iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Facebook's Zuckerberg Says Privacy No Longer A 'Social Norm' (VIDEO)

First Posted: 03/18/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:10 PM ET

Zuckerberg

In a recent interview with TechCrunch, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg revealed that he had taken an "about face" on privacy and argued that privacy is no longer a "social norm."

Zuckerberg's stance on privacy resonates with recent controversial changes to Facebook's privacy settings, which not only reduced the control users have over their personal data and pushed more personal information public, but sparked a federal complaint.

Arguing that online users have become more accustomed to sharing information online, such as on blogs and other social media services, Zuckerberg noted, "if he had created Facebook today, as opposed to several years ago, he would have made user information public, not private, by default as it was for years until the company changed dramatically in December," ReadWriteWeb reports.

ReadWriteWeb transcribed the portion of Zuckerberg's interview in which he discusses his attitude toward privacy.

In response to the question, "where is privacy on the web going?", Zuckerberg responds:

When I got started in my dorm room at Harvard, the question a lot of people asked was 'why would I want to put any information on the Internet at all? Why would I want to have a website?'


And then in the last 5 or 6 years, blogging has taken off in a huge way and all these different services that have people sharing all this information. People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people. That social norm is just something that has evolved over time.


We view it as our role in the system to constantly be innovating and be updating what our system is to reflect what the current social norms are.


A lot of companies would be trapped by the conventions and their legacies of what they've built, doing a privacy change - doing a privacy change for 350 million users is not the kind of thing that a lot of companies would do. But we viewed that as a really important thing, to always keep a beginner's mind and what would we do if we were starting the company now and we decided that these would be the social norms now and we just went for it.

Watch TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington's six-minute interview with Zuckerberg in the video below, and read more about the implications of Zuckerberg's privacy stance on ReadWriteWeb.

Concerned about what information you're sharing online? Read these nine tips for protecting your privacy on Facebook.


WATCH:



Follow HuffPostTech On Facebook And Twitter!

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

In a recent interview with TechCrunch, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg revealed that he had taken an "about face" on privacy and argued that privacy is no longer a "social norm." Zuckerberg's stanc...
In a recent interview with TechCrunch, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg revealed that he had taken an "about face" on privacy and argued that privacy is no longer a "social norm." Zuckerberg's stanc...
Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 308
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
auteur
11:18 AM on 01/13/2010
He's a pretentious little pryk isn't he. Facebook will flame and burn just like Myspace. Bebo baby, Bebo.
photo
dakotawoman
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill. . .old time Progressive
11:05 AM on 01/13/2010
Maybe he should be the one to check out the "trees on Mars" story elsewhere on Huffpo.

Bet he'd be glad to "decide" what those photos "reflect".
09:00 AM on 01/13/2010
Self-love is a beautiful thing.
02:53 PM on 01/12/2010
1) "... updating what our system is to *reflect* what the current social norms are."
2) "... *we decided* that these would be the social norms now... "

this is the confusion of a boy confounded by his own rationalizing. i believe the second of these two humorously conflicting statements is closer to his little heart, don't you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:30 PM on 01/12/2010
Hes a thief.

Being under the thumb of the cia is his comeuppance.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:19 PM on 01/13/2010
The truth is we can do nearly EVERYTHING that really needs doing without this convenience called the Internet, to say nothing of the narcissistic toy, Facebook.

And as you note, follow the trail of the people involved with the board level of Facebook. CIA operatives. Use the other toy, Google, and get the facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
halucijason
Lysergic tales I live and tell.
01:13 PM on 01/12/2010
Facebook sucks. So does google, but I'm glad they are keeping youtube on life support.
11:43 AM on 01/12/2010
Go back to kindergarden, Zuckerberg.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Beka13
Veni vidi vici
11:40 AM on 01/12/2010
Au Contrair, monfrair (sp?) LOL...The only thing I have on the internet is what I want people to know about me...If you want to know me or you want me to know you...You will have to meet me and I would have to want to like you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CptKendrick
11:19 AM on 01/12/2010
This is only a big deal for the lemmings who somehow think Facebook is a necessity, ala, the telephone or a car.

Our lives don't really depend on being "on-the-grid" 24x7, and that most of it is just frivolous, unnecessary, trends.

So if somehow choosing to fart around on stupid websites and posting status updates on when you last went to the bathroom could lead to an invasion of privacy, well...I don't really have much else to say.
10:43 AM on 01/12/2010
20 something kids who grew up with helicopter parents wiping their peepees, giving them ribbons and trophies for not having temper tantrums, and accompanying them to job interviews will think he's right on.
07:23 PM on 01/12/2010
What?
08:11 AM on 01/12/2010
It's too bad Mr. Zuckerberg's policy on privacy has changed only recently - and too bad there isn't one simple and easy step to take to permanently delete a Facebook page as a whole lot of people would like to leave that can't without all the rigmarole that goes one has to go through to do so...
photo
LightShadow62
The answers are not found in the extremes
05:56 AM on 01/12/2010
Actually it sounds like Zuckerberg is testing the legal waters to see what will happen when he sells all that information that people have so willingly and stupidly given up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyrione
05:39 AM on 01/12/2010
What do you expect from a guy who stole technology from a colleague at Harvard [his former colleague built the technology for Facebook] and branded it his software while settling out of court for millions.

The man is slime.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dee Amschler
on the edge
03:34 AM on 01/12/2010
Just because Zuckerberg is too lazy to install proper privacy protection and/or making too much money off of 3rd party apps that want enough access that it prevents installing proper privacy protection, doesn't mean WE who use or even MIGHT USE his product "don't want" privacy. Clearly there's a logic failure here, somewhere between the right and left ear of Mr. Zuckerberg.
02:36 AM on 01/12/2010
Just because this 20-something narcissist thinks privacy is passe doesn't make it so.