Obama Calls Out Conservative Democrats For Their Timidity

First Posted: 02- 3-10 12:58 PM   |   Updated: 02- 3-10 04:28 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Obama

Just as President Obama's appearance before the House Republican caucus last Friday gave him an opportunity to push back against some of the most outlandish conservative caricatures of his presidency, his visit with Senate Democrats on Wednesday morning allowed him to confront, head on and in public, the timidity and centrism from within his own party.

"There was apparently a headline after the Massachusetts election," Obama declared during the morning meeting, to which cameras were allowed access. "The Village Voice announced that Republicans win a 41-59 majority. It's worth thinking about. We still have to lead."

VIDEO AND FULL TEXT AVAILABLE HERE.

In one key exchange this morning, Obama rebuked pleas from Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) that he moderate his agenda and work with Republicans to ease the current state of economic uncertainty.

Lincoln described a constituent who she said was "extremely frustrated because there was a lack of certainty and predictability from his government for him to be able to run his businesses."

She asked: "Are we willing, as Democrats, not only to reach out to Republicans, but to push back in our own party for people who want extremes, and look for the common ground that's going to get us the success that we need not only for our constituents, but for our country, in this global community, in this global economy?"

"Look," said Obama, "there's no doubt that this past year's been an uncertain time for the American people, for businesses and for people employed by businesses. Some of that uncertainty just had to do with the objective reality of this economy entering into a free fall...

Story continues below

"Let's remind ourselves that if you've got an economy suddenly contracting by 6 percent or a loss of trillions of dollars of wealth basically in the blink of an eye, where home values are descending by 20 percent, that that's going to create a whole lot of uncertainty out there, in the business environment and among families. ...

"And part of what we've done, over the course of this year, is to put a floor under people's feet. That's what the Recovery Act did."

From there, Obama turned to a more pointed critique of Lincoln's argument. "If the price of certainty is essentially for us to adopt the exact same proposals that were in place for eight years leading up to the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression -- we don't tinker with health care, let the insurance companies do what they want, we don't put in place any insurance reforms, we don't mess with the banks, let them keep on doing what they're doing now because we don't want to stir up Wall Street -- the result is going to be the same," he said. "I don't know why we would expect a different outcome pursuing the exact same policy that got us into this fix in the first place."

Middle class Americans, Obama said, "are more and more vulnerable, and they have been for the last decade, treading water. And if our response ends up being, you know, because we don't want to -- we don't want to stir things up here, we're just going to do the same thing that was being done before, then I don't know what differentiates us from the other guys. And I don't know why people would say, boy, we really want to make sure that those Democrats are in Washington fighting for us."

This is the type of argument from Obama that a lot of Democrats, and not just progressives, have longed to hear. While a united Republican opposition has clearly slowed down his legislative agenda, it has been the conservative Democrats in the Senate who have punctured enormous holes in it.

The White House has largely coddled these four or five Senators, at least in public, in hopes of gradually winning over their support. The White House declined to criticize Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) for holding up health care reform over a public option --- even while lashing out at former Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean when he said the bill should be stopped because it lacked the public plan.

This was the first sign that Obama might be willing to call out those in his party who think that watering down his administration's platform makes for smart politics and policy.

Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter
Just as President Obama's appearance before the House Republican caucus last Friday gave him an opportunity to push back against some of the most outlandish conservative caricatures of his presidency,...
Just as President Obama's appearance before the House Republican caucus last Friday gave him an opportunity to push back against some of the most outlandish conservative caricatures of his presidency,...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
5,725
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next ›  Last »   (73 pages total)
Show: 
photo
NHGranite   06:55 PM on 2/04/2010
Something he's saying must be working, because today the Senate confirmed Johnson for GSA after sitting on it 9 months. And the vote was 96 - zip
research   04:30 PM on 2/04/2010
longest filibuster in history was 24 hours.

