EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Sealed With A Kiss: Dems Unite To Beat GOP Filibuster

First Posted: 3/18/10 Updated: 5/25/11

Harry Reid sealed the biggest legislative victory of his career Saturday night with a kiss. And then a hug.

Emotionally reserved doesn't begin to describe the Senate majority leader, a Democrat facing reelection in Nevada. Yet the man was beaming as the members of his caucus left the Senate floor, each one of them having given him their support, leaving him with exactly the 60 votes he needed to overcome a filibuster and move to an official floor debate on landmark health care reform legislation.

Three of those votes had been uncertain up until the last two days. Sens. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) and Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) waited until floor speeches on Saturday to announce that they'd back the motion to proceed, which allows the bill to move a major step forward. Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) broke what little suspense there was about his vote on Friday.

Reid approached Landrieu after the vote, smiling ear to ear. He locked arms with her, gripping her right elbow as she locked his right arm in return. After the two spoke, he grasped her hand with both of his, leaned over and laid a kiss on it.

From there, he trod up the floor's risers to find Lincoln in the back row where she'd been sitting with Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.). Reid smiled broadly and put his two hands on her shoulders, which is typically what counts as a hug from Harry Reid. Then he went all in, wrapping her in a full embrace.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) followed Reid's lead, smothering Lincoln with both arms. Lincoln blushed as she emerged from his embrace.

Reid left the floor to speak on the phone to Ted Kennedy's widow Vicki in the Democratic cloak room; she was crying and deeply moved, he later said. As Reid returned to the floor and headed for the exit to speak to reporters, he spied Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), who had shepherded the reform bill through the health committee in Kennedy's absence. Reid laid a hug on him, too.

Nelson was not gifted with such affection, though he had only himself to blame: as soon as the vote ended, he headed for the GOP side to chat up arch-conservative Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.).

Reid's effusive display of gratitude followed a unusually somber, silent vote. Normally, senators approach the front desk to cast their vote and chat amongst themselves. This night, each voted from his or her seat as the chamber sat in dead, eerie silence.

"I mean, it was sort of like a European parliamentary summit or something -- but it was worth it," remarked Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), who also suggested it felt like "somebody was getting impeached."

As the roll was called, senators stood and announced either "aye" or "nay." It was too much for John McCain.

"Ooooh, this is soooo tense," the Arizona Republican could be heard stage-whispering.

Nelson was seated as the roll was called and unceremoniously declared his yes vote. Landrieu and Lincoln, however, were absent at the start, as was Sen. Bob Byrd (D-W.Va.), the 92-year-old who this week became the longest-serving senator in the history of the upper chamber.

His presence is never assured at votes,so his absence added an element of real suspense, McCain's mocking notwithstanding. A few minutes into the vote, Byrd was wheeled in and pointed to the sky, signaling an "aye." He pulled in next to Reid. Reid grasped Byrd's hand with both of his.

Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.), whose vote would have made the bill bipartisan just a few months ago, rose to his feet and strode over to Byrd to shake the former majority leader's hand.

Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.), whose route to the Senate took him through an Illinois impeachment hearing and a Senate ethics panel, stood to vote aye and, after retaking his seat, backhand slapped Joe Lieberman on his arm and flashed a wide grin. Lieberman, the independent from Connecticut, had voted yes as well, but is still threatening not to join a GOP filibuster on the final bill if it includes a public health insurance option.

Lieberman smiled and the two shook hands heartily. Just moments later, however, he rose from his chair and fled, finding more comfortable ground next to Lincoln. The two holdouts batted each others' arms and exchanged chuckles.

When the vote tally was called in the House exactly two weeks ago, the Democratic caucus erupted in celebration. The Senate is not that sort of place. Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), as presiding officer, announced the final 60-39 vote and scattered, muted "yay"s rose from the Democratic side, as the victors seemed unsure what to do. Only Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) could be seen clapping; a few tourists in the gallery booed at the chamber.

(The one absentee senator was Republican George Voinovich of Ohio. Brown told reporters that his fellow state lawmaker had decided to attend a celebration of the thirtieth anniversary of his Cleveland mayoral election instead.)

Outside the chamber, the volume was turned up.

"It's an historic vote, a terrific vote, and one of the better moments since I've been in the Senate," Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) told HuffPost.

"We're rounding third and we're heading home," said Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who now chairs the health committee.

"We can see the finish line now, but we're not there," Reid told reporters after the vote.

Just one Democrat could yet derail the effort.

Before the vote, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell begged for such a Democratic defection.

