Jobs Tax Credit: Obama Revives Plan For Job Creation

Obama Jobs Tax Credit

STEPHEN OHLEMACHER   01/26/10 05:15 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's push to create jobs includes a new tax credit for small businesses that add employees, an idea that fell flat in Congress last year and continues to have skeptics this year.

The idea has appeal as the nation struggles with an unemployment rate topping 10 percent. But House Democrats left out Obama's proposal when they passed a jobs bill in December because they didn't know how to target the credit effectively. The Obama administration still hasn't provided details on how the tax credit would work, and some tax experts question whether it would.

"It's very hard to know when a company is incrementally adding jobs because of a tax credit, and when they would have done it anyway," said Eugene Steuerle, a Treasury Department official in the Reagan administration who is now co-director of the Tax Policy Center, a Washington think tank. "I'm sympathetic to subsidizing low-wage jobs. It's just a question of how you design it."

Congressional researchers say a tax credit for firms that increase payroll could be a good way to increase employment, if the credit is available to all companies, not just small businesses. They cautioned, however, that it would be difficult to administer.

Among the issues raised by tax experts:

_How would the government prevent abuse by companies that artificially increase payroll?

_How would new companies be treated?

_How would a firm be prevented from disbanding and reopening under another name just to claim the credit?

_How would the government ensure firms add long-term employees when the credit is only for a year or two?

_Would firms be willing to add workers to get a tax credit when consumer demand for their products has not increased?

Clint Stretch, a tax policy expert at Deloitte Tax, said the tax break would help companies that shed jobs last year and were ready to start rehiring this year.

"Guys who were ruthless and threw people out on the street will benefit while those who kept their workers will not," Stretch said.

The Obama administration renewed its focus on job creation last week and the president called on Congress to pass a jobs bill that provides "tax breaks to small businesses for hiring people."

Obama first proposed the tax credit late last year, but House Democrats didn't include it in a jobs bill they passed in December. The bill is awaiting action in the Senate. Aides said Obama will focus on job creation in his State of the Union address Wednesday.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office recently analyzed several proposals to create jobs and improve the economy, and concluded that a payroll tax credit for firms that increase payroll would be among the most effective. However, the analysis said limiting the credit to small businesses would reduce the economic benefits.

Congress enacted a similar tax credit in the 1970s and few small businesses took advantage, the CBO report said.

Two economists have been promoting a job creation tax credit for the past several months: John H. Bishop, a professor at Cornell University, and Timothy J. Bartik, senior economist at the W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research in Michigan.

Under their proposal, businesses that increase their payrolls by more than 3 percent over 2009 levels would get tax credits worth 15 percent of the increase. The tax credit would only apply to the first $50,000 of a worker's salary, capping the amount at $7,500 per worker.

Big and small employers would be eligible, and the credit would be available for existing workers who get raises or more hours, as long as payroll is increased for employees making less than $50,000. The tax credits would be refundable, meaning employers would get them as payments, even if they don't owe any taxes.

Bishop said companies that hire workers, increase hours or increase wages would all be helping the economy.

"We're trying to find a way to lower the cost of adding labor," Bishop said. "The job creation tax credit has the highest bang for buck."

Several lawmakers have proposed similar tax credits, including Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., and Rep. Steve Kagan, D-Wis.

Two senators, noting the "lukewarm" response to Obama's proposal in Congress, have also come up with a plan for a payroll tax credit for businesses that hire workers who have been unemployed at least 60 days.

The proposal, by Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, would exempt businesses from paying the employers' share of Social Security taxes on those workers for the rest of 2010. The plan would save companies 6.2 percent of the workers' salaries that are subject to Social Security taxes.

The money would be repaid to Social Security over the next five years from unspecified budget savings.

"Everyone likes the idea of the jobs tax credit in the abstract, but then when it's been applied in the past, it hasn't worked or it's been kind of wasteful," Schumer said. "We've looked at what went wrong in the past and tried to make corrections for that."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's push to create jobs includes a new tax credit for small businesses that add employees, an idea that fell flat in Congress last year and continues to have sk...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's push to create jobs includes a new tax credit for small businesses that add employees, an idea that fell flat in Congress last year and continues to have sk...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 114
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:00 PM on 01/27/2010
Unless the tax credit more than offsets the cost of the new employee, how does it help?
I hire when I need the help, and the tax credit will be nice, but it won't encourage me to hire when I otherwise wouldn't because an additional employee is still an added expense.
How about a tax credit that lets us grow our businesses to the point where we need to hire? And since there are too many business models to craft specifics for, that means an across the board tax cut only makes sense.

