iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dems, White House predict success on health care

ERICA WERNER   12/22/09 11:00 PM ET   AP

Capitol

WASHINGTON — From the White House to Capitol Hill, Democrats on Tuesday confidently predicted Senate passage of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul after the bill cleared its second 60-vote test and the time was set for a final tally.

Coming to the Senate floor in the middle of the afternoon, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., announced an agreement to vote on final passage at 8 a.m. Thursday, Christmas Eve. It would mark the 25th consecutive day of Senate debate on health care.

"The finish line is in sight," Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., said at a news conference with other Senate leaders and cheering supporters. "We're not the first to attempt such reforms but we will be the first to succeed."

At the White House, spokesman Robert Gibbs declared: "Health care reform is not a matter of if. Health care reform is now a matter of when."

Obama said the Senate legislation accomplishes 95 percent of what he wanted on health care. "Every single criteria for reform I put forward is in this bill," the president said in an interview with The Washington Post.

Senate Democrats remained behind their compromise bill over steadfast Republican opposition. A motion to shut off debate and move to a vote on a package of changes by Reid passed 60-39.

The final 60-vote hurdle, limiting debate on the bill itself, is expected to be cleared Wednesday afternoon, setting up the Thursday morning-before-Christmas vote on the legislation, which at that point will need only a simple majority to pass.

The Senate has been voting at odd hours since Monday around 1 a.m. because Republicans have insisted on using all the time allowed under Senate rules to delay the bill. Not to be thwarted, Reid has refused to postpone action until after the holidays. On Tuesday, they started voting at sunrise.

With fatigue and frustration rising, Reid appealed to his colleagues to set aside acrimony and reach for some holiday spirit.

"I would hope everybody will keep in mind that this is a time when we reflect on peace and good things," he said. Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said he, too, wanted to close the debate. After conferring with McConnell, Reid announced the timing of the final vote.

Even so, partisan fires were burning.

GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina denounced concessions won by conservative Nebraska Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson, whose support gave Democrats the 60th and final vote they need. Among other things, Nelson got an agreement that the federal government will pay to expand Medicaid services in Nebraska.

"That's not change you can believe in. That's sleazy," Graham said on NBC's "Today" show.

South Caroline Attorney General Henry McMaster, a candidate for governor, said he and his counterparts in Alabama, Colorado, Michigan, North Dakota, Texas and Washington state – all Republicans – are jointly taking a look at whether the special provisions for Nebraska and other states are constitutional.

"Whatever the legal status may be, and we hope to find out soon, these negotiations on their face appear to be a form of vote-buying paid for by taxpayers," McMaster said, adding he hopes citizens will challenge the legislation in court.

Reid has defended the dealmaking, asserting that every senator got something they were looking for in the health bill and if they didn't it speaks poorly of them.

Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa also defended the concessions, saying: "The one that's being talked about for Nebraska, it also benefits other states. It's not just Nebraska."

He also said he would vote for the package even if it didn't contain concessions for Iowa. "The principle of this bill overrides everything," Harkin told CBS' "Early Show."

Moderate Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., who has also been criticized after securing a boost in Medicaid for her state, defended the concessions she got, saying they benefited low-income families small businesses.

Also Tuesday, Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., announced that the inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services has agreed to his request to investigate whether drug companies are raising prices of brand-name prescription drugs used by Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries ahead of passage of the health care bill. AARP says prescription drug prices are on the rise, but the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America said in a statement that Nelson's request "was spurred, in large part, on misleading statistics and sensationalized media reports."

The Senate measure would still have to be harmonized with the health care bill passed by the House in November before final legislation would go to Obama.

There are significant differences between the two bills, including stricter abortion language in the House bill, a new government-run insurance plan in the House bill that's missing from the Senate version, and a tax on high-value insurance plans embraced by the Senate but strongly opposed by many House Democrats.

Senate moderates have served notice they won't support a final deal if government-run insurance comes back. And Democratic abortion opponents in the House say a Senate compromise on the volatile issue is unacceptable.

