More

Jobless Decade May Loom

JEANNINE AVERSA   12/26/09 01:43 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Call it the Terrible Teens.

The decade ahead could be a brutal one for America's unemployed – and for people with jobs hoping for pay raises.

At best, it could take until the middle of the decade for the nation to generate enough jobs to drive down the unemployment rate to a normal 5 or 6 percent and keep it there. At worst, that won't happen until much later – perhaps not until the next decade.

The deepest and most enduring recession since the 1930s has battered America's work force.

The unemployed number 15.4 million. The jobless rate is 10 percent. More than 7 million jobs have vanished. People out of work at least six months number a record 5.9 million. And household income, adjusted for inflation, has shrunk in the past decade.

Most economists say it could take at least until 2015 for the unemployment rate to drop down to a historically more normal 5.5 percent. And with the job market likely to stay weak, some also foresee another decade of wage stagnation.

Even though the economy will likely keep growing, the pace is expected to be plodding. That will make employers reluctant to hire. Further contributing to high unemployment is the likelihood of more people competing for jobs, baby boomers delaying retirement and interest rates edging higher.

All this would come after a decade that created relatively few jobs: a net total of just 464,000. By contrast, 21.7 million new jobs were generated between 1989 and 1999.

Economist David Levy, chairman of the Jerome Levy Forecasting Center, says the country faces a new era of chronically high unemployment, averaging 8 percent or more over the next decade.

The "New Abnormal," he calls it.

Levy thinks the New Abnormal also means average pay will dwindle, along with consumer prices. That would make it harder for households to pay down debt, he warns.

By the Federal Reserve's reckoning, the jobless rate could remain as high as 7.6 percent in 2012. And it would take two or three years after that for the job market to return to normal, the Fed says.

It's possible jobs won't return to pre-recession levels at any point over the next 10 years, Levy says.

That's mainly because the economy's recovery, sluggish by historical standards, isn't expected to regain its vigor over the next few years. As a result, companies will be in no rush to ramp up hiring.

Other analysts think the economy will recover the jobs wiped out by the recession by 2013 or 2014 but that the unemployment rate will stay high. They note that the healing economy will cause more people to stream back into the labor force, vying for too-few jobs.

In addition, baby boomers whose retirement accounts have shrunk could put off retiring and stay in the work force longer. That would leave fewer positions available for the unemployed.

Other contributing forces – businesses squeezing more work from employees they still have and relying more on part-time and overseas help – have intensified. And record-high federal budget deficits and the threat of inflation could drive up interest rates, which could hobble growth and restrict job creation.

All those factors could combine to keep unemployment high.

"It will be the mother of all jobless recoveries," predicts economic historian John Steel Gordon.

On the other hand, it's possible some technological innovation not yet envisioned could generate a wave of jobs. Yet at the moment, most economists aren't betting that any such breakthroughs will rescue the labor market.

The last time the jobless rate reached double digits, in the early 1980s, it took six years to bring it down to normal levels.

Unemployment hit a post-World War II high of 10.8 percent at the end of 1982 as the country was emerging from a severe recession. The rate fell to around 5 percent in 1988. It took less than two years for the number of jobs to return to its pre-recession level.

In this recovery, the economy is far more fragile.

Hard-to-get credit is exerting a drag. Wounds from the banking system's worst crisis since the Great Depression will take years to fully heal. People and companies, scarred by the crisis, are likely to restrain borrowing, spending and investing.

Some analysts think the jobless rate might have already peaked at 10.2 percent in October. But most economists predict the rate will peak at around 10.5 percent by the middle of next year.

"We are digging out of a very deep hole," says Lynn Reaser, chief economist at Point Loma Nazarene University in San Diego and chief economist for the National Association for Business Economics.

Reaser estimates it will take until 2015 for the unemployment rate to drop to 5.5 percent.

A sputtering job market carries other consequences. One is flat wages. When many people compete for few jobs, employers have no incentive to raise pay.

The economic shocks of the past decade already have cut into Americans' incomes. That's among the reasons why people feel they're standing still economically.

Median household income, adjusted for inflation, fell to $50,303 in 2008, according to the U.S. Census. That gauge combines wages and salaries, investment income and government benefit payments like Social Security. It's down 4 percent from a peak of $52,587 in 1999, when incomes were bolstered by stock gains from the dot-com boom.

That bubble burst in 2000. Since then, workers have seen meager wage gains. Adjusted for inflation, wages grew about 13 percent in the past 10 years – the slowest pace in five decades, according to calculations made by Scott Hoyt of Moody's Economy.com.