See the problem is, legislators like to craft rewards that they can then control and take credit for. And then political favoritism and detail wrangling produced complex and failed policies (like HCR was looking like).
An across the board tax cut can't be doled out to favorite constituency groups. But it will help America feel stronger and act more boldly economically.
11:38 AM on 01/27/2010
This proposal is just a further and harder confirmation that these guys just don't get it. If a small business is down due to lack of customers and revenue, giving it a tax credit for hiring another expense is just hastening its bankruptcy. It's just a clueless packaging of the GOP's only economic policy; A tax cut. if you have no job, no income, exactly what tax liability is going to be reduced. We are so far beyond this banality. The real unemployment rate is probably around 20-23%. A lot of people have just given up, so they don't count any longer, many people are on reduced work weeks, but they still count as employed, and all those people who are been underemployed and are working at near minimum wage count as employed. State and local governments are terminating employees at rates that exceed the hiring in the private sector., but because of pension and unemployment provisions, their costs continue on, just a different bucket.

The only irony of this entire mess is that corporate America has terminated its customers. The American consumer has driven the global economy for many decades. When your employees, past or present, can not longer afford to buy your products exactly how do you foster a robust economy. Lending has essentially stopped, so that artificial driver of the economy is disappearing. Corporate America, get your excessive bonus now. Your shareholders may want it back by next year.
03:45 AM on 01/27/2010
There are a number of companies here in the US who are currently filling open positions with people who are offshore. They should be filling the open positions with people who are already in the US.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Joyal
retired bum
07:15 PM on 01/26/2010
Tax cedits are like saying the checks in the mail, USLESS.
END NAFTA LIKE YOU SAID YOU WOULD can I say it louder END NAFTA LIKE YOU SAID YOU WOULD.
DON'T BUY FOREIIGN MADE PLANES BUY BOEING!!! BUY AMERICAN HELICOPTERS BUY AMERICAN, BUILD AMERICAN PRODUCTS, BUILD AMERICA
What else do you want to know JUST ASK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
07:52 PM on 01/26/2010
The only industry left is SERVICE/HOSPITALITY ORIENTED and most Americans do not want menial jobs. Most hight paying tecnical jobs has been imported to Asia, for the most part to China, Japan, and India. American work force are regretably do not have technical advantage - our tecnology is archaic.

China, Japan, Singapore have more Engineers. In contrast, our University Grads favorite major is Psychology. Their labor work force are more efficient and their products better than USA. As to Boeing - not that you do not already know, planes are manufactured and delivered in China. You can google it - BOEING CHINA.

And, to make it worst, Steel is no longer a viable industry in the USA. They are, for the most part manufactured in China, Japan and Russia.

How dya like them apples ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Haditup2here
8 Years of Insanity and now you're mad?
05:28 PM on 01/26/2010
How about reforming our current trade policies first?
04:10 PM on 01/26/2010
Bring Customer Service departments back to the United States. Give the companies that do a tax credit. Their customers will be happier and they can advertise that they did this--bringing in new customers.

Lots of people can work customer service desks and every company has one. It is a sit-down job so older and disabled people could do it.

Every person who has been on hold to India will appreciate this.
09:18 PM on 01/26/2010
I am with you 100%.
I hear a lot of ranting by people to "create jobs".
Basically, the corporations have shipped most of the "jobs" overseas. Bringing some of these back will be a good start. Once people have jobs, demand for goods and get the economy going again.
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
04:00 PM on 01/26/2010
Sigh...apparently the American people are to be sacrificed, because nobody is talking about the artificial inequities in currency exchange rates STILL.

http://www.x-rates.com/d/CNY/USD/graph120.html

The currencies of SOME nations just don't have anything to do with reality (observe the lack of variability in that graph), and since our few - the guiding lights behind our Republicans - are getting rrrrrrrrrrrich exploiting those artificial inequities, apparently America has to be smashed upon the rocks of their greed.

