EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

The Worst Drug Company Marketing Techniques (PHOTOS, POLL)

First Posted: 3/18/10   Updated: 5/25/11

The Huffington Post recently learned that pharmaceutical industry insiders are expecting the health care reform legislation agreed to between the White House and Senate Democrats to result in a surge of new profits for drug companies -- more than $137 billion, according to one estimate.

But, are these profits deserved? Over the past several years, the Justice Department has clashed with a number of pharmaceutical companies over what it says were a host of illegal schemes to boost profits. As a result, huge drug companies have paid out billions in fines and settlements.

These charges include paying kickbacks to health care providers, illegal pricing and off-label marketing (which is a euphemism for pushing drugs on patients who don't need them). Bloomberg reported this week that the practice of off-label marketing -- where drug companies promote a drug for uses other than those approved by the FDA -- is widespread:

"Marketing departments of many drug companies don't respect any boundaries of professionalism or the law," says Jerry Avorn, a professor at Harvard Medical School in Boston and author of "Powerful Medicines: The Benefits, Risks, and Costs of Prescription Drugs" (Random House, 2004). "The Pfizer and Lilly cases involved the illegal promotion of drugs that have been shown to cause substantial harm and death to patients."

With the massive penalties and settlements that drug companies have paid out in the name of profits, we took a look at some of the biggest cases of the last several years. Check them out below, and vote for the worst offender.


Pfizer -- $2.3 billion
 
Earlier this year, Pfizer, the world's largest pharmaceutical company, pleaded guilty to a fraud charge and, along with its subsidiary, agreed to pay a record $2.3 billion fine. The penalty stemmed from allegations that the company advocated the use of certain drugs for treatments beyond what had been approved by the FDA. In the case of Bextra -- which has since been withdrawn from the market due to concerns about the drug's safety -- Pfizer executives reportedly encouraged the company's salespeople to recommend the painkiller for the alleviation of pain unrelated to arthritis or menstrual discomfort, the only conditions it had been approved to treat. This wasn't Pfizer's first violation for off-label marketing: in 2004, it was hit with a $430 million penalty after it was charged with recommending its epilepsy drug Neurontin for other uses.
Rate This Photo (Current Rank: loading...)
That's Just Entrepreneurial Savvy
Dangerous Enough For Jail
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Now Make Your Own Top 5
Average rating: loading... out of 10
Current Top 5 Slides
loading...
Share Your Top 5 Slides
Users Who Voted on this Slide
loading...
loading...
HuffPost Community Top 5 Slides:
 


Get HuffPost Business On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

The Huffington Post recently learned that pharmaceutical industry insiders are expecting the health care reform legislation agreed to between the White House and Senate Democrats to result in a surge ...
The Huffington Post recently learned that pharmaceutical industry insiders are expecting the health care reform legislation agreed to between the White House and Senate Democrats to result in a surge ...
Filed by Grace Kiser  |