That trend is predicted to continue.

"There will be a continued hollowing-out of the middle class," says H.W. Brands, a historian at the University of Texas.

He points to productivity growth, which has let companies produce more with leaner work forces, the offshoring of service-sector jobs and the shrinking of factory jobs.

That's why Vicki Adriano, 51, who works at a General Motors plant in Lordstown, Ohio, looks ahead to the coming decade with trepidation.

The economic wreckage of the past year means she'll probably have to work longer than she had expected at the factory_ at least seven more years. She frets about the loss of economic security.

"Everything you worked for all those years can be gone in a minute," she says.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — Call it the Terrible Teens. The decade ahead could be a brutal one for America's unemployed – and for people with jobs hoping for pay raises.
WASHINGTON — Call it the Terrible Teens. The decade ahead could be a brutal one for America's unemployed – and for people with jobs hoping for pay raises.
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 275
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
06:16 PM on 12/29/2009
What do you suppose the average income is if you subtract the top earning one percent from the equation?
12:25 PM on 12/29/2009
Lets throw the bums out. We'll start with 1/2 the Obammi cabinet & the fed.
Obama = Obammi until he gets his act together. I'm regretting voting 4 him.

hat tip to: http://iamned111.blogspot.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:00 PM on 12/29/2009
Seriously addressing off-shoring (levy large taxes and heavy tariffs on off-shored jobs) would be a good place to begin. Ignore it and perish.
03:16 AM on 12/29/2009
Yes, it will be bad. So as to reduce the depression and unemployment, you should emulate some of those literary British news journals, and include a 'topless twenty something of the day' on your site. Although, since there is currently no nudity on the Internet, it might shock a lot of people.
01:27 AM on 12/29/2009
Geeee, are we in trouble??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Americanium
Liberal nut
11:16 PM on 12/28/2009
I say it is time to bell the cats..the cats on Wall Street.

Citizens need to start fires on feet....literally.
photo
deepintheheartoftejas
Middle o/t Road = Yellow stripes & dead armadillos
12:30 PM on 12/28/2009
It took over a decade to fix the problems of Republican misrule during the 20s. Not surprising that 8 years of Bush can't be fixed overnight.
07:14 PM on 12/28/2009
You are funny. Let's blame Aztecs or Romans for the tireless Democratic efforts to debase our currency and to destroy our businesses (stimulus, cap-and-trade, health care, union power, and other democratic pet projects).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Americanium
Liberal nut
11:09 PM on 12/28/2009
I know you turds love to forget the Decade of Bush but it is reality. If you are a student of US Economics you would know that everything that is happening now was as a result of policies made 5 years ago.
10:11 AM on 12/28/2009
it's not a recovery until every able bodied American who wants word can find work and we have universal healthcare & affordable education.
good articles: http://iamned123.blogspot.com

GDP figures are nonsense
07:15 PM on 12/28/2009
Your dream actualy came true in the Soviet Union. That country collapsed. Remember?
09:35 AM on 12/28/2009
The U.S. may be near 3rd-world status but trust the corporate-owned media when they tell you protectionism would be bad for you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:23 AM on 12/28/2009
So, with approx 20% of US citizens unemployed or underemployed, do we still need to import workers or allow them to come in unchallenged? Those who believe US workers are overpaid or don't want to do "certain" jobs are full of it.

Those workers in their 40, 50s and yes, even 60s and older, have seen jobs pulled out from under them because companies can find younger people (in many jobs, here illegally) willing to work for much less. This throws many US citizens into programs they never thought they'd need. Younger workers can more often "go with the flow", although they're affected and are not able to get into the work ethic earlier, but for older workers, their identity has been tied many years to being able to provide for themselves and their families, it can be devastation beyond what many realize (I went through the same in my late 50s and never recovered). Even going back to school at middle age or older puts you in competition with not only those with more experience in the field you choose, but with your children and yes, even grandchildren many times. This is an upsetting of generational issues where we see adult children (even with their own children) moving back in with parents, or the elderly with no place to go except to their children because they cannot keep up with the cost of living and can no longer afford the upkeep of a home.
photo
zelda777
transcend the B. S.
11:00 PM on 12/28/2009
Welcome to the New American Family Values.
02:47 AM on 12/28/2009
I thought increased productivity would mean shorter work weeks. People would job share. For example, same pay, 3/4 the time at the office, not on a daily basis but weekly or monthly. So 3 months on 1 month off or 3 weeks on 1 week off. Depending on the field and its productivity levels, the splits could 5/6 or 2/3, or 1/2, etc. Of course, there'd be less money for the uber execs and shareholders but what a happy health country! I know call me a dreamer.

