More

Mass. Senate Poll Shows Scott Brown Leading Martha Coakley

Browncoakley

GLEN JOHNSON and LIZ SIDOTI   01/15/10 11:40 PM ET   AP

BOSTON — His health care plan in peril, President Barack Obama laid on a last-minute campaign trip to Massachusetts for Democrat Martha Coakley on Sunday with polls showing her struggling in an unexpectedly close race against Republican Scott Brown to fill the late Edward M. Kennedy's Senate seat.

Vice President Joe Biden, trying to turn the focus of the race away from the president's embattled health care bill, joined the fray, sending an e-mail to Democrats assailing the Republican candidate for opposing Obama's just-announced plan to tax large Wall Street firms.

The late-game White House aggressiveness reflected a sudden deep concern among Democrats that they could lose a seat the party has controlled for more than half a century – and with it the 60th Senate vote that is all that has kept alive the health care overhaul that Obama has spent his entire first year pushing toward passage.

Beyond that, a poor outcome for Coakley on Tuesday would make moderate Democrats ever more nervous about backing Obama on other issues out of concern about their own re-election chances in November, undercutting his presidency just as he's beginning his second year.

On defense and on the attack, Coakley made the same argument as Biden Friday as she tried to appeal to an anti-government, pro-populism electorate. "I'm standing with Main Street on this one. Scott Brown stands with Wall Street," she said.

Brown countered at a campaign event later: "There's only one candidate in this race who's a tax cutter – and it's not Martha Coakley."

Democrats control 60 votes in the Senate, enough to thwart a Republican filibuster of Obama's near-complete health care plan. If Coakley wins, she has said, she will vote, as Kennedy did, with the 57 other Democrats and two independents who side with them. Brown has made clear he would vote against the health plan, which all other Republicans oppose, giving Senate Republicans the 41st vote they need to block the legislation.

"If Scott Brown wins, it'll kill the health bill," said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass.

Secretary of State William F. Galvin, Massachusetts' top election official, said certifying Tuesday's results could take more than two weeks, maybe enough time for Democrats to push Obama's signature legislation through Congress before Brown could take office. Sen. Paul G. Kirk Jr., the interim appointee to Kennedy's seat, says he will vote for the bill if given the chance.

Reversing course from earlier in the week, the White House hastily arranged Obama's trip to campaign with Coakley – even as Democratic leaders in Congress struggled along with the president to nail down a deal on the historic legislation overhauling the country's system of medical care.

Until now, Obama's involvement in the Massachusetts race has been limited to taping an online video and automated phone messages asking Bay Staters to vote for Coakley. "She'll be your voice and my ally," the president promised.

What changed from earlier in the week when the White House announced that the president wouldn't travel to Massachusetts? "He got invited," said White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs.

That invitation, Gibbs said, came Friday, one day after a Suffolk University survey signaled a possible death knell for the 60-vote Senate supermajority the president has been relying upon to pass his health care bill and other initiatives through Congress before November's midterm elections

The poll showed Brown, a Republican state senator, with 50 percent of the vote. Coakley had 46 percent. That amounted to a statistical tie since it was within the poll's 4.4 percentage point margin of error, far different from the 15-point lead that Coakley, the Massachusetts attorney general, enjoyed in a Boston Globe survey released last weekend.

Private, internal polling for both Republicans and Democrats showed a tight race, as well. Momentum was clearly on Brown's side following a final debate in which he was widely seen as beating Coakley on Monday.

The Suffolk University survey showed that Brown backers include some disaffected Democrats. It also showed similarities between his supporters and the Republicans and independents who shaped recent GOP victories in the Virginia and New Jersey gubernatorial races last fall. The supporters are showing a high degree of enthusiasm for their candidate, a relative unknown who has never run statewide, while Democrats have shown little passion for Coakley although she cruised in the four-way Democratic primary with nearly 50 percent of the vote.

The election comes the day after the three-day Martin Luther King Jr. holiday weekend – and on the last day of Obama's first year in office. Snow is forecast for Monday, and many locals head south for warmer weather or north to go skiing during the shortened workweek.

On Friday, Republican and Democratic heavyweights campaigned for both candidates.

At a rally in Boston's North End, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani urged voters to elect Brown for his anti-terror credentials.

"His election, I believe will send a signal – and a very dramatic one – that we're going in the wrong direction on terrorism," said Giuliani, who opposes the administration's decision to have the trial of Sept. 11 terror suspects in New York City.

Former President Bill Clinton was making two appearances in Massachusetts despite his duties as a special envoy to earthquake-ravaged Haiti, another sign of the stakes. "You just have to decide if you want to pick the person who gets to shut America down," Clinton told voters at one stop.

