SEC Workers Investigated For Porn-Watching

First Posted: 04/04/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:25 PM ET

Sec Porn

Washington Times:

The work computer of one regional supervisor for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission showed more than 1,800 attempts to look up pornography in a 17-day span: "It was kind of distraction per se," he later told investigators.

Read the whole story: Washington Times

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
10:15 AM on 02/03/2010
These were embedded Republican members of the Federalist Society and god forbid they should be fired....and this is going on throughout the government.....I say dock their pay and make them pay triple damages and it will stop immediately......or better yet give them a RATIONAL review and fire them for this if their is no performance of duties....they all have job descriptions.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
11:45 PM on 02/02/2010
The SEC must be very pleased with its "results" over the last 8 years.
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
10:18 AM on 02/03/2010
Yes it is Bush was very happy with them....
06:09 PM on 02/02/2010
financial fraud has been legalized so the SEC doesn't do anything but kill time anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
02:30 PM on 02/02/2010
Another "family values" conservative hire, no doubt.
12:40 PM on 02/02/2010
What is an 'attempt to look up pornography?'
photo
rbchilds
Independent with Open Eyes
09:53 PM on 02/02/2010
A political mindset, thinking one thing but not knowing what buttons to push.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
11:39 AM on 02/02/2010
Most, if not all, men do that. So?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
11:39 AM on 02/02/2010
It isn't porn watching that concerns us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
washlib
11:17 AM on 02/02/2010
big friggen deal. Monitor his usage, send him to a sexual appropriateness class, and call it good.
11:37 AM on 02/02/2010
One guy made 1,880 attempts over a period of 17 days. That's not a "big friggen deal", that is insanity. Over 100 hits a day? If he worked 10 hours a day, that's a significant part of his day that he is doing anything but working. How can you possibly think that's okay?

No wonder the SEC never has any idea of what is going on with regards to regulation - people like this supervisor are too busy doing whatever they feel like doing that isn't work.
photo
rbchilds
Independent with Open Eyes
09:54 PM on 02/02/2010
The unintended consequences of viagra, maybe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RSKaz
Impact not ego.
11:15 AM on 02/02/2010
This just in: Vivid Video Employees Investigated for Watching CNBC.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
confuseddemocrat
11:13 AM on 02/02/2010
Now we know why the SEC couldn't catch Madoff.......................
08:17 PM on 03/08/2010
No, they were too busy chasing his brother Jack.
photo
lisaman
vote for your best interests or shut up
11:03 AM on 02/02/2010
So is this how Madoff got away with his schemes for so long?
photo
comicpro
Stupid Should Be Painful
11:00 AM on 02/02/2010
Hey maybe they can be good at something since apparently dropping the ball in regards to regulation they totally missed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FHTB
10:53 AM on 02/02/2010
No need to worry...they aren't finding him...he's DEAD as a DOORNAIL...and let's stop trying to discuss him as a living person from here on out, K?
KennebunkportIndependent
Back in my day, we had NINE planets.
10:47 AM on 02/02/2010
I will be sure to wear gloves before, and wash my hands after, I touch any post from these agencies!
11:07 AM on 02/02/2010
The BIG story at the SEC is that it is being sued for over 3 trillion dollars for running a Ponzi scheme.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blacksmithn
Iron, cold iron, is master of them all...
10:24 AM on 02/02/2010
Two dozen people over a two year period in an agency that employs 3500 folks. And none of them apparently accessed the objectionable material.

Seems like much ado about nothing to me.
11:07 AM on 02/02/2010
No, that was one person who tried it 1,800 times in a period of 17 days. If you are hitting porn sites (or trying to) that often, you clearly do not have enough to do. That's over 100 attempts a day, and that's nuts. What does he do at home?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blacksmithn
Iron, cold iron, is master of them all...
11:49 AM on 02/02/2010
That was one-- presumably, the most egregious-- example. The article clearly states that this involved two dozen people over a two year period.

In any organization of 3500 over such a period, whether government or public sector, this is hardly surprising. We had one genius bring in a porn dvd he'd made of he and his wife to show off. Why he thought that was a good idea, I'll never know and, yes, he was disciplined for his ridiculous lack of judgement.

As for the 1800 times a day guy, obviously he needs therapy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
11:44 PM on 02/02/2010
Two dozen indiscretions might be forgiven if they had made even one credible bust.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blacksmithn
Iron, cold iron, is master of them all...
09:43 AM on 02/03/2010
Actually, 2009 appears to have seen a reinvigorated agency actively investigating and enforcing the law. See:

http://watchingthewatchers.org/indepth/95828/mid-year-review-sec-enforcement-2009

In remarks to the NY Bar Association in August 2009, Robert Khuzami, newly appointed director of Enforcement for the agency noted:

"Comparing the period from late January [2009] to the present to roughly the same period in 2008, the Division has opened 10% more investigations (approximately 525, compared to 475); have been granted 118% more formal orders (which grants us subpoena power) (275, compared to 126); have filed 147% more TROs (52, compared to 21); and have filed nearly 30% more actions (397, compared to 306)."


Progress? Certainly. Is it sufficient? Most likely not, but it's clearly a giant step in the right direction. Why hasn't this information been more widely made known? Like most regulatory agencies, much of what they do is unheralded, unnoticed and unseen.