Beck's Guest List Included White Supremacists, Other Extremists

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Beck's Guest List Included White Supremacists, Other Extremists stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 11-16-09 11:16 AM   |   Updated: 11-16-09 03:17 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Beck

Conservative radio and television talk show host Glenn Beck has made his reputation and fortune in part by taking innocent if not strictly professional relations and turning them into major political scandals. His crusades against Obama administration advisers Patrick Gaspard and Van Jones, who has since resigned, stand out as crowning achievements of the guilt-by-association game.

What happens, however, when one looks closely at the people Beck has chosen to invite onto his show, and to whom he has lent his megaphone?

The Huffington Post took a look some of the bombastic host's past guests and found names steeped in controversy. Beck has hosted, and even occasionally praised, a renowned white supremacist, a devout southern secessionist, a defender of slavery, and a 9/11 skeptic.

On October 4, 2007, for instance, Beck had on his CNN/Headline News show Michael Hill, the founder and president of the League of the South, and Thomas Naylor, a secessionist who is head of the Second Vermont Republic. The conversation, which centered on dissolving the government, was at times, contentious. But Beck - for all the pushback he offered - did acknowledge that he was kind of intrigued. "Don`t get me wrong," he said. "There`s part of me that says, mm-hmm."

Hill's League of the South (LOS) group is a decidedly white supremacist organization, arguing that the "Anglo-Celtic" culture of the South must be protected and insisting that "white men" must "shed the guilt heaped upon them by their opponents and defend their interests." The group has questioned "what sort of ammunition is being given to black 'racists' by the media's skewed coverage of interracial crimes." Hill himself has been quoted as saying, "Let us not flinch when our enemies call us, 'Racists;' rather, just reply with, 'So, what's your point?'''

Hill wasn't the only Beck guest with LOS ties. Beck has also given airtime to Tom Woods, a historian and economic theorist who was present at the group's founding. Woods was just 21 years old at the time and insists that he is no longer a member. But even those who have accepted those explanations say he harbors radical, pro-Confederate views.

In his book, "Politically Incorrect Guide to the American History," Woods wrote that "strictly speaking, there was never an American Civil War...Other, more ideologically charged (but nevertheless much more accurate) names for the conflict include the War for Southern Independence and even the War for Northern Aggression."

"Woods clearly wants to tender a neo-Confederate interpretation, in which slavery is shunted into the background as a motive for southern secession," wrote Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, a San Diego University Professor who reviewed the book for the Journal of Libertarian Studies.

Story continues below
advertisement

Nevertheless, Woods has appeared twice on Beck's radio program and three times on his Fox News show. When Beck was out with appendicitis last week, Woods was on with fill-in host, Judge Andrew Napolitano, to discuss his new book, "Meltdown." He's regarded so highly by the program that Beck has asked him to write for his newsletter "because I think you've got it down," Beck said.

Another Beck guest with a controversial past is Larry Pratt, the president of Gun Owners of America. Pratt appeared on the Fox News program on February 16, 2009.

A Second-Amendment rights enthusiast, Pratt may be best known for being forced to resign as co-chair of Pat Buchanan's 1996 presidential campaign because of ties to white supremacist and extremist groups. The same year, the Southern Poverty Law Center reported that Pratt was contributing to an anti-Semitic periodical titled "United Sovereigns of America." Gun Owners of America, meanwhile, was discovered donating money to a white supremacist attorney's group.

Nevertheless, he was warmly greeted on the show by Beck, who promptly complimented him for his "dream marriage" because neither he nor his wife exchanged Valentine's Day cards.

Roy Beck, the founder and president of NumbersUSA -- and no relation -- has appeared with Beck three times, including one appearance just over two weeks ago. According to SPLC, Roy Beck "is the Washington editor of The Social Contract, a quarterly journal that has published articles by 'white nationalists' like Samuel Francis, who was fired from the conservative Washington Times after writing a racially inflammatory column, and James Lubinskas, a contributing editor for the racist American Renaissance magazine."

Finally, there is Charles Goyette, a self-described Independent and popular Phoenix-based radio host, who appeared as a guest on Beck's October 12, 2009, Fox News program. Goyette would be non-controversial except for the fact that months earlier, on his own program, he said that the official story behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks is "worse than Swiss cheese." Beck, of course, memorably pilloried Van Jones for putting his name on a petition that questioned whether 9/11 was a government conspiracy.

If Beck were a self-avowed journalist -- which he's not -- these guests could be chalked up as an effort to foster intriguing debate, whether about immigration policy, constitutional principles or the strength of the dollar. But, taken as a whole, the roster reflects the host's partiality to an ideology that is far-right if not outright extremist.

Beck himself has argued that one must "step back and look at the big picture" if one wants to understand philosophical motives.

After repeated requests for response by the Huffington Post, Beck's production company declined comment for this article.

