iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tobacco Companies Using Loophole To Avoid Hundreds Of Millions In Taxes

MATT APUZZO   11/17/09 03:30 PM ET   AP

Tobacco Tax Loophole

WASHINGTON — When President Barack Obama signed a law expanding children's health insurance this spring, he slapped tobacco companies with huge tax increases to pay for it.

It didn't take long for the companies to find a multimillion-dollar loophole.

As soon as the new law took effect, raising taxes on roll-your-own cigarettes from $1.10 to $24.78 a pound, companies adapted. They all but shut down their roll-your-own brands and reinvented them under a less-restricted, less-taxed category: pipe tobacco. It's still destined to be rolled and smoked, but it's taxed at barely a tenth the rate, $2.83 per pound.

Pipe tobacco is normally too coarse and moist to roll into a cigarette, but nothing says it has to be. In fact, the Obama administration says the only distinction between pipe tobacco and roll-your-own tobacco is how it's labeled, effectively giving tobacco marketing executives an opportunity to shape their own tax rate.

Nearly overnight, roll-your-own brands like Criss Cross and Farmers Gold came off the shelves, replaced by pipe tobacco with the same names. The cuts may be slightly different, but they're suitable for rolling. Knowing this, retailers steer customers to the new products, sometimes with a wink and a nod, sometimes with outright advertising.

"They tried to make a product within the elements of the law that they could, in fact, market as pipe tobacco," said Scott Bendett, owner of Habana Premium Cigar Shoppe in Albany, N.Y., which advertises the new pipe tobacco for hand-rolled cigarettes.

Tobacco companies say they're just trying to find a legal way to stay afloat after being saddled with an enormous tax increase. But both the Obama administration and some in Congress say they'll try to come up with a distinction between the tobacco types, closing a loophole that could cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars year.

"If the companies won't do what is right, then we will," said Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., a reliably anti-tobacco voice in Congress.

Because the small, independent companies in the roll-your-own market are often overshadowed by the huge, publicly held cigarette companies, the sudden shift toward pipe tobacco caught researchers by surprise.

Daniel Morris, who tracks tobacco production data at the Oregon Department of Health, thought he had made a mistake when he saw April's figures. Pipe tobacco production had more than doubled in a single month. After years of producing about 270,000 pounds per month, companies put more than 566,000 pounds of pipe tobacco on the market in April.

Morris called the federal Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, which collects the data.

There was no mistake.

Over the next several months, the numbers climbed higher. In August, the most recent data available, pipe tobacco reached 1.7 million pounds, enough to roll more than 42 million packs of cigarettes.

The huge spike in production corresponded with a tremendous drop in the roll-your-own industry. Companies produced 660,000 pounds in August, down from an average of 1.5 million pounds before the tax.

"It really shows how the industry is able to respond to changes in the tax environment," Morris said.

Anti-tobacco groups say it's deception, and not just because of the taxes. While flavored cigarettes are now banned in an effort to reduce the appeal of smoking to children, no such ban applies to pipe tobacco, allowing companies to sell black cherry, vanilla and other varieties.

"This is a direct challenge to the federal government," said Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids.

Art Resnick, a spokesman for the Tax and Trade Bureau, said there's no way to know how many companies have reinvented their brands as pipe tobacco, or whether the new offerings are just cigarette tobacco with pipes on the labels.

The tax implications could be huge. As much as $32 million a month could be lost in taxes if the sudden spike in pipe tobacco is just cigarette tobacco in disguise.

Companies say they're just trying to survive within the law. People buy roll-your-own tobacco because it's cheap, so when Washington raised taxes 2,000 percent, pipe tobacco became the affordable option. For some, it was the only option.

"It allowed companies to stay in business, enough to keep paying the light bills," said Cheryl Turner, vice president of M&R Holdings, a small company in Pink Hill, N.C., that manufactures Farmers Gold.

After the tax increase, the company cut staff from about 40 employees to about a dozen.

Kevin Altman, who represents a handful of small companies with the Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of America, acknowledged that some companies were exploiting the loophole, packaging cigarette tobacco and marketing it as pipe tobacco.

"What are you going to do? You're trying to save the company," Altman said. "And what they're doing ... , as far as I can tell, is within the limits of the law."

Still, Altman said his companies want the government to make the definition clearer. The ambiguity hurts those companies that didn't make the marketing switch and must sell their tobacco at higher prices.

"Many times our government passes things without first taking an extra few days to say, 'What are the unintended consequences?'" Altman said. "That's what happened here."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — When President Barack Obama signed a law expanding children's health insurance this spring, he slapped tobacco companies with huge tax increases to pay for it. It didn't take long ...
WASHINGTON — When President Barack Obama signed a law expanding children's health insurance this spring, he slapped tobacco companies with huge tax increases to pay for it. It didn't take long ...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HisXLNC
No.
10:42 PM on 11/19/2009
I don't smoke, but good on the tobacco companies. Government taxes too much as it is.
03:05 PM on 11/18/2009
Once again, Obama fails to make progress with anything. All this traveling is a waste of tax payer dollars and never brings any resolution. We need less free trade and more manufacturing in America.

hat tip to http://financeopinionss.blogspot.com
Meanwhile, wall street makes record revenues and profits while unemployment shows no signs of abating. What a joke.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:43 PM on 11/18/2009
Seriously what did the administration expect with a 2000% tax increase? The affected companies and consumers would say "ahh shucks" and pay it?
The tone of the article gives away the writers bias. Comments about how tobacco companies are taking tax dollars away from the govt indicates the writers view that these dollars already belonged to the govt. If the label hadn't been changed and smokers either switched to smoking pipes or quit altogether then that tax revenue would not have been collected. Would the writer then complain that the American smoker was taking tax dollars away from the govt by not smoking?

