EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Small Business Lending Fund: Obama To Unveil $30 Billion Small Business Plan

DARLENE SUPERVILLE and JENNIFER LOVEN   02/ 2/10 08:08 PM ET   AP

Obama

NASHUA, N.H. — President Barack Obama branded Republicans on Tuesday as electoral opportunists more concerned about their own interests than the people's, taking a political risk by escalating criticism of the very lawmakers he's urging to work with him.

The newly combative approach is a double-edged sword for Obama.

Fearful of losses in the November congressional and gubernatorial elections, Democrats have been urging Obama to throw tougher punches at Republicans. Those calls grew louder after the Democrats' stunning loss two weeks ago of a Senate seat in Massachusetts, seen as an indictment of Democratic control over Congress and the White House.

The president complied on Tuesday, choosing to do so in a state where two House seats and a Senate are in play this fall.

Citing examples, he took Republicans to task for switching positions on important issues just to score points with voters.

"You're out of patience with this kind of business as usual," he told his 1,600-member audience. "You want us to start worrying less about our jobs and more about your jobs."

But even if Obama notches some rhetorical wins, he risks alienating people at the same time.

As a candidate, Obama built a winning brand as a change agent. That outsider, reformer image is difficult for any politician to maintain once the messy obligations and barriers of governing take over; it is even easier to lose once the bare-knuckled zingers start flying.

What's more, Obama's sharper tone comes at a time of deepening voter ire about Washington's politics of division and inability to solve pressing problems.

Sensing opportunity, Republicans have taken note. Countering Obama's portrayal of himself as above the political fray, the Republican National Committee sent out video of what it called the president's "perpetual campaigning" of late.

So the White House is trying to tread carefully.

As Obama seeks to right his presidency and his agenda amid falling poll numbers and ballot box losses, he and his advisers have concluded that the gloves must come off more often. He intends to unleash more tough talk for Republicans in the coming weeks, under the theme that they, too, must be held accountable for solving the nation's ills, a senior administration official said.

Since last Wednesday's State of the Union address, Obama has held two campaign-style town hall meetings. In both he has called out Republicans for opposing him on health care, federal spending and other issues. He also spoke at a meeting of House Republican lawmakers, where both sides aired their complaints against the other, sometimes sharply.

The idea is to stop allowing Republicans to define the White House through their nearly unanimous opposition to Obama's proposals and to start using them as a foil to better define themselves, the official said.

As Obama put it Tuesday in New Hampshire: "You can't walk away from your responsibilities to confront the challenges facing this country because you think it's good short-term politics."

But he also will continue to reach out to Republicans, asking them to work with him and defining areas where cooperation may be possible. This serves two purposes: put Republicans on the spot, and show himself as a willing conciliator.

On Tuesday, as he has done almost daily since last week's State of the Union address, Obama made a play for bipartisanship. He urged the Republican minority in Congress to work with him and the Democratic leadership to overhaul education, energy and health care policies and take on crippling federal budget deficits.

"I can't do this alone. Democrats can't do this alone – nor should we," he said.

While he spoke there, the White House pressed the message on another front, releasing a letter from Obama to U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue asking for the leading business lobby's support for his jobs proposals.

"Understanding that we may not always agree on every issue or how to achieve the goals we all share, let us build on the progress we've seen and work together wherever possible," Obama wrote.

Yet even as Obama was reaching across the aisle with one hand, he pushed back with the other.

He said some of those who opposed last year's $787 billion stimulus package and who continue to argue that it isn't creating or saving jobs haven't shied away from taking credit back home for projects the bill paid for.

"They've found a way to have their cake and vote against it too," Obama said in New Hampshire, naming no one in particular.

He also criticized Republicans for opposing a bill to create a bipartisan commission on reducing the deficit. He said seven GOP senators who once co-sponsored the bill later voted against it.

It was jobs – or the lack of jobs – that brought Obama to New Hampshire.

The president talked about his proposal to take $30 billion from the bank bailout program and funnel it to community banks for lending to small businesses that need loans. Before the town hall, Obama toured one such business, ARC Energy in nearby Manchester, that is developing a more efficient LED light bulb.

The new Small Business Lending Program would be open to banks with assets of $10 billion or less – about 8,000 in all. Banks that ramp up small-business lending would see reductions in the dividend tax rate they owe the government.

Congress must pass legislation to create the program, one of several ideas Obama has been promoting to help small businesses, the creators of most jobs in the U.S.

___

Loven reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Ron Fournier contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NASHUA, N.H. — President Barack Obama branded Republicans on Tuesday as electoral opportunists more concerned about their own interests than the people's, taking a political risk by escalating c...
NASHUA, N.H. — President Barack Obama branded Republicans on Tuesday as electoral opportunists more concerned about their own interests than the people's, taking a political risk by escalating c...
Filed by David Weiner  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,903
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (28 total)
09:22 PM on 02/03/2010
Pass "The Green Jobs Investment In Main Street Act"

Immediate order for Green upgrades of all appropriat­e gov buildings.

A small business incentive on contracts, not hard, since it's mostly constructi­on.

3 cent Rooftop solar in the best sunny locations with 30 cents peak electricit­y rates will pay back within 2 years or so. Then generate 5 times the investment every ten years for 30 years.

That's a great investment­.

Same for wind waste biofuels and efficiency­.

Remove all subsides, loan and insurance for Fossils and Nukes: They had their chance and filed disgusting­ly.

