WTO Chief: U.S.-China Trade Friction Rising

BRADLEY S. KLAPPER   01/21/10 02:49 PM ET   AP

Pascal Lamy Us China Trade
Pascal Lamy, director-general of the World Trade Organization, says trade friction will rise between the United States and China.

GENEVA — Trade friction between the United States and China over everything from cars to chemicals will increase in the coming years as the world's biggest importer and exporter buy and sell more of each other's goods, the World Trade Organization's director general said Thursday.

Pascal Lamy said his institution was up to the task of ensuring that Washington and Beijing never get into an all-out trade war that could have devastating consequences for the global economy. The WTO will be challenged over the next two years as unemployment figures remain high and test the free trade credentials of world leaders, he predicted.

"There is no risk of slipping into a trade war," Lamy said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Placing the U.S.-China relationship in a historical context, Lamy compared it with the tensions that existed between Washington and Tokyo in the 1980s and between the U.S. and Europe over different periods in recent decades.

In these cases, disagreements increased as the value of their trade expanded, he said. But the international trade body with its negotiations and rules for settling legal disputes defused the tensions.

The United States and China are engaged now in a series of trade spats over issues such as steel, poultry, patents and Hollywood films. Google's threat to pull out of China over concerns about censorship and security also could sour relations between the two countries.

"The question is not whether there is friction, the question is whether it is handled the right way," Lamy said.

The 62-year-old Frenchman, a former European Union trade commissioner, is now in his second term as director general of an organization that resolves international commercial disputes and negotiates new rules for export of farm produce, manufactured goods and services.

In the 4 1/2 years since Lamy entered office, healthy economic growth has been replaced by a crippling global slowdown. Annual trade crashed by 10 percent after 16 years of uninterrupted growth. And the vision of a 150-nation deal to tear down trade barriers around the world has been partly replaced by the immediate challenge of preventing countries from erecting new obstacles to each other's goods.

Lamy credited the WTO's close monitoring of countries last year for preventing a slide into global protectionism where countries break the rules to shield domestic jobs from foreign competition – pressure that was only natural, he said, as financial markets collapsed and whole economies teetered on the edge.

"We are certainly not out of the woods on protectionism," Lamy said. "The fundamental reason there is a protectionist impulse has to do with the job market. We know that unemployment will remain high this year, maybe even next year."

He didn't elaborate, but some trade observers believe the danger could be even greater in 2010 as governments shift their focus to job creation plans from last year's stimulus packages and financial bailouts.

As governments try to make it easier on national companies to hire people, free-trade principles may be sacrificed along the way, with the ultimate risk being a worldwide descent into a trade war as happened during the Great Depression, the argument runs.

Lamy has been pushing governments to complete what he says is the final lap of the Doha global trade round, which could add billions of dollars to the world economy.

The negotiations launched in Qatar's capital in 2001 aim to reach a binding treaty that would slash subsidies and cut tariffs in agriculture and manufacturing, including for new economic powerhouses like China, India and Brazil.

But the talks are mired in disagreement. The round is already six years behind schedule, and even a completed accord would have to win parliamentary approval in most countries and Senate ratification in the United States.

With unemployment over 10 percent and President Barack Obama's Democratic Party showing weakness, it is unclear how committed the United States is to finishing the round.

Lamy said he believed Washington was committed to a pledge it made with other countries last year to wrap up an agreement by the end of 2010. Whether the Americans would take on such a challenge in the current environment, he declined to answer.

"That's more a question for them, than a question for me," Lamy said. "They tell me ... they want to conclude the Doha round by the end of this year."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
GENEVA — Trade friction between the United States and China over everything from cars to chemicals will increase in the coming years as the world's biggest importer and exporter buy and sell mor...
GENEVA — Trade friction between the United States and China over everything from cars to chemicals will increase in the coming years as the world's biggest importer and exporter buy and sell mor...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:57 PM on 02/13/2010
I CAN CREATE 15 MILLION JOBS ALMOST OVER NIGHT right here in America !!!

Here is my Job creation Computations:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Total USA Imports in 2006:
----------------------------------
$ 2,211.7 billion ----- Total Imports.
$ 309.4 billion less --- (minus spent on Imported Crude Oil)
--------------------------------------------------
$ 1,902.3 billion / 30 billion=63.41 million jobs lost from Imports. ==================================================

Total USA Exports in 2006:
----------------------------------
$ 1,451.7 Billion / 30 billion=48.39 million jobs America Created from Exports.

If USA Pulls out of NAFTA and WTO right now:
USA would absolutely gain a total of 63.41 million Jobs by Manufacturing all IMPORTS right here in the USA.

So, 63.41 minus 48.39 = 15.02 million NET JOBS GAIN. But, a lot of Exports must be purchased in the USA. That would mean an even larger number of jobs created in America than I have estimated.