"All it takes is one vote. Just one," said the Kentucky Republican, turning to the left side of the chamber with an outstretched palm. "The simple math is this: If there were one Democrat, just one of our friends on the other side of the aisle, just one, who would say 'no' tonight, the voices of the American people would be heard... And then we could start over with a common-sense, step by step approach."

Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) also begged for a do-over: "I still hope we can start over and get to work on a bipartisan bill."

Lieberman is among several in the caucus who have threatened to doom the effort, and he sounded like Eeyore again Saturday night, calling the public option "an eleventh-hour addition to a debate that's gone on for decades. Nobody's ever talked about a public option before, not even in the presidential campaign last year."

From the liberal end, Burris repeated a threat made earlier: That if the public option is taken out, he's gone. "I won't vote for it," he said.

"You'll lose people on the left," confirmed Brown.

Reid, aware of the fine line he's walking, told reporters that Landrieu, Schumer and Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) are working on a compromise public option, perhaps something that 60 folks could support and save face.

"Now," said Kerry, "we just have to go forward and really legislate."

Arthur Delaney contributed to this report

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Harry Reid sealed the biggest legislative victory of his career Saturday night with a kiss. And then a hug. Emotionally reserved doesn't begin to describe the Senate majority leader, a Democrat facin...
Harry Reid sealed the biggest legislative victory of his career Saturday night with a kiss. And then a hug. Emotionally reserved doesn't begin to describe the Senate majority leader, a Democrat facin...
 
  • Comments
  • 6,046
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (65 total)
10:42 PM on 11/23/2009
"They just did."
----------­----------­----------­--
No, they did not.

Lieberman voted for cloture. so they did not break
the filibuster filibuster without Lieberman.

moreover, he has insisted
all along he will vote to uphold the filibuster whhen
the final bill is voted on-if it contains a the public option.
and without the public option all we have is
a burdensome mandate to purchase insurance whether
or not you want it or need it .

if theres no public option it stinks-to the delight of the insurance industry
that has Joe bought and paid for,

any any event,
without Joe Lieberman we have only 59 votes,

PPS: its better to have accurate info before you post
rather than after...
10:32 PM on 11/23/2009
As long as Lieberman is the 60th vote, we cannot stop the certaion GOP filibuster­,
wishful thinking notwithsta­nding-unle­ss Ried drops the public option> if he does that,
I hope it does fail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NeoConsAreFinished
Fight the Ah mer I cun talibanned
01:14 PM on 11/23/2009
WIlsonvete­ran quit threatenin­g to leave will you?
Just go.
Go already.
Quit like your hero Palin..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
08:30 PM on 11/22/2009
The leader of the House seems to be acting on the right path, but his beginning was questioned by the political analysts as to why the Leader of the House was dividing the party on health issue and with what motive. They finally said could they believe without seeing his effort to the last whether or not it remains constant or fluctuates­.

If the needle shows to support his best of friend the lone hypocrite it will be clear about his effort so far. If finally he can get the democrat to victory passing all obstacle especially by venomous snakes threatenin­g to striking the bill to end it finally to failure will go beyond proving that he is a successful worthy Democrat Leader of the House and definitely his past activities could be washed away as a mistake.

After the decision of the bill whatever it may be the fate of the traitor should be decided without any further delay. The public has already noted and the voters of his constituen­t should be continuous­ly kept abreast of his treachery with the Party in addition that it is not the question of loyalty to the party but to the nation. As such liar and traitor is a dangerous liability for the Nation.

He should not be let to go free without going through a thorough inquiry with regard to all activities he did during his incumbency as a US lawmaker and the asset made with beyond known source of income.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aznurse
02:23 AM on 11/23/2009
I've read this over and over and I just don't understand what the heck you're trying to say.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
01:19 AM on 11/27/2009
Hi! My Friend Aznurse, Thanks a lot for your sweet nice and kind comment on FAcTISFACT­'s comment. My friend I thought I have written the comment in English, but from your comment I feel very dishearten and think I wrote all Greek.

However, don't bother to go through it may be next time I comment I will try and write in the standard of English that commensura­te you to understand­.

I would have been happy if I could do it for your kind perusal and understand the contents, but you know now it is not possible sorry MY FRIEND. May be next time for sure if rules permit. However, Thanks once again for your intelligen­t sweet comment. Take Care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NeoConsAreFinished
Fight the Ah mer I cun talibanned
01:20 PM on 11/23/2009
LOL either you use the word generator or you are Sarah Palin in disguise..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
01:38 AM on 11/27/2009
Hi! My Sweet Friend NeoConsAre­finished, Thanks a lot for you sweet nice and kind comment on FACTISFACT­'s comment. You see, in your comment you opined about me which COMPARES my poor self with a very high profile personalit­y.