Reid is LETTING THIS HAPPEN.
Artos   03:38 PM on 2/04/2010
I wish it were as easy to get done as calling the Dems cowards. Does Obama really think that is going to work. I've been calling them that for the last several years, ever since they started rolling over for the Republicans under Bush and even before that. I wish it were as simple as believing that they are just a bunch of Old People who have a lack of energy then at least they might have some excuse. I wish it were just because they had medical problems like lack of hearing capability, but none of that seems to be the case. How do you give an entire political Party gumption to stand up for what is right. Maybe a stick of dynamite under their rumps would work? I don't know though if even that would do it. I just don't think we have a government that money can't buy, whether they're Dems or Repubs.
photo
thinkRegress   01:49 PM on 2/04/2010
And the democratic party is doomed to become more and more irrelevant as it is conquered by the fringe radical left.
mw21   02:19 PM on 2/04/2010
I only wish the left controlled the Dem party. It is the cowardly right who run as if they are on the left that have captured the party.
photo
thinkRegress   03:26 PM on 2/04/2010
Which is why Repubs are making new gains in formerly blue states and will continue to do so.
photo
thinkRegress   03:27 PM on 2/04/2010
aw shucks I replied to the wrong poster. Now it looks odd :(
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PanFx   03:18 PM on 2/04/2010
Which is why Republicans have lost historical amounts of support to a point where they are the minority. Yeah, right.
Artos   03:31 PM on 2/04/2010
There is no fringe radical left except in your imagination. There are people who have a desire to see something get done on the other hand. People who aren't asleep half the time or can't get themselves motivated any more because unfortunately Geritol isn't as popular as it once was. Of course you may prefer to have a Democratic party that thinks that progress is waking up in the morning, I don't.
photo
PaiaGirl   01:35 AM on 3/03/2010
Odd that he would call the 80% of the Democrats who want the public option "fringe". More Like Blanche Lincoln is the fringe.
photo
NHGranite   06:52 PM on 2/04/2010
Curly says " I read that somewhere. I wrote it down and then I read it" Get some facts first please

NYUK NYUK NYUK
photo
DFL   01:01 PM on 2/04/2010
Ones like LIEberman and the rest of the blue dogs are perfect examples of what's wrong with washington, all they care about is what's best for them and the will of the people doesn't matter anymore! they need to be removed from office and replaced with "real" democrats!
photo
just-a-mechanic   08:45 AM on 2/05/2010
Lieberman is an Independent. That alone should be enough to explain why he sits in the center.
photo
Hal Goldfarb   05:20 PM on 2/06/2010
What is a "real" democrat? (I can't wait to hear the response to this...)
photo
PaiaGirl   01:37 AM on 3/03/2010
Someone who follows the Democratic Party Platform which support social justice, etc. You can read the platform here: http://www.democrats.org/page/-/pdf/dem-platform.pdf
photo
marignymitch   12:38 PM on 2/04/2010
Pot to kettle!
prankin   10:31 AM on 2/04/2010
Obama's argument is nearly insane. He posits a position (status quo) THAT WAS NEVER ARTICULATED BY SENATOR LINCOLN. Then, he proceeds to debunk that made-up position. I think this man is so self-absorbed, so narcissistic, that he simply can not allow the possibility of another approach to policy other than his own. And yet, his approach to "change" is to give over to the House and Senate complete responsibility for drafting health care and bank reform. Odd, really odd.

PWR
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
InfinteShibumi   10:58 AM on 2/04/2010
New here? He answered Lincoln's question and proceeded to make another point. It's permitted.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ProgressiveAndProud1   11:09 AM on 2/04/2010
He must have watched Faux's non-coverage and did what all teabaggers do .....

Pull a bunch of blatant lies out of his bunghole.
justobserve   09:13 AM on 2/04/2010
Forget about being "bipartisan". The Great Obstructionist Party has shown very clearly they are the Party of No and we want to go forwards. Obama just need to lead his own party and we are there in no time. But he didn't! That's why we are in this mess about health care. He told us he would fight the lobbyists, the Wall Street power but he didn't! He let them lead the health care debate and now we have a reform without a public option but with a mandate.That's the total reversal of his porition before the election.
photo
just-a-mechanic   08:47 AM on 2/05/2010
Correction... We do not have any reform. The bill is as good as dead.
yankee222   09:02 AM on 2/04/2010
Oooh scary... Obama called them out. Yikes ! Duck and Cover