Sen. John Kerry, recovering from hip replacement surgery, took the stage at one event with the help of Kennedy's cane. And Kennedy's widow, Vicki Kennedy, planned to join Coakley at her first canvassing event in Boston on Saturday.

Kennedy, who died Aug. 25 of brain cancer, also was elected to the Senate in a special election on Nov. 6, 1962. He took office the next day, Nov. 7. It was the seat his brother, John F. Kennedy, vacated when he became president in 1961. The Democrats have held the seat since JFK was elected in 1952.

___

Liz Sidoti reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Julie Pace and Alan Fram contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Filed by Michael Falcone  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,793
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
10:45 AM on 01/18/2010
Bad moon rising, I wonder why!
10:14 AM on 01/18/2010
I got a motto for Massachusetts, should they turn into a red state as many seem to predict, "We're now Muricans, leave your intelligence at the state line because ignorance now rules".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
11:19 AM on 01/18/2010
Maybe they are just pissed off because their New England Patriots couldn't make it passed the first round of the playoffs. It really is going to be a sad for this country tomorrow if Brown wins. And it will speak volumes about how easily the people of this state are taken in by "pretty boys" who in reality have no substance. MA deserves what they get.
09:32 PM on 01/17/2010
When Democrats can't scare the voters out with "look out! Sarah Palin," they go to plan B.

They suggest the lesser of two evils approach, "We're not Bush," or "Where else are you gonna go?"

The last resort is to insult voters in hopes of getting them to the polls. They couldn't possibly acknowledge that they've gone off course and need to live up to their 2008 promises.

When pharma doesn't get what they want from Democrats, they cut of donations and put out attack ads.

When voters don't get what they were promised, they work harder, phone bank, donate more, and drag friends to the polls.

We can see which approach politicians respect when we look at the Drug Reimportation Amendment. Pharma got what they wanted. Taxpayers and patients lost.

Let's hope Democrats learn from this election, whether it's a close call or a loss, and govern in 2010 the way they promised in 2008. Otherwise they're in trouble in November.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
11:22 AM on 01/18/2010
Anna Quinlen of Newsweek had a wonderful quote, you should pay attention to meko~

"So if the American people want the president to be more like the Barack Obama they elected, maybe they should start acting more like the voters who elected him..."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanetE
12:16 PM on 01/18/2010
Politifact counted 500 promises candidate Obama made and 91 done.
So he has accomplished 20% of his promises.

Would you agree that many people who elected him are surprised and disappointed in the way he is governing?

I think the worst thing is that although the deficit increased under Bush, Obama's agenda will increase it by FOUR more times.

That's not really the change people expected and are therefore disappointed in that and many other things his administration has done.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JaneK13
09:21 PM on 01/17/2010
When the debate moderator asked Mr. Brown about "the Kennedy Seat," and Mr. Brown corrected him saying, "It's not the Kennedy Seat, it's not the Democrats' Seat, It's the People's Seat," he won the debate.

Scott Brown told the people he would represent them...not himself or the party. He won a lot of votes during that debate..
01:18 AM on 01/18/2010
So brown was debating the moderator? Get real!
01:19 AM on 01/18/2010
It was still a good response.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
11:29 AM on 01/18/2010
And you believed him! Let's see if can deliver on that representation.......you better not jump into that pool head first without checking to make sure there's water in it.
08:57 PM on 01/17/2010
Brown Has 9.6% Lead in New Poll

http://insidemedford.com/2010/01/17/brown-has-96-lead-in-new-poll/
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Tommygun264
2Q2BSTR8
10:22 PM on 01/17/2010
Gee, lies are like manure to you - you just love spreading them around. Once again, you're quoting a fatally flawed poll conducted by a right-wing rag. According to the methodology they listed:

"MRG surveyed 565 likely voters between 5:00 P.M. and 8:45 P.M. on January 15, 2010 using touch-tone polling technology."

There were no call-backs to verify the participants - nothing to control multiple votes cast by single participants, so it's about as reliable as the phone polls used on American Idol. Furthermore, the standard for accuracy in standard scientific polls is a minimum of 1,000 respondents. By their own admission they surveyed only 565 people who identified themselves as "likely voters", without any verification control. The first time I saw you trying to pull this garbage I assumed you were just ignorant, posting poll results just because they supported your opinion without checking the poll's validity or accuracy. But now I have to assume you are intentionally propagating lies.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
SPQR1052
VET & GLBT - http://www.ryanvouchercare.com -
10:26 AM on 01/18/2010
Fanned. #245
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohsnap
08:55 PM on 01/17/2010
Medicare does not pay for itself. And pretty soon the younger generations will get sick of paying for it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Leigh49
Close your eyes, you won't feel a thing
05:45 PM on 01/17/2010
have the people of Mass gone Mad?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanetE
06:48 PM on 01/17/2010
If this bill is passed, there will be thousands of lawsuits.

