Global Warming Opens Up Arctic For Undersea Cable

DAN JOLING   01/21/10 04:19 PM ET   AP

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Global warming has melted so much Arctic ice that a telecommunication group is moving forward with a project that was unthinkable just a few years ago: laying underwater fiber optic cable between Tokyo and London by way of the Northwest Passage.

The proposed system would nearly cut in half the time it takes to send messages from the United Kingdom to Asia, said Walt Ebell, CEO of Kodiak-Kenai Cable Co. The route is the shortest underwater path between Tokyo and London.

The quicker transmission time is important in the financial world where milliseconds can count in executing profitable trades and transactions. "Speed is the crux," Ebell said. "You're cutting the delay from 140 milliseconds to 88 milliseconds."

The project, while still facing many significant obstacles, also serves as an example of how warming has altered the Arctic landscape in profound ways.

The loss of summer sea ice prompted the U.S. to list polar bears as a threatened species in May 2008. Walrus in two of the last three years gathered by the thousands on Alaska's northwest shore rather than ride pack ice to unproductive waters beyond the outer continental shelf.

Summer sea ice melted to its lowest recorded level ever in late 2007, and most climate modelers predict a continued downward spiral. The result is a path through the Northwest Passage, the Arctic route connecting the Atlantic and Pacific that has fascinated explorers for centuries.

"That opens up the construction window to actually do something like this without the need of heavy icebreakers," Ebell said. "On the other side, you've got the market part of it and the increasing demand we're seeing for lower and lower latencies, or transmission times."

But the project, called ArcticLink, is not without hurdles – namely the estimated construction price of $1.2 billion, said Alan Mauldin, research director at TeleGeography Research, a Washington, D.C.-based telecommunications market research company.

"That's not a cheap project," he said by phone from the Slovak Republic.

By comparison, a line beginning service next month between Japan and the U.S. West Coast was built for $300 million, he said.

The leaders of the project will need to persuade telecommunications companies to buy a piece of the capacity created by the cable. Telecom companies will make that decision largely based on demand from financial companies.

"What we've seen is just because you have a diverse path does not mean that you can necessarily sell that capacity for much more than the current market price," Mauldin said.

Ebell uses the analogy of building a shopping mall to describe the financing process: Secure some initial investments and then lure an anchor tenant to really drive the project forward.

The cable will cut a 10,000-mile path across half the world: It would be laid in deep water from Japan to the Aleutian Islands, then traverse north through the relatively shallow waters of the Bering Sea.

The line would need a regeneration station – essentially a booster of the signal to compensate for the long distance – on the northern coast of Alaska, probably at Prudhoe Bay. From there, it will wend its way through the Northwest Passage, then dip around the southern tip of Greenland and across the North Atlantic to the United Kingdom.

Branches off the line would provide access to the East Coast of the U.S., ensuring quicker transmission times between Tokyo and New York, Ebell said.

"It will provide the domestic market an alternative route not only to Europe – there's lots of cable across the Atlantic – but it will provide the East Coast with an alternative, faster route to Asia as well," he said.

The cable would pass mostly through U.S., Canadian international waters and avoid possible trouble spots along the way.

"You're not susceptible to 'events,' I should say, that you might run into with a cable that runs across Russia or the cables that run down around Asia and go up through the Suez Canal into the Mediterranean Sea. You're getting away from those choke points."

Ebell's Anchorage-based company is partnering with KhaNNet, part of Khanjee Holdings, Inc., on the project, and the partners are pursuing financing.

The company also hopes to link rural Alaska communities to the cable. It has applied for $350 million in federal stimulus money, nearly 5 percent of that total for broadband grant and loan program, for lines to eight hub communities in western and northern Alaska. The Asia-Europe line does not depend on stimulus money, Ebell said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Global warming has melted so much Arctic ice that a telecommunication group is moving forward with a project that was unthinkable just a few years ago: laying underwater fibe...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Global warming has melted so much Arctic ice that a telecommunication group is moving forward with a project that was unthinkable just a few years ago: laying underwater fibe...
Filed by Katherine Goldstein  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:08 PM on 01/29/2010
I'm looking forward to climate change. I'm bored with the climate not changing. Lets embrace the change and stop whining about it.
11:37 AM on 01/29/2010
Good news for the warmist. Even though CRU officials broke the law, they won't be prosecuted.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1246661/New-scandal-Climate-Gate-scientists-accused-hiding-data-global-warming-sceptics.html
08:53 AM on 01/29/2010
From the New York Times, 128 years of looming polar doom:

