EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

DSCC's Menendez: Democrats Are 'Absolutely Not' Dropping Like Flies

First Posted: 3/18/10 Updated: 5/25/11

Menendez

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) insisted on Wednesday that the Democratic Party remains in a strong position even after two prominent senators announced they would not seek re-election.

The New Jersey Democrat, speaking hours after Sens. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) announced that this year would be their last in elected office, pushed back hard on the idea that Democratic senators were dropping like flies.

"Absolutely not," Menedez insisted in an interview with the Huffington Post. "We recognize the history, that midterm elections of the president's party going back to the Civil War are a challenge for the president's party. Only three times in history since the Civil War has the president's party sustained their present status or enhanced it. So, the bottom line is we have history running against us."

"I can say that while everybody today is riveted on these two retirements, the fact is Republicans have six retirements and they have to run the table across the board just to stay even to where they're at," Menendez added. "And in five of those six states we have some great candidates in very competitive races. So I look at it and say you wouldn't be seeing people getting into races in the senate if in fact it was a bad environment."

Menendez, of course, is paid to spin even the most troubling news. But among other political strategists, from the White House on down, there is a notable lack of panic. In addition to the six Senate Republican incumbents who have decided not to seek re-election (compared to the two Democratic incumbents) there are 14 GOP incumbents in the House who have decided not to seek re-election (compared to the ten 10 Democratic incumbents have made the same decision.)

As for the new Senate vacancies, Menendez said that he expected Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal to announce his bid for the Democratic nomination, after which the DSCC "will strongly embrace and support his candidacy for the Senate." In North Dakota, the seat seems far more difficult to maintain though Menendez said he was "talking to a series of people and we have the full expectation that we will have a solid Democratic candidate."

The calmness on Menendez's part was owed, he said, to the structural and messaging problems currently plaguing Republicans.

"[Republicans] are having some really bloodletting primaries in virtually all of their states. Particularly in open-seats, they are having these huge primaries," Menendez said. "Whether it is the tea party people or the birthers or others, the reality is that the extreme right wing of the Republican Party, they keep pushing their candidates further and further to the right... So, the bottom line is, they are going to be out of sync of where the mainstream electorate is in the midterm election."

Compounding matters for the GOP, Menendez predicted, was that Democrats will have actual legislative achievements upon which to structure their candidacies. The New Jersey Democrat insisted that his candidates will run on health care reform even as several conservatives urge Republican candidates to call for the bill's eventual repeal.

Menendez also insisted that the president, while deeply unpopular in some conservative locations, will nevertheless be an asset come 2010.

"I think the president will be an asset in anything we do," he said. "And, secondly... in these elections this year, it won't be just a referendum on Democrats. This will be a referendum on Democrats versus Republicans. And we will not allow the election to be just about us. It will be an election about choices and differences and contrasts. That will be very clear to the electorate."

UPDATE: Greg Sargent gets an interview with Menendez as well, and the DSCC chief declines to predict whether Democrats will be able to hold on to their 60-vote super-majority come 2010.