1- According to the Constitution, laws must treat all states equally, yet this bill exempts states by buying votes.

2- According to the Constitution, the government cannot MANDATE that we BUY anything!

So as soon as someone is arrested for not having health insurance and not paying the fine, the lawsuits will fly!

It's wrong. It's all wrong. It's too expensive. It raises taxes on the middle class. It raises the cost of medical items like hip replacement parts, etc. It lowers the quality of Medicare. IT CONTROLS OUR LIVES with all it's mandates. The word "shall" was used over 3,000 times in this bill. That means on every page!!!

Government ... stop trying to rule our lives. Enough is enough!
We are mature enough and wise enough to make our own decisions!
Scott1560
Proud Reagan Republican to Indy and Back!
08:42 PM on 01/17/2010
Gotta love your #3 (although you dd not designate as such)......

Gotta love the compassion of both major parties, apparently thrilled by the fact that the U.S. already has the highest incarceration rate in the world. Hey, what's a few more behind bars. Absurd! And neither ever does a thing to reduce the numbers...........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inorbit
10:34 AM on 01/18/2010
Never under-estimate the ability of the US public to vote against its own interests and support those of Wall Street and the big corporations. That's why we are in the mess we are in now - with a decimated economy, no job growth for 10 years and no real increase in workers wages for over 20 years.

Wake up people - you are being conned!
07:05 PM on 01/17/2010
No just MSM, pay no attention to MSM they are bought of paid for by the rethug party.
05:20 PM on 01/17/2010
MANY people use the word socialism and government takeover and other words to scare people. These words do NOT have a negative conotation..on the contrary ...they have a very direct meaning ...especially to the people that are suffering right now ...have lost their home or all they have to pay for an insurance ....which should be just that ...a backstop...a safety net ...a preservation of a way of life that if you buy into ...work hard ..save ...get ahead ...that you won't have in the blink of an eye it ALL taken away from you ...just because you get sick...

In Canada and in most other western democracies ...the crux of the matter is twofold (2 )

DO people of higher means help pay more for people thay have little or nothing? ...and the answer is yes in those countries but NOT in the US.

Can Insurance companies in some of those countries co-exist with the government ? ..and again the answer is yes (ONLY ) with strict regulation and the guiding principle that yes ...capitalism ..or a commericial entity can make a profit ...just NOT one that is OBSCENE...

so there you have it ..argue away one way or the other ..but it ALL boils down to that ...and now the few people that stand in the way have to vote and wrestle with their morals ... ...

if they have any?”
08:19 PM on 01/17/2010
This isn't the single payer of Canada.

This isn't a Belgian-style system in which for-profit health insurance companies are eliminated; all non-profit insurance funds are required to only sell a few standardized high quality insurance plans; the same insurers are required to use a single government-set reimbursement rate, so all can truly afford health insurance.

This isn't a mandated Netherlands style system where the government mandates only the sale of strictly defined high quality insurances and all basic policies must have identical coverage rules, premiums are affordable, there is a strong national regulator, and extremely robust risk adjustment mechanisms force insurers to compete based on quality and not risk selection.

The bill being proposed is a mandate to purchase insurance from politically connected monopolies that will only be regulated by toothless state boards that can't enforce the consumer protections we have now. And there's more:
* Large age ratios force older consumers to pay substantially more for their premiums
* Insurers are given wide latitude in design policies and allows for the sale of very low 60% actuarial junk insurance and “catastrophic plans”
* People will be force to pay 9.8% of their income for a low value insurance plan
* The weak risk adjuster that would not stop insurers from trying to game the system and cherry pick customers

So the problem is it's a bad bill and a bad plan and that's why many oppose it.
Scott1560
Proud Reagan Republican to Indy and Back!
08:35 PM on 01/17/2010
Wel stated!
04:27 PM on 01/17/2010
This election like NJ and Va is about America realizing that the social experiment tha we started one year ago is an unmitigated disaster. 8 years of Bush are rapidly looking better and better to the non-fringe American. The fact that this is even close is a huge rejection of the course BHO/Pelosi/Reid are dragging us down
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Leigh49
Close your eyes, you won't feel a thing
05:46 PM on 01/17/2010
Eight years of Bush was hell for everyone but the rich. Must be a lot of rich people voting these days.
07:47 AM on 01/18/2010
I am sure all of the dead and seriously injured solders, dead Iraqis and the millions of Iraqi citizens who left the country do not likely share your great regard for President Bush (can only make assumption for the dead). Of course you also managed to ignore the huge increase in the national debt under Bush.
03:16 PM on 01/17/2010
To all Dems:vote early,vote often,let's ACORN the election.HOPE IS NOT A POLICY!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
bluntobject
Gandhi didn't like your attitude either!
03:04 PM on 01/17/2010
All these republican trolls on here saying Coakley is toast. Please, you don't know that. It is just wishful thinking. Maybe one day, these detractors and TEA BAGS will lose their health insurance and also have pre-existing conditions to deal with. Then, maybe then, they will see the need for Health Care reform. Unfortunately, for many of those who are already desparate, it will be too late.