• 1881: “This past Winter, both inside and outside the Arctic circle, appears to have been unusually mild. The ice is very light and rapidly melting …”

• 1932: “NEXT GREAT DELUGE FORECAST BY SCIENCE; Melting Polar Ice Caps to Raise the Level of Seas and Flood the Continents”

• 1934: “New Evidence Supports Geology’s View That the Arctic Is Growing Warmer”

• 1937: “Continued warm weather at the Pole, melting snow and ice.”

• 1954: “The particular point of inquiry concerns whether the ice is melting at such a rate as to imperil low-lying coastal areas through raising the level of the sea in the near future.”

• 1957: “U.S. Arctic Station Melting”

• 1958: “At present, the Arctic ice pack is melting away fast. Some estimates say that it is 40 per cent thinner and 12 per cent smaller than it was fifteen years [ago].”

• 1959: “Will the Arctic Ocean soon be free of ice?”

• 1971: “STUDY SAYS MAN ALTERS CLIMATE; U.N. Report Links Melting of Polar Ice to His Activities”

• 1979: “A puzzling haze over the Arctic ice packs has been identified as a byproduct of air pollution, a finding that may support predictions of a disastrous melting of the earth’s ice caps.”
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
12:30 PM on 01/26/2010
If only the denial knuckleheads were the only ones to suffer the consequences from pretending that human-driven (as opposed to natural) climate change is a scam, I wouldn't mind your stupidity.
11:54 PM on 01/24/2010
I mentioned before that maybe this is God's plan to show us
what is beneath the icebergs...and new possibilities.
Nobody said the icebergs would stay forever.

There are other parts of the earth that have changed over many years, why not there.

I have been wondering where Al Gore is.....Haven't heard a word from or about him for quite awhile.
Do you think he is taking advantage of the "global warming" and
spending winter on a nice sunny beach somewhere in the
South Pacific....while most of the U.S has been freezing and digging
out from all the snow.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
01:39 AM on 01/25/2010
Haven't heard from Al Gore? You mean other than that big book he published like two months ago?

And don't bring God into this. Your personal faith is your right, but you can't possibly expect the rest of us to interpret these events through the lens of your interpretation of the whims of a magical man in the sky.

If God exists, I bloody well hope He has better things to do than worry about new business opportunities for venture capitalists. Isn't that a little bit petty for the creator of the universe?
02:56 AM on 01/25/2010
Al did start hiding under his SUVs after the whole science scam broke. And then there was that embarassing houseboat thing. Forgot the solar panels first time around. Someone took a photo. And then he was a no show at the million dollar plate dinner in copenhoaxen. Not been too rosy for him lately. But he will be back.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
07:49 AM on 01/25/2010
f God exists, I bloody well hope He has better things to do than worry about new business opportunities for venture capitalists. Isn't that a little bit petty for the creator of the universe?

LOL
Fanned
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
06:38 PM on 01/24/2010
We don't need the melting of glaciers and polar ice sheets to know that the planet is warming. Our carefully calibrated thermometers demonstrate that fact quite well.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
01:51 PM on 01/24/2010
Global Warming? It's -28 C outside with a -36 wind chill.

:)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
04:33 PM on 01/24/2010
How nice to know that your immediate local conditions are an indicator of long-term global trends. I'm so relieved.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
02:04 AM on 01/25/2010
Sarcasm eludes you, huh?
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
06:29 PM on 01/24/2010
"Global Warming? It's -28 C outside with a -36 wind chill."

Not everyone lives near a polar axis.
photo
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:41 PM on 01/24/2010
Hurry up and lay the cable. It'll freeze up again some day soon.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
06:30 PM on 01/24/2010
Really, when and how do you know?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StJames
In absentia luci tenebrae vincunt
08:35 AM on 01/24/2010
Well now we know the SOURCE of Global Warming Denial...and here we thought it was the Oil companies...should have known it was the Financial Whores.
photo
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:42 PM on 01/24/2010
The reflexive anti-capitalism is noted.

The source of the global warming hysteria is becoming evident.