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

Conservative radio and television talk show host Glenn Beck has made his reputation and fortune in part by taking innocent if not strictly professional relations and turning them into major political ...
Conservative radio and television talk show host Glenn Beck has made his reputation and fortune in part by taking innocent if not strictly professional relations and turning them into major political ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
3234
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (38 pages total)

i love how people on beck's show are background checked by this site while President Obama's friends and mentors were ignored. once again, a joke of an article. the truth was obviously stretched to make a point. just another reason why typical americans are sick of all media

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 PM on 11/22/2009

If Stein got paid for this nonsense of an article, someone should demand he give it back...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 11/21/2009
photo

it doesnt suprise me that the author would have a problem with a guy who loves his country...­....

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 11/21/2009
- JaCar I'm a Fan of JaCar 7 fans permalink

Sounds very unAmerican. When an election doesn't go your way, your suggestion is to dissolve the union? Apparently to you and your friends on the right "free" speech means the right to slander others without them responding. Interesting how opinions have changed with the election of a black President. Under GW we were told that criticism of the President supported our enemies and endangered our troops. Apparently it's now ok to suggest that we dissolve the union, because some people on the fringe are unhappy with our Democratically elected leaders. I wonder what signal this sends to our "enemies'.

You sir are free to leave and take as many tea partiers with you as you'd like. Nobody is forcing you to stay in this country or infringing on your right to spew whatever hate you'd like, but it's simply absurd to think that others shouldn't be allowed to challenge your rhetoric. If democracy isn't your thing, please be on your way.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 11/20/2009
- Akat1973 I'm a Fan of Akat1973 11 fans permalink
    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 AM on 11/20/2009
- Akat1973 I'm a Fan of Akat1973 11 fans permalink
    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 AM on 11/20/2009
- Akat1973 I'm a Fan of Akat1973 11 fans permalink
photo

beck said he hated the nineleven victims families& was tired of hearing them whine google it

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 AM on 11/20/2009

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/ariannas_pc_delta_force/

Says it all. And I'm not a Beck supporter in the slightest.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 11/19/2009
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 22 fans permalink
photo

Extremism in support of bigotry, racism, and murder, are sometimes protected, but always promoted by FOX.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 11/19/2009

Dumb.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 11/19/2009
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 22 fans permalink
photo

Ignorant

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 11/19/2009
- JaCar I'm a Fan of JaCar 7 fans permalink

A bigot says "dumb"

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 11/20/2009
photo

I wish that this columnist could limit his focus and go into a little more detail, rather than lumping this whole group of people together. Tom Woods is a very thoughtful writer, for example. It is a pity to dismiss him out of hand just because he questions what we were all taught in sixth grade.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 11/19/2009
photo

This article is ridiculous Anyone who thinks the government is too big is now an "extremist­." Yes, bow down to the state, lick its boots, Sam. You have lost all credibility.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 11/19/2009
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 22 fans permalink
photo

It's not the size that is most worrisome, but who actually runs the government. Conservatives, now that big government, Ronnie Raygun and GW are gone have returned to their downsize mantra. This is a deflection from the important debate of who in a democracy should run this government. Conservatives continually support corporations running the country. They have since Reagan joined the free-marketeers in supporting ideas that diminish the middle class. They have joined in a consensus with these economists, and corporate leaders that the middle class is no longer needed, and will be a threat to their future rule.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 11/19/2009
- JaCar I'm a Fan of JaCar 7 fans permalink

Have you seen the tea party rallies? Threat of succession and violence, racial propaganda, equating the President to Htler AND Stalin. This isn't concern about the size of government. This is a temper tantrum for losing last year's election.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 11/20/2009
- CactusClef I'm a Fan of CactusClef 3 fans permalink

I read some time ago about some extremist that objected to the taxes and tyranny that were being imposed by a king from a far away remote place. They decided to declare their sovereignty, and thus was born a new and novel form of government.

I've met and read work by at least one of the "extremist" mentioned in this article, and his views differ little from the views of those that designed and constructed the foundation for this new republic.

In a time when the unsustainable practices of the fractional reserve banking system, through their ties with the government, have all but obliterated the sovereignty of the individual against that of the state, I welcome these "extremist" ideas.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 11/19/2009
- gbrooks I'm a Fan of gbrooks 72 fans permalink
photo

Bravo!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 11/19/2009
- JaCar I'm a Fan of JaCar 7 fans permalink

Teason is a crime. There is no right to treason in the constitution that you falsley believe you have knowledge of. We have the right to disagree with our government, to elect those that we believe best represent our interests, but we do not have a right to wage war on our government because an election doesn't go our way. That is treason. I would suggest you leave, because Democracy just doesn't seem to be for you.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 11/20/2009

What is the punishment for "teason"? Bwahaha. Dude learn how to spell if you intend to make an educated sounding argument.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 11/20/2009
- JerryAguy I'm a Fan of JerryAguy 4 fans permalink
photo

The man does his homework, just look how many folks have had to step down. I can't think of any other tv host who have been able to do that, even against the last admin. If you are hard left then you most likely won't listen to him. Mr. Keith O. has not been able to do that even with his worst person award he fails to list an actual worst person on, himself.
Like I've said all along different channels back different sides, sometimes they'll do it til they even lose viewers when they are unfair. I have yet to see anything story wise critical of MSNBC but there is non-stop ranting on fox when they both do the same things.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 11/19/2009

It's hilarious that this article comes out 3 days AFTER Glenn Beck had a show dedicated to minority conservatives (and minority liberals who regret their Obama vote).