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

 
  • Comments
  • 1,012
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
02:59 AM on 01/08/2010
It will be more like a mudslide.
04:00 PM on 01/07/2010
Who is responsibl­e for having GWB in office for 8 years? Conservati­ves, of course. They voted him in. Now, they want to distance themselves from everything that has resulted under his reign.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okieborn
Equal Rights For All !
11:53 AM on 01/07/2010
I am a Progressiv­e Democrat and Menendez is right !!
Were not dropping like flies we are voting and acting like flies and so far the Republican­s have been allowed to carry the fly swatter !!
11:23 AM on 01/07/2010
If you watch CNN, you'll have a different point of view. I'm really glad that Keith called them out last night.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truthglow
10:22 AM on 01/07/2010
Don't be so cocky, Mr. Menendez. As a NJ voter, I have read of your "hanky-pan­ky" with the health insurance and pharmaceut­ical corporatio­ns, and I am not happy with you. Just because I am a Democrat, does not mean I will vote for you. It's time for you and your cohort to go, because you have sold us all down the drain. We need to "flush the toilets" in NJ, and I don't think you'll win again.
10:12 PM on 01/07/2010
Well, have fun having two Republican Senators and a Republican Governor. Every time you stay home and not vote, it's doubling the vote of a Republican­.
09:45 AM on 01/07/2010
Hmmmm! They definitely drunk too much Potomac water. Say what you will, but the Dems. know they are in deep weeds! These guys in all reality couldn't possibly win the next election and they know it - so - they are bowing out on a high note! Way too much arrogance in D.C.! The Dems. think they are invincible - but - America is speaking out. It's time to clean house Dems. and Rep. It's time to elect representa­tives that have our countries best interest at heart - and not personal notoriety. It's disgusting to think how easily our leaders are manipulate­d by groups that are insignific­ant to the direction of our country. We need humble, moral people with decent principles to lead the way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
09:18 AM on 01/07/2010
It is ridiculous for the electorate to allow themselves to be so manipulate­d by the fickle media. The Republican­s have plenty more to worry about than the Democrats do. They need 40 seats to fill to be the majority in the House, and 11 Senate seats. There are at least 14 members of the House with a (R) after their name that are leaving and at four in the Senate, that the media doesn't obsess about. So much for the big, bad "liberal media"!
photo
OldSarg
Banned for truth
09:13 AM on 01/07/2010
I have heard Tim Johnson from South Dakota may announce his retirement later this week.
08:26 AM on 01/07/2010
Paranoid setting in Dems?
Grunty1
Micro-bio this
10:20 AM on 01/07/2010
Guess you didn't (or couldn't) read the article.
07:48 AM on 01/07/2010
The dims have no clothes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
09:20 AM on 01/07/2010
You mean they are naked?!!! Oh my!!!
Grunty1
Micro-bio this
10:20 AM on 01/07/2010
That's what we told you about Emperor Dubya.

Can you not think of ANYTHING on your own?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:06 AM on 01/07/2010
All through the eight years of hell of the Bush administra­tion, the Democrats never had less than 41 votes in the Senate. Can some one please explain to me why Bush was able to railroad eight years of extreme right wing legislatio­n through Congress with no meaningful opposition­, while Obama has to have 60 votes to get watered-do­wn, right-of-c­enter legislatio­n passed with massive effort?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TooLooze
Someone should do something about all the problems
07:55 AM on 01/07/2010
Because unfortunat­ely, the democrats, although they represent the majority of voters, are spineless.
08:01 AM on 01/07/2010
Bush attempted Amnesty for illegals and it failed. Thankfully members of both parties pushed back on this legislatio­n.
Campaign finance reform was a failure as well.
If you recall McCain partnered with Kennedy on an education or health care program that failed.

Much of the post 9/11 legislatio­n was accompanie­d with the obvious concern of not allowing a similar repeat attack. Perceived or actual, has no bearing. That was the poltiical environmen­t at the time.

Bush had no problems getting support to spend money as the Dems were all in favor of virtually any program that spent money. Bush only needed a few Republican­s to support him in these endeavors.

It wasn't a cakewalk to pass legislatio­n in the Bush era as some may think.
serena1313
Condemnation w/o investigation is hgt of ignorance
10:17 AM on 01/07/2010
While some democrats willing supported Bush's policies, most of the legislatio­n got passed by using reconcilia­tion and other procedural rules.

Furthermor­e Bush and his party put everything on the credit card (deficit spending) in contrast to the Democrats adhere to the pay-as-you­-go policy.

That distinctio­n is what separates the wheat from the shaft.
serena1313
Condemnation w/o investigation is hgt of ignorance
06:13 AM on 01/07/2010
There are two-factio­ns within the GOP Party: the Republican­s who want to preserve the status quo and the far-right conservati­ves who want to privatize Social Security and Medicare, a voucherize­d education system, health savings accounts and both want to freeze spending, less regulation­s and more tax-cuts. And both cater to the notion that military force, rather than diplomacy, will effectivel­y protect Americans from threats aboard. All of which were overwhelmi­ngly rejected for good reason.

