iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Six Surprising Places For Solar Power

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:00 PM ET

Special From The Daily Green, By Brian Clark Howard

Although the Recession has slowed down the rapid rise of alternative energy technologies like solar, wind, wave and biofuels, the future is still quite bright. The good news for homeowners and businesses large and small is that the benefits of home solar power are not restricted just to the sunniest states. Impressive gains are being seen in some unlikely places as well.

It's probably no surprise that interest in solar power is heavy in sunny California. PG&E, one of the state's major utilities, reports that it connects to 40% of all solar panels in the U.S. It's probably also not a stretch to believe that South Florida is a hotbed of solar activity, given balmy weather and a progressive bent. Likewise, parts of the Phoenix area are becoming heavily solarized, and to a lesser extent solar panels are being deployed fairly regularly up and down most of our nation's coasts, where there is less of a concern with shading and a higher concentration of people with money to spend on improvements.

workers from namaste solar electric install solar panels on a house

Of course, the decision to go solar is a big one, and it can seem complicated, as well as expensive. Getting started may be easier than you think, however, and what's particularly exciting are the rise of solar panel leasing plans and neighborhood groups that are pooling resources to get hefty group discounts.

So what determines consumer interest in home solar power? Major factors do include availability of sun, as well as social and political values, disposable income and - significantly -- state and local incentives. (Check out DSIRE, The Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency, to find out what incentives and rebates are offered from your state, town or utility.) We can get a fascinating overview of how these various factors influence actual consumer behavior with this mashup map by Cooler Planet.

Cooler Planet took all of the inquiries they've received over the last several years -- some 30,000 -- and mapped them on a live data, interactive heat map. Who's Cooler Planet? They're a Seattle-based company created by environmentalists with backgrounds in software engineering and online marketing, with one goal: "Over time, we aim to provide you all the tools and resources you need to reduce the carbon footprint of your home, your business, and your life." Cooler Planet's service is completely free, and matches interested homeowners and businesses with their network of pre-screened Green Professionals.


More solar energy information.

A look at this map shows some of the trends above (wealth and progressive values tend to correlate to interest in solar power in Seattle and Boston, for example, despite a relative lack of sun.) Also worth noting is the hotpots in New Jersey and Colorado, two states with incentive systems that promote adoption of solar technology, in addition to California. But there are also some regions that may surprise some observers. One note is that the interest map does skew toward regions with more dense populations, but even taking that important fact under consideration we think some trends are worth noting:


Washington State

While the Evergreen State does have a concentration of progressive, tech-savvy and green leaning folks in the Seattle area and Bellingham, it's interesting to note that interest in solar power is still fairly strong in rural areas and, to a lesser extent, the eastern part of the state, where incomes are much lower. Further, Washington is the cloudiest state, both in reputation and according to the data. In fact, the first 14 least sunny cities in the nation are all in Washington.

Minnesota

The Twin Cities are known to be progressive and relatively affluent, so it's not surprising that people there would be interested in solar power -- although it's also true that Minnesota is quite cloudy and has notoriously rough weather. Interest in solar is still quite strong through much of the state's farm country.

Chicago

The Windy City is not known for friendly weather, and the dense population doesn't necessarily make it easy to find shade-free spots. Still, the city has been experiencing a bright green renaissance, in no small part spurred by Mayor Richard Daley.

The Rust Belt in Ohio, Michigan and Indiana

A Red State that has long opposed progressive energy reform (and my home state), it's perhaps surprising that there's as much interest in solar power in Indiana, particularly in the Rust Belt north, where the weather is also often dreary (it is the setting for A Christmas Story). Solar power is also coming on quite strong throughout Ohio and lower Michigan, two states that are heavily represented on the list of least sunny. Plus, that part of the country has been hardest hit by the global recession, with soaring unemployment and grim real estate prospects, so in some sense it's a wonder that anyone is able to look forward.


Southeast Appalachians

Bicoastal environmentalists and trend watchers often don't expect progressive, risk-taking behavior to come from rural Kentucky, Tennessee, the western Carolinas and northern Georgia. Yet this region shows pretty solid interest in renewable energy, even in areas that are not densely populated.

Upstate New York

While it's not surprising that Massachussets has high interest in solar power, given it's deep blue leanings and strong state incentives, as well as relative wealth, neighboring upstate New York is a bit more interesting. The area is cloudy, cold and experiencing economic decline.