I with my normal sense would never like to be nor can I now change any ongoing trend of day to day happenings my sweet friend.

Thanks for holding me to such a high esteem in your comment, I am indeed obliged to you and have been humbled down to earth. Thanks once again for your sweet nice and kind comment My Sweet Friend. Take Care.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
goodog
Honk if you believe in a public editor.
05:50 PM on 11/22/2009
"Lieberman is among several in the caucus who have threatened to doom the effort, Saturday night, calling the public option 'an eleventh-h­our addition to a debate that's gone on for decades. Nobody's ever talked about a public option before, not even in the presidenti­al campaign last year.'"

So not true. Page 6, specifical­ly, in the Obama'08 "Plan for a Healthy America"

http://oba­ma.3cdn.ne­t/59968115­83d82a33cd­_6muomvq5x­.pdf

"Specifica­lly, the Obama plan will: (1) establish a new public insurance program available to Americans who neither qualify for Medicaid or SCHIP nor have access to insurance through their employers, as well as to small businesses that want to offer insurance to their employees"

Lieberman puts the lie in Lieberman. Does he really want anchor his argument in such an easily verifiable lie?

To be sure, though, it was Howard Dean who drove Obama's campaign promise home after the election.

http://the­plumline.w­horunsgov.­com/presid­ent-obama/­howard-dea­n-to-annou­nce-major-­campaign-o­n-health-c­are/
05:43 PM on 11/22/2009
mccain is such a cynical, jaded piece of sh*t.
just *imagine* if he had been elected!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:14 PM on 11/22/2009
There is a poll on cnn.com: Do you want the Senate to pass its health reform bill?

Current response: 55% YES, 45% NO.

I'd say the public wants this.
05:36 PM on 11/22/2009
THANK GOD THIS BILL WILL NEVER GET OUT OF DEBATE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talmageb
Shameless liberal
05:41 PM on 11/22/2009
97.6 percent of all Senate bills that cleared this procedural hurdle during the past 10 years eventually won final Senate passage
05:42 PM on 11/22/2009
Yes, and for a change people should get what they want
out of government­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talmageb
Shameless liberal
05:06 PM on 11/22/2009
I have many conservati­ve friends. They are capable of making coherent arguments to support their ideology (though it is admittedly more challengin­g for them now that their grand economic experiment blew up in their face and required government interventi­on and will most likely show a need for protection­ist economic policies) However, they are capable of speaking intelligen­tly on issues and truly want fiscal conservati­sm, smaller government­, increased states rights, lower taxes and the like. They approach most issues through the filter of small government and lower taxes. These are their bedrock issues. The new conservati­ve party. Heavily represente­d on this website seems to believe that obstructio­nism, ad hominem attacks, and use fear tactics. See "death panels", comparing members of congress to "communist­s" and generally berating and belittling anyone they disagree with. I know that democrats and progressiv­es engage in this behavior also. But the primary difference is that it has not become the cornerston­e of our ideology. It is going to be hard to climb out of the irrelevanc­e that the republican­s are in so long as they are unable to engage on issues. Even though I think they are wrong on most issues as I am a progressiv­e unabashed liberal. Just putting it out there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talmageb
Shameless liberal
05:08 PM on 11/22/2009
should read...The new conservati­ve party. Heavily represente­d on this website seems to believe that obstructio­nism, ad hominem attacks, and use fear tactics. See "death panels", comparing members of congress to "communist­s" and generally berating and belittling anyone they disagree with [are the cornerston­e of the conservati­ve movement]. Sorry about that.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LHoney
Life is short, seize the day!
04:15 PM on 11/22/2009
Why are amendments accepted into these bills from representa­tives who will not vote for the bill? I so don't get that...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaryanneAZ
Raven enjoys the Halloween candy!
04:34 PM on 11/22/2009
It is a method used to try and garner additional votes, especially from the minority Party. Depending on the legislatio­n under considerat­ion, it sometimes works to gain votes. The Amendments will be shed once it is clear that those votes are not viable.
04:09 PM on 11/22/2009
WARNING ---- NEXT BIG POST CONFUSION ---- JUMP PAST IT
03:51 PM on 11/22/2009
This Bill is NOT perfect.. in FACT, it is not a "Bill" at ALL yet.

This vote for CLOTURE just guarantees that it will go to the floor of the Senate for debate, AFTER which the results will go to a Conference Committee to reconcile the SENATE version with the HOUSE version.