My calculation means an ABSOLUTE 15.02 million Jobs gained if the rest of the world did not buy even one penny of USA EXPORTS.

SO MOTE IT BE. . . . .

Do you truly want to help straighten out the United States Government now? Then, copy and post this article everyplace on the Internet you can post.

BY: Harry Dingey

Have a good day my friends.
photo
DFL
Liberal and proud of it.
08:38 PM on 01/24/2010
Thanks to the last administration the kids future is now owned by communist china, and with them loaning us money, it's like they are paying us to buy their products!
11:07 AM on 01/24/2010
This is why we should end 'globalization' and Anglo-Dutch-style 'free trade'.

Let every sovereign nation manufacture and develop their own industries.

But no no no, Wall Street/City of London can't make any money that way - that's your problem.

The U.S. China India and Russia should create a 4-Powers agreement of fixed-exchange rates to stabilize currencies around the world and implement their own respective national credit system for development.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:35 AM on 01/24/2010
The Chinese have been playing hardball, while the USA has been playing slow-pitch baseball. It is no wonder that they are tearing us a new one.
We have no choice but to trade with one another, but we shouldn't automatically give into them everytime they want to rape us.
07:26 AM on 01/24/2010
The Japanese have been playing hardball with us since the 50s. We let it slide largely because of the Cold War, arrogance, and then ideology (free market garbage). The Koreans followed. When these countries were "allies" and there was a threat from the USSR there was some minor justification for this defense based strategy. But not much in my mind. We always sold ourselves cheap. They got the most benefit both in defense and trade.

With China there is no reason we should allow one iota of advantage. And with the weakness of American industrial capacity, we are in no position to do so if we wish to remain a significant world player.

So it's time to decide to eliminate the trade deficit and rejuvenate American manufacturing and tech (and make sure Americans benefit from the tech and not foreign firms and workers). That means getting exchange rates right asap and doing the Chinese/Japanese/Koreans, etc. the honor of being just as open to trade as they are. Mirror image policies. If they do it, it can't be protectionist.

Rich Country, Strong Army - in that order.
09:39 AM on 01/23/2010
what happened to obama's campaign promise of reviewing our trade agreements. i guess making the bankers richer was more important
05:23 PM on 01/23/2010
No problem. The Extreme Court's ruling this week, makes this article irrelevant. China is creating its' corporation, and will control what candidates get elected, making our government in the image of China, shortly.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Angie Cordeiro
We do all things with Grace which empowers us.
07:21 PM on 01/23/2010
...and that's why I'm learning Chinese.
07:00 AM on 01/23/2010
And, oh, by the way, contrary to the WTO's image as a promoter of free trade, it is nothing of the sort. By its own admission, it enforces protectionism in favor of two thirds of its member states. But not the U.S., of course. The WTO's mission is to boost the economies of developing nations by shifting manufacturing (and jobs) in their direction. They play the U.S. for a fool.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
10:25 PM on 01/23/2010
Oh no, the WTO serves the U.S. quite adequately; U.S. corporations that is. I have to agree that it's the enemy of the U.S. people though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
10:26 PM on 01/23/2010
And a point I missed, Wall Street and corporations control the U.S. government, so it only makes sense that we play nice with the WTO.
06:56 AM on 01/23/2010
"There is no risk of slipping into a trade war"? We've been in a trade war for decades and the U.S. is losing badly because it won't even put up a fight! Since our last trade surplus in 1975, our cumulative trade deficit stands at $9.6 trillion and continues to grow at a rate of a half trillion dollars per year.

The time has come for the U.S. to extricate itself from the WTO and return to the sensible use of tariffs to maintain a balance of trade.

Pete Murphy
Author, "Five Short Blasts"
photo
cef911f1
Dog loving, liberal old white guy living in SC.
09:53 PM on 01/23/2010
Couldn't agree with you more. Fanned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:30 AM on 01/23/2010
LOL. Who chose THAT picture and why?
12:03 AM on 01/23/2010
Stop this global trade nonsense. It is overated anyway. One job created in global trade is 10 jobs lost in manufactoring.

America for American! Don't let these borderless Wall St thugs and their cronies running the corporations pack our jobs whole sale to foreign land.

America is built by Americans, not these Wall St thugs who stole the money printing press.
01:53 AM on 01/23/2010
The proper response is, you can not have free trade without fair trade. Tax levies should be applied to all goods regardless of source where those goods do not adhere to local manufacturing requirements and laws.
All those cost should be applied as a tax penalty where goods do not adhere to equal environmental protection laws, equal labour protection laws (actually being applied), equal minimum wage standards, equal tax basis (no tax havens) and export subsidy advantage elimination. Those laws establish the basic requirements for maintaining sustainable egalitarian humane human societies and as such need to be enforced upon a global basis.
Either countries ensure they adhere to those standards or they find their products financially penalised for the willingness of their corporations to abuse their own countries citizens and environment. No local company should be competitively penalised for doing the right thing.
07:31 AM on 01/24/2010
The U.S. has occasionally made noises about "fair trade" since the '70s but done nothing that would take us there. It doesn't exist to any large degree and never will. The competition (Japan, Korea, China, the EU) is all more closed than the U.S. and employs coordinated trade and industrial policies to win. We have to finally decide to eliminate the trade deficit and rejuvenate American manufacturing and tech. And I don't mean allowing foreign firms to come in and "assemble" products which then magically become American.

