iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Unemployment Rate Holds Steady At 10%, 85,000 Jobs Lost In December

JEANNINE AVERSA and CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER   01/ 8/10 05:04 PM ET   AP

Unemployment December

WASHINGTON — Brace for a year of stubbornly high unemployment.

Gripped by uncertainty over the economic recovery, employers chopped 85,000 jobs last month, and difficulty finding work helped chase more than half a million people out of the job market.

The unemployment rate held steady at 10 percent. It did not creep higher only because so many people stopped looking for work and are technically not counted as unemployed.

But the jobless rate is likely to rise in coming months as more people see signs of an improving economy and start looking for work again. Some economists think it could near 11 percent, which would be the highest since World War II, by June.

The Labor Department's monthly jobs report suggested employers will remain wary about hiring and skeptical of the economy recovery. Just Friday, UPS said it would cut nearly 2,000 white-collar jobs.

"It is a wait-and-see attitude," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group.

The economy is growing, but too weakly to persuade employers to ramp up hiring. Growth has to be robust to drive down the jobless rate, especially as more people start looking for work.

Complicating the recovery are remnants of the recession: high debt, a sputtering housing market and the inability or reluctance of people and businesses to borrow and spend. Most economists think unemployment will rise this year and stay high into 2012.

That poses a threat to President Barack Obama and Democrats in the fall congressional elections and escalated pressure on the administration to boost job creation. The "road to recovery is never straight," Obama said after Friday's report.

The president pushed for an expanded government program that he said would help create tens of thousands of new clean-technology jobs. Obama announced the awarding of $2.3 billion in tax credits to companies that manufacture green technologies. The money will come from last year's $787 billion stimulus program. He also called on Congress to approve an additional $5 billion to help create more such jobs.

Analysts had expected the economy to lose just 8,000 jobs in December. The loss of 85,000 was a setback after November, when, according to revised figures released Friday, the economy actually added 4,000 jobs, the first gains in nearly two years.

"The labor market is getting better, but it is still a long way from being healthy again," said Paul Ashworth, economist at Capital Economics Ltd.

Stephen Jankiewicz, who was filling out an online resume Friday at a job center in Milwaukee, said he has noticed more job listings for welding positions, but potential employers remain reluctant to hire.

Jankiewicz has been without a job since the manufacturing plant where he worked closed nearly two years ago. One company has expressed interest in him – but not until it's more confident in the recovery. He was told to call back in a month.

"They didn't want to hire anybody just to lay off anybody again," he said.

The 85,000 lost jobs for the month is based on a government survey of employers. A separate government survey of households found a much darker picture – nearly 600,000 fewer people said they had jobs in December than in November.

That gap could reflect layoffs at small businesses that are having trouble getting loans and can't afford to hire new people. That's something many economists think the employer survey misses because it undercounts small companies.

It was the second straight month the unemployment rate came in at 10 percent. The only reason it didn't rise was that 661,000 people stopped looking for jobs and left the work force.

In a normal economic recovery, more people would be entering, not leaving, the job market. If those people hadn't dropped out, the rate would have hit 10.4 percent in December, according to an estimate by the Economic Policy Institute.

Counting the people who have given up looking for work and the part-time workers who would rather be working full-time, the so-called underemployment rate edged up to 17.3 percent in December. The record high is 17.4 percent, reached in October.

The House has passed a bill intended to generate jobs, extend unemployment benefits and a health insurance subsidy and provide other aid. But the Senate is reluctant to go along. Republicans say Obama's first stimulus package hasn't been effective.

The December numbers complete a picture of a disastrous 2009 for American workers. The unemployment rate averaged 9.3 percent in 2009 – up from average of 5.8 percent in 2008 and the highest since 1983.

The number of unemployed has hit 15.3 million, up from 7.7 million when the recession started in at the end of 2007. The recession has wiped out 7.2 million jobs. And the number of people jobless for at least six months hit a record 6.1 million.

One of them is Debra Winchell, who lost her job last January as an administrative assistant at a health insurance company and has been looking for work since.

Winchell, of Latham, N.Y., said she is seeing more online job postings, giving her some hope. But the jobs pay as little as $10 an hour. And when she does apply, no one calls back. Her unemployment benefits are set to run out this spring, so Winchell, who is single, said she will reluctantly sign up for temporary work.