The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders. In an interview with The Mail on Sunday, Dr Lal, the co-ordinating lead author of the report’s chapter on Asia, said: ‘It related to several countries in this region and their water sources. We thought that if we can highlight it, it will impact policy-makers and politicians and encourage them to take some concrete action. It had importance for the region, so we thought we should put it in.’
--David Rose, Mail on Sunday, 24 January 2010

How the claim ended up in a report whose authors are supposed to scrutinise "every statement in every sentence" is a mystery.
--Robin McKie, Sunday 24 January 2010
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StJames
In absentia luci tenebrae vincunt
02:01 PM on 01/24/2010
Right and the evidence of your own eyes and the fact that for the first time this cable is possible tells you nothing?

I'm not the least bit anti-capitalism. I am however anti-corporate socialism. I am anti the 10% of the population who controls 70.9 % of the wealth sucking up all the remaining capital of the country, indeed the world, with damn little concern as to how they do it or how much damage they do. With even less concern for those who have had their own small share of the pie destroyed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Pass The Pakalolo
01:59 AM on 01/24/2010
know what's really melting lol?

the IPCC..

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/NOAAroleinclimategate.pdf
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MAJK
Economic Democracy > Capitalism
08:10 AM on 01/24/2010
Last week you were quoting Tabloids and Fox News and now you are posting links from opinion pieces by the Exxon Mobile company employee Joseph D’Aleo, who is also a weatherman - I think you've outed yourself enough on these blogs.. I look forward to the next laugh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Pass The Pakalolo
11:40 AM on 01/24/2010
i'm an equal-opportunity..

anthropogenic climate change denier MAJK..

lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RichieB
Science is true whether you believe it or not
09:29 AM on 01/24/2010
Fumes, "Summer sea ice melted to the lowest recorded level ever in 2007 and most climate modelers predict a continued downward spiral". Do you think corporations would invest 1.2 billion in a project if this were not true? The loss of summer sea ice prompts polar bears to be listed as a threatened species. Do you not like polar bears (lol)?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Pass The Pakalolo
11:37 AM on 01/24/2010
i like polar bears RB though i've never met one..

the IPCC thinks we cause this climate change with our CO2..

and i don't.
photo
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:43 PM on 01/24/2010
But the polar bears don't mind! There are more than ever. They have expanded their range, showing up in northern Iceland for the first time in years, it seems.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Osborne
12:34 AM on 01/24/2010
Egad, there are capitalists investing in polar ice melt and the "Green" vertical is still covered in denialist tr0//s. Where do they come from?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
12:48 AM on 01/24/2010
Many of them are probably on someone's payroll. Some of these trolls just ring false to me, as though they're playing a part. I suspect a fair number are hired shills tasked with muddying the waters on behalf of commercial interests.

The parameters of victory favor the corporate world, as an environmentalist must actually prove his idea even beyond the usual rigors of science while his opponent succeeds simply by sowing obfuscation and doubt.

Not an ideal state of affairs.
photo
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
04:00 PM on 01/24/2010
The evidence is that local SUBSURFACE temperature changes due to variations in the Earth's core are the cause of any changes observed--NOT GLOBAL WARMING.

That's where we come from. From SCIENCE.
photo
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
03:58 PM on 01/24/2010
Straight from the scientific journals!

"Some of the present-day claims that ice sheets ‘collapse’ are based on false concepts. Ice sheets do not melt from the surface down – only at the edges. Once the edges are lost, further loss depends on the rate of flow of the ice. The rate of flow of an ice sheet does not depend on the present climate, but on the amount of ice already accumulated...

The very ice cores that are used to determine climates over the past 400,000 years also show that the ice sheet has grown over that period by accumulation of stratigraphic layers of snow, and has not been deformed or remelted. The mechanism portrayed by Christoffersen and Hambrey (2006), of meltwater lakes on the surface finding their way down through cracks in the ice and lubricating the bottom of the glacier is not compatible with accumulation of undisturbed snow layers. ..

The global warming doomsday writers claim the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are melting catastrophically, and will cause a sudden rise in sea level of 5 or more metres. This ignores the mechanism of glacier flow which is by creep. Glaciers are not melting from the surface down, nor are they sliding down an inclined plane lubricated by meltwater... Variations in melting around the edges of ice sheets are no indication that they are collapsing. Indeed ‘collapse’ is impossible."
--Cliff Ollier, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences
The University of Western Australia
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Matt Osborne
05:23 AM on 01/25/2010
"The global warming doomsday writers claim the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are melting catastrophically, and will cause a sudden rise in sea level of 5 or more metres."

