iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Scott Brown's Win in Massachusetts: HuffPost Bloggers React

Huffington Post   First Posted: 03/22/10 06:12 AM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 04:15 PM ET

Massachusetts' special election to fill the seat of the late Ted Kennedy Tuesday resulted in a debilitating loss for the Democratic Party and a historical upset in favor of the Republicans. Though traditionally known as one of the bluest of blue states, GOP State Senator Scott Brown took home 52 percent of the votes to Martha Coakley's 47 percent. Now, in the aftermath, the commentary is rolling in. Scroll down to see a round-up of HuffPost bloggers' reactions, predictions, I-told-you-so's, and more. And feel free to leave your own comments below.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Massachusetts' special election to fill the seat of the late Ted Kennedy Tuesday resulted in a debilitating loss for the Democratic Party and a historical upset in favor of the Republicans. Though tr...
Massachusetts' special election to fill the seat of the late Ted Kennedy Tuesday resulted in a debilitating loss for the Democratic Party and a historical upset in favor of the Republicans. Though tr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 176
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dhhh
10:21 AM on 02/17/2010
Coakley i now hope is politically dead. She was arrogant and stupid. What made this foolish woman think she could win without throwing her entire self into this CAMPAIGN.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zetacplus
Conservatism has failed America
03:01 AM on 01/24/2010
President Obama royally screwed up by allowing health care reform to just meander through Congress. The party of NO blocked every piece of legislation while they were screaming that they were being ignored by the democrats. The democrats, with a shaky 60 vote majority (because of the traitor Lieberman) were unable to pass the legislation they wanted to. Instead of punishing the repugs, the people punish the president and democrats. President Obama is stuck between a rock and a hard place but he needs to use his presidential pulpit to rally popular opinion so the people will understand what's going on.
02:48 PM on 01/21/2010
Does anyone remember Shannon O'Brien, the democratic guberantorial candidate who ran against Mitt Romney? I worked on her campaign and during canvassing, phonebanking, research and just talking to friends, discovered that Massachusetts is sexist. In a mostly democratic state, when a female gubernatorial candidate loses by a small margin, you have to ask why? The answer is Jane Swift (2001) --the lieutenant governor who became governor when then governor Paul Cellucci resigned to become Ambassador to Canada. (Jane Swift also had twins while in office). Whenever, I asked someone why they wouldn't vote for Shannon O'Brien, the answer was Jane Swift, we had a woman and look how that turned out, and Jane Swift was a Republican. The constituency saw her as "bad", the woman (not the politician) who screwed up the state. Right after that, Shannon O'Brien had the unfortunate circumstance to run and Mitt Romney was the male challenger. Now, you've got another republican "pretty boy" getting elected. I think it's time for Massachusetts to do some serious soul-searching.
photo
dakotawoman
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill. . .old time Progressive
11:25 AM on 01/21/2010
Can someone PLEASE explain to me?

A majority of Americans (according to the polls) WANTED a public option health care reform bill.

The party proposing this reform occupies the presidency AND has a majority in both houses of Congress.

WHAT the F***?!!!!!!

The Republican MINORITY and Big Business are clearly the real power brokers here. And have apparently ALWAYS been. The concept of America as a representative democratic republic is a farce.

Why try to change anything, when the best, most hopeful and altruistic of efforts smash like insects on the windshield of a juggernaut called "corporate special interest married to theocratic fundamentalist oppressors determined to strangle every individual's personal choices in the name of a desert nomad god'.

We are f*****.

A whole country held hostage by reactionary Neanderthals determined to keep us mired in their fantasy vision of an America that never existed in the first place.

More years of deadlock.

More generations owned and kept chained up to minimum wage lives without benefits as wage slaves to the corporations that very obviously and clearly are the REAL government.

I'm done.

Been fun talking with you all.

Goodbye.

I'm going home now to bunker down and entrench for the coming American Dark Ages.
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
08:41 AM on 01/21/2010
Scott Brown won because of non-transparent voting "machines" "counting".

Research done by Bev Harris of Black Box Voting

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

"According to preliminary media results by municipality, Democrat Martha
Coakley won Massachusetts overall in its hand counted locations,* with 51.12% of the
vote (32,247 hand counted votes) to Brown's 30,136, which garnered him 47.77% of
hand counted votes. Margin: 3.35% lead for Coakley.

Massachusetts has 71 hand count locations, 91 ES&S locations, and 187 Diebold
locations, with two I call the mystery municipalities (Northbridge and Milton)
apparently using optical scanners, not sure what kind"
07:09 AM on 01/21/2010
There were a lot of us who voted for Martha Coakley 'anyway', just not enough.
Scott Brown was a very appealing candidate, a man's man. Martha wasn't.
The Kennedy hold on Massachusetts politcs has come to an end.