"I'll be lucky if it pays the bills," she said.

___

AP Business Writers Emily Fredrix in Milwaukee, Christopher Leonard in St. Louis and Associated Press Writers Philip Elliott and Jim Kuhnhenn in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — Brace for a year of stubbornly high unemployment. Gripped by uncertainty over the economic recovery, employers chopped 85,000 jobs last month, and difficulty finding work helped ch...
WASHINGTON — Brace for a year of stubbornly high unemployment. Gripped by uncertainty over the economic recovery, employers chopped 85,000 jobs last month, and difficulty finding work helped ch...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,191
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (36 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mero909
None of our comments will matter anyway
10:37 AM on 01/12/2010
@billobasher

Mero,

Why do you speak untruth? You often quote Rush word for word. You even use his terminology.

-------------------------------------------------

You are a complete sheep. If I don't listen to Rush... and you don't listen to Rush... then how do you know what his terminology is?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
10:29 PM on 01/11/2010
FACT- G.W. Bush inherited a 280 BILLION dollar yearly budget surplus. FACT-He handed Barack Obama a 1.3 TRILLION dollar deficit.

FACT- G.W. Bush inherited an economy that had just created 22 million new jobs. FACT-He handed Barack Obama an economy that was bleeding millions of jobs.

FACT- Bush went on TV and told the nation that if we did not bail out the banks that we would be in a great depression inside of a few days. FACT- Bush is who handed AIG 137 BILLION.

FACT-Bush and the REPUBLICAN led Congress passed a 600 billion dollar prescription drug program for seniors, and offered NO WAY to pay for it but to pass it on to debt.

Where were the TEA BAGGERS?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
10:23 PM on 01/11/2010
FACT. As the top tax rates on the wealthy have gone down, so has the standard of living for American workers.

FACT- Starting with Ronald Reagan there was an explosion in the number of super rich. Yet a decline in the numbers of well paid American workers.

The truth is that wealth does not TRICKLE DOWN. Wealth is SUCKED UP.
02:15 PM on 01/11/2010
i'd be nice if these stories would move the market
hat tip to http://iamned-website.blogspot.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
12:21 PM on 01/11/2010
Don;t look now but the Obama plan for GM appears to be working. They expect to be back in the black by the end of 2010. They plan to repay the government faster than they anticipated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
12:20 PM on 01/11/2010
Unemployment would be even higher had McCain been elected. McCain's answer would have been more tax cuts for the rich. The 500 BILLION dollar Republican "stimulus" had a slew of new tax cuts for the rich. It did not extend unemployment benefits. Which would have created even more job losses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
05:33 AM on 01/11/2010
In another paper's headline yesterday I read that the jobs lost in December were actually 1million
"insideautomotive.com." To get rid of Welfare one would have to actually pay the people a living wage, otherwise it is not possible. People who gripe about it, know that anyone working retail or food cannot
sustain itself on those kind of wages. There again, our wages have been stagnant for the last 20 years
and when you look at the earnings of the top 1% you know it shifted all to them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mravka
The world has gone completely mad.
02:29 PM on 01/10/2010
An Irony of History (1)

One of the pioneers of robotics has written: 'In the next century inexpensive but capable robots will displace human labour so broadly that the average workday would have to plummet to practically zero to keep everyone employed.'
Hans Moravec's vision of the future may be closer than we think. New technologies are rapidly displacing human labour. The 'underclass' of the permanently unemployed is partly the result of poor education and misguided economic policies. Yet it is time that increasing numbers are becoming economically redundant. It is no longer unthinkable that within a few generations the majority of the population will have little or no role in the production process.
The chief effect of the Industrial Revolution was to engender the working class. It did this not so much by forcing a shift from the country to to towns as by enabling a massive growth in population. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, a new phase of the Industrial Revolution is under way that promises to make much more of that population superfluous. . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mravka
The world has gone completely mad.
02:30 PM on 01/10/2010
An Irony of History (2)

In rich countries, that time has already arrived. The old industries have been exported to the developing world. At home, new occupations have evolved, replacing those of the industrial era. Many of them satisfy needs that in the past were repressed or disguised. A thriving economy of psychotherapists, designer religions and spiritual boutiques has sprung up. Beyond that, there is an enormous grey economy of illegal industries supplying drugs and sex. The function of this new economy, legal and illegal, is to entertain and distract a population which - though it is busier than ever before - secretly suspects that it is useless.
Industrialisation created the working class. Now it has made the working class obsolete. Unless it is cut short by ecological collapse, it will eventually do the same to nearly everyone.