But there's considerable pressure on Democrats to avoid messy negotiations over a final bill. Public support for the legislation continues to sink in opinion polls.

The bills probably have more in common than differences. Each costs around $1 trillion over 10 years and installs new requirements for nearly all Americans to buy insurance, providing subsidies to help lower-income people do so. They're paid for by a combination of tax and fee increases and cuts in projected Medicare spending.

Unpopular insurance company practices such as denying coverage to people with existing health conditions would be banned. Uninsured or self-employed Americans would have a new way to buy health insurance, via marketplaces called exchanges where private insurers would sell health plans required to meet certain minimum standards.

___

Associated Press writers Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar in Washington and Jim Davenport in Columbia, S.C., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

WASHINGTON — From the White House to Capitol Hill, Democrats on Tuesday confidently predicted Senate passage of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul after the bill cleared its second 60...
WASHINGTON — From the White House to Capitol Hill, Democrats on Tuesday confidently predicted Senate passage of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul after the bill cleared its second 60...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 396
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lingal17
09:44 PM on 12/22/2009
No Public Option? Then we need an Insurance Czar. Insurance companies are NOT going to do the right thing once politicians stop looking. If Americans are forced to remain with private insurers then we need an enforcer of strict regulation. An Insurance Czar is definitely needed; an Elliot Ness or an Elliot Spitzer will do just fine. We also need answers to the following questions:
Will the premiums for people with pre-existing conditions be higher and by how much?
Will there be some outside regulatory agency to govern the insurance companies in the event of misdeeds?
Will there be co-pays and deductibles and by how much?
Will there be a limit of services provided by these so-called state regulated insurance plans, i.e., will the poor receive less services based on the type of insurance they have?
How much assistance will the middle class receive regarding insurance premium payments? 10%, 20%?
Is there a cap on how much an insurance CEO can earn?
Will there be reductions in payments of Medicare and Medicaid to physicians?
Will these plans be taxed to people who earn above a predetermined income?
No one wants a perfect plan, just a fair one. President John F. Kennedy said it best: “If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich”.

I hope the politicians are listening.

http://drlindagalloway.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/no-public-option-then-we-need-an-insurance-czar/
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ncmom54
08:33 PM on 12/22/2009
Success???... hmmm maybe a good choice of words for the Corporate Health Industry.
They got what they paid for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proggirl
college teacher, artist, writer
07:46 PM on 12/22/2009
The way it looks to me right now....
I'm going to have to pay for insurance whether I have the $ or not.
The Company can decide the rates.
No public option, no buy-in on Medicare, no anti-trust legislation against insurance companies encouraging them to control their rates to compete.
Swell.
Part of me hopes this does pass and i get insured, because the way this is turning out is making me sick.
05:25 PM on 12/22/2009
There are way to many optimistic remarks in these comments!
The idea that single payer is "just around they corner"? Not with Conservocrats like Nelson, Conrad, Bachus, Lincoln, and Landrieu in the Senate! Until they die, retire, or are voted out, they have shown that the needs of the majority don't mean bubkus to them.

Most of the comments on here are the "it's a start, the next few years it can be upgraded", uhhuh, only after the above mentioned senatorial rats are gone and real Progressives in their place. This was not a "show of compromise and negotiation", this was a good bill (day one), that after 25 days has been turned into a WTF bill. The name is the same, but the guts don't look anything like they did.

The tax provision starts IMMEDIATELY after the bill is signed, nothing else until 2014, gee, does the phrase "tax and spend liberals" ring a bell?
The insurance industry has 4 years to purge their rolls and increase the premiums, in order to set the "basis" for mandated coverage.

In this case the minority has given Billions to their Masters in Corporate America, punished the rest of us through mandates, and done what the Republican leadership could not, they have killed health reform.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
05:16 PM on 12/22/2009
The subject line should read "Health Insurance".

