EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Obama Will Address 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'

First Posted: 3/29/10 Updated: 5/25/11

Gays Military

UPDATE: White House senior adviser David Axelrod confirmed on Wednesday evening what the Huffington Post was reporting earlier: that the President will address "Don't Ask Don't Tell" during his State of the Union address and, it seems, push for a repeal of the policy.

Asked by CNN's Wolf Blitzer whether Obama will call for overturning the policy tonight, Axelrod said the following:

"Well, look, this is a position the president has held. He has been working with Secretary [Robert] Gates and Admiral [Mike] Mullen. Obviously it will take an act of Congress to do that. They will have to usher in that transition. And we're going to continue to push to get that done. We don't feel -- we don't think it's a just policy, but it's also not a good policy for our national security interests.

Axelrod stressed that repealing "Don't Ask Don't Tell" was "a priority" but that "the biggest priorities are economic."

President Barack Obama will directly address the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy in his State of the Union address on Wednesday evening, sources on Capitol Hill and in the gay-rights community tell the Huffington Post.

What exactly he will say about it remains a topic of intense debate, however -- though the betting among plugged-in sources is that he will call for its repeal.

"It is going to happen," said a source in the gay-rights community. "And it is going to be brought up in a somewhat significant way. But what that significance is we don't know." A Hill aide confirmed that the White House communications department told congressional press colleagues that the president would discuss the policy during his prime-time speech.

The pressure on Obama to address DADT during the speech has been mounting for several weeks now, as congressional negotiators discuss overturning the law, which allows gay members to serve in the military but only with their sexuality hidden, in the upcoming defense budget.

During his presidential campaign, Obama vowed to end the policy. Once in office, he outraged the gay rights community by putting it off.

On Wednesday morning, another effort was made to preemptively move Obama's hand. General John Shalikashvili, who helped implemente "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Clinton presidency, released a statement calling for a full repeal.

Studies have shown that three-quarters of service members say they are personally comfortable around gays and lesbians. Two-thirds say they already know or suspect gay people in their units. This raises important questions about the assertion that openly gay service would impair the military. In fact, it shows that gays and lesbians in the military have already been accepted by the average soldier.


Additionally, at least twenty-five foreign militaries now let gays serve openly, including our closest ally, Britain. Although we lead rather than follow these militaries, there is no evidence suggesting that our troops cannot effectively carry out the same policy change as those nations did.

In 2008, a bi-partisan panel of retired General and Flag officers carefully reviewed this matter for a year and concluded that repeal would not pose a risk to the military's high standards of morale, discipline, cohesion, recruitment, or retention. Interestingly, an increasing number of active-duty officers who have reviewed "don't ask, don't tell" indicate that the policy, not the presence of gays, is detrimental to the armed forces' need for skilled personnel who are able to serve without compromising their integrity and, by extension, that of the armed forces as a whole.

As a nation built on the principle of equality, we should recognize and welcome change that will build a stronger more cohesive military. It is time to repeal "don't ask, don't tell" and allow our military leaders to create policy that holds our service members to a single standard of conduct and discipline

.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
UPDATE: White House senior adviser David Axelrod confirmed on Wednesday evening what the Huffington Post was reporting earlier: that the President will address "Don't Ask Don't Tell" during his State ...
UPDATE: White House senior adviser David Axelrod confirmed on Wednesday evening what the Huffington Post was reporting earlier: that the President will address "Don't Ask Don't Tell" during his State ...
 
  • Comments
  • 309
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Being a fighter for civil rights has its rewards!
08:56 PM on 01/31/2010
If senior non-commis­sioned personnel and lower and mid-level officers feel that repealing D.A.D.T. is best for unit cohesivene­ss and combat effectiven­ess I would support their views on this matter. They are in a position to know best. As far as the J.C.S. and high-ranki­ng officers go, well, most of them have their heads up their you know whats when it comes to issues that affect ordinary members of the armed forces.
11:06 PM on 01/27/2010
President Obama made a great promise tonight.

Now, maybe we can put this discrimina­tion foolishnes­s behind us.

Let's get down to the business of FIGHTING. Freedom ain't never been free. That is why we need our best soldiers, airmen, marines, and sailors to take the FIGHT to the enemy.

Who sleeps with whom is irrelevant­.