John Gray, Straw Dogs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
12:47 PM on 01/10/2010
The shift has occured and will take years of undoing. The middle class is all but gone. Perhaps we would have been better off allowing the entire country to fall (no bank-Wall Street bailouts). Then we could have had a chance at all beginning to step upward from the bottom. Now we are pushed there and will be forced to remain there. Government is all bought off regardless of party and the people are ruined. Ive been jobless for 1 1/2 years now. It is becoming hopeless to find a job to support a living. Merely surviving is becoming the new way of life! Towns are seeing hundreds of loss jobs and simply cannot sustain this much longer. Any future bai outs will be lost to to keep town and city government alive. They believe in their own job security over its citizens, yet they expect the citizens to continue to pour in money they dont have. The war is here, forget Afganistan, we are losing our homefronts and no body cares!
10:48 AM on 01/10/2010
Construction and manufacturing jobs plummet again - thats the key - until they stabilize and improve things will continue to deteriorate.

more risk by banks ,unlimited freddie and fannie bailout, its coming folks
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
09:22 AM on 01/10/2010
So these numbers are not from 1st time unemployment claims but rather they are pulled from a survey.It seems that there is a slight difference between the surveys. The employer survey says 85,000 lad off and the household survey says 600,000 laid off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sueinmn
12:51 PM on 01/10/2010
As lies continue to be reported nation wide, it will only become worse. Too many people are no longer counted and they must keep these lies going or we no doubt would have a revolution. People WAKE UP! We need protectionism as cheap labor will continue to drive this country to the lows of China. I never understood why we buy everything from a Communist county! We have allowed the farm to be sold and now we must eradicate the animals or they (we) will all starve to death!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GerryS
I WANT to pay $1 million per year in taxes, or mor
12:12 AM on 01/10/2010
wow,

I can not believe that educated americans can believe that the UE rate is only 10%.

when you count the under employeed and the people that want to work, but can not find work,
that either have gone beyond their UE benifits, or like myself, are self employeed and can not
find work,

I think the UE number is probably closer to 15-16%
photo
NativeSonII
Be Happy!
12:39 PM on 01/10/2010
I believe the UE rate is closer to 20%. Our company is starting to see signs of life on the project front, which hopefully means some jobs will open up.
08:35 PM on 01/09/2010
OK LIbs. All in unison Bush, Cheney, Haliburton.

Obama's fixing everything that the Repubs messed up on... Right?

Obama will fix the economy by 2012. Only two more years of recession.
08:51 PM on 01/09/2010
Well, I guess we can all thank Bush & co. for the fact that millions of unemployed people won't have to get out of their warm beds the next few days.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
06:18 PM on 01/09/2010
If conservatives are so "frugal," why have deficits soared under each fo the last three Republican president's? Reagan, Bush, and Bush 43? Why was there a surplus by the time Clinton left office?

G.W. Bush inherited a 280 BILLIOn dollar SURPLUS. Bush handed Obama a 1.3 TRILLION dollar deficit.

What is it their hero Reagan once said? "Facts are stuborn things?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
05:41 AM on 01/11/2010
We had 10% unemployment when Bush took office!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
06:16 PM on 01/09/2010
Never let the right wingers forget that unemployment was 10.8% towards the end of "Saint' Ronnie Reagan's third year in office.

He was re-elected in 1984 claiming "It's Morning in America" when it was still 7.7%. L-O-L

Funny thing, I'll bet Rush, Sean, and Glenn, have never told this to their sheep.
photo
NativeSonII
Be Happy!
12:41 PM on 01/10/2010
Let it go Bill. You sound like a loon.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billobasher
08:36 PM on 01/10/2010
Yes sir Native Son,

In your world someone who quotes actual facts sounds like a "Loon."

It must be nice to live in such bliss.