iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Summers: Obama Will Persuade Bankers Because 'We Were There For Them'

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 03:55 PM ET

Senior White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers said Sunday that he expects employment levels in the country to rise in the spring.

"That is the judgment of most professional forecasters," Summers told ABC's "This Week." "If you look at the employment statistics they will show employment growth. They were showing losing 700,000 jobs a month. Last month they showed losing 11,000 jobs. They will bounce from month to month. But I believe that, as do most professional forecasters, that by spring the employment growth will start to be turning positive."

The assertion was surprisingly direct. The Obama White House has shied away from making testable predictions ever since two of the president's chief aides predicted unemployment topping out at eight percent with passage of the stimulus bill.

Later, host George Stephanopoulos told Summers, "President Obama is calling in the heads of some of the country's biggest banks tomorrow to try to get them to lend more to small businesses and consumers, and that seems to be a big failing so far."

Summers defended Obama's attempts to persuade banks to increase lending. "The country did incredible things for the banking industry. Those things had to be done to save the economy, but no major bank would be intact, in a position to pay bonuses, if that extraordinary support had not been provided. The bankers need to recognize that. They need to recognize that they've got obligations to the country after all that's been done for them, and there is a lot more they can do, and President Obama is going to be talking with them about what they can do to support enhanced lending to customers across the country. We were there for them. And the banks need to do everything they can to be sure they're there for customers across this country."

Not everyone on the Obama economic team is quite so confident about the state of the economy. Appearing on "Meet the Press," White House economic adviser Christian Romer refused to declare that the recession was over, at least until "the unemployment rate is down to normal levels." Romer also insisted that it would be "suicide" for the government to focus on the deficit when the country was in need of jobs.

But Summers refused to provide a number for what the White House was willing to spend on employment and was noticeably vague on details, saying merely that "every bill is going to be a jobs bill going forward."

The panel that followed Summers on ABC's "This Week" was tough on administration for not putting words into action. John Podesta, head of the Center for American Progress and the leader of Obama's White House transition, said he wasn't sure that the president was "meeting with the right people" if he wanted to get credit flowing to small business groups.

"He is meeting with the big bankers," Podesta said. "He needs to be meeting with the regional bankers, community bankers to find ways to get credit flowing to those small businesses."

And Huffington Post co-founder Arianna Huffington pointed out that for all the talk of encouraging the financial system to lend more, the president and his advisers had done quite little.

"There is a lot more he could do," she said. "For Larry Summers to say that the president needs to encourage the bankers to lend is really for the president to give up on his responsibility as the head of the executive branch. He is not a pundit, cajoling and admonishing, which he has been doing constantly. Remember he has gone to Wall Street, he has spoken to them, he talks to them on the phone. Larry Summers talks to them on the phone. [Treasury Secretary] Tim Geithner talks to them on the phone... They are not going to do that while it is in their interest to continue to borrow money at practically a zero interest rate, and trade that money and have the safety net of the government.

"[Summers] is the wrong man to be heading the president's economic team," she concluded. "His response is so lackadaisical. No sense of urgency." As for his optimistic employment prediction, she said, "He keeps quoting the same forecasters who predicted that unemployment would not go beyond 8 percent."

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Senior White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers said Sunday that he expects employment levels in the country to rise in the spring. "That is the judgment of most professional forecasters," Summ...
Senior White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers said Sunday that he expects employment levels in the country to rise in the spring. "That is the judgment of most professional forecasters," Summ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,640
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (55 total)
01:40 PM on 12/18/2009
Larry!! You don't expect the bankers to respect the golden rule, do you? They could not care less what happens to us and obviously, neither does Obama. You are all in the tank to Wall Street. You lost a billion of Harvard's money. I certainly wouldn't put my future or my faith in you.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsarets
02:19 AM on 12/15/2009
I don't understand...

Any psychopath can rationalize taking someone's money and then refusing to do favors in return.

And we're talking about bankers. Those are garden variety psychopaths.

