More

S.E.C. Seeks New Charge Against Bank of America

Bank Of America

LARRY NEUMEISTER   01/12/10 02:51 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK — Federal regulators sued Bank of America Corp. on Tuesday, accusing the company of failing to disclose "staggering financial losses" at Merrill Lynch before shareholders approved a combination of the companies.

The lawsuit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission in U.S. District Court in Manhattan sought an order requiring Bank of America to pay a civil penalty for not telling shareholders it was losing $15.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008.

Bank of America spokesman Robert Stickler called the charges "totally without merit."

He said the company believes it provided sufficient and appropriate disclosure to shareholders prior to their vote approving the combination.

"We look forward to presenting the facts in court," Stickler said. "What we would note is that there were no charges against individuals and no charges of fraud. We were pleased with that."

The SEC said the information about the losses should have been announced when it was learned after the companies publicly announced their deal in September 2008. They did not obtain shareholder approval until three months later.

Federal laws governing such transactions require that losses be revealed if they were not already reflected in Merrill's quarterly reports or other filings.

The SEC and Bank of America, which is based in Charlotte, N.C., are already scheduled to go to trial March 1 after the SEC previously accused the bank of failing to disclose billions of dollars in bonuses paid at Merrill Lynch after the acquisition was completed a year ago.

In the new lawsuit, the SEC said Bank of America "learned of staggering losses at Merrill" in October and November of 2008.

The agency said the bank consulted its lawyers who "erroneously and negligently concluded that no disclosure was necessary because the projected quarterly loss was within the range of losses that Merrill had sustained in the preceding five quarters."

Those losses included a $4.5 billion loss by Merrill in October 2008. The deal was approved by shareholders at a Dec. 5, 2008 meeting. Several days later, Bank of America received an updated report reflecting a forecasted net loss of more than $12 billion at Merrill, the SEC said.

It said the full fourth quarter 2008 results at Merrill were announced on Jan. 16, 2009, nearly six weeks after the shareholder vote and two weeks after the deal had closed.

A day after net loss of $15.3 billion for the quarter was reported, Bank of America stock dropped by nearly 30 percent, the SEC noted.

Bank of America shares fell 72 cents, or 4.3 percent, to $16.21 in afternoon trading.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

NEW YORK — Federal regulators sued Bank of America Corp. on Tuesday, accusing the company of failing to disclose "staggering financial losses" at Merrill Lynch before shareholders approved a com...
NEW YORK — Federal regulators sued Bank of America Corp. on Tuesday, accusing the company of failing to disclose "staggering financial losses" at Merrill Lynch before shareholders approved a com...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 448
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
06:20 AM on 01/12/2010
Do these charges MEAN anything???
05:57 AM on 01/12/2010
All these "new" (What happened to the old? Oh, there weren't any!) charges and investigations wil go nowhere. It doesn't even play out in the MSM as good PR by the Dems, or anyone else, as a show of being in charge and looking out of us little people. The profiteers are in charge and control the courts--Hell, our DOF is so inept even with proof, confesssions, and the smokjing gun,they can't convict mercenaries in Iraq or Afghan with murder. Everything is tilted for the profiteers and ruling one percenters. Freedom of speech now gets us arrested and fired. As for moving your money to a local bank, I did that years ago and never looked back. Hit them all where it hurts--Don't support them and don't be a rabid consumer.
04:37 AM on 01/12/2010
BoA? Big banks? Why take from them?
04:18 AM on 01/12/2010
New charges, were there old charges?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dems08
2012: 60 US Senators / 218 House Seats
03:02 AM on 01/12/2010
charge 'em
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Walking an 87-year-old in the sand isn't easy
02:40 AM on 01/12/2010
Wait a minute -- didn't Merrill post its December losses late?

By DAN FITZPATRICK

Bank of America Corp.'s loss projections for Merrill Lynch & Co. swelled by nearly $2 billion two days before shareholders approved the securities firm's takeover, but bank executives concluded that the losses weren't severe enough to disclose publicly before the vote, according to company emails and people familiar with the situation.

In a Dec. 3 email sent at 6:51 p.m. to several top bank executives, Bank of America Chief Accounting Officer Craig Rosato wrote: "4Q revenues need to be adjusted down by $3B." That revision changed the estimated fourth-quarter net loss to $8.98 billion, worse than the previous Merrill forecast of $7.06 billion sent to a top Bank of America executive earlier the same day.

The emails and attached documents challenge Bank of America's insistence that the losses at Merrill didn't begin ballooning until after shareholders approved the takeover on Dec. 5. Bank executives said nothing publicly about Merrill's problems until they spiraled into a net loss of $15.84 billion for the fourth quarter and the government bailed out Bank of America in January.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124952686109510009.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Walking an 87-year-old in the sand isn't easy
03:14 AM on 01/12/2010
That's a heck of a lot more than the $4.5 billion loss reported in October that this article mentions was not disclosed.

