iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's Nobel Peace Prize Speech Notes Irony Of Award During Wartime

BEN FELLER   12/10/09 09:31 PM ET   AP

OSLO — Newly enshrined among the world's great peacemakers, President Barack Obama offered a striking defense of war. Eleven months into his presidency, a fresh Obama doctrine. Evil must be vigorously opposed, he declared as he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on Thursday. At the same time, he made an impassioned case for building a "just and lasting peace."

"I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people," Obama told his audience in Oslo's soaring City Hall. "For make no mistake: Evil does exist in the world."

Pronouncing himself humbled by such an honor so early in "my labors on the world stage," Obama nevertheless turned his Nobel moment into an unapologetic defense of armed intervention in times of self defense or moral necessity. The hawkish message was an inevitable nod to the controversy defining his selection: an American president, lauded for peace just as he escalates the long, costly war in Afghanistan.

It was a jarring moment when Obama, in the midst of the ceremony, said of his troops in Afghanistan: "Some will kill. Some will be killed."

He lauded Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., preachers of nonviolent action. But he added, "A nonviolent movement could not have halted Hitler's armies. Negotiations cannot convince al-Qaida's leaders to lay down their arms."

"To say that force is sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism, it is a recognition of history."

The president laid out circumstances in which war is justified – in self-defense, to come to the aid of an invaded nation, on humanitarian grounds such as when civilians are slaughtered by their own government.

At the same time, he also stressed a need to fight war according to "rules of conduct" that reject torture, the murder of innocents and other atrocities.

"We lose ourselves when we compromise the very ideals that we fight to defend," he said. "And we honor those ideals by upholding them not when it's easy, but when it is hard."

He emphasized a need to exhaust alternatives to violence, including worldwide sanctions with teeth to confront nations such as Iran or North Korea that defy international demands. He pushed himself away from George W. Bush in defending diplomatic outreach that engages even enemies. He defined peace as civil rights, free speech and economic opportunity, not just the absence of conflict.

"Let us reach for the world that ought to be," Obama said. "We can understand that there will be war, and still strive for peace."

Back in the U.S., presidential historians and foreign policy specialists saw the speech as underscoring Obama's revamping of America's stance – away from confrontation and toward cooperation and negotiation when possible, and military action when unavoidable.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was President Jimmy Carter's national security adviser, said Obama had presented "a very broadly stated case that we cannot in all circumstances avoid war." But he said he would have liked to have heard "some greater clarification of how he will pursue the broad objectives he has articulated."

Obama showed "a sense of daring" in talking about war as he was honored as a man of peace, said John Baick, professor of history at Western New England College in Springfield, Mass. "He bared his soul, said we were going to have to kill, have to send soldiers to die, we hope we're doing the right thing," Baick said.

The centerpiece of Obama's swift trip to Europe, the speech doubled the length of his inaugural address. Appearing tired here, Obama had worked all the way through the night on the flight to Norway, an aide said.

Such is the weight of he prize. Suddenly and forever, Obama is in the company of King, Nelson Mandela, Mother Teresa, the Dalai Lama.

He drew laughter from his hosts when he acknowledged "the considerable controversy that your generous decision has generated."

"My accomplishments are slight," Obama said, by comparison to such "giants of history." In addition to other Nobel winners, he said the unrecognized masses who fight for peace are "far more deserving."

Obama's wife, first lady Michelle Obama, listened to her husband's words and showed tears by the end. The president was accompanied by a small crew of family, friends and advisers.

Politically, the White House was careful not to play up Obama's big award, what with so many families hurting economically at home and more troops heading off to war. Quite a few Norwegians were said to be miffed that he stayed but a day, not the usual three, and skipped a number of traditional events.

Still there was ceremony aplenty.

Before an evening banquet with Norwegian royalty, the Obamas stepped onto their hotel balcony to wave to a crowd of thousands who had gathered for a torchlight procession. In the square below, there were chants of "Yes, we can" and "O-ba-ma" as scores of torches were held aloft. Nearby, up to 2,000 demonstrators protested, many carrying banners demanding the U.S. get out of Afghanistan.

Obama capped his evening with a sentimental toast at a candlelit dinner with Norwegian dignitaries, paying tribute to the influence of his late mother and the "largeness of her heart." And he spoke hopefully of the "extraordinary power" of the Nobel Prize to lift up those who might otherwise be forgotten.

Earlier, on a damp and chilly day, the reaction on the streets of Oslo seemed curious but not overly excited. Crowds were not nearly of the size Obama has seen elsewhere. And there were protests.