Also, the Palin hold on US politics is now over. There's a new kid on the block.
photo
CindyInIndy
Just a small town girl, living in a lonely world.
09:52 PM on 01/20/2010
If you add a p,e,n,i,s to Sarah Palin, you'll have Scott Brown.
08:33 PM on 01/20/2010
Just think, Brown only needs to serve 123 days in the US senate, then he'll be fully qualified to be President!!
07:55 PM on 01/20/2010
Obama never had a majority.
08:12 PM on 01/20/2010
Unless you count Joe Lieberman.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
1murillo
Can't be neutral on a moving train - Zinn
03:33 AM on 01/24/2010
If you mean 60 votes then you'd also consider Sanders (I) as a non-Democrat. Nelson, Baucus Lincoln, Landrieu, all Democrats are part of the more conservative side of the senate Democrats.
07:35 PM on 01/20/2010
A good outline on how the President can get back in the game:

www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34956715/ns/politics-white_house/
07:25 PM on 01/20/2010
The chickens have come home to roost America!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Passenger57
Keeping Calm And Carrying On...
07:20 PM on 01/20/2010
After eight years of suffering under the Republicans, all of a sudden Democrats are impatient with one of their own in charge,see how the Republicans are fighting him every step of the way - so they vote in a Republican with the same anti-whatever-Obama-does agenda...which also erases the filibuster-proof majority the Dems had.
Yup. Makes perfect sense...things will start getting done in DC now, by gum!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidShort
07:48 PM on 01/20/2010
Hopefully, we will have enough gridlock that nothing gets done. Much less damage that way.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BMcCue7
I'm Buddy McCue (and you're not.)
07:25 AM on 01/21/2010
That WOULD protect the status quo, alright.

Some of us don't think that's such a great idea.
10:08 PM on 01/20/2010
Uh, no. Independents are frustrated at having liberal ideology rammed down their throats. Independents voted Republicans out in 2006 and 2008 in repudiation for their ideological idiocy (not as endorsement of Democratic ideological idiocy), And now Independents are reminding Democrats that they are not anti- or pro- Republican or Democrat but anti-ideological idiocy on either side.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BMcCue7
I'm Buddy McCue (and you're not.)
07:26 AM on 01/21/2010
Incremental change isn't the same thing as having "ideology rammed down their throats."
07:06 PM on 01/20/2010
As a person who actually lives in Massachusetts I must comment. To be honest, I did not vote for Scott Brown, but I saw the direction of this election changing about a week or so ago. Alot of this is a vote against Martha Coakley and her lackluster campaign and against the stranglehold that democrats have on the Massachusetts senate. Nothing gets done here because of cronyism and it is very frustrating. Martha Coakley came off as entitled and as one of the insiders on Beacon Hill. Also, Massachusetts can be very conservative and very bigoted. There is a lot of NIMBYism from alot of comservative catholics and ethnocentric groups here in the Bay state. There was alot of talk about Scott Brown being a "red blooded American",etc. He is a non-challenging entity that conservatives in this state can live with. He doesn't make them uncomfortable or challenge the things they think make people "American". He has to run again in 2 years so we'll see what happens then. Frankly I'm surprised that people are convinced he has so much power. He is a junior Senator with a relatively short time to learn. Let's face it, he probably just wants to hold onto this job.
07:30 PM on 01/20/2010
Wow... The state that carried Obama by 26 points is now suddenly racist? Get a clue. Did you ever think that people vote based on policies? Ignorant.
06:53 PM on 01/20/2010
Of passing interest, the polls which predicted an upset (and
were quite upsetting at the same time) were actually pretty accurate.

More than a little disturbing, Rasmussen seems to take pride &
credit for motivating Republicans to finish off Martha Coakley.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/massachusetts/brown_wins_stunning_victory_in_massachusetts
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Passenger57
Keeping Calm And Carrying On...
08:13 PM on 01/20/2010
I'm only concerned about the exit poll...or lack thereof...
isadora
Leftie, educator, labor activist, Unitarian Univer
06:17 PM on 01/20/2010
Let us recall "Mitt' Romney's senatorial campaign against Ted Kennedy as recounted in the book "True Compass." "Mitt" portrayed himself as pro-choice, though he's always been a Mormon pledged to that group's absolute 'pro life" position. He also stated progressive views on gay issues again in direct opposition to his church's hard line that violence is the answer against gays and lesbians.. The MAN WHO WAS MIRACULOUSLY ELECTED last night drove around in a pickup truck and distanced himself from the repubgang depicting himself as a 'man of the people.' Seems like the repub and indy gang in MA are repeatedly falling for BS. I'm to sad to say more.
06:59 PM on 01/20/2010
There was perhaps more than a little Mitt Romney involvement in
Scott Brown's campaign, including 'Romney's Brain' Eric Fehrnstrom.
If you can't be the king, it's good to be the king maker. Get ready for 2012.