Neil Barofsky, TARP Watchdog: Bailout Will 'Almost Certainly' Result In Loss For Taxpayers

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Neil Barofsky, TARP Watchdog: Bailout Will 'Almost Certainly' Result In Loss For Taxpayers stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11-12-09 05:48 PM   |   Updated: 11-12-09 05:56 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Neil Barofsky Tarp

bloomberg.com:

Nov. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Neil Barofsky, the federal watchdog for the $700 billion financial industry bailout, said the program will "almost certainly" result in a loss to U.S. taxpayers.

Read the whole story: bloomberg.com

Nov. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Neil Barofsky, the federal watchdog for the $700 billion financial industry bailout, said the program will "almost certainly" result in a loss to U.S. taxpayers. ...
Nov. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Neil Barofsky, the federal watchdog for the $700 billion financial industry bailout, said the program will "almost certainly" result in a loss to U.S. taxpayers. ...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
95
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

With 'almost certain certainty', anything is possible.

As Alan Greenspan said in his banking committee testimony just about a year ago, the best forecasters are wrong more than half of the time. The value in paying attention to any of them appears to be minimal.

What is actually certain is the fact that some of those businesses who were labeled as the most likely to go out of business a year ago have repaid these loans with significant amounts of interest to the taxpayer.

Warren Buffet (who is generally not a prognosticator) thought it was a good program. There is not a lot of good evidence that there are many in the country with a better sense of how to make money than him. Perhaps we would all be doing ourselves a favor by spending less time paying attention to those who have figured out how to get paid for making statements that have little probable value and more time making sure that our own personal finances are in good order based on the rules of simple arithmetic.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 11/15/2009


We, the American people, dug ourselves into this hold for which there is no escape.a

hat tip to: http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 11/14/2009
photo

AMERICANS GET SCR_EWED ON BANKSTER TARP - LOSSES NOT GAINS!

Bar0fsky, special inspector general for $700 billion TARP bailout will be loss to taxpayers.

Barofsky is conducting 65 fraud investigations with very little cooperation from Treasury

Barofsky will release an Audit looking at if AIG paid too much to G0LDMAN & others=$50Bn

Fraud ranges from complex Derivatives to Mortgage-Fraud = 50% from insiders+v­ictims+ public

Barofsky=“I’d be..warning about potential fraud..and..hear ‘Oh, they’re bankers..they wouldn’t put their reputations at risk committing fraud.”

“We’ve done a good job of instilling ..skepticism that..Wall Street isn’t necessarily Holy Grail.”

Barofsky = Has NOTHING to say about BofA investigation by New York's AG Cuomo!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 AM on 11/14/2009
photo

Clarification:

Last December 2008 G0LDMAN had $30 Trillion in Hidden Derivatives!

http://www.occ.gov/ftp/release/2009-34a.pdf

See page 22!

Current 3rd 2009 Quarter G0LDMAN had $48 Trillion in Hidden Tier Three According to OCC!

A 60% increase in three Quarters!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 AM on 11/14/2009
photo

G0LDMAN’S Earnings=FAKE “Mark-to-Fantasy” Accounting = Massive UNJUSTIFIED BONUSES PAID ON BACKS OF AMERICANS (via FED+Treasury+A1G)

Credit products+m­ortgages=S­ecurities held but Can’t sell=Mark to whatever profit number we want

"Revenues in Equities were 78% higher”= Derivatives FAKE mark up over prior year quarter

Mark-to-Fantasy illiquid Derivatives =Fabulous Incomes+Bonuses paid by Treasury+FED+AIG

JPM+G0LDMAN=FAKE MASSIVE ACCOUNTING Paper PROFITS = Cash Bonuses

In the hoopla the media missed that housing foreclosures hit a new record high!

JPM + G0LDMAN = A Grand Theft in the FACES OF THE WORLD’S People

Should JPM+GS really get BONUSES or be PUT IN PR1SON?

http://truthingold.blogspot.com/2009/10/re-goldman-sachs-earnings.html

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 AM on 11/14/2009
- shivasquest I'm a Fan of shivasquest 126 fans permalink

What does Geithner say?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 AM on 11/14/2009
photo

What is that name again?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 AM on 11/14/2009
photo

AMERICANS GET SCR_EWED ON BANKSTER TARP - LOSSES NOT GAINS!

Bar0fsky, special inspector general for $700 billion TARP bailout will be loss to taxpayers.

