Ecommerce Scams: Hundreds Of Well-Known Sites Scam Customers, Report Shows

First Posted: 11-17-09 03:49 PM   |   Updated: 03-18-10 05:12 AM

What's Your Reaction?

Senator Rockefeller released the results of an investigative report into "Aggressive Sales Tactics on the Internet and Their Impact on American Consumers" in advance of a hearing on the subject by the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

The research examines "controversial e-commerce business practices that have generated high volumes of consumer complaints" and focused on sales tactics that "charge millions of American consumers for services the consumers do not want and do not understand they have purchased," according to the Staff Report.

A controversial practice known as "post-transaction marketing" was at the center of the research into the e-commerce business practices.

TechCrunch offers context on how "post-transaction marketing" works (also see the senate committee report's illustration of the steps involved in an "Aggressive 'Post-Transaction'" sales):

Background: hundreds of well known ecommerce companies add post transaction marketing offers to consumers immediately after something is purchased on the site. Consumers are usually offered cash back if they just hit a confirmation button. But when they do, their credit card information is automatically passed through to a marketing company that signs them up for a credit card subscription to a package of useless services. The "rebate" is rarely paid.

The report reveals that numerous well-known e-commerce companies have earned millions of dollars through post-transaction marketing "scams", including sellers such as 1800Flowers.com, Fandango, FTD, Orbitz, Priceline, Shutterfly, Buy.com, Barnes & Noble, Expedia, as well as many, many more.

The chart below, taken from the committee's report, highlights a number of the companies that have received income from post-transaction marketing, along with an approximation of how much money they've received through the practice:

In the Staff Report summarizing the investigation's findings, the committee writes,

Eighty-eight e-commerce companies have earned more than $1 million through using these tactics, including 19 that have made more than $10 million. Classmates.com has made more than $70 million using these controversial practices.
Story continues below
Advertisement

Senator Rockefeller issued a statement on the report, saying:

After six months, this Committee has found that the companies we are investigating have figured out very clever ways to manipulate consumers' buying habits so they can make a quick buck. American consumers have been complaining for years about these misleading practices and asking for answers - and rightly so. [...] Millions of Americans are getting hit with these mystery charges every month - we have to do all we can to protect the hard working families relying on us to look out for their wallets and well-being.

Get the full report and read the Press Release from the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation here.

TechCrunch has additional reporting on the committee's findings.

Read comments from customers about post-transaction marketing scams here.

The chart below, taken from the senate committee's report, illustrates "Aggressive 'Post-Transaction' Sales Tactics in an Online Purchase":



Follow HuffPostTech On Facebook And Twitter!


Senator Rockefeller released the results of an investigative report into "Aggressive Sales Tactics on the Internet and Their Impact on American Consumers" in advance of a hearing on the subject by the...
Senator Rockefeller released the results of an investigative report into "Aggressive Sales Tactics on the Internet and Their Impact on American Consumers" in advance of a hearing on the subject by the...
Filed by Bianca Bosker  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
68
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »   (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung   06:02 PM on 11/18/2009
I'll be most interested to see whether Tiger Direct (retail computer parts, fair prices I have to say) and Digital River (electronic distribution of retail software) will suffer more or less than the rest for this. One might expect that computer-related companies would lose all business immediately for computer-related fraud schemes, but my interactions with people who tend to use those kinds of services is that they would have spotted the cheesy bait-and-switch tactics, and have little sympathy or care for others, who don't know better.
photo
peaceplumber   03:40 PM on 11/18/2009
And this is the great privet sector that is more trustworthy than the government.
photo
AdobePhsyko   03:21 PM on 11/18/2009
When you sign up for ANYTHING online , Scroll down the entire page and READ WHAT YOU ARE AGREEING TO.
If you do this it's hard to get ripped off
photo
FoonTheElder   04:43 PM on 11/18/2009
But it's easy for Weasels To Rip Your Flesh....RZZZZZ!
photo
AdobePhsyko   11:13 PM on 11/18/2009
Very few people would recognize "Weasels".
Frank will live Forever , Thanks to us
photo
mrpotatohead   04:36 AM on 11/19/2009
Why should you have to do that when ordering a pizza?