Such a huge tax increase was never intended to raise revenue but to control people's behaviour. Would anybody here buy a snack from a vending machine that one day cost a dollar and the next cost $30? Of course not and no tax revenue would be generated but arrogant politicians that know how we should live our lives better than we do would be satisfied that they are saving the people from themselves.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:27 PM on 11/17/2009
Which 4 southern Senators inserted these loopholes ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
03:50 PM on 11/17/2009
Tobbaco taxes are too high. traffic tickets same way.
Tax slave labor chinese goods go balistic with investigating bad trade d4eals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediamarv
1-2-3 Is this thing working?
03:22 PM on 11/17/2009
Tobacco companies never quit!!
06:14 PM on 11/17/2009
Of course they quit, several times a day. :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
02:51 PM on 11/17/2009
I don,t like Mr Myers stance here !
02:15 PM on 11/17/2009
It's tragic that THIS is where the government chooses to enforce strict laws and penalties (taxes).

One could compare this to the situation in my town (and others) with traffic enforcement. The city government is very efficient at enforcing parking regulations and collecting every penny owed to them in fines. When it comes to the enforcement of moving violations (running a red light, speeding, illegal u-turns, etc.), the effort is limited at best. Why? Because convicting a driver of a moving violation is HARDER. An officer will actually have to testify in court in many instances. The positive effect of convicting a bad driver of a moving violation, though, is far more substantial than giving someone a parking ticket.

No one (I hope) is advocating tobacco use. In the scope of our problems, however, and with regard to the amount of revenue potentially brought in by this obscene tax, this is trivial nonsense--mostly for show.
02:30 PM on 11/17/2009
Just wait until the red light cameras hit your town.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
02:35 PM on 11/17/2009
yeah they are trying to make up for their lack of good management of our state tax dollars

and so ticket every one because the state need the money !!
06:32 PM on 11/17/2009
Your right Gunny. We have them here in San Diego and I think that they are joke. They often fire off without a vehicle triggering it. They usually only work on one lane out of three so "regulars" know which lane to be in when they run the red. Not to mention the nuclear blast flash at night when the camera goes off. And of course the cameras are outsourced so that a private company gets a cut of the fine.

Put a traffic cop at a problem intersection for an hour and they would have a day's worth of citations; Running the red light, blocking pedestrians in the crosswalk, expired tags, tinted windows, music exceeding the decibel limit.

The Old Senior Chief
01:17 PM on 11/17/2009
O.K. Let's close the loophole! Now. Then we can use the money for the payment of the Public Option for Healthcare. The money belongs in Healthcare anyhow. PROBLEM SOLVED! Yea!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
02:40 PM on 11/17/2009
wait why do you want to tax my product why not soda chip,s or hamburgers for that matter

raise the beer tax there are more that drink beer then smoke cigarettes now !

trust me on this ! I enjoy my smokes and can not afford more taxes on them !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediamarv
1-2-3 Is this thing working?
03:22 PM on 11/17/2009
quit smoking. No tax. simple.

Next!
01:36 PM on 11/18/2009
Tax everyone by their weight.
12:44 PM on 11/17/2009
yes - lets continue to rail the tobacco companies and conveniently ignore the fact that Wall St, Ben, Timmy G and their cronies are ra_ping the taxpayer like never before...
11:08 AM on 11/17/2009
Wall St is hurting the country in a much bigger scale and they are getting away with it or even rewarded for it. Why shouldn't tobacco companies do what they can to protect their profit? They are not asking us to bail them out. At present the threat of a lung cancer seems miniscule compared with the stress that Wall St brought on us.
11:05 AM on 11/17/2009
Capitalism Kills (literally)
11:00 AM on 11/17/2009
and in a flash my small Bali Shag vice was history........and ammo prices are sky high.....and gasoline is expensive........and seafood has gone up...what's next prescription only microbrews?........is nothing sacred?
10:51 AM on 11/17/2009
Cigarettes should be illegal. However, the tobacco lobby is just too powerful, so the tax is the next best thing to criminalization.

Legalize marijuana! We're already paying "taxes" through a pricing model which accounts for the criminality of the product, so smokers would not mind that "extra" going to the gov't. At least weed doesn't kill and does not include poisons such as arsenic, and nicotine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:34 AM on 11/17/2009
This isn't news.

Big corporations don't pay taxes.

It will be new when you have a headline that says, middle class America enmass dodging taxes.