And from what people are saying (big fines if you can't afford it, giveaway to the insurance companies, insurance company stock skyrocketing during this time (insider trading too, perhaps?), and so on), this isn't any reform worth the use of the word "reform". Americans have been gutted enough as it is.

Besides, large corporations (including GM, at one time) saying how insurance costs are ruining their profits, to force them to buy insurance for their employees isn't going to help a thing.

We'll see. Either way, we'll see. I suspect the media, in putting up the scaremongering with the "insurance company stock skyrockets!" articles and such, are more likely to be accurate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jojothedoggirl
Outside a dog a book is mans best friend
04:14 PM on 12/22/2009
I'm sure Sen Byrd looks at as a proud honor. And we thank him. And Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Reid thank you for all the are twisting and hard work. Don't stop.
04:11 PM on 12/22/2009
Succeed as in passing a bill, or as in doing something useful? There is a difference.
03:52 PM on 12/22/2009
I hope there will be one liberal who is going to stop this mess. Am totally hos.tile towards the Senate bill.
04:49 PM on 12/22/2009
A lot of progressive people are howling about this bill. So this makes sense? The bill only goes halfway toward achieving the correct state of affairs...i.e. Medicare for all...so we should discard the 50% progress, join in with the nasty little right-wing operation, and suck all the energy out of progress?

No. The door is now open a crack. It's a good time for people like me to stop feeding the habit of complaining about conditions and start working to get a couple more more Dems in the Senate. With two more we would be looking at single payer right now. The paranoid B.S. about insurance corporations controlling the entire game is self-defeating and only half-true. We actually can achieve Medicare for all, and actually will with just a few more hands on deck.

Anyone notice that $626 Billions for military slipped through the process like greased lightning while we were watching the hand that held the health care bill?
05:05 PM on 12/22/2009
No. Just agthering around the door won't open it. The public option would have provided the needed crack. Is it there? No. We are just appeasing every interest and special interest for another decade. This experiment will fail befoer it starts. E.g. uninsured will stay uninsured until the Health Exchange is up..... in 2014!! In the meanwhile health insurers are free to do whatever they want. Why 2014?This fact alone shows how corrupted this piece of sht is. I hope that a smart Democrat will filibuster this corporate welfare bill.
03:52 PM on 12/22/2009
Universal health care and single pay health care system - you are dreaming. Even a public option won't be added in the next 30 years. Why, because this bill right now will add 30 million customers to the current insurance cartels thus making them even more powerful with more money from the government in subsidies and with more money to fight any real reforms.
03:47 PM on 12/22/2009
With this bill so friendly to the health care insurance cartels Mr. Presidente should get 100 votes in the Senate not 60.
03:36 PM on 12/22/2009
I really want just ONE story that will show WHAT the Republicans contributed to, passed, or was actually for this year in 2009. From January 2009 until now.

Please, some investigative reporter, journalist, blogger, tell me what positive things has a Republican representative done this year to improve the United States of America.

I keep on thinking about all the No's, and complaints they've done. But what solutions, programs, and actually substantive items have they made or made progress on.

Has anyone ever thought about this? Huff Post blogger, please do some research on this. I'd really like to know.
03:22 PM on 12/22/2009
Republicans simply aren't praying hard enough.
Gawd is very disappointed in you...
03:03 PM on 12/22/2009
Let's stop looking at the details for a moment. This is a great leap forward and now, since we have done this step, futher steps to a real universal health care system are not far. I predict that in 2030, we will have a single-payer system. Without this reform, we wouldn't have anything close to that before 2040.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jojothedoggirl
Outside a dog a book is mans best friend
04:12 PM on 12/22/2009
My, oh my, all the distraught hand wringing. Don't worry , I bet the bill will look very different before long. If you were the parent of a child with pre-existing conditions I think you would love this bill.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
01:37 PM on 12/22/2009
The genie is out of the bottle. Universal Health care cannot be far behind.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PAposter
Radical Progressive
03:19 PM on 12/22/2009
Finally!
05:05 PM on 12/22/2009
B.linded by the light.