When Obama pulled up to the prime minister's office, black-hooded anti-war demonstrators banged drums and chanted slogans such as: "The Afghan people are paying the price."

The president will return to Europe next week to speak at the international conference on climate change, and activists pushing for a serious global climate deal challenged Obama to earn his award.

He won it, in the eyes of the Nobel committee, for changing the U.S. approach toward the world. The panel cited his efforts on nuclear disarmament, climate change and diplomacy.

"President Obama is a political leader who understands that even the mightiest are vulnerable when they stand alone," the committee chairman, Thorbjorn Jagland, said Thursday.

In every stop of Obama's Oslo tour, war shadowed peace.

The president who is sending 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan made clear in a brief news conference that when troops begin coming home in July 2011, the pace will not be fast.

It was the latest, sober warning that the United States will be at war for years.

As for the other criticism of Obama's award – it was just plain premature for a leader not quite 11 months on the job – the president said to track his results. He said he wants to advance America's international interests and fix its economy, not win an award.

"If I'm successful in those tasks, then hopefully some of the criticism will subside," he said. "But that's not really my concern."

The Nobel comes with a $1.4 million prize. The White House says Obama will give that to charities but has not yet decided which ones.

___

Associated Press writers Matti Huuhtanen and Ian MacDougall contributed to this report from Oslo, Steven R. Hurst from Washington.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

OSLO — Newly enshrined among the world's great peacemakers, President Barack Obama offered a striking defense of war. Eleven months into his presidency, a fresh Obama doctrine. Evil must be vigo...
OSLO — Newly enshrined among the world's great peacemakers, President Barack Obama offered a striking defense of war. Eleven months into his presidency, a fresh Obama doctrine. Evil must be vigo...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9,034
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (112 total)
01:00 PM on 12/16/2009
Mr president sino-US relations have entered a new phase of histoiry let os join hands to build a more stuble more solid sino-US relations thus building a lasting peace and common prosprity harmonious world and strive to
To leam fom obama
tribute to obama
the great african-american president the people of the world revelutian long live the great leader of obama
11:53 AM on 12/16/2009
dear Mr president our country immediately and your country to celebrate our 40th anniversary of normalization of relations butween the two countries in the last century 70's facing the prevailing international situation the new changes to richard milhous nixon led the goverment your country assess the situation and take the intiative made " to establish diplomatic relations with the PRC " a major strategic decision and in february 21 1972 to 29 days shall be the president of the people's repbulic of china when mao zedong and premier zhou enlai at the invitation conducted a nine-day official goodwill visit and 29 in shanghai signed a landmark " china-US shanghai communique " declared the normalization of bilateral relations have intered phase then the two counties began a seven-year " establishment of diplomatic negotiations " anc finally january 1 1979 established formal diplomatic relations then the chinese leader deng xiaoping to visit your country is was the founding of new china in 1949 china's ledears of the first visit your country
in the long ago before you get the nobel peace prize to accept the award the previous mort you paid an official visit to china the visit to the chinese people impressed by the
02:37 AM on 12/16/2009
washington DC the white house the united states federal goverment respect his excellency president barack hussein obama
you to accept award of the nobel peace prize and the occasion on behalf of the chinese goverment and people to you and throungh you to the frendly goverment and people of the united states expressed congratulations and cordial greetings
as part of your country after world war II the first one was warded the nobel peace prize the current president your prize belongs not only to your own also belongs to the american people and people of the world it is worth you to cherish for life
08:31 PM on 12/15/2009
Under the Constitution, Article 1, Section 9--it is UNLAWFUL for Obama, as a sitting president, to accept the Nobel Peace Prize without authorization from Congress. "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State."
photo
rabiddog6708
This Dog's bite is Worse Than his Bark
08:36 AM on 12/11/2009
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates ended a two-day trip to Afghanistan on Thursday, telling a group of Afghan soldiers that America will maintain a presence beyond the troop pullout set to begin in 2011.

"While we hope to transfer power in July 2011, we will have a large number of forces here for some time beyond that," Gates told the group at Kabul International Airport. "This is the first time in Afghan history when foreign forces are here to help, and we intend to be your partner for a long time."
09:11 AM on 12/11/2009
The War on Terrorism is DARKNESS, a pretense of a good war to hide
the intent of the rich ruling class to enrich themselves upon our misery
all the more.