And the Democrats are just going along with it...so I guess that the Democrats are wholly-owned, too..or they're stupid.

It is really hard to tell. Should have given Ross Perot a great big shotgun and a "007" license wayyyyyyy back.
03:10 PM on 01/26/2010
Somehow I think that the money has to get directly into the hands of the people. Once consumers start spending in the economy again it will spark interest in business products. Our problem is lack of consumer spending and jobs.
04:19 PM on 01/26/2010
Consumer confidence was up 3% this month, to just under 60%. Not great, but going in the right direction.
03:02 PM on 01/26/2010
How far out of touch can this administration get? Companies do not hire or fire because of taxes. When a company has more customers than they can handle, they hire. When they do not have enough customers to stay busy, they fire.... When you cut their taxes, the execs get a bonus.
02:46 PM on 01/26/2010
I think we've drained the swamp in jobs here in America. It bugs me when I hear people saying that small business is the engine of the economy. It depends on the business. If consumers are not buying from them, pumping tax credits into them won't help. It pains me to say it, but we may have to put some people back on welfare in order to move them off the unemployment rolls. We need some consumers to spend money in the economy and peope who receive welfare spend money immediately into the economy, and that might spark interest in small business products. Or if we can find a way to put money into the hand of people who are working that allows them to get caught with some of their debt, they may be encouraged to spend money in the economy. We have to think of ways to encourage consumers to spend again. I am bearly getting by, I am not motivated to buy anything at this point.
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
04:53 PM on 01/26/2010
One example: Walmart already compels precisely that; putting people on welfare. After they themselves get it, despite their size and stature.

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Corporate_Welfare/WalMart_Welfare.html
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/53177/
http://www.progress.org/2005/tcs179.htm
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3045walmart_iowa.html

* Walmart gets corporate subsidy from the government. WELFARE. And they needn't a penny.
* They pay so little, their employees have to get welfare. (and when managers tell their workers how great they are for bringing business, don't ask if the workers get a cut of the share of the HARD WORK they put in.)
* walmart comes in with artificial prices (see 'welfare' above for 2 reasons how) and drives out other businesses
* as they destroy livelihoods, people can no longer spend so they leave the area

Most want to contribute and be middle class. Few want to be on welfare -- except for the big large companies that seem to be forcing the issue upon everyone else. Like the bumper sticker said, "corporate kings blame welfare queens". It's one of the few times an issue is so cut'n'dry that a bumper sticker is more "unmitigated truth" than "glossed-over catchphrase".
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
04:55 PM on 01/26/2010
BTW: Yours was a great post and you're spot-on about the rightwing who keep claiming the small business is the heart of America, followed with their helping out big corporations with subsidy, offshoring, bailouts, et cetera.
photo
OLJW00
right is right
02:46 PM on 01/26/2010
I'm just going to lable this a Human Caused Employment Disaster.

And only a year late...go figure.
Sandmanj
Tread gently. Mother nature is pregnant.
02:37 PM on 01/26/2010
Just look at Howdy Doody posing in front of a sign that says: "Middle Class Task Force".

Every thing's just a campaign style image for him. All form and no substance.
photo
FoonTheElder
Always choosing between the lesser of two evils
02:19 PM on 01/26/2010
Tax credits are useless. All they tend to do is reimburse businesses for something they were going to do anyway. This is a typical solution for someone who doesn't want to make any hard decisions on the real reasons U.S. jobs have disappeared.

Tax credits are rarely refundable, so they will only apply to those companies that are making money in this recession. They are the ones who probably need the money the least.

It's another round of hype followed by very little change.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:18 PM on 01/26/2010
Task force for what? Taking more money from middle class workers without dependents and giving it to the middle class with dependents? I'm sure those on the receiving end will be elated. Me- not so much.
02:42 PM on 01/26/2010
I'm with ya humpfree. I'm getting screwed on taxes. No dependents either but I feel like i support 50 families.
02:09 PM on 01/26/2010
Back to the basics..this should have been the original plan, instead of bailing out over-bloated money-men, thinking the magic of the trickle-down-effect will appear to produce wonders for the people. At times it takes a disaster to learn simple truths!