More

Senate Votes To Debate Health Care Reform Bill

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:45 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AP)-- Invoking the memory of Edward M. Kennedy, Democrats united Saturday night to push historic health care legislation past a key Senate hurdle over the opposition of Republicans eager to inflict a punishing defeat on President Barack Obama. There was not a vote to spare.

The 60-39 vote cleared the way for a bruising, full-scale debate beginning after Thanksgiving on the legislation, which is designed to extend coverage to roughly 31 million who lack it, crack down on insurance company practices that deny or dilute benefits and curtail the growth of spending on medical care nationally.

Watch Sens. Reid, Dodd, Harkin Discuss Today's Vote:
Watch the vote:

The spectator galleries were full for the unusual Saturday night showdown, and applause broke out briefly when the vote was announced. In a measure of the significance of the moment, senators sat quietly in their seats, standing only when they were called upon to vote.

In the final minutes of a daylong session, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., accused Republicans of trying to stifle a historic debate the nation needed.

"Imagine if, instead of debating whether to abolish slavery, instead of debating whether giving women and minorities the right to vote, those who disagreed had muted discussion and killed any vote," he said.

The Republican leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said the vote was anything but procedural - casting it as a referendum on the bill itself, which he said would raise taxes, cut Medicare and create a "massive and unsustainable debt."

For all the drama, the result of the Saturday night showdown had been sealed a few hours earlier, when two final Democratic holdouts, Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, announced they would join in clearing the way for a full debate.

"It is clear to me that doing nothing is not an option," said Landrieu, who won $100 million in the legislation to help her state pay the costs of health care for the poor.

Lincoln, who faces a tough re-election next year, said the evening vote will "mark the beginning of consideration of this bill by the U.S. Senate, not the end."

Both stressed they were not committing in advance to vote for the bill that ultimately emerges from next month's debate.

Of particular contentiousness to moderates is a provision for the government to sell insurance in competition with private companies, subject to state approval - a part of Reid's bill expected to come under significant pressure as the debate unfolds.

Even so, their announcements marked a major victory for Reid and the White House in a year-end drive to enact the most sweeping changes to the nation's health care system in a half-century or more.

At the White House, press secretary Robert Gibbs issued a statement saying the president was gratified by the vote, which he says "brings us one step closer to ending insurance company abuses, reining in spiraling health care costs, providing stability and security to those with health insurance, and extending quality health coverage to those who lack it."

The legislation would require most Americans to carry insurance and provide subsidies to those who couldn't afford it. Large companies could incur costs if they did not provide coverage to their workforce. The insurance industry would come under significant new regulation under the bill, which would first ease and then ban the practice of denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions.

Congressional budget analysts put the legislation's cost at $979 billion over a decade and said it would reduce deficits over the same period while extending coverage to 94 percent of the eligible population.

At its core, the legislation would create insurance exchanges beginning in 2014 where individuals, most of them lower income and uninsured, would shop for coverage. The bill sets aside hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits to help those earning up to 400 percent of poverty, $88,200 for a family of four.

The House approved its version of the bill earlier this month on a near party line vote of 220-215, and Reid has said he wants the Senate to follow suit by year's end. Timing on any final compromise was unclear.

All 58 Senate Democrats and two independents voted to advance the bill. All 39 votes in opposition were cast by Republicans. GOP Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio was the only senator not to vote. Montana Sen. Max Baucus, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee who has labored on health care for more than a year, flew in from his home state on a government plane for the vote and was returning afterward to be with his ailing mother.

While timing made Landrieu and Lincoln the final two Democrats to announce their intentions, Sen. Paul Kirk of Massachusetts had a clear claim as the 60th vote.

Appointed to office this fall after the death of Kennedy, who championed health care issues for decades, Kirk said he spoke for those "who for so many years revered and loved and elected and re-elected (him) ... that I think they're all - they all, as we do, have him in our minds and our hearts tonight. ..."

Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., echoed those sentiments later in the evening when he referred to Kennedy's "lifelong quest" for national health care and said "tonight and in the days to come we will pay him the highest compliment by fulfilling that" goal.

At a post-vote news conference, Reid said he had talked with Kennedy's widow, Vicki, about the vote. "We both said Ted would be happy," Reid said.

In hours of debate before the Saturday evening vote, a few Republicans piled copies of the 2,074-page bill on their desks while others criticized it as a government takeover of health care and worse.

"Move over, Bernie Madoff. Tip your hat to a trillion-dollar scam," said Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., likening the bill's supporters to the imprisoned investor who fleeced millions.

In her remarks, Landrieu said, "I've decided that there are enough significant reforms and safeguards in this bill to move forward, but much more work needs to be done." She also touted the $100 million included in the legislation to help her state cover its costs under Medicaid, the state-federal health care program for the poor.

Lincoln referred repeatedly to the political controversy surrounding the issue. She said $3.3 million has already been spent by outside groups advertising either for or against health care legislation in her state, and said, "these outside groups seem to think that this is all about my re-election. I simply think they don't know me very well."

