court in brooklyn have to do with Obama, or the federal government for that matter?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 AM on 11/11/2009

Oh for the love of Pete when you blame the economic collapse on Obama you just expose your ignorant naked lack of clothes. Where have you been for the last 30 years of deregulation and dismantling of the New Deal. Your intellectual dishonesty makes appallingly clear that if Obama had lost you'd be mindlessly excusing every action of MCain and Palin. If you truly love freedom try freeing your mind from Fox talking points and USING IT!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 AM on 11/11/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect