More

Congress Drafts Bill To Turn Volume Down On TV Commercials

ANN SANNER   12/14/09 02:45 PM ET   AP

Tv

WASHINGTON — Television viewers jarred by abrupt spikes in volume during commercial breaks may someday be able to give their mute buttons a rest.

"I not only dive for the mute button, but I end up having to close my windows so that the blast doesn't affect by neighbors," says Congresswoman Anna Eshoo. "I live on a cul-de-sac, and so the sound resonates."

Irritated with loud commercials, the California Democrat found it was also a common complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. So she drafted a bill aimed at preventing TV ads from playing noticeably louder than the programs they sponsor.

The House is scheduled to vote Tuesday on the bill. An identical measure has been introduced in the Senate. Even if they become law, will viewers notice much difference? Maybe, maybe not, some experts say.

Eshoo's bill originally prescribed that television advertisements could be no louder than the average maximum loudness of the programs they accompany. She changed her bill to instead adopt guidelines developed by the TV industry, which she said will accomplish the same goal.

"I didn't go with the industry," she said. "I prodded the industry to come up with the technology and the standards. And they did."

Robert Thompson, a professor of television and popular culture at Syracuse University, says Congress should have higher priorities than strident commercials.

"The idea that this is a problem that is so big that it requires legislative action is incredibly absurd," he said. "I don't think anyone's ears have ever been damaged by this."

Right now, the government doesn't have much say in the volume of TV ads. It's been getting complaints ever since televisions began proliferating in the 1950s. But the FCC concluded in 1984 there was no fair way to write regulations controlling the "apparent loudness" of commercials.

Correcting sound levels is more complicated than using the remote control. The television shows and ads come from a variety of sources, from local businesses to syndicators.

Managing the transition between programs and ads without spoiling the artistic intent of the producers poses technical challenges and may require TV broadcasters to purchase new equipment. To address the issue, an industry organization recently produced guidelines on how to process, measure and transmit audio in a uniform way.

Eshoo's bill requires the FCC to adopt those recommendations as regulations within a year and begin enforcing them a year later.

Mark Richer, who heads the industry's Advanced Television Systems Committee, said some companies have started to make changes.

"People are already hearing a difference – or not hearing a difference – is a better way to put it," he said.

Richer's group doesn't have a position on the bill, but he said he hopes the government doesn't do something that complicates the industry's own attempt to smooth out the volume. Consumers Union and the American Association of Advertising Agencies support the legislation. The National Association of Broadcasters declined to comment on it.

Even once the adjustments are in place, listeners may still notice different volume levels, Richer said. Sound spikes can be part of the storytelling – the screeching sounds of a car, for example – and some commercials may just seem noisy because they follow a quiet, intense scene.

"That's life," Richer said. "That's what sound is."

___

The House bill is H.R.1084.

The Senate bill is S.2847.

___

On the Net:

Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov

FCC: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/backgroundnoise.html

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Filed by Gazelle Emami  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 236
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler VanderMeer
11:59 PM on 12/15/2009
I can't deny I have this problem. But do we really need a congressional bill for this?
01:16 PM on 12/15/2009
Mr Thompson is obviously a corporate schill.
07:48 AM on 12/15/2009
Why doesn't Congress limit the amount of ads that can be on tv.

You can't watch a 1/2 hour show without about 9 minutes of commercials.

NO wonder we are no longer a funny society, but a oversold one.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
fireW
Don't believe everything you think.
07:45 AM on 12/15/2009
". . the industry's own attempt to smooth out the volume. . ". Please. The industry has, in fact, spent decades denying they even do this. Other attempts to force the industry to be reasonable & stop lying about the practice have failed; I predict this effort will also. If/when it does fail, anyone wan't to take a guess as to why? Gee, could it be that the con corporate shills will have legislatively protected their annoying corporate masters yet again?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elyriaohio
Stop the Monarchy
07:21 AM on 12/15/2009
Just use the SAME STANDARDS AS RADIO!
It's NOT BRAIN SURGERY!
photo
PoliticalRockChick
Hatred for bible & hypocrites
07:20 AM on 12/15/2009
It's so annoying when these commercials do that. You have to find the remote and you can't find it. Hopefully the bill also include commercials online as well.
07:20 AM on 12/15/2009
Be warned - they'll probably find a way around it and it will make no difference.