To finance the expanded coverage, Reid proposed higher taxes as well as cuts totaling hundreds of billions of dollars in projected Medicare payments. Hardest hit would be the private insurance Medicare plans, although providers such as home health agencies would also receive significantly less in future years than now estimated.

The bill raises payroll taxes on incomes over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples. Reid eased the impact of an earlier proposal to tax high-value insurance plans, which has emerged as one of the principal methods for restraining the growth in health costs.

The bill includes tax increases on insurance companies, medical device makers, patients electing to undergo cosmetic surgery and drugmakers.

___

Associated Press writer Donna Cassata contributed to this article.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON (AP)-- Invoking the memory of Edward M. Kennedy, Democrats united Saturday night to push historic health care legislation past a key Senate hurdle over the opposition of Republicans eager t...
WASHINGTON (AP)-- Invoking the memory of Edward M. Kennedy, Democrats united Saturday night to push historic health care legislation past a key Senate hurdle over the opposition of Republicans eager t...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 542
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
07:52 AM on 11/23/2009
Anyone professing delight at the defeat of a filibuster is really not seeing the big picture. The fact that we're actually gonna see a DEBATE on whether to provide reliable, accessible, non-bankrupting health care to everyone -- something that citizens of all other western democracies take for granted -- is an embarrassment of huge proportions. Thanks to the unabashed lies of the right and the spinelessness of the left, the insurers will win, and will end up bleeding us to death until either society collapses or a violent revolution destroys it from the other end. Pack us in ice, we're already dead. Australia here I come.
11:05 PM on 11/22/2009
It is heartening to see the democrats actually fighting against that most contiguous disease in congress. Yes, it is The Spine Flu of course. Although I do agree with Bernie because of his fiscal ideology (yes, every one of those program is of the highest priority regardless of cost), we simply must have a smart robust public option. We can in fact pay for it with the Bush tax cuts alone, if we do not cut side deals like those with the drug companies for example and relinquish rights of negotiation. The only bad outcomes which are inevitable when cutting any deal that takes negotiation off the table, is something most kids learn by the age of five.
09:33 PM on 11/22/2009
Obama finds way around 2 Amendment making firearms against the law.

Meanwhile Big Brother wants to monitor your every pee, your every poo and everything you do. Did we not abolish slavery?

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/105079
06:23 PM on 11/22/2009
This is really nuts, I think the health care issue is gonna destroy Obama.
Just check out what it says here…
http://ketiva.com/Politics_and_Government/bizarre_debates_over_us_health_care_reform1.html
03:00 PM on 11/22/2009
I was elated by the Senate vote last night thinking we had finally overcome two of three major hurdles in passing genuine health care reform legislation. Then a friend said that passing the bill and any amendments from here on will still require 60 votes, not a simple majority of 51. Is this so? Does in fact the tail (any of the three "L's": Landreau/Lincoln/Lieberman) wag the Democratic dog? Must we end up with something that is neither fish nor fowl but dishwater to all? Someone, please tell me it isnt so!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peacegurl48
02:19 PM on 11/22/2009
Welfare fraud is dwarfed in comparison with corporate fraud and welfare for the very rich that began with Reagan. The Right has successfully focused the hate and anger on the poor, minorities and the Left because they know that they cannot allow their base to truly understand who is responsible for the "rape" of the average American. Healthcare is just one sickening example of who runs the country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
01:41 PM on 11/22/2009
Few people in the general public really know about the fillibuster. How 41 Senators out of 100 can dictate their way over the other 59.
11:08 AM on 11/22/2009
I was hopeful once, but not so much now.

You can bet there will not be a robust public option but there will be a mandate for the insurance companies.

Special interests will win in the end.
10:23 AM on 11/22/2009
We must remember, given the absence of any republican support and the right-wing ideologies of Lincoln, Landrieu, Nelson, and Lieberdick, that the final bill, should it pass, will be even weaker than what we have now. There is no way around it and reconciliation is not an option because, according to some progressives, it would hand the bill over to the finance committee that would weaken it even further.

So what's left? More and more compromises to the right-wing democrats and a public option that exists in name only. There is little victory here and we will not get another chance soon. And president Obama? He seems oddly absent from all of this while his henchman Emanuel works the room handing out compromises in exchange for the opportunity to declare victory.

Publicly funded elections or a failed democratic experiment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RayinDC
09:08 PM on 11/22/2009
I share your concern, but remember that whatever bill passes the Senate will need to be "reconciled" with the House version, and the resulting compromise version (which will probably be stronger) will then only need to pass the Senate by an absolute minority (51 instead of 60). So there's risk, but also hope.

Check out my post at http://newsericks.com/the-louisiana-purchase/ about the Senate vote and bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhazard
Obama/Biden 2012
10:15 AM on 11/22/2009
The remark by Sen Kit Bond made me sick to my stomach.

He is retiring from the Senate this term with, I'm sure, a very healthy pension and he will probably have government covered health insurance for the rest of his life.