I guess if Beck had aired that show after this article, one could claim that it was a defensive move in response to Sam Stein's writing.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 AM on 11/19/2009
- Akat1973 I'm a Fan of Akat1973 11 fans permalink
photo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf33g9ep4YU here you go says it all

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 AM on 11/20/2009
- acanthus I'm a Fan of acanthus 5 fans permalink

It was a defensive move in response to Color of Change's actions against him.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 11/22/2009

Why is one an extremist to believe that dissolving a country is not the best option at some point in history? The US has supported the breakup of other nations for various political reasons. It is clear that many of our founding fathers were of the opinion that revolution was sometimes a necessary thing.

While I don't care much for Glenn Beck, he is much less of a threat than the Sam Stein's whiney, politically-correct smear tactics on fine men. Tom Woods is an upstanding libertarian and scholar and Thomas Naylor is a modern liberal with sound thinking and scholarship. Has he ever bothered to read Prof. Naylor's writing? Naylor is perhaps the most non-violent man one can find.

When it is no longer possible to talk about subjects that people so disagree and cannot intellectually defeat, then I suppose it is OK to slander folks and their ideas with false and distorted accusations. This is a danger to be feared--the loss of free speech.

I, for one, think that all topics are on the table if and when we are to be free men.

What does the author propose--that we lock up these "extremists" in labor camps? If Mr. Sten can't present an intellectually sound argument he is truly without merit.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 AM on 11/19/2009

Spot on and fanned.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 AM on 11/19/2009
- gbrooks I'm a Fan of gbrooks 72 fans permalink
photo

I'm not sure Michael, but I think I just fell in love. Don't worry, I want you for your mind.

Either way--fanned. That was beautifully said.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 11/19/2009
- JaCar I'm a Fan of JaCar 7 fans permalink

No response to my earlier post? No explanation of your hatred for democracy? Come on, defend your position.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 11/21/2009
- JaCar I'm a Fan of JaCar 7 fans permalink

Sounds very unAmerican. When an election doesn't go your way, your suggestion is to dissolve the union? Apparently to you and your friends on the right "free" speech means the right to slander others without them responding. Interesting how opinions have changed with the election of a black President. Under GW we were told that criticism of the President supported our enemies and endangered our troops. Apparently it's now ok to suggest that we dissolve the union, because some people on the fringe are unhappy with our Democratically elected leaders. I wonder what signal this sends to our "enemies'.

You sir are free to leave and take as many tea partiers with you as you'd like. Nobody is forcing you to stay in this country or infringing on your right to spew whatever hate you'd like, but it's simply absurd to think that others shouldn't be allowed to challenge your rhetoric. If democracy isn't your thing, please be on your way.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 11/20/2009
- gbrooks I'm a Fan of gbrooks 72 fans permalink
photo

You make a lot of assumptions in your post.

For one, you assume that he was/is a fan of GW Bush. Anyone with a brain in their head can see that Bush was atrocious for this country, our civil liberties and had a violent foreign policy that we will be paying for for decades. Obama is continuing that.

You see, son, I actually voted for Obama, and the reason that these things are coming up now is because we did vote for change, and we're getting a heck of a lot more of the same. It has nothing to do with his color, his background or any other superficial reason you can dream up. It has to do with the failure of government being of the people, by the people and for the people. With Obama's election and performance thus far, it's becoming more and more apparent that this government is of the corporations, by the bankers and for the wealthy elitists. And the Bush family is part of that.

Why do you think people elected such a noob? We wanted someone who wasn't bought and paid for, we wanted someone who could heal the crisis we have with the Middle East, and he's taking out just as many civilians as W.

Hope that helps ya. :)

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 11/21/2009

The Constitution is in fact a social contract between the federal government and the states. With regards to any legally binding contract, when one party breaches said contract then the contract becomes null and void. This is why secession is a legitimate and completely legal option to oppose a tyrannical central government.

If I sign a contract with you and you fail to deliver on the terms of the contract, then it becomes void and I have every avenue available for legal recourse. In the relationship between the federal government and the states, secession is the legal recourse as the federal government has failed to live up to the terms of the Constitution.

You may not like it, but it's pretty simple really.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 11/24/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (38 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect