iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Inside Obama's Plan To Spend $8 Billion On High-Speed Rail (VIDEO)


First Posted: 03/30/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:20 PM ET

JOAN LOWY, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - High-speed rail projects in California, Florida and Illinois are among the big winners of $8 billion in grants announced Thursday by the White House -- the start of what some Democrats tout as a national rail-building program that could rival the interstate highways begun in the Eisenhower era.

President Barack Obama announced the awards during a town hall meeting in Tampa, Fla. -- a follow-up to Wednesday's State of the Union address that focused on getting Americans back to work. Thirteen passenger rail corridors in 31 states will receive grants, which are funded by the economic recovery act enacted last year.

Obama said focusing on building 21st century infrastructure projects is an important element of the country's economic recovery.

"It creates jobs immediately and it lays the foundation for a vibrant economy in the future," Obama said.

Though the administration bills the program as "high-speed rail," most U.S. projects won't reach the speeds seen in Europe and Asia. California's trains would be by far the fastest, exceeding the 200 mph achieved by some trains overseas.

Some of the money will go toward trains with top speeds of 110 mph, while other funds -- such as the $400 million allotted to Ohio to connect Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton and Cincinnati -- will be for trains traveling no faster than 79 mph.


A half-dozen Cabinet members and other senior administration officials were fanning out across the country for rail events Thursday and Friday. The White House said rail projects will create or save thousands of jobs in areas including track laying, manufacturing, planning, engineering and rail maintenance and operations.

Obama told the crowd at Thursday's town hall that when the high-speed rail line connecting Tampa and Orlando is finished, "I'm going to come back down here and ride it."

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and members of Congress have acknowledged they expect much of the expertise and equipment to be supplied by foreign companies. Except for Amtrak's Acela line between Boston and Washington, there are no high-speed trains in the U.S. and no domestic high-speed rail industry.

The $8 billion investment is just a start. Last year, Obama asked Congress in his budget request for an additional $1 billion a year for five years. Congress for this year approved another $2.5 billion that remains to be awarded. And Obama is expected to ask for yet more rail funds when his budget is presented next week.

Also, LaHood has hinted that some of the $1.5 billion allotted in the stimulus plan for discretionary transportation projects may go toward high-speed rail.

Japan launched the first high-speed trains in 1964, and France and other European countries followed in the 1980s and 1990s. China has announced plans to expand its high-speed rail system to a network of more than 16,000 miles by the year 2020 at an estimated cost of $300 billion.

In the U.S., only the projects in California and Florida are planned to reach maximum speeds of 150 mph or more, what most transportation experts consider high-speed rail.

Projects awarded the largest grants include:

• California: $2.3 billion to begin work on an 800-mile-long, high-speed rail line tying Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay area to Los Angeles and San Diego.

• Florida: $1.25 billion to build a rail line connecting Tampa on the West Coast with Orlando in the middle of the state, eventually going south to Miami.

• Illinois-Missouri: $1.1 billion to improve a rail line between Chicago and St. Louis so that trains travel up to 110 mph.

• Wisconsin: $810 million to upgrade and refurbish train stations and install safety equipment on the Madison-to-Milwaukee leg of a line that stretches from Minneapolis to Chicago.

• Washington-Oregon: $590 million to upgrade a rail line from Seattle to Portland, Ore.

• North Carolina: $520 million for projects that will increase top speeds to 90 mph on trains between Raleigh and Charlotte and double the number of round trips.

By spreading the $8 billion among so many states, Obama is ignoring the advice of transportation experts and high-speed rail advocates who said the best way to build continuing political support for the program would be to concentrate on two or three grants large enough to get a high-speed line up and running. Once that happens, they reasoned, other parts of the country would lobby for more money to build their own lines.

Rep. John Mica of Florida, the senior Republican on the House transportation committee, complained that the Midwest lines awarded grants will achieve top speeds of only 110 mph and were "selected more for political reasons than for high-speed service."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

JOAN LOWY, Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON - High-speed rail projects in California, Florida and Illinois are among the big winners of $8 billion in grants announced Thursday by the White House --...
JOAN LOWY, Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON - High-speed rail projects in California, Florida and Illinois are among the big winners of $8 billion in grants announced Thursday by the White House --...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,478
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koelschwolf
11:06 PM on 03/14/2010
When you look a the High-Speed Rail corridors one must realize that it is all piece-meal, a little bit here and a little bit there but nothing connects. I. E. there is the Oklahoma-Texas corridor and another coming south from the Chicago area, but they do not connect, just separated by a few hundred miles. Neither is there an East-West corridor connecting the two coasts. Strange thinking
02:24 PM on 03/11/2010
The speeds are a joke compared to high speed rail in Europe and Asia.

For example, the route between Chicago and St Louis will allow for 90-110 mph. What a joke! This is a route that is FLAT, there are no mountains, no tight curves, etc. So, if that is the best speed that can be accomplished ... in 2010 and thereafter in the United States, it proves that the entire project is a joke.

The Japanese Bullet train and France's TVG have been around for 25+ years. So, America is putting its future into trains that will travel at approximately 50% of the speed of what the Japanese and French have had for decades?

Most people who drive on I-55 -- the Interstate highway between Chicago and St Louis already drive at a good 75 mph, so traveling in a train at 90-110 mph is a joke -- especially when you consider that it will make at least 2 stops between the two major hubs (Bloomington-Normal, and Springfield). The state of IL is looking to increase the speed limit from 65 to 70 mph, so drivers will soon speed up from current 75 to 85 mph ... not much less than by train.