In the meantime, the whole point of a jobless decade is to lower the US pay scale and thus standard of living. From Dubai to Dakar, Boston to Budapest, Paris to Prague, the best hotels, restaurants, and golf courses are uniformly terrific and the unwashed masses invariably invisible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
01:01 AM on 12/28/2009
but you know, as long as the rich and well connected are getting richer and more powerful, then whats the matter with it? The Ivy Greeders sure dont care about us plebeians. If we can enrich their lives or bank accounts we are useful to them. Otherwise , were dog poop on the soles of their shoes. An annoyance to be wiped off and forgotten. Until the masses understand this, and that fighting over parties, democrat v. republican, libertarian v. everyone else , and so on. only enables those in power, in power. Divide and conquer. If they cant divide us by race wars, they use political party wars. If that wont work, they use class wars, and anything else they can think of. Those with stars upon thars, and those with none. You dont have to be a genius to understand what is going on. Really! You can really understand a lot about the power and control over the masses with divide and conquer just by reading Dr. Seuss. Go ahead. Choose your party, and roll up your sleeves, dig in and fight hard. Because your only ensuring things will always remain the same. Even when you fall for re-invented rue paul or Palin types. Use your head.
04:40 AM on 12/28/2009
DR SEUSS WENT TO DARTMOUTH! Careful where you point your fingers. A million (upper middle class) is not what it used to be (rich) and even people with 10 million (really nice houses, cars, vacations and comfortable retirements) do not rule. The truth is that deca- and centi-millionaires are the people with power. Meaning many tens or hundreds of millions.

While many ivy leaguers are upper middle class your assertion is a crude, blunt and mindless attack. Kinda like saying white American males are sexist, racist, imperialists who while only 1/3 of the US population and increasingly less educated than their female counterparts think they should retain 2/3 of the best jobs at higher pay.

Not all of the top 1% went to an ivy league school and not all ivy leaguers are power brokers. Many are doctors, engineers, lawyers, professors, teachers, artists, etc. So your assertion comes off as dangerous and disappointingly bigoted.

A more responsible approach would be to do some home work, look at: Forbes' list of the 400 Richest Americans; the annual reports of the Fortune 100 and D&B's Top 50 Private firms for their CEOs, boards, and executive management. The annual compensation of these powerful individuals is listed in the Form 10K (or annual Proxy report for the board of directors). All available online and free courtesy of the US taxpayers and our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Then find out where they stand on the future of our country.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
12:50 AM on 12/28/2009
This article was ok but it was kind of just an easy rehash of known issues.

But in that theme the one paragraph that rang true was this one.

‘He points to productivity growth, which has let companies produce more with leaner work forces, the offshoring of service-sector jobs and the shrinking of factory jobs.’

This is all we should be talking about. Workers are doing more and more and jobs are being shipped offshore because it is a few percent cheaper. But for how much longer? Our economy is driven by our being consumers, but without jobs our economy will stop. I guess the big companies will simply sell their products in these emerging markets.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:55 PM on 12/27/2009
Guess I'm going "Dillinger" for the next ten.
10:24 PM on 12/27/2009
Two observations:

One, we apparently have enough money to spend billions of dollars per month on Iraq and other atrocities, then we have enough money to give each American citizen

ONE MILLION DOLLARS...

WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE POLITICAL WILL TO DO IT.

Two....forgetting one for a moment...

17% of Americans are out of work...given this idea that it might take many years for us to get employed again strikes me as plain stupid. Not only that we will not tolerate it, Washington DC will change markedly in Jan 2011.

And if the "new" congress doesn't make it happen then something else will happen.
photo
deepintheheartoftejas
Middle o/t Road = Yellow stripes & dead armadillos
12:28 PM on 12/28/2009
Uh, sure, we could give every American a million dollars. That would be about 300 trillion dollars handed out, or 21 times the entire country's GDP. The value of a dollar would immediately fall by about 1 millionth. It'd wipe out our national debt, at least (except for holders of inflation-adjusted bonds), though no one would ever be willing to lend to us again.

Other than that, I love the idea. It'd certainly eliminate the penny, but it'd be great to buy a loaf of bread with a $100,000 bill.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverstreet
All you need is love
01:26 PM on 12/28/2009
In other words, it's better to give those trillions to the banks to hoard