For the rich who control Middle East oil control the world, and to
accomplish such a mighty thing requires mighty violence and
only under cover of a "good war" could the rich get so brutal.
11:48 AM on 12/12/2009
July 2011? Who said July 2011? Afghanistan is America's next military base for a long long time. Didn't we know that? Or have we been fooled into believing that this is all about the Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden? This is about Iran and about strengthening the U.S. presence in Asia on behalf of Israel and other interests.
01:22 AM on 12/11/2009
Quick question:
Did President Obama violate the Constitution today by accepting this award?

Article I, Section 9:

"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

According to the U.S. Code [Title 5, Part III, Subpart F, Chapter 73, Subchapter IV, Section 7342], on the Receipt and disposition of foreign gifts and decorations], if Congress did not consent to the acceptance of the gift, “the decoration is deemed to have been accepted on behalf of the United States, shall become the property of the United States, and shall be deposited by the employee, within sixty days of acceptance, with the employing agency for official use.”

Now, since the Nobel Committee is a commission of the Norwegain parliment, this basically means that without congressional approval, the award money becomes property of the taxpayers.
09:03 AM on 12/11/2009
The Nobel Peace Prize is DARKNESS, a pretense of good
by the wealthy ruling class to hide their intent to enrich
themselves upon our misery.

For most of the oil rights in the world, especially in the
Middle East, are owned by the rich nobility of Europe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StillweRise
10:21 AM on 12/11/2009
GO AHEAD... file suit in court...

du`masse
01:03 AM on 12/11/2009
"He won it, in the eyes of the Nobel committee, for changing the U.S. approach toward the world. The panel cited his efforts on nuclear disarmament, climate change and diplomacy."

It takes a lot of chutzpah to accept the Nobel Peace Prize and make a speech lauding war.
Bob Dylan wrote a much better speech for the occasion nearly fifty years ago.

How many times must a man look up,
before he sees the sky?
And how many ears must one man have,
before he can hear people cry ?
And how many deaths will it take till we know,
that too many people have died?

The answer my friend is blowing in the wind,
the answer is blowing in the wind.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
01:11 AM on 12/11/2009
Please read the words to "Masters of War" -- it's even more appropriate.

http://www.bobdylan.com/#/songs/masters-war
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
12:46 AM on 12/11/2009
This honor should have been bestowed on all Americans who dared to vote for change in the midst of an avalanche of fear-mongering indoctrination. However the dishonor should go to Obama, who asked for our help, took our money, promised to deliver change and instead took us in the same direction.

I know what peace means. Some of the Laureates of the past: MLK, Nelson Mandela, the Dalai Lama, Mother Teresa and others are human manifestations of peace with their life's work and struggles representing a true testament to peace and its immense power to heal all wounds, but Obama? What has this man achieved except present himself as the anti-thesis of Bush which in itself thrilled the world-wide audience, but which is merely the by-product of hope and charisma. Obama is like a pop phenomenon. He moved us with his eloquence, and then left us bewildered with his actions.

Instead of provoking change, Obama himself has been changed by aligning himself with the same players who got us where we are today both domestically and internationally. Even his speeches have started to change. They're more artificial, arrogant and less inspiring. It's unbelievable to me that the man I witnessed in the primaries is now using his mastery with words to distort the real meaning of peace and manipulate people into thinking that the machinery of war could be a vehicle for peace. We've been led down this road one too many times before.
09:26 AM on 12/11/2009
All through 2008 I kept telling my brother that Obama was a paid actor,
a classic example of Chicago gangster politics from which he was
spawned. Our dad having come from Chicago my brother knew full
well how all-encompassing is the corruption, yet to this day he
refuses to see the light.

For common horse-sense is nothing we need prove to anyone,
either you have it or you don’t.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StillweRise
10:26 AM on 12/11/2009
If you could learn to see beyond your nose, you would know the president is doing exactly what he said he'd do. and he is doing things in the interest of citizens and not corporations. and he's doing it with withering opposition from an unethical, disloyal, 'not-in-good-faith' opposition, media, and 'connedservatives within his own party.


so what do you propose? forget about the middle east, send a bunch of planes and ships to get everyone and wipe your hands clean? What happens if America does not extract itself carefully?

again I ask.... what's your suggesstion??? to go back and convince everyone to vote republican??