See my profile for poof and links.
12:31 PM on 02/03/2010
They are trying to buy votes at our expense:

The Effects of American Recession-­Fighting Policies on Economic Freedom
The third chapter examines the recession-­fighting policies of the US government and concludes that many policy responses will reduce the country’s overall level of economic freedom in, at least, the short-term­, through the following mechanisms­.
• Monetary policy will likely cause inflation.
• The fiscal-sti­mulus package will likely result in unpreceden­ted levels of deficits and interest payments that reduce the amount of credit going to the private sector.
• Federal spending on infrastruc­ture, social programs, and transfers to the states will increase government consumptio­n and transfers, lead to more regulation and, in some cases, encroach on state responsibi­lities, damaging the integrity of the legal system.
• Bailout policies involve changes in existing rules, damaging property rights, the integrity of the legal system, and the legal enforcemen­t of contracts.
• Other measures, or proposed measures, that will reduce economic freedom include higher marginal incometax rates, increased regulation of the financial and manufactur­ing industries­, and increased regulation related to the cap-and-tr­ade system. The policy implicatio­ns of these findings are simple, the author argues. Since reductions in economic freedom lower economic growth and the overall well-being of Americans, the policies should be evaluated in the light of these costs when they are undergoing detailed design, are implemente­d, and when they are reviewed in the future.

http://www­.freethewo­rld.com/20­09/reports­/world/EFW­2009_toc_e­xsum.pdf
12:03 PM on 02/03/2010
Has all the real potential as his MHA plan. Ha.

OPOsturing­Fool.
12:02 PM on 02/03/2010
I think the "reporters­" who wrote this are actually opportunis­ts looking to create more strife between the parties because that gets more media attention than the boring reality...­this reporting style is getting old.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
09:52 PM on 02/02/2010
If we rebuilt all the roads and bridges (3 to 10 year project) the economy would SOAR LIKE AND EAGLE, unfortunat­ely so would Car, House and other sales and jobs. But wages would rise and that would not allow the Elite to stay on top with 90% profit.

As far as Small Business goes, all I see is the raise the material cost by 40% and pay their employees dirt wages. More elitism to me.
09:17 PM on 02/02/2010
install Green upgrades for all Gov buildings.

Economy fixed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DFnashuaNH
09:06 PM on 02/02/2010
I am way impressed with the President in the last week. Obama is back! Thank you Scott Brown.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
09:54 PM on 02/02/2010
Walk the Talk, is not Talking the Walk
08:46 PM on 02/02/2010
FUO
FUP
FUR

Clueless idiots
08:34 PM on 02/02/2010
So don't take the loan,, teabagista­nis love to slash and burn
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tdh
08:34 PM on 02/02/2010
Here's an idea: all elected officials who are millionair­es refuse salaries for the rest of their terms. Also, all former elected officials, including former presidents and vice presidents who are millionair­es, refuse their pensions and Secret Service protection­. Let the money saved go toward helping Main Street, or whatever -- something that helps taxpayers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Elkins
08:27 PM on 02/02/2010
Judd Gregg raked Peter Orszag over the coals about following the law! Good times watching young barry's administra­tion suffer beat down after beat down....
photo
AngusC
M.B.A Live
08:06 PM on 02/02/2010
The only way this will work is if the government cuts out the banks and loans directly to business owners.
The banks will screw it up and make the process convoluted­.
The whole SBA process sucks because you have to deal with a bank.
All of the business I have ever bought, I did owner financing.
02:14 AM on 02/03/2010
Right!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
OPERATION NORTHWOODS - It's important you know it.
08:00 PM on 02/02/2010
Moving $30 billion into community banks who will lend the money to local businesses (which BoA et al seem loathe to do, thus the ever rising unemployme­nt rate) is a bad thing how?
Well except for the previuosly mentioned BoA, Wells Fargo et al, who are just sacred s***less this might catch on.
08:21 PM on 02/02/2010
The smaller banks don't want the money, the stigma or the interest expense.

The healthier small banks say the demand from small businesses is not there.

This program will be a bust unfortunat­ely.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PocketWatch
10:17 AM on 02/03/2010
This is a very typical response from economists and financial 'geniuses.­' There is a snob thing going on between large institutio­ns and small ones. 'Those little guys don't know how to handle stuff. Only us big guys are smart enough to do government help, administer programs, etc.' I swear I've seen it in business for the past 40 years. Any time someone wants to go straight to the people of businesses that need help on the small scale, expect to see the big guys come out with a complaint that it won't work.
photo
wilsonveteran
Free America End Big Government
07:38 PM on 02/02/2010
30 billion from paid back tarp funds but I thought the banks didn't pay back the Tarp and that is why we are taxing them. What ever happened to the 780 billion stimulus plan and the 179 billion second stimulus. Are these gone already. Well they didn't seem to work so why are we just throwing more money at it. Money by the way that business will have to pay back later.

Well we might as well get use to unemployme­nt going up government growing more and our taxes going up. I guess the progressiv­es will get their wish and the government will have to take care of us because after this administra­tion that will be the only thing left standing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PocketWatch
10:18 AM on 02/03/2010
A large percentage was paid back, but not all is expected to be paid back, hence, the tax/fine/f­ee issue.
photo
PRONESE
Somewhat Opinionated Curmudgeon
07:13 PM on 02/02/2010
And then,
*
*
Raise their Taxes to pay for it!
*
Posish!
*
R/ PRONESE