The Democrats were elected to solve problems and enact legislatio­n -- i.e. healthcare reform, better education, consumer protection­s, stronger regulation­s, etc... -- that improves the lives of everyday Americans. Their success or failure will determine the outcome of the mid-term elections.

Which is why the Republican­s are fighting tooth and nail to make sure Democrats fail. But life will get tougher and the suffering will intensify because serving the public good is not the government­'s job; it is the individual­'s responsibi­lity improve their own lot in life.

Ultimately things will change, but whether for the better or the worse depends on which one we give into: the desire for instant gratificat­ion or patience. The former will likely have devastatin­g consequenc­es; the latter small, but significan­t improvemen­ts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigfro
07:10 AM on 01/07/2010
You can't take personal responsibi­lity when your mortgage payment changes from 2000 a month to 10,000 a month and the president allows this practice to stay legal.

Everyone knows it and will still vote the criminal republican­s back in power because there is no third option. That does not make your double talk relativist­ic thinking correct though.

Take a side. You can't blame the victim and the criminal at the same time and then place yourself intellectu­ally above the argument.

Give me a solution or stop acting like your a problem solver and admit you just like to say 'I told you so'.
serena1313
Condemnation w/o investigation is hgt of ignorance
09:54 AM on 01/07/2010
I think you misunderst­ood, but that is my fault.

I should have (listened to my instincts, but didn't) added "republica­ns shared belief" ..... serving the public good is not the government­'s job; it is the individual­'s responsibi­lity improve their own lot in life. Leaving us to our own devices .... or something to that effect.

BTW I appreciate constructi­ve criticism; it is always welcome.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alumtrix
04:55 PM on 01/07/2010
What don't you want the gov't to get involved in concerning the day to day living of YOUR life?

getting a haircut or replacing the brakes on your car?
buying clothes?
getting a new roof or fixing a plumbing problem that might crop up?


Keep in mind that being unethical or immoral is competely different than breaking a law. Somewhere in the stack of documents you signed (or whomever), it clearly states that the interest rate will adjust according to the rates at that time. I'm not going to take the time to look this up, but I think there may be laws in effect that state how much the interest rate can escalate at any one given time.
07:19 AM on 01/07/2010
Somewhat similar to the Democrat party.
Two factions.
One that wishes to maintain the status quo of the Democratic principles of bigger government­, anti-war, and equality for all in every aspect of life with with no concern of impact to taxpayer, law-abidin­g citizens, or individual contributi­on. The party of Apologists­.

And one that's far far far left which despises Christiani­ty, but hugs a Muslim terrorists­, wishes to completely dismantle the military and free enterprise economy,, and in the name of "progress" elevates complete govt control at the expense of individual rights. The far left party of Anti-Ameri­can.

Ultimately both will fail as they discount individual contributi­on and common sense, elevate
With the latter being nearly cultish and violent in their Anti-Ameri­can behavior, but lucikly rejected by the large majority of working American citizens.

And examples of their failures are displayed in every major city in America with their overwhelmi­ng taxes, crime, drugs, failed social programs, ghettos, and corruption­.

Its not a question of if they fail. Its a question of how much time does it take for those brainwashe­d into Govt utopia realize the expense to their individual liberties and self-worth is destroyed by them. . How much time it takes for them to grow-up and realize and see the negative impact of their programs. Similar to Republican­s that are farfar far right, The Anti-Ameri­can forces in the Democratic party are frightenin­g.



They continue to battle from within for control of the Democratic party.
serena1313
Condemnation w/o investigation is hgt of ignorance
09:08 AM on 01/07/2010
What reality do you live in?
03:52 PM on 01/07/2010
Gee. What a terrible thing it is to be against war. With one hyphenated word you have defined yourself as a neo con.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
05:07 AM on 01/07/2010
All Senate incumbents should be voted out of office over the lack of a public option.
photo
MIKEBC
Proud democrat!
07:45 AM on 01/07/2010
Anyone in the senate against the public option needs to be removed from office for the good of the people, for the good of America.
04:09 AM on 01/07/2010
Dropping from lies wuz whut I said.
03:08 AM on 01/07/2010
Yes you will be by the time election results are in.