Barofsky is conducting 65 fraud investigations with very little cooperation from Treasury

Barofsky will release an Audit looking at if AIG paid too much to G0LDMAN & others=$50Bn

Fraud ranges from complex Derivatives to Mortgage-Fraud = 50% from insiders+v­ictims+pub­lic

Barofsky=“I’d be..warning about potential fraud..and..hear ‘Oh, they’re bankers..they wouldn’t put their reputations at risk committing fraud.”

“We’ve done a good job of instilling­..skeptici­sm that..Wall Street isn’t necessarily Holy Grail.”

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 AM on 11/14/2009
- vinny I'm a Fan of vinny 72 fans permalink
photo

revolt

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 11/13/2009
photo

if you go to an American family, two kids, etc., and say the only way to reform is revolt, they are going run straight into the arms of the first person who promises them he/she will oppress.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 11/14/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 356 fans permalink
photo

Are you saying that fear will keep the people from doing anything to fight back -- and do you consider that a good thing?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 11/14/2009
- shivasquest I'm a Fan of shivasquest 126 fans permalink

LOL!!!
Nice ......... lower case.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 AM on 11/14/2009

Every person who took bonus money and received a ridiculously high salary paid for by bailout money is a thief. Taxpayers won't get paid back the bailout money because it is hiding in the pockets of these criminals. The bailout was the greatest robbery in world history. The worst part is that the U.S. government is not even going to enforce the law to put these criminals behind bars and recover the taxpayer's money.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 11/13/2009

Of course taxpayers won't see the bailout money anymore. It is hiding in the pockets of the executives who gave themselves bonuses with this money.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 11/13/2009

No more bailouts for too big to fail. NO more stupid tax cuts and other gimmicks. Need more jobs, affordable education & heath care.

good articles; http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 11/13/2009
photo

You need jobs. Great. Then wise up, because you will not get jobs if you keep thinking destroying the financial system would have been a good idea.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 11/13/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 356 fans permalink
photo

The financial system is only for the benefit of the banksters and not Main Street America. We are NOT getting helped here.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 11/14/2009
- Papa Swamp I'm a Fan of Papa Swamp 5 fans permalink
photo

Geez ya think? Waiting for bailout 2.0 or is it 4.0/5.0 since AIG has had 3 trips to the $$ trough and Fannie needs another bailout (3rd 4th?).

At least they will get their bonuses.....vomit

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 AM on 11/13/2009
- vippy I'm a Fan of vippy 66 fans permalink

Now our dear congress wants gambling associated with derivatives! That stinks to high heaven.
Derivatives should be outlawed. Why is no one jumping on the speculators in oil driving up the price of gas, oil should be no more than $ 40 per barrel. Hedgefunds should be outlawed!
The bonuses need to be stopped until the taxpayer gets all their money back first.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 11/13/2009


As Homer says: DUHHHHHHHH­HHHHHHHHHH­HHHHHHH

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 11/13/2009
- ntmessage I'm a Fan of ntmessage 35 fans permalink

No doubt at all on this. Once the congress got their hands on TARP and decided that non-financial firms, unrelated to the crisis should get bailed out as well they turned this money from investment to spending. Not to mention the extra 180B of pork. So perhaps 300-400 Billion of almost 900 Billion went to what TARP was designed to do. Now we continue to vilify the financial businesses once they paid the money back only to deflect that the other 500-600 Billion was simply spent. Your congress in action. Nice work. If only they can get rid of the pork in the health care, we would see that we could pay for the entire robust public option via the bush tax cuts alone. For this congress? Not a chance. When legislation gets passed everyone in congress, have their hands in the citizens pockets for their special interests alone. And then they blame others for their own actions.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 AM on 11/13/2009
photo

Yes, he should be segregating by sectors. For being a champion of transparency, Barofsky speaks murky.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 11/13/2009
- StephenJK I'm a Fan of StephenJK 20 fans permalink

"The bankers would never risk their reputation to make a few bucks!"

HAHAHAHAHAH

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 AM on 11/13/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 356 fans permalink
photo

While I like Barofsky in general, this comment is a bit hard to stomach:

"The inspector also concluded in that report that ex- Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke didn’t illegally pressure Bank of America to complete its acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co. While Bank of America considered ending the deal last December after Merrill’s losses spiraled, Paulson and Bernanke advocated its completion, and arranged another $20 billion in assistance."

Oh, why? Because they SAID so?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 AM on 11/13/2009
photo

I am with you on that! Very fishy!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 AM on 11/14/2009
- Carolab I'm a Fan of Carolab 356 fans permalink
photo

I mean, is he trying to say Cuomo's case is full of crap?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 11/14/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect