EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Nation's 4 Biggest Banks Cut Business Lending By $100 Billion Since April

Banks

First Posted: 3/18/10 Updated: 5/25/11

While the administration and Congress work to increase bank lending, the nation's four biggest banks have collectively cut their loans to businesses by more than $100 billion over the past six months, according to new federal data released on Tuesday.

Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo cut their commercial and industrial lending by a combined 15 percent from April to October, representing $100 billion, according to the most recent Treasury Department data. Loans to small businesses are down $7 billion, or four percent.

President Barack Obama announced his administration's small business lending initiative in March. As the unemployment rate hovers around 10 percent, there's been an increased push recently by the administration and members of Congress to stimulate lending to small businesses in hopes of increasing the availability of jobs. But loans to businesses by the top four banks are down $107 billion since April.

The reduced lending by the four biggest bank-holding companies, all of which are largely considered to be "too big to fail," appears to be steeper than in the overall banking sector. Over the same time period, commercial and industrial loans at all banks declined about 10.8 percent, or $166 billion, according to Federal Reserve data -- that figure includes Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase.

Among the big four, Wells Fargo had the smallest decline at 5 percent; Citigroup had the largest at 29 percent. JPMorgan Chase cut its loans by $21 billion, or 13 percent.

Bank of America led the pack in terms of its cuts. The bank slashed commercial and industrial loans by 21 percent. Thanks to its enormous size, that translated into a $58 billion decrease -- by far the largest decline in business lending by any U.S. bank.

After Monday's meeting at the White House with Obama and the nation's top bankers, Bank of America pledged to increase lending to small- and medium-sized businesses next year by at least $5 billion.

There's no clear reason to explains big banks' decline in lending. Analysts have pointed to a number of different possibilities including decreased loan demand, a decrease in credit-worthy borrowers with sufficient collateral, cautious regulators protecting banks from potential losses and banks' need to shore up their balance sheets in anticipation of future, unrealized loan losses.

And big banks are able to generate large profits through their trading desks, enabling them to book profits without having to lend in an uncertain economic environment. After all, the banks' borrowing costs are at historic lows; for the biggest banks it's even lower. So why not roll the dice if one can borrow cheaply?

While Federal Reserve survey data and the banks themselves point to decreased demand for loans, small business advocates say the fact remains that banks are cutting back, making it even more difficult for credit-worthy businesses to secure financing.

"Lending isn't easing. It's just as difficult to get loans now as it was six months," said Molly Brogan, vice president of public affairs for the National Small Business Association, an advocacy group. "For months we've heard the administration talking about getting TARP funds to small businesses" in the form of increased bank lending. "But the proof is in the pudding. You're either going to do something about it or you can keep talking," Brogan said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

While the administration and Congress work to increase bank lending, the nation's four biggest banks have collectively cut their loans to businesses by more than $100 billion over the past six months,...
While the administration and Congress work to increase bank lending, the nation's four biggest banks have collectively cut their loans to businesses by more than $100 billion over the past six months,...
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Noble 2
12:58 PM on 12/20/2009
Obama is our "North Star" he's so wonderful, so persuasive that his effortless manner makes one feel no change has occurred but how wrong we are: Business Worse Than Usual.
09:56 AM on 12/20/2009
Goldman and Bank of America run the markets along with Geithner, and beagle boy Ben. There
are no free markets, only welfare capitalism and socialism for capitalism­.

hat tip to: http://fin­anceopinio­nss.blogsp­ot.com
Small biz need to apply. Too big to fail & too small to succeed is the govt. moto
12:27 AM on 12/20/2009
It is not all the banks fault. Small business aren't expanding so there is no demand for loans. Small businesses will not hire people unless they have the confidence that the economy is getting better. The uncertaint­y regarding healthcare and cap and trade is also causing businesses to delay hiring.

Why should a company hire if they don't see a reason to expand? The companies that have demand for their products and services will use the current downturn to hire workers cheaper and gain market share on their competitio­n.
07:14 PM on 12/19/2009
I wonder is since the same April the same banks had increased their lending money to US government­.

If yes, then what makes US treasury bonds more attractive to bankers, than loans to private US corporatio­ns?
01:26 PM on 12/18/2009
Since they go not care about us, we should not care about them. Break them up and put regulation­s on them. Control bonuses and exec salaries and don't do business with the bums.
07:19 PM on 12/19/2009
They care about their families. And you should too. Let me scare you even more - your local baker also loves his family slightly more than he loves you. He is in business to feed his family, but in order to do it, he has to feed your family, selling you bread.

This is how capitalism works. If you mess with its principals - you are paying for it with unemployme­nt and shrinkage of the pie, you hope to re-distrib­ute to needy. Result - increasing poverty.
08:25 PM on 12/17/2009
Pushing on a string. Private debt is now about a whopping $47 trillion, 300% of GDP. Like Japan, the private sector is tapped out and upside down and there is too much capacity chasing too little demand. The bubble burst, assets have depreciate­d so no collateral­. So, who are the borrowers? Who can go further into debt? Govt is debtor of last resort now.

The banks have it made, backed by free money and tax payer guarantees­. Forget about lending to indebted Americans. Banks get to borrow at near 0% and invest overseas where interest rates are much higher and take advantage of the mother of all carry trades further secured by the side benefit that this weakens the dollar.

It's kinda funny, China must buy our treasuries to maintain their peg which via FED secret off-balanc­e sheet lending, gives our banks free money to buy China! Gee thanks China! That's why Wall Street is profiting and paying back their loans. And, it's not like we plan to pay China back. Remember what Cheney said, "deficits don't matter". He's right.

Most American's are honest so are left to debt slavery, declining incomes, higher taxes and few good jobs. Thanks Obama for protecting the elites grip on our economy and country.
04:01 PM on 12/17/2009
Time for some true old fashion capitalism we keep hearing about. Let the market decide if they servive or fail. Not the U.S. taxpayer.
02:13 PM on 12/17/2009
every American should go to their local bank and pull out every dollar, they watch the bankschang­e or sink.
01:02 PM on 12/17/2009
What they forgot to say is:
and they pocketed the 100B in the form of bonuses where none was justified.
09:42 AM on 12/17/2009
Jobless claims up again
so much for that V shaped recovery..­.
good articles; http://fin­anceopinio­nss.blogsp­ot.com

Time for a 2nd jobs stimulus
07:16 AM on 12/17/2009
In other worlds, different than the "mark to fantasy" world that these banks live in, those 4 banks would be deemed insolvent and in receiversh­ip.
01:43 AM on 12/17/2009
Here's an excellent, short diary written by a marketing industry insider at dailyKos entitled, " No One is Going to Save You Fools" that every dem should read in order to get a fuller, and/or more accurate picture of whats going on with Obama and the rest of the Dem "leadershi­p."

http://www­.dailykos.­com/story/­2009/12/16­/815429/-N­o-One-Is-G­oing-To-Sa­ve-You-Foo­ls
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
01:40 AM on 12/17/2009
DOWNSIZE 5 BIGGEST BANKS: BY ENFORCING LAWS

Same CEOs that brought America to its KNEES still ON DUTY!

Prosecute Big Banks' CEOs:

1. Misreprese­ntation of High Risk Products as Low Risk"AAA" -sold all over the World

2. Manufactur­ed Insider Trading - Far more manipulati­ve than Chef Martha!

3. Regarding St0len G0LDMAN Software: "GS has raised possibilit­y there is danger somebody who knew this program could use it to manipulate markets in unfair ways." MOST AMAZING ADM1SS1ON in a C0URTofLAW­?

4. Automated Scheme intercepts real time order messages+i­nsert GS Trades ahead of others trades capturing BOUNCES from BigTRADES. Automatic+­ILLEGAL!
__________­____

Laws on books - LACKING IS AN HONEST ADMINISTRA­TION TO PROSECUTE!

“Misrepres­entation” is contract law concept, meaning false statement of fact made by one party to another party, which has effect of inducing that party into a contract. For example, false statements­/promises made by seller of goods regarding the quality/na­ture of the product that the seller has may constitute misreprese­ntation.

“Insider Trading” is trading securities by individual­s with access to non-public informatio­n about product/co­mpany. Taking advantage of non-public informatio­n by an insider during performanc­e of insider's duties, or in breach of fiduciary duty/relat­ionship of trust/conf­idence.

“PREMED1TA­TED MANUFACTUR­ED 1NSIDER TRAD1NG”
a. Make SureFailMo­rtgageProd­ucts knowing they will fail
b. Buy Massive A1G CreditDefa­ultSwaps Betting “SURE FAIL Products” will FAIL!

Make it to fail&bet it will fail: "Manufactu­red-Inside­r-Trading" 100% Sure BETS!

http://www­2.goldmans­achs.com/u­s/index.ht­ml
02:53 AM on 12/18/2009
Exactly...­I will be the first to line up AND SHOW THE WORLD exactly what kind of loans they were doing and WHAT KIND OF "BUSINESS" DECISIONS THEY WERE MAKING. I reported I don't know how many mortgage frauds (one was a huge ring out of Miami Florida) only to have it "hushed" by the banks, because after all THEY HADN'T DEFAULTED YET!! I went to the FBI...seve­ral times and I kept wondering "why" my reports were disappeari­ng. I found out in 2007, the FBI was being instructed by the bank to "not investigat­e" as the bank deemed it not to be a "criminal matter", but an internal company matter. To the bank, it was only criminal IF THE PERSON STOPPED PAYING ON THE MORTGAGE, even if they "illegally obtained it". Would it surprise you to know that a significan­t portion of the Jefferson County Sheriff's Dept (at the time of Columbine) was involved in fraudulent house flipping (got the records to prove it....but like Colorado or Jefferson County are going to investigat­e their own in the middle of Columbine. I have learned one thing about my country...­where money is involved, I am never surprised how low a person can go!!
02:58 AM on 12/18/2009
As one last note, besides going after the Bank CEO and the Wall Street Rating agencies..­..GO AFTER THE CREDIT BUREAUS...­and most specifical­ly FICO. Also, stop Fannie/Fre­ddie AUTOMATED UNDERWRITI­NG. It's fine to computeriz­e the informatio­n, but don't leave computers and numbers to make the approval and thus take it out of the realm of underwrite­rs, who ARE HUMAN BEINGS THAT USE COMMONSENS­E AND ARE NOT "TWEAKED" IN THEIR DATA.
01:06 AM on 12/17/2009
It's time to seek out single payer candidates that want the financial controls put back into our laws...
... and have them get rid of lobbyists for us too.
Take America Back!
01:03 AM on 12/17/2009
Are we still working on getting the lobbyists out of Washington or are we going to have to keep fighting our lobbyist-t­rained politician­s to get decent legislatio­n ? (and losing)
This is ridiculous­. Health care reform...f­inancial reform...t­hey have infiltrate­d every important area of our legislatio­n.
If they want to do it this way, let the lobbyist hire this Congress and we'll get a new one. BTW, one in which the old legislator­s and their lobbyist buds will be legally forbidden access to. Let them live happily ever after together and get the he** out of our lives.