Straw man. Ice cap melt will raise the seas to be sure. Less saline seas mean weaker currents and weirder weather. Permafrost may release methane and accelerate the problem even further. All of this is interdependent, as are most natural systems, and the disaster won't be a Hollywood two-hour epic. The "alarmists" are quite aware of the decadal time-scale involved.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:21 PM on 01/23/2010
"The quicker transmission time is important in the financial world where milliseconds can count in executing profitable trades and transactions."

That's something that should be fixed. The global economy should not depend on milliseconds. Limiting trading frequency would cure many problems.
photo
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
04:58 PM on 01/24/2010
One of my long-ago stated theories was that much of the booming economy of the late 1980s and 1990s was created by the boom in cell phones. Executive decisions could thus be made much faster than previously. No longer did one exec or secretary track down a boss by landline, contacting another secretary or a hotel operator, and eventually getting the decision-maker on the line. The speeding up of executive decisions thus boosted the economy, helped increase job growth, and boosted stock prices.

Trying to halt the benefits of technology seems unwise to me.
10:01 PM on 01/23/2010
the Jan 24 edition of the Sunday Times is going to report yet another IPCC issue where they are reconsidering their earlier stance that a statistical relaitonship exists between GW and severe weather such as Hurricanes and floods. Here we go again
12:18 AM on 01/24/2010
The earth is not getting warmer. It’s getting colder. The IPCC admitted this week that their claim that the Himalayan glaciers are melting away was false.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
12:26 AM on 01/24/2010
Everything you just said is wrong.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SFTor
08:22 PM on 01/23/2010
One perplexing fact is that the United States, which has the best network of climate stations of any country, is not warming.

This is strange.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/noaa_pl1.jpg

Since 1990 NOOA uses about 1,500 stations around the world to measure "global" temperature, down from around 6,000 before 1990. When unadjusted temperature data are analyzed, the time around 1990 shows a definite jump in temperatures.

This is also strange.

Bolivia, the country in the world with the largest land area over 10,000 feet altitude, seems to to show a lot of warming. Yet there is not a single station reporting temperatures to the NOAA data set in the entire country. All the data for Bolivia are extrapolated from stations in lower altitudes, some as much as 1,200 km away. That would be like measuring temperature variations in Phoenix and applying them to San Francisco.

That doesn't seem right either.

Remember the hyperbole before Copenhagen, that climate change is happening so quickly that we must act immediately to counter it? Seems like we need to reassess the quality of our data before we jump to any such conclusions.

We are nearing a point where we have to seriously question whether the Earth has warmed in any meaningful sense at all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quillsinister
09:33 PM on 01/23/2010
And in the meantime, we need to get off oil anyway for economic and geopolitical reasons that are more urgent and time-sensitive than the slow unfolding of climate change could ever be.

Our oil addiction perpetuates trade deficits, creates our wars and funds oppressive regimes. Coal poisons us with, among other things, high levels of Hg.

There is no good here. Whether you're a treehugger or a calculating military man (and I happen to be both), our way out is exactly the same. We have no choice but to get off oil; the only question is whether we'll do it when it's comparatively easy or when we're really under the gun a decade or two down the road after we've gutted the core strength of our economy and other developed nations have beaten us to the punch.

I vote we lead the way. Because we're America, and that's what we're supposed to be good at.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
conservatism = "low-effort" thinking.
10:41 PM on 01/23/2010
More selective info gathering. EVERY GW report I've read has said the most dramatic and obvious signs will be closer to the poles, then the effects will work out from there, as we've seen.
Some people insist the light at the end of the tunnel is daylight, even though they can hear the train coming.
Are you willing to bet your children's lives you're right? If so, I'd like to hear the conversation explaining to them if you're wrong, they're the ones who are going to suffer the most.
12:26 AM on 01/24/2010
The big risk in the discrediting of the global warming crowd is that it could discredit other, more legitimate concerns about the climate, like the huge amount of harmful chemicals in our water supply. The persistence of dangerous chemicals in our recycled water is something to be really worried about. You don’t want the environment to turn into a sink for man-made chemicals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
03:56 PM on 01/23/2010
Oh no, climate change isn't happening huh?