Furthermore, I recognize these rip-offs but not everyone can figure this out. My mother certainly couldn't.
photo
FoonTheElder   03:15 PM on 11/18/2009
When are they going to do something about those gigantic scamming sites, like Capital One, Chase, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Citibank, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nor Cal Mom   11:38 PM on 11/18/2009
Word.
photo
Crass Innuendo   12:03 PM on 11/18/2009
I've got Firefox and my security software configured to alert me when being redirected for those few times when a moment's careful perusal doesn't make it clear what's really going on. And I watch my cards' current activity routinely as well as make sure my statements add up with what I know I've charged.

Too good to be true is ALWAYS a maxim to live by, especially on the Internet.
sliznim   11:24 AM on 11/18/2009
1800flowers got me with this... By the time I noticed they had charged my credit card $12/month for nearly a year. One call and I was refunded though- Look at your statements!
photo
Nat Burnett   07:31 PM on 11/18/2009
800Flowers got me as well but I noticed a $80 charge exactly a month after I ordered the flowers. I called the company (not 800Flowers) that issued the charge and they were very quick to refund it.

However... I then called 800Flowers - asked to speak to a supervisor and informed him to pass this up the chain. That because they work with a dirty company that uses shady tactics to charge customers for a non-service I would not be using 800Flowers ever again. I would also make it my status on Facebook for all my friends to see that 800Flowers was involved with a scam.

They used to say "1 unhappy customer will tell 10 of their friends" well... now it's more like a thousand because of the internet. I have ordered flowers from elsewhere 3 times since the occasion and am pretty sure that the friends I told about the scam will not use 800Flowers either. *Good* companies should not partner with these scam corps. Teach them a lesson.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Flight   11:01 AM on 11/18/2009
Get'em Rockefeller...!!!
photo
kjwhite   10:01 AM on 11/18/2009
Pizza Hut was the one that got me recently. After ordering a pizza online, the last screen to pop up said they would give me $10 off my next online order if I took a quiz or something like that..anyway, after we got through with all of it, and on the last page the fine print said they would start charging our credit card monthly to "save on various" orders to companies on their list...yadda yadda.

Luckily, we were able to back out immediately, but for people that don't read the fine print, they'd be getting whacked at $10 or $15 bucks a month for nothing.
photo
mrpotatohead   04:38 AM on 11/19/2009
Who doesn't read all the fine print when ordering a pizza?? I have my lawyer order my pizzas.
whoknew---   09:52 AM on 11/18/2009
Another questionable item is those free magazine offers.

There's this one site I had the misfortune of visiting where a magazine offer was put below the initial checkout prompt tag which actually looks like it is not part of the itemized order. The way it is set up is you have to type "no" or it will assume you want the magazine offer. As you went through with your purchase through the different prompts onto last prompt to purchase there was nothing on the order indicating that you were getting a free magazine offer.

After the confirmation prompt was initiated the final itemized bill didn't indicate anything regarding a "free magazine offer".

Another tricky thing about that whole episode was it was set up courtesy of a third party. In order to find out who that third party is you have to either call up the magazine subscription department or to the website where you made your purchases initially.

The whole episode has put me off on the buying stuff online from smaller outfits, I stick to larger department stores and really go over the small print.

Hope this is a warning to all who reads it----

Best Wishes---
photo
SpaghettyIrish   09:17 AM on 11/18/2009
Never been a fan of e-commerce, even if it's worked well enough on the rare occasions I've used. It's hard to overpay or be scammed when paying with cash and possessing reasonable math skills; with e-purchasing, there's just too much behind the scenes possibility for my taste.
photo
EmeraldWorld   08:59 AM on 11/18/2009
Basically it's a good idea to carefully examine everything on the ordering/billing/confirmation pages when you purchase items online. I think this can be easily avoided as long as you're cautious.
photo
SueBrooksLCDC   07:35 AM on 11/18/2009
Thanks for including the chart of how to avoid the charges.
photo
Imzadi   05:55 AM on 11/18/2009
I have encountered these add-ons occasionally and skip right by them.

Thank you for the list!! I now know who to avoid online.

You have performed a valuable service!
photo
Cunningham   04:00 AM on 11/18/2009
It's definitely an underhanded business practice, but those who are duped by it have to take SOME responsibility for not reading what they're signing up for.
photo
escribacat   12:15 AM on 11/18/2009
S l i m e b a g s.

Twitter Edition