is your memory 'really' THAT short?
10:50 AM on 12/11/2009
What darkness is you fiction,
what worthless garbage that does
not rise to the level of being worthy of a response.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StillweRise
10:56 AM on 12/11/2009
you didn't respond..... because you cant.
11:51 PM on 12/10/2009
Listened to the speech a good three times now and have come up with three possible explanations for the speech today accepting the Peace Prize.
1. Needs to reassure the U.S. Military he has their back and will do whatever it takes to WIN, and we wont just cut and run wasting another 2 years of our soldiers lives.
2. He is making sure the world leaders understand he has a military that he is not afraid to use and no matter what the UN says, if he feels there is a viable threat we will strike.
3. This is cover and support for Isreal which is planning on a strike sooner than later on Iran.
Could be one or more of the above. Other than that am at a loss, he has made the RIGHT way too happy while he could have been praised and cheered Internationally.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeloresT
Writer/retired teacher
11:15 PM on 12/10/2009
This award was actually given in honor of the PEOPLE of the US who got rid of Bush/Cheney/Palin/McCain.........or it could have been given in recognition of US citizens surviving 8 long years of Bush. Or perhaps it was given to President Obama for not losing his temperment when all others around him were losing theirs (Bush/Cheney/Palin/Liebermann/Fox/ Beck/Hannity /Limbaugh).............. Regardless, anytime that someone in the US is honored with such an award, I feel honored as an American.
12:20 AM on 12/11/2009
I think you're right about that. It's unfortunate that Bush/Cheney weren't replaced by someone who would have the courage to change their policies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
uneeda
Make Peace in Our Time
10:58 PM on 12/10/2009
"Yes we can " really means "not bloody likely " and we're very sorry folks but we are moving swiftly further to the right.In fact if the SCOTUS upcoming decision on the funding of political campaigns allows unlimited financing ,then we will have fascism .This decision is expected any day .How about a friday night release just before Xmas when not a creature is stirring,not even us meece .
photo
Salfana
Concerned citizen
10:00 PM on 12/10/2009
I was very proud when I learned the Nobel peace prize was given to Pres. Obama he really did talk about a change of attitude plus he gave hope to the world. It does not stop me or others to disagree with Pres. Obama on the way we conduct ourselves in our wars this is not OK no matter who is president.

The UN had warned the Bush administration, then in November we were warned again by the UN that we are breaking international law in using Pred-ator dro-nes stri-kes on civilian areas. The despised Black-water (X-e) has been contracted by the US to open a bureau in Karachi Pakistan to do their neatly drone jobs on Pakistan side. But it seems OK under the Obama's administration by the same crowd that were after Mr. Bush for the same reasons. Except for the Repub comments that will hate Pres. Obama on whatever he does there is a real trend on every Pres. Obama's thread to absolutely not accept any valid critic on policies. This is very troubling.

When we disobey international law we descend and become the oppressor. Dro-nes kills a lot of innocent people (lots of women and children) for just one or two US enemies. This should be done by special ops. For the record I voted for Mr. Obama.
09:57 PM on 12/10/2009
Dear His Excellency President Barack Hussein Obama : Hello , as your country in the far east and the west pacific region after japan and south korea,s third after the allies , china once again for your congratulation to the nobel peace prize
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StillweRise
10:48 AM on 12/11/2009
NOMINATED FOR DUMBEST POST...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tisfilm
09:38 PM on 12/10/2009
I'm long liberal and Obama supporter, I ha.te war, but I watch Obama's speech very careful. I understand what he mean. He tired to his best to understanding in war, because of Bush's mess up!
I don't care another people said.
12:23 AM on 12/11/2009
Obama is in the White HOuse now, not Bush. Obama's party holds comfortable majorities in both houses of Congress. At some point this becomes their policy and their war. You can't blame Bush forever.
12:48 AM on 12/11/2009
Yeah! Spin it... just like Dana Perino said this nation was never attacked under Bush adm. One that starts a war will always own it.
09:37 PM on 12/10/2009
In Oslo, President Obama showed that he is more about humility than hubris and, in so doing, demonstrated why the committee gave him the Nobel Peace Prize, even if, in Obama’s own characterization it could be viewed as premature.

Yet, Obama has demonstrated how a world leader can be strong both militarily and diplomatically, without turning the free world against America as George W. did.

What surprises our politicians on both sides of the aisle is how tough this president is. He’s no wimp when it comes to using military force. In fact, he has been criticized, from the left, for sounding hawkish.

But he came to his “surge” decision in Afghanistan with the professorial scrutiny -- contrary to W. -- for which he is famous.
10:50 PM on 12/10/2009
??What?? Come again.
10:54 PM on 12/10/2009
OMG! You have brilliantly said it all...been pondering from thread to thread but now I can finally sign off absolutely satisfied...thank you! Faved!
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
11:45 PM on 12/10/2009
It really doesn't take a whole lot to impress you, does it?