Here's a map of least sunny U.S. cities with more than 50,000 people:

map of least sunny cities

Also from The Daily Green:


FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Special From The Daily Green, By Brian Clark Howard Although the Recession has slowed down the rapid rise of alternative energy technologies like solar, wind, wave and biofuels, the future is still q...
Special From The Daily Green, By Brian Clark Howard Although the Recession has slowed down the rapid rise of alternative energy technologies like solar, wind, wave and biofuels, the future is still q...
Filed by Eve Solomon  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:08 PM on 01/26/2010
I am glad to see the installers in the photo are wearing safety harnesses - most people don't understand how dangerous it is to be up on a roof.

http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/03/deaths-per-twh-for-all-energy-sources.html

Take a look at nuclear...
03:05 AM on 01/11/2010
Good article. Some people seem to always find a reason why something won't work. But not us "real Americans," we have a can do attitude!

The fact is that solar is less expensive than utility power for many typical American homes. For example, if you spend $200 per month for electricity with a utility, then you will spend $81,979 over 25 years, including a low annual price inflation rate of 2.5%. No matter how you calculate it, you will save money with a $5,000 to $25,000 solar panel system. Forget the confusing and distracting cost per kilo-watt (kW) comparisons. Remember, you can pay the utility for 25 years, with annual price increases, or you can pay a lot less for solar power. You'll also get some great tax credits and cash rebates, and you will increase the value of your home.

If you want to do something about this today, then visit FreeCleanSolar.com to search a nationwide network of local solar panel installers representing the top solar panel brands including sunpower, sunwize, evergreen, kyocera and sharp. You can also find information about state solar rebates, federal tax credits, solar financing and leasing, system costs and the benefits of going solar. The bottom line is that many home and business owners can can save money with solar power today.

Solar... it's the cleaner, cheaper and "Real American" alternative to big, dirty, expensive and unsightly coal.
06:13 PM on 01/06/2010
Great report on the availability and pricing of solar power around the US. Home owners and business owners alike can take advantage of solar power: especially now with incentives from state and federal agencies for installing arrays and selling back excess power.

If you’re interested in solar energy or any other alternative energies, check out http://www.greencollareconomy.com. It has hundreds of case studies on emerging green technology and solar power. It's also the largest b2b green directory on the web.
06:24 PM on 01/05/2010
I live in the Portland area, the sun sucks.

Bio Char and BioFuels are great! Wind too.

I want to move somewhere sunny,

so I can get the cheapest electricity the end user can buy: 3 cents rooftop pv solar!

http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/solar_panels.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
04:38 PM on 01/05/2010
Solar panels are not the whole answer, but they are a big part of the answer.
When combined with wind power, and electrical storage systems, we see solar as a huge success.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
12:11 AM on 01/05/2010
You'd think that people who don't want anyone taking their money would be most inclined to buy solar panels, so that they wouldn't have to pay energy companies. And yet they support coal.
04:35 PM on 01/05/2010
Most solar panel options for homes only save money in a term of 15 years. Cost to install, and maintain are very high compared to the average electric use of a homeowner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
06:06 PM on 01/04/2010
This is all wonderful.. .but the article doesn't tell the whole story. Solar power is and will be for the foreseeable future only A SUPPLEMENT. Homes cannot run on solar power alone!! You can build homes that have heat sinks and can absorb IR radiant energy and you can use solar panels to help with low power appliance requirements.. but you can't reliabley run a refrigerator, a microwave, a television or even a computer only on SOLAR POWER.
lightnessandjoy
Is micro-bio a new disease?
07:23 PM on 01/04/2010
Huh? Of course you can. I have any number of friends in California run their homes during the summer with solar power during the summer and have negative power bills and then use some utility power during the winter. Certain times of day they may need the grid, but essentially get about 80% of their electrical power from the sun. No one is suggesting we can currently get completely off the grid with home solar, but we can go a long ways towards that goal.

What is the point of your post?
08:03 PM on 01/04/2010
The electric grid has to match supply to demand at all times in order to operate efficiently without having brownouts.

Solar and wind constitute an uncontrollable supply of varying output.

When the skies clear or the wind blows, the supply increases, and the grid operators have to respond by throttling or shutting down other generators that it can control. Then when the clouds roll in and the breeze peters out, the operators have to bring more capacity online in order to meet demand.

As the amount of peak solar/wind capacity increases, the grid has to be able to respond to increasingly large variations relative to controllable generator capacity.

In practice, the availability of solar and wind power replaces natural gas, since those plants are the easiest to control.