Rich Country, Strong Army - in that order.
10:30 PM on 01/22/2010
no kidding!

what is China's Currency based on, and how are they truly funding their ridiculous worldwide overzelous expansion at the same time of internal housing, factory, powerplant, dams, Trains, Olympic City, other cities, while expanding their Military.

AND being a huge lobbyist in D.C.

AND holding 2.3 Trillion in OTHER nations debts?

all without proving its money is worth the paper its printed on?

just a little 'friction' alright
11:50 PM on 01/22/2010
So we're enslaved by our debt to China just like one would be enslaved by a credit card company. What do you think will happen next? I have a feeling that US is going to have to give up some of it's assets. With the growing Chinese population we'll have to be forced to give up something.

Anyhow America needs to focus on making money and more of us have got to start our own businesses. A great way to start is with the secret. http://www.residualsecret.com/totalwellness
11:56 AM on 01/23/2010
America needs to eliminate the trade deficit and rejuvenate manufacturing and tech. And make sure that the tech we develop benefits America for a change (there has been an outflow of tech for over 50 years and basically no inflow).

That means that we have to focus on big industries as the base. Small firms can not compete internationally on a scale that makes much difference. The competition is largely big firms with government backing.
09:19 AM on 01/24/2010
I can see it now

Aide: "Mr Jintao? phone call from Washington"

BO: "Uh, Hello, This is Mr Obama from Washinton Sir, we were wondering if you would mind tacking on a few hundred Humvees to our order of boots, uniforms and helmets, pretty please?"

HJT: "Is your account up to date? our Finance Ministry tells me you are behind on your debt payments"

BO: "well, yes we have this here recession going on, and since we no longer really make anthing here in the US that creates wealth, we thought you might be able to tide us over until the next bubble inflates"

HJT: " hmm so it is, we will help, but you must cede whats left of your auto technology to us, and let us make key components for your aircraft"

BO: "Done"
Sevilleaba
There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need
09:22 PM on 01/22/2010
Pleased be advised that through the "American Chamber of Commerce in China" the American companies are the ones that exploit cheap chinese labor to produce the products that are dumped onto the American market thru southern based companies like Walmart, HomeDepot, and Dollars stores. It is the American companies who operate the manufacturing plants in China that exploit the absence of environmental and workplace regulations.

So when we suggest getting into a trade war with China, we are actually getting into a trade war with American global companies.
photo
Erdgeist
per omnia extrema
07:32 PM on 01/22/2010
"Washington and Beijing never get into an all-out trade war that could have devastating consequences for the global economy."

===================

We have certainly been in a trade war for some time and are still losing - it's like the war on drugs. To date, we have lost millions of jobs to China. If an all-out trade war means that American companies will have to come home and build factories here to manufacture goods - I am for all-out war. Bring it on!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SirenForSanity
Hi De Hi Hi De Ho Times
01:39 AM on 01/23/2010
That's one war I could support.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vere15
Vero nihil verious (nothing truer than truth)
01:34 AM on 01/24/2010
Bush thought the war on drugs was a war that you fought while you were on drugs
Sevilleaba
There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need
07:23 PM on 01/22/2010
It is the "American Chamber of Commerce in China" that is the primary agent facilitating the dumping of cheap chinese made products onto the American market. So lets be clear when we began to bash China. In order to be fair to China, we should first juxtapose "China" with "American Companies doing business in China".

American companies know the American market and know what American's need and want. American companies moved to China to exploit cheap chinese labor and further exploit laxed environmental regulations and non-existent labor laws. It is the American companies, operating in China, that ship back to America the inexpensive and sometimes low quality products that stock the shelves of Southern companies like Walmart, HomeDepot, and Dollar stores, etc.

It has been more than 25 years since NIKE showed American companies how to exploit cheap chinese labor for the purpose of dumping product onto the American market at a cheaper price than competitors who employ American's workers and pay American wages. And once NIKE established the way, profit driven American companies followed. MONKEY SEE, MONKEY DO.

So don't blame China or the chinese laborer, place blame where it should be- which is "The American Chamber of Commerce in China". CHINESE CURRENCY ISSUES ARE ONLY MERE DISTRACTIONS.
06:34 PM on 01/22/2010
the WTO along with its financial market insiders including the federal reserve is responsible for the position the US is in...yet they point at the most obvious issues as if they didn't know it was problem...for the US citizenry.