MOREOVER:

The firm argued that Merrill had already incurred five consecutive quarterly losses, and that another loss for the fourth quarter of 2008 would not have been unexpected in the depths of the financial crisis.

NEARLY SIXTEEN BILLION FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER WAS NOT "UNEXPECTED"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FogBelter
Illegitimis non carborundum
01:58 AM on 01/12/2010
Somewhere AP Giannini is pissed ... and I mean really pissed!

(Um, by the way, the current Bank of America is nothing but Nations Bank in a faded BofA T-Shirt.)
photo
tucsoncindy
dyslexia bob
12:04 AM on 01/12/2010
I had to look up proxy statement found this on wikipedia:
proxy statement ( or said form not filed) with merger. The statement assessing how
management is paid and potential conflict of interest issue with auditors...the form also
discloses the CEO compensation...so it depends on the institutions statue in said district....

Prakosh...thank you for your inputs...I can't take anymore finger pointing...just need to know
where we stand as citizens in the reality of the fleecing of the working class hero's and why we
should as citizens ( we own these thieves) take action.

Propaganda separates and continues the lie.
11:56 PM on 01/11/2010
Finally !....a good meat-and-potatoes conspiracy to bite into.
11:49 PM on 01/11/2010
I have money in both, however when I first read of AHHP's push for this I was skeptical, as I don't trust her. Something smelled fishy and I was not sure that it was not an o.d.o.u.r coming from the telly each time I saw her p .i.m. p.in herself on various news programs trying to get a permanent spot. Well it turns out that I was right. If she is so much the advocate for community banks, why does she have an advert for BOA on the business page? This site has lost a great deal of credibility lately, from the new paid TR@//z from the right, to the sensationalized headlines and poorly researched articles. I need not mention all the spin concerning Prez in effort to attract h8ters and hungry TR@//z with TR@//food headers. The constant SPor g y also needs no mention as to how skeeved I have become as of late.
11:52 PM on 01/11/2010
$$$$'sbuy misinformation...thus it penetrates everything. It is time to research and dig for ourselves, and to use all available sources to compile an accurate picture of the facts as they currently exist...No site, source, or ideology will provide you with that same picture.
12:04 AM on 01/12/2010
Ever so true.
11:45 PM on 01/11/2010
The problem with a lot of these banks is that the clowns who run them think that they have to make EVERY dollar. They were not satisfied that everyone in the organization, from the top down, makes a comfortable living while providing a valuable serve to the public.

I'm guessing that they did this, attempting to maximize the banks profits, because they worked it out such that bonuses were tied to this type of performance. This is something, that I as a shareholder, would have objected to. In essence, they sacrificed the banks' well-being by engaging in wild investment and gambling hoping for large profits upon which to base their extravagant bonuses, which they award themselves.

The shareholders need to sue these clown-executives, possibly in shareholder derivative law suits, to recoup every cent made by these selfish oafs that resulted in these banks almost going under but for the fact that the taxpayers bailed them out.

If criminal activity is uncovered, try the buggers and jail them if they're found guilty.
11:47 PM on 01/11/2010
That would work if our congress and courts were not equally corrupt and paid for by the bankers.
11:41 PM on 01/11/2010
CONSPIRACY.....all the d.irty laundry is tumbling out now.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Frustrated in PA
I am not frustrated, I am NOW disgusted
11:39 PM on 01/11/2010
Anyone watching Colbert right now? They have the dude from the Move Your Money. HP got a segment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adartist777
Overqualified
11:37 PM on 01/11/2010
This story is really big news down here in NC. Charlotte is the home of B of A.

When I was driving home this afternoon, it was the talk of NPR and its affiliate. A lot of us here can't hardly wait until the trial comes up in March. Some of us think that a lot of truth will come out involving other banks.
11:41 PM on 01/11/2010
It will be smoke and mirrors..Dig in now, and act now. There is no need to wait for action to take itself...cheers
06:04 AM on 01/12/2010
We all want the truth, but anyone expecting convictions, firings, CHANGE so this will not occur again is not being rational. Obama is surrounded by the very archetects of this meltdown--Or accessories to it. They are protecting each other even as they are being given access to unlimited tax dollars to continue business as usual. All these greedy sociopaths are still eager to get their hands on SS and privatize it--Gut it and destroy the only truly social program that ever worked. They want everyone totally dependent and enslaved to their religion. We have become a nation of Barons, landed Knights, serfs and slaves--Take your pick.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dreamers101
11:37 PM on 01/11/2010
MartinEden22 I'm a Fan of MartinEden22 I'm a fan of this user 44 fans permalink

So tell me, Hume, how does Timmy's @ss taste?
________________________________________

Speaking of a$$ how did Bush's or Cheney's taste at least you had that for 8 long years!