The grid, therefore, has to maintain enough natural gas capacity for muggy summer evenings when everybody's AC is running and there isn't much solar or wind power available.

From the consumer's perspective, they are perhaps producing as much energy as they consume. But at certain times, their demand must be met by other means, so the grid needs a way to replace up to all of its peak solar/wind capacity.
lightnessandjoy
Is micro-bio a new disease?
07:25 PM on 01/04/2010
PS and yes, that includes refrigerators, computers, big screen TS - all their major appliances. What are you talking about? Solar power circa 1958?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drkazmd65
Mom Taught me - Question Everything - Thanks Mom!
05:17 PM on 01/04/2010
I'm still planning on putting some panels on the roof of my historic townhome in Central Maryland,... but,... I have some saving for a down-payment to do yet,... and then will have to figure out how to navigate the issues of getting a permit to do so through the Historic District council guys,....

I've got a great, unobstructed southern exposure though just begging for some panels.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:58 PM on 01/04/2010
So, for us snow-covered yankees, perhaps it wouId be reasonabIe to have soIar paneIs for the summer months, but winter is a different story.

I heat a Iot with wood, which is carbon-neutraI, but I've been thinking that the right system couId not onIy heat a home with wood, but produce eIectricity via a boiIer. Just something to think about.
07:27 PM on 01/04/2010
Wood isn't carbon neutral if it comes from mature trees. Forests are long-cycle carbon sequestration. Wood is carbon neutral if it comes from tree farms, but farmed trees generally accounts for less than 15% of all wood production.

Some companies are beginning to produce briquettes of compressed shredded recycled paper and other cellulosic waste. This is a promising way to produce cooking/heating fuel from short-cycle carboniferous wastes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:51 PM on 01/04/2010
I cut my own wood with a frigging axe and pIant new ones every year, more than I cut down. What do you want from me? How do you stay aIive?

It is certainIy a carbon neutraI source of energy. WouId you prefer I went with 100% naturaI gas? coaI? Saudi oiI?
photo
FormerReaganite
Government Regulations Save Lives
08:58 PM on 01/05/2010
Wood burning is carbon *offset* not carbon *neutral.*

Offset: "anything that balances, counteracts, or compensates"

Neutral: "no activity or development; not taking part of"

Here is an analogy: A vehicle transmission has "drive, neutral, and reverse." You can only be in one of these at a time, in other words, driving forward one kilometer, then driving backward in reverse one kilometer does not equal having been "in neutral" the whole time. Rather, what we have done is "offset" our displacement. "Neutral" is a completely different state: there is no impetus, thus we have not moved the car any distance at all.

People are mistakenly claiming biomass combustion to be "carbon neutral" when it is actually "carbon offset." The word "offset" fits the term; the word "neutral" does not.

The term "carbon-neutral" refers to non-carbon energy sources: wind, solar, hydro, nuclear, tidal, etc.
11:51 AM on 01/04/2010
Even in the most unlikely places, SOLAR MAID has been establishing new operators because anyone with a little insight of trends knows very well that solar is going to (already has in many places)spread very quickly and the need for panel cleaners is starting to explode.

Solar panel cleaning and maintenance business opportunities available in many top locations.

http://www.solarmaid.org
11:38 AM on 01/04/2010
Wonderful, and this is all innovative technology, but it gets sunny everywhere. We should make solar panels a mandatory requirement for all homes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:16 PM on 01/04/2010
No we shouIdn't. In windy pIains, it's more reasonabIe to have windmiIIs, in other areas--hydroeIectric. And what wouId you do? Kick poor peopIe out who can't afford it? WouId you force a homeowner who Iives with trees shading his home to chop them down?
06:15 PM on 01/04/2010
It would be mandatory and the state would supply the panels and people would get a tax write off for paying for it themselves. Those that can't would get the gov't loans to help.
I would also insist on mandatory windmills of course. Good idea. Thanks for your input.
Your comment about houses being shaded with trees is out of context.
09:55 PM on 01/04/2010
To answer your cocky question though, I would not force anyone to chop down trees. I would suggest they trim them for obvious reasons so the solar panels worked better. As for whether or not it became mandatory, it would just make more sense to trim them. People should have the right to live with or without electrical power like the Amish if they so desire, but sooner or later we need to stop relying on fuel to give us electricity. We are becoming a poor nation from the dependency of foreign oil, and nature is screaming for us to make the changes for the future. America needs to improve its financial infrastructure, and going green is the answer.