Obama can't persuade banks that have long since changed their business models to securitization to start originating loans again. That's not what these institution do anymore, and they don't want to be in that business no matter how much money he throws at them.

They'll take our money if there's no strings attached, but they won't fuel a recovery. They connect lenders with investors. They don't want to be lenders or investors. They just want to be the go-between that takes a cut of the action.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Acharn
09:11 PM on 12/27/2009
Exactly. The headline is totally misleading.

'Summers defended Obama's attempts to persuade banks to increase lending. "The country did incredible things for the banking industry. Those things had to be done to save the economy, but no major bank would be intact, in a position to pay bonuses, if that extraordinary support had not been provided. The bankers [b]need to[/b] recognize that. They need to recognize that they've got obligations to the country after all that's been done for them, and there is a lot more they can do, and President Obama is going to be talking with them about what they can do to support enhanced lending to customers across the country. We were there for them. And the banks need to do everything they can to be sure they're there for customers across this country."

He doesn't say they will return the favor, he's whining that they need to return the favor. He's just denying that his BFF's aren't doing what he wants, after he gave them lollipops.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessicajuliette
10:41 PM on 12/14/2009
This from the guy who almost turned Harvard into a Community College...
04:53 PM on 12/14/2009
if Obama believes that he should be impeached for mental incompetency.
BlackBottom
Staunch supporter of the Capite Censi & Middle Cls
04:30 PM on 12/14/2009
The hysteria is at an all time high today.
04:24 PM on 12/14/2009
Literally YES. You were there for the Banks, not for the people. What an incriminating Freudian slip!
photo
RRoadrunner
Living in a 'Pro-ignorant culture'
03:35 PM on 12/14/2009
Mr. Summers must be delusional, bankers appreciative? They should have been nationalized when we had the chance.
03:05 PM on 12/14/2009
Larry, Larry, Larry. Do you think the American people are stupid?

Yes you were there for your bankster buddies and you always will be. It's the American people who continue to suffer. Some economic advisor you turned out to be!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
02:43 PM on 12/14/2009
To My fellow country men and women !

do you know what started the war for our independence ?? Money it was about money !!

it was England who took from us our money and replaced it with the queens money and that money came with interest attached !! so of course we the free people decided that was not going to happen !!

and when the British went to execute a warrant to be served on John Hancock that was the shot heard round the world

money and a warrant !!

and in all this time we are where our fore father tried so desperately to keep us safe from !!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
02:35 PM on 12/14/2009
I don,t trust what you say !! and after all that has happened can ya really blame me Mr, Summers

I mean really !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PackyJ
02:09 PM on 12/14/2009
Hahahahahaha!

Yeah, those investment bankers have such a strong sense of loyalty, Larry, because of their honesty, and their ingrained sense of fairness and honor.

Is everyone in the White House this naive?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaliGrown78
WORLD CLASS SMART A$$
01:52 PM on 12/14/2009
Is he for reals??????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
01:08 PM on 12/14/2009
As much as I have respect for your credentials...

Perhaps... you do not understand how Americans feel today...

Being ripped off and the best ad I have seen is Ally bank's...

Asking two children "do you want a pony?" one got a stuff animal and the other one got the real pony...
simply, by saying... "you did not ask"...

We should be asking more questions to our representatives... what other alternatives?

If you are getting something in return from interest group... can you be neutral? or fair?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArjenBoatsma
No such thing as too much coffee.
12:53 PM on 12/14/2009
"Obama will persuade bankers 'because we were there for them'."
A lovey sentiment, but utterly naive
photo
pdsimdars
Steel spine and golden aura.
08:41 AM on 12/14/2009
It's all there in the title to this article. The HUGE question that arises is would the police, or any other law enforcement organization, anywhere in the world, ever have the thought to try to PERSUADE someone to curtail their activities? The whole idea is wrong. NO, you make laws that are for the common welfare and then you enforce them. That idea isn't that taxing to the brain. Or is it just me?