The US should have nothing less than 150 mph to use the term "high speed" rail. That would put the US on par with what others had 25 years ago. The Chinese Maglev in Shanghai is around 250 mph by comparison!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobertFromMN
Fiercely secular Luxemburgist
05:10 AM on 02/26/2010
Looks great, but why no connection between Pittsburgh and Columbus, or Buffalo and Cleveland? One more small connection and so many more cities could be connected. Also, that bit between Jacksonville and Orlando should be connected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foundryman
Reality trumps ideology
01:20 PM on 02/09/2010
I see no reason whatsoever to have any of these rails built in Texas or the south, except for Florida and along the east coast. Southern republicans are unaminously opposed to this and even one governor is calling for succession. These teabaggers deserve none of our tax dollars.
12:40 PM on 02/17/2010
Yeah! F rural AMerica!

Nothing but racists and teabaggers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueknight41
DEMHOUSE2014
12:56 PM on 02/09/2010
you would think they would be a route from NEW YORK to LA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
09:53 PM on 01/31/2010
While we talk, and a HST is still ten years away, theChinese have built and put into service the world's fastest HST (245 mph) in just 4 years, and will build 42 lines by 2012!
Nice pictures: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1238496/Unveiled-Chinas-245mph-train-service-worlds-fastest--completed-just-FOUR-years.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueknight41
DEMHOUSE2014
01:01 PM on 02/09/2010
well there a communist dictatorship it helps when have no say in what government does no lobbyists in the hall ways just simple devise a plan get you some low wage workers too build it and there ya go a high speed rail system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
03:23 PM on 02/09/2010
Then our Wall Street dictatorship and low wage workers are more inefficient?
And 8 years after, we still don't have anything built at the WTC site, you know, the memorial we were going to build to show we couldn't be beaten? Hell yeah.
Looking at your incoherent reply you're either using voice to text or have they outsourced comments to Bangalore as well?
02:48 AM on 02/11/2010
Yes, God forbid our country catches up with the rest of the world technologically. If they keep this up those Commies might even succeed in *gasp* fixing our roads and bridges! Those devious sons of pregnant dogs...

Also "too build"? Seriously?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Raccoon1
These are the times that try men's souls........
09:33 AM on 01/31/2010
Opposition to this is just another example of Republican monkey-bots doing the bidding of big business/corporations in this country. Oil companies don't want mass transportation. Car companies don't want mass transportation. "Citizens for Better Roads", otherwise known as road/highway contractors, don't want mass transportation. Airlines don't want mass transportation.
12:42 PM on 02/17/2010
My life sucks because Republicans exist. Waahhh!
08:21 PM on 01/30/2010
Terrorists everywhere just got a woody.
02:48 AM on 02/11/2010
Maybe it's just you...
01:37 AM on 01/30/2010
we're not europe and we're not japan and we don't care for trains. no one ever makes an objective economic argument for these things, just bleat about how we are behind japan and europe...............................................................who cares?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:13 AM on 01/30/2010
Who's this we? Since when do you speak for all of "we"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harmlesstree
Préjudice est la raison des sots - Voltaire
01:37 AM on 01/31/2010
You don't think Americans would enjoy, and benefit,( for starters...think of the environment, traffic congestion, and time) from this: German high speed trains.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qx0L_uut5fQ&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko4wYN-1SVU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvF1t0mtb7U&feature=related

And they are getting faster...China, France
photo
JBS
Part time misanthrope & full time curmudgeon
01:11 AM on 01/30/2010
North Carolina: $520 million for projects that will increase top speeds to 90 mph on trains between Raleigh and Charlotte and double the number of round trips.
------------------------------------------

That means twice a day will become 4 times a day. Still no passenger service to Asheville or to Wilmington, two cities that should be linked in if the system is going to work. High speed rail don't mean nothing if you can't get there from here.
photo
nobodyatall
信じられない…
08:43 PM on 01/29/2010
I'm a fan of high speed rail, but investing in this stuff now is like pouring money into typewriters when the rest of the world has moved on to PCs and the Internet.

At this point, we should just skip this generation of trains and use the funds to develop new faster-than-flight systems (maglev, vactrains, etc) that will revolutionize transportation and make us the world leader in technology once again.

C'mon America, we can do better than this! :-)
05:26 PM on 01/29/2010
Apparently CA is getting $54 million for the Napa WIne Train (not high speed) which is expected to add 12 jobs. It is job growth, but pretty expensive.
02:41 PM on 01/29/2010
Politics trumps all wise advice. Never fails!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SPQR1775
01:46 PM on 01/29/2010
If you are not going to apply for the job to lay tracks or build trains....STOP complaining. You sound ignorant. The US is by far waaaaaaaay behind any european nation, asia or canada when it comes to rails. If we had invested in this long time ago, then the airline industry would have been cheaper and stop ripping people off. I can't wait for this to go NATIONAL then I will only drive or take the train. Airline should be history unless we are going outside the nation. Link us to Canada and South America. The workers will be mainly blacks or latino, some asians southernerns have no clue about hard work or else they would have work their own tobacco, cotton and rice plantations. YES, CHANGE IS LOOKING GOOD....HATERZ!
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
04:25 PM on 01/29/2010
Say what? Do you know how much the average airline is losing per year? Most are not profitable.
08:20 PM on 01/30/2010
At least they are *capable* of being profitable. Trains? Not so much.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jasev01
12:11 PM on 01/29/2010
Why must we spend so much to get so little?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitar63
01:41 PM on 01/29/2010
This railway will have huge implications for future development. I think this is much more worthwhile than wars or subsidizing large businesses (shadow wellfare). This has to happen sooner or later.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jasev01
04:32 PM on 01/29/2010
Def agreed, I would just like to see us spend money more wisely and not on antiquated technology.