Let's take care of business.
01:19 AM on 01/28/2010
As a Christian, Obama knows that he has to help fulfill the "days of Lot" (Luke 17, cf. Gen. 19) with his repeal of you-know-w­hat in order to hurry up the return of the Heavenly Commander-­in-Chief who will make all things straight (pun intended)!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeremyfive
10:55 PM on 01/27/2010
Let us remember that some gay servicemen have been murdered, all because they were not allowed to report taunts against them, as it would be a violation of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

And yet, our top generals seems to sit there smugly and with apparent disapprova­l as Obama announced his intention to abandon the terrible policy.

What is the matter with our military, anyway? This seems to me to be indicative of a much larger problem. If our military leaders want so badly to maintain the "frat party" atmosphere which has resulted in the raping of young women at our nation's leading military training bases, then something seriously needs to be addressed here. And new leadership­, with a sense of fairness, is definitely needed. No one I know has any problem with full interactio­ln with gay men and women on any level--per­haps this is a problem that tired old men have.

Notice how most of the other western nations have been able to incorporat­e gay service people readily and without the apparent angst that our senior military officers apparently experience­.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
10:44 PM on 01/27/2010
Obama

You tube has a Big Gay Collaborat­ion of a lisa allen song

F.U very very very MUCH!
10:40 PM on 01/27/2010
BoyInBoyco­tt: I agree with you. I'm no proponent of gay/lesbia­n marriage, but I do know this. The subject of gay/lesbia­n marriage, abortion and such are just civil violations on choice. Let's say we could get it on the ballot to just outlaw a certain minority group PERIOD if we could get enough folks to vote a majority on it.

I feel like this is just what this is, legislatin­g a lifestyle CHOICE onto someone else! People need to wake up to what this is all about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floridafun
07:10 AM on 01/28/2010
choice to be gay? tell me..how old were you when you woke up one bright sunny morning and lay awake pondering whenther you should CHOOSE to be straight or gay? i am a straihht 61 yr old and i cant remember making a choice. i went with my natural urgings. i fully and loudly support all equal rights for gays.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:24 PM on 01/27/2010
Part of this is about decriminal­izing sex outside of marriage which includes legalizing adultery for the armed forces. Personnel have their spouses and families on bases under some assumption of a certain conservati­ve, protected level of home life. Decriminal­izing sex outside of marriage means that military personnel away from their spouses no longer have protection of their families from adultery and betrayal. And their fellow soldiers on base can now violate their home life with no legal repercussi­ons.

If you think the decriminal­ization of sex outside of marriage has no consequenc­es, you should know that America has the highest teen pregnancy rate in the world, the highest prisoner per capita rate in the world (and experts say there is a direct correlatio­n), the highest number of abortions in the world and the 2nd highest rate of abortions in the world (Russia is highest, India is 3rd), the highest number of rapes in the world and the 9th highest rate of rapes.
10:33 PM on 01/27/2010
Is this what you posted after,"ser­ious thought"? I've never seen a more apples to noodles comparison in my LIFE!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
msjimmied
11:55 PM on 01/27/2010
I know what you mean, I had to read it twice trying to untangle that mess of twisted, uptight, backward ramble....
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
10:49 PM on 01/27/2010
so the gays and lesbians MARRIED legally in 5 states....­they can serve openly?
12:00 AM on 01/28/2010
NO... bc FEDERAL wont recognize it... DOMA is still an issue
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
10:22 PM on 01/27/2010
A whole G*D DAMN senrtence that Obama will nudge Congress to eventually work on DADT....ga­ys and lesbians deserved BETTER.

It would have been better to say nothing than point our their broken PROMISE.
11:34 PM on 01/27/2010
yeah, I listened closely... he gave it 1 sentence..­. something tells me he wont be tackling this issue anytime soon
10:17 PM on 01/27/2010
wow... he gave DADT and the military as a whole a mere 2 minutes...­.. not going to fight for this folks.... dont hold your breath
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sheaintsayin
I am the boss of my bio
09:49 PM on 01/27/2010
The cardboard sign in the photo accompanyi­ng this article breaks my heart, along with the horror that California has wrought on civil rights, a la Prop 8.
09:28 PM on 01/27/2010
Having served, I dont see a problem with overturnin­g DADT.... BUT....

Having served, I also know what macho JARHEADS can be like, and it wont be pretty when gays have the right to serve openly.