I hope republicans, like Nude Model Brown, can live with themselves. My guess is, they can.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Leigh49
Close your eyes, you won't feel a thing
05:48 PM on 01/17/2010
Republican'ts think desperate people are of the devil. They will never change. Look at Limbaugh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanetE
06:34 PM on 01/17/2010
The Republicans wanted MEDICARE REFORM exactly the way the Dems are proposing in this current bill -- Bush was for it -- it was the Democrats in Bush's Democrat ruled Congress after 2006 that voted it down.

So what makes anyone think that all the money Pelosi/Reid are claiming to SAVE in this bill with Medicare reform is actually going to happen now?

Medicare reform is the key to this entire bill. It's how the whole thing will be paid for. Without it, the defiicit will go way way up as well as our taxes.

So I don't understand what makes people think the Dems will actually do the reform now when they voted against it when Bush wanted it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:50 PM on 01/17/2010
Once again the great people of the state of Massachusetts have risen to the occasion and will save us from the tyrants.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Leigh49
Close your eyes, you won't feel a thing
05:49 PM on 01/17/2010
They didn't save us from massive spending on two wars, tax cuts for the wealthy and Medicare part D.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
11:38 AM on 01/18/2010
Yes, I do hope they save themselves and the country from Republicans.....no doubt about it!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:48 PM on 01/17/2010
Cambridge police are acting “stupidly” again. They are backing Brown. To make matters worst, her husband is a retired Cambridge Police Officer.

The people of Mass have seen the light.

Go Brown !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Leigh49
Close your eyes, you won't feel a thing
05:50 PM on 01/17/2010
If they vote for Brown, they may as well go to the light. Cause it wont' be good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donbrown
A television producer in Hawaii
02:41 PM on 01/17/2010
I agree that it seems unfair for the people of Massachussetts to be punished (taxed) for passing a progressive health care bill on their own, just as it was unfair for California to roll back their own standards for emissions on care to conform wilth a less progressive federal CAFE standard.

What if they just exempt the state fro the law or allow them to opt out, so the rest of the country can enjoy what they have.

Would that solve the problem?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanetE
06:38 PM on 01/17/2010
Oh great, another exemption. It's against the Constitution to pass a law that does NOT treat all states equally.

And that's why if this passes, there will be a ton of lawsuits over the millions of dollars that bought votes by exempting states.

Go back and do it right. And show all the negotiations on C-Span as promised.
And stop rewarding all the lobbyists who voted for Obama. The unions threatened to hold back all their millions of votes in Nov 2010, so Obama exempted them from the Cadillac tax. Is THAT how this is supposed to work???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donbrown
A television producer in Hawaii
08:17 PM on 01/17/2010
You obviously don't know what your talking about. The congress has been talking all along about an opt-out for states on the health care bill -- you haven't been paying attention.

If it WERE unconstitutional do you think they'd be considering it?

Do your homework.
01:42 AM on 01/18/2010
Their bill isn't very progressive. It's the same mandates the federal bill wants. It's the same lack of competition. It's the same weak regulator. It's the same failure to protect consumers who are forced into an untenable situation.

That's why Massachusetts has the highest premiums in the nation. That's why 21% of those with the mandated individual insurance policies forgo care, because their deductibles make it so they can't afford it. That's why so many just pay the fine rather than buy insurance they can't afford.

This is a regressive bill. Just like the federal bill. It puts a burden on the middle class. It doesn't bother to tax the wealthy. It's a windfall for insurers.
02:34 PM on 01/17/2010
I see that many don't care that it could be the end of health care reform if Brown wins, but there will still be education reform and energy bills going through Congress. Are we closer to change by voting in this man?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
11:42 AM on 01/18/2010
We are closer to gridlock for sure. And closer to a tea party with the Mad Hatter!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JanetE
12:11 PM on 01/18/2010
No, if Scott Brown wins, we would be closer to the CHECKS AND BALANCES that our government is supposed to have, as opposed to one party rule.

One party rule is what communist countries and dictatorships have.
Our free country is supposed to have checks and balances.

Obama invited the Republicans into the White House in the very beginning of his term.
And then excluded them from everything after that.
Republicans would write, asking to be heard and he completely ignored their letters or had someone write back that he could not fit them into his schedule yet and then never did.

Don't fool yourself.
The Democrats WANT this to be THEIR thing.
So that they could say the Democratic Party is the party that was able to put through health care reform, cap and trade, etc etc etc.