THEN it goes to the Senate for final passage (which it will.. despite the GOP OBSTRUCTIO­NISTS).

That said... it's a GREAT START..a GREAT point of departure.­. even that BibleBeati­¬¬¬¬¬¬ngBu­n¬k¬o¬A¬r¬­t¬¬is¬t, Joe Stupak is BACK-PEDAL­ING.

ALL the “drama”, the bogus articles about “infightin­g” & the “President­s reluctance to support the Public Option” (all to eagerly parroted on this site).. the nonsense about “triggers” was simply political brinkmansh­ip by MASTERS.

Those States that are STUPID enough to “opt out” will have to explain to their constituen­ts WHY they can’t CHOOSE for themselves­.. & the party responsibl­e for it will seal themselves into their OWN TOMBS..

The HOUSE is now pushing (& will GET) an ACCELERATE­D schedule so as to make provisions like the eliminatio­n of “PRE-EXIST­ING CONDITIONS­[” & the health insurance industry’s ANTI-TRUST EXEMPTIONS as soon as early NEXT YEAR (the LATTER of which will ostensibly c.astrate their power forever).

Coupled with the “Opt-OUT” clause, States who decide to choose against the Public Option can ALSO choose against PRIVATE INSURERS as well & set up a STATE-WIDE “Single Payer” system.

Our FOOT is in the DOOR now.. & there is NO turning back!.
03:55 PM on 11/22/2009
oh here we go again with all this blah blah blah . hey buddy we all know how to use the internet please shorter comments will do .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:03 PM on 11/22/2009
go play with ur raygun...
04:03 PM on 11/22/2009
An apt rebuttal from a typical ditttohead­.

You have the attention span of a GNAT.
04:14 PM on 11/22/2009
PURE CONFUSION

The health bill is more good then harm, but you make people think
bill is more confusion then good.

Do you really believe your helping this free WEB page stay in business?
04:33 PM on 11/22/2009
And you look like such a nice friendly man,
when your so hostile and confrontat­ional.
03:42 PM on 11/22/2009
HEALTH BILL ---- MORE GOOD THEN HARM

(1) Only if the Democrats are lying to us is the bill more harm then progress,
as the fulfillmen­t of it surely would do more good then harm.

(2) If it is a deceitful blind alley, the rich ruling class after a plunder to
the maximum, all the sooner will a rebellion cause Empire USA
to expire in a convulsion­.
04:43 PM on 11/22/2009
Huh? Might want to try cutting those pills in half...
03:15 PM on 11/22/2009
All this sound and fury over a 2,000 page bill written by the insurance company lobbyists the lawyers for the health care industry. Here''s some advice for the average American: If you don't know what's in it, don't buy it no matter what Reid and Dodd and Obama and the other political con men, whether Republican or Democrat, have to say about it.

We want health care reform for the people, not for the insurance companies that have spent the last 30 years raping, fleecing, and plundering the American people.

Given what's in this bill, most members of Congress and the president might as well announce that they are little more than lobbyists for the insurance companies.

Beware Americans!­! Your support for a bill you have neither read nor studied nor analyzed strongly suggests you are shooting yourselves in the foot or making decisions blindly, just as you did when you voted for Obama and many other political charlatans­. It's time for some serious self-analy­sis before it's too late!
03:31 PM on 11/22/2009
Most politician­s paid actors working for the highest bidder,
surely we the people have no control or guilt for anything
that goes on in your make believe government­.
You of the rich ruling class most surely are aware of this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NeoConsAreFinished
Fight the Ah mer I cun talibanned
01:22 PM on 11/23/2009
Its only 2000 pages because they used a very large font so you ignorant people could read it easily. If it was typed in normal font it would be about 200 pages..
02:57 PM on 11/22/2009
ILLNESS INSURANCE ---- UNDER PENALTY OF LAW

"The Senate would phase in a maximum $750-per-a­dult annual penalty."

If government was taking steps to reduce illness, enlighteni­ng people
that the major cause of illness was bad diet and a body destroying
lifestyle, taxing junk food, cigarettes and liquor to the extent they
increase healthcare costs, then health insurance would be moral
and legal.

But the biggest bottleneck to reducing illness is our capitalist
government­, it doing nothing that harms excessive profit,
and this makes illness insurance more harm then good,
and both illegal and immoral.
03:03 PM on 11/22/2009
PAP..

Every word of it.
.
03:08 PM on 11/22/2009
PAP: People After Progress
03:57 PM on 11/22/2009
see, short and to the point. nice
02:49 PM on 11/22/2009
hey boys and girls there really isn't much to pat each other on the keister about.