But he is going out as the obstructionist he has learned to be in his years in government. D**n him.
10:01 AM on 11/22/2009
reading, watching and thinking about the vote yesterday and the bill itself had me thinking just HOW far as a nation we have lurched to the RIGHT in a generation.


the DEMOCRATIC bill that was moved along yesterday is far to the RIGHT of what NIxon proposed in the 1970's.

sad, actually.
photo
longtalldrink
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you wan
02:21 PM on 11/22/2009
Yes, I've also noticed this hard right turn this country has taken...I think it is because the minorities are starting to become the majority according to the census bureau, and this "right turn" is all about trying to get the uh genie back in the bottle, as it were.
08:37 AM on 11/22/2009
Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) should call for REPEAL of BUSH TAX CUTS!

55% increase GVT SPENDING under GOP BUSH 8 years-

BUSH RECESSION-

GOP Pick up a MOP!

Republicans eager to inflict a punishing defeat on President Obama - Is that Country First?

Lincoln-Douglas NOW!

Finally- Ciivics American Style- this is how our government is supposed to work!

8yrs such a long time!

Bring on the DEBATE!
08:43 AM on 11/22/2009
On C-Span Tom Scully Bush's admin CMS- stated Med Advantage a failure & no GOP will admit this.

He’s correct!

Pull the archives- C-span healthcare HUB
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Leigh49
Close your eyes, you won't feel a thing
08:33 AM on 11/22/2009
Why do Republicans hate the poor and middle class Americans so much when many of them are in those categories? Doesn't make sense.
08:53 AM on 11/22/2009
I'll tell you why. Because Republicans, in general, are mean spirited people. They are selfish and unkind, they are greedy. They believe that people are poor because they want to be poor. They believe they are superior to everyone else. All they think about is lining their pockets, filling up their purse, their wallets with more and more and they don't give a damn about anyone else. In a nutshell, that is why and that is the truth.
10:16 AM on 11/22/2009
Your wrong.... They dont like the unproductive who take advantage of a welfare system.... Do you like being taken advantage of?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Leigh49
Close your eyes, you won't feel a thing
11:30 AM on 11/22/2009
I don't let anyone take advantage of me.
11:40 AM on 11/22/2009
OH! Reagan's famous "welfare mothers in Cadillacs". That's right, blame the poor for being poor, and it really works with Republicans, because the base is uncaring on the rich end and stupid on the poor end.

According to the New York Times, the total amount of welfare fraud is about $1 Billion per year [http://www.nytimes.com/1987/12/07/us/fraud-in-welfare-put-at-1-billion.html]. This is disputed, but we'll stay with that number.

Never mind that Bush's now laughable "American Dream Downpayment Act" led to the exact abuses of no down payment loans that cost the US over a trillion dollars (x1000 welfare fraud, for you math-challenged Republicans) [ ]. Never mind that the Iraq War is over $700 Billion dollars (x 700) - supported and demanded by Republicans. Never mind that the F22 bombers that were canceled by Obama were $62 billion - but didn't work for the job intended. Never mind the $92 billion on corporate welfare that is spent with the broadest Republican support [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare]. Right there is $1,762,000,000,000 of wasteful spending demanded by Republicans.

No you want to blame poor people and illegal immigrants for all of our problems. An easy, simple target that hasn't the lobbying power to fight back. Perfect for the Republicans to set up as the perfect straw man argument for any expenditure they don't like.

You are happily accusing the mice of leaving elephant tracks. They don't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:23 AM on 11/22/2009
For those of you who think Socialism is bad for America think about these.... Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Unemployment Insurance, Public Schools, Public Libraries, Labor Laws, Child Labor Laws, Federal Aviation Authority, Amtrak, Banking Laws, Securities & Exchange Commission, to name a few... There really is no valid reason why America can not function without a Public Health Option so that all American's can have access to health insurance...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vere15
Vero nihil verious (nothing truer than truth)
08:35 AM on 11/22/2009
Good list. There is also the flip side where a single payer public option would actually support responsible capitalism because it would make American industry more competitive - given the PRIVATE payroll tax extorted by private coverage companies.

How many more people could hired if employers were relieved of this direct burden.

However, the GOP exists for about 0001% of the electorate and seems to want to fuel a higher unemployment number to block any potential for Reagan's trickle down to occur.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:25 AM on 11/22/2009
What else is new? We've always had mixed but capitalist driven economy--and I refuse to play into the mythology that said mixed economy is socialism because it isn't. By the way, you left out public parks. Also, we most certainly can function without the PO that is presently in place because only about 2% per cent of the population will be eligible for it. Obama, the capitalist, said that the PO would be only a tiny "sliver" of the total plan, and by the time, there is another round of compromises, you'll need a zoom lens to find it in the plan.
08:05 AM on 11/22/2009
This article gives misleading information. It talks of cuts in Medicare payments etc. That suggests cuts in payments to retirees. But that is untrue. The cuts in payments are payments to insurance companies which were donated by Bush and the Republicans for no good reason and for no added benefit to retirees. It should never have occurred but Democrats were skittish about filibustering anything with the name "Medicare" attached to it. The current President said to Dems: forget about being scared and do what is right. Good move.
08:33 AM on 11/22/2009
On C-Span Tom Scully Bush's admin CMS- stated Med Advantage a failure & no GOP will admit this.

He’s correct!