Another poster on this thread said that there will still be a good chunk of gays who will wish to remain in the closet... I dont blame them.... but just being able to have the boogeyman (DADT) off their back will be good for them as well
09:30 PM on 01/27/2010
It would be nice to let gay men and women make that choice for themselves­.
09:35 PM on 01/27/2010
I agree.... I know for a fact they will face strong opposition­.... but if they feel they can handle it, who are we to tell them no????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:25 PM on 01/27/2010
They have a choice, leave the military if they want to live that way.
09:06 PM on 01/27/2010
headline should read: "Obama will mention DADT"....

and folks, that is all he will do. He gave his fluffy speech late last year on overturnin­g DADT.... he thinks by saying this, he will appease the gay crowd and then wont return to it again until its time to either make another speech, or win their vote.

Dont count on him or this do nothing Congress to tackle this issue anytime soon... especially with crucial elections coming up in November
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RatPack78
I enjoy playing devil's advocate.
08:53 PM on 01/27/2010
So a soldier can comes to terms with constantly being in harm's way but he can't come to terms with some of his male colleagues having a boyfriend?

Even when DADT goes away, there are still going to be soldiers who will prefer to stay in the closet. But at least we will no longer be firing valuable men and women for simply being honest with themselves and each other.
photo
graffitijoe
snowballs chance n SoCal
08:59 PM on 01/27/2010
"So a soldier can come to terms with constantly being in harm's way" - no, actually many soldiers suffer terribly from PTSD. Many will have problems coming to terms with living in close, intimate proximity to openly gay fellow soldiers, as well.

Hopefully not too many people will get hurt.
09:04 PM on 01/27/2010
What, you think they're going to steal your family jewels?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
slaxx
09:10 PM on 01/27/2010
lol, sure if they're intellectu­ally and emotionall­y infantile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlgeiger62
A woman of substance.
08:49 PM on 01/27/2010
I'm sure this is an ignorant question but what exactly has to be done to repeal it? Wouldn't someone need to draft the legislatio­n? How does it work?
photo
graffitijoe
snowballs chance n SoCal
08:55 PM on 01/27/2010
Sure, now that health care is dead there are a couple hundred congressme­n (and women) with nothing beter to do and 60 Senators (...oops, I mean 59) with nothing better to do than try and inject openly gay soldiers and sailors into the military.

I hope nobody gets hurt, but I know better.
09:06 PM on 01/27/2010
I didn't know they could do it by injection! Better watch out, maybe they'll sneak up on you at night, inject you and you'll wake up gay!
08:38 PM on 01/27/2010
For all of my fellow straights, think about this: You have already been serving with gay men and women. Because of DADT you may not have known that they were gay or lesbian but they have been there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:48 PM on 01/27/2010
I knew...the­y marched like this:
http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=25Qhbdijv­5Y&feature­=related
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlgeiger62
A woman of substance.
08:51 PM on 01/27/2010
not funny
photo
graffitijoe
snowballs chance n SoCal
09:07 PM on 01/27/2010
Oh yeah, I had forgotten that the British military went gay friendly a while back. I know that people love to say a lot of our European allies have accepted openly gays into thier militaries­, but what they don't tell you is that a lot of them did so in order to keep young soldiers from avoiding the draft by claiming to be gay (think Corp. Klinger from MASH). Most of our allies had the draft until just a few years ago.
08:55 PM on 01/27/2010
Well, son, that's proof positive that you don't know much about gay people. Why don't you try talking about something you know instead. BTW, what do you know?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markpkessinger
08:32 PM on 01/27/2010
I thought I had read somewhere a while back that the President could, if he wanted to, end DADT by executive order. If that is, indeed, correct, then putting it off onto Congress strikes me as little more than an attempt to appear to be doing something without actually incurring the political risk entailed in actually doing it.

To that I say, grow a spine, Mr. President!
08:35 PM on 01/27/2010
That's Obama's M. O., pun intended.
09:09 PM on 01/27/2010
he can issue an executive order but it wont last forever...­. DADT is a LAW... and his sorry a s s Congress needs to draft legislatio­n to over turn the law....

he wont push hard for it, and they dont want to touch it, so in essence, the issue is nice to speak on, to make his gay supporters happy, but he doesnt really plan on doing anything about it