Here in the UK, we had a similar law passed a few years back. The ads might be lower in volume, but it doesn't seem to apply to the station promos that bracket each ad break. So you still get that jarring, massive increase in volume the minute an ad break starts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piper1233
07:14 AM on 12/15/2009
I'm not a big television watcher but I must admit this is a good move by Congress. There is nothing more infuriating than watching a movie at normal volume and suddenly being blasted by some obnoxious commercial with deafening sound. I cant understand why they believe that its good for the product. Sure it catches your attention, but it only serves to connect my feelings of extreme annoyance to what ever product that they are trying to push.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
kevinabt
07:11 AM on 12/15/2009
Thank you so much for helping us with the problem of television broadcast volume, congress. I mean, really, I don't know what we would do without your assistance. We'd be totally helpless. *sarcasm*
06:42 AM on 12/15/2009
I don't buy products that do that, and its so anoying.
photo
Kasado
en jolt of terminus
06:36 AM on 12/15/2009
And it happens even while I am watching programs on my computer. Give it a rest I'm 2 feet away from the speakers. OK
05:24 AM on 12/15/2009
Between commercials and "paid programming" 40% of the 54 bucks I pay for "entertainment" are commercials. They are not entertaining at all. They suck big time. I'm so glad the "bam" guy bit the bullet finally. I'm an insominac. Many nights I fall asleep on the couch with the mind numbing fare finally putting me to sleep just to hear yelling on commercials.
I buy the TV. I pay for the cable. When I set the volume, that is the loudest db level any noise should be. I should be the one in charge of the volume. Broadcasters though are going to make this a moot point. I've almost reached the saturation point when it comes to commercials and loud commercials. I live in a place where I can put up an antenna. But I don't like reality shows or wrestling, so why bother.

So glad I have a library card!
04:10 AM on 12/15/2009
Wow, how absurd Robert Thompson's comments are. Look into the history, the FCC allowed broadcasters to increase the maximum level of decibels a few years ago allowing them to broadcast commercials at a higher level than that selected by the programs they advertise... It does make a huge difference as to anyone who watches television. His criticism seems to stem not from his understanding of the regulations, but of the fact that he probably regards the complaints as trivial. Sorry you don't watch TV that much Robert Thompson, but guess what, if you did JFDL;AJFD;AJFLDA;JFDAJFLA;JFDLSAJF;DSLAFD;A... That's what you hear during a commercial break!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
UpFromLiberalism
Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.
04:04 AM on 12/15/2009
dems believe there is no limit to what the federal gov't can regulate

another nail in the 10th amendment coffin
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elyriaohio
Stop the Monarchy
07:28 AM on 12/15/2009
When I'm paying $90/month for cable & they can't deliver a reasonable product because of corporate greed, maybe they should instill the same regulation that the radio industry has always had.
---
That would infringe on your right to do what? Annoy everyone who watches television?
08:08 AM on 12/15/2009
Neocons are for freedoms, right? I want freedom to control my own TV set. I do not want big corp greed hogs blasting into my living room every 10 minutes. If they were responsible, govt would not need to be involved. This is a measure for the common good, which is a mission of govt. This blasting is just another example of big business intrusion in our lives. Do they need to do it? Is it really beneficial to their clients? They don't care, they do it because they are big and rich and can get away with it. Govt is the last resort.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acacia72
02:12 AM on 12/15/2009
You would THINK that California politicians would have BETTER things to do than to work on TV COMMERCIALS for Pete's sake!!

Those commercials DO come on pretty dang loud tho....
04:11 AM on 12/15/2009
Not to repeat myself but you should really review the FCC's rulings on this matter. The industry caved to lobbyists to allow for the increase in volume for commercials