What a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PanFx   03:24 PM on 2/04/2010
Based on your puerile remark, I'm willing to bet a week's pay that you didn't watch the entire 78-minute video.
Jacqueline3   08:22 AM on 2/04/2010
These Democrats need to grow some balls and lead...
photo
Patriotallday   08:08 AM on 2/04/2010
Demos know Obama is now just a one term president and will not sacrifice their political careers to go along with his radical socialist agenda. Obama is spending this country into bankruptcy and destroying our currency. The federal government will run out of money in just 3 weeks unless the national debt ceiling is raised AGAIN to new record levels.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hEkfx_bpGC-zVoeKNR38gWLcjXdw
blizb   09:13 AM on 2/04/2010
No you are wrong.

Bush is the one who made the economic policies that included "tax cuts for the rich" who did not reinvest in America and shipped jobs overseas or downsized then took the cash without providing jobs.

Bush inherited from Clinton a balanced budget, a surplus, a great job market, and the intelligence memo stating Bin Laden was determined to attack us. Condi Rice admitted in hearings that they chose to ignore that memo.

Bush and the GOP shoved through a Medicare expansion and the highly unpopular Medicare RX bill creating a deficit.

Bush crashed the economy with his policies and GOP support of those policies, Bush came up with the bailout plan to save his legacy before leaving office.

Bush left Obama a huge deficit and no choice but to continue the bailout. Bush bankrupted the country before he left.

Quit avoiding where the blame really lies.

The only problem with the conservative Dems is they support special interests in the hopes of following corrupt GOP representatives who take money from special interests to fund campaigns.
photo
thinkRegress   01:46 PM on 2/04/2010
BOOOOOOOOOOSH DID IT. Tax cuts alone put us trillions in debt! But at least Bush had democrat support for what he did.

Obama has no choice but to spend spend spend!

Problems caused by Bush's borrowing and spending will be solved by OBAMA'S borrowing and spending! If you disagree you just might be a r@cist.
photo
DubiousVoter   01:59 PM on 2/04/2010
Obama is following the same policies of the previous administration. The office changes hands, but nothing ever changes. The reason is that there is one master plan called the New World Order.

If you don't wake up and see the big picture, you will find yourself in a FEMA camp labeled as a "useless eater".

Don't wait until you are standing in line to be chipped before you wake up and see the obvious:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRIuYxmeppY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRNyte66LTQ
lylo   11:16 AM on 2/04/2010
lol
photo
RRK70   04:24 PM on 2/08/2010
it would help if you stop ignoring where the debt comes from.

If you wish to be taken seriously terms like "radical socialist" don't help.
photo
StormWarrior   07:53 AM on 2/04/2010
photo
graffitijoe   07:31 AM on 2/04/2010
Obama is the weakest President since Carter, maybe even weaker.
photo
StormWarrior   07:47 AM on 2/04/2010
..T.e.r.r.o.r.i..s.m. - Bush's National Security Legacy of Failure

http://www.nsnetwork.org/node/1174
photo
DeeFromTheD   07:48 AM on 2/04/2010
Hmm. That statement is irrelevant because he has gotten 96% of what he wanted to do than his predecessors did in their first year.
photo
MalteseTiger   11:02 AM on 2/04/2010
Bush salted the earth.. don't blame obama for taking some time to clean up the mess.. meanwhile DINO's and Repugs are going through the motions of cleaning while sprinkling salt packets all over.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PanFx   03:29 PM on 2/04/2010
This is about the 3rd time I've seen you post this, and it is no less !diotic every time I read it. You were probably popping zits in the mirror when Clinton was being fellated in the Oval Office.
photo
Jond0   06:00 PM on 2/04/2010
Replace weak with smart and you might just have a winner.
photo
clintonius   07:26 AM on 2/04/2010
Blanche Lincoln is a corporate shill.
photo
StormWarrior   07:05 AM on 2/04/2010
Ann Richards on How to Be a Good Republican:

1. You have to believe that the nation's current 8-year prosperity was due to the work of Ronald Reagan and George Bush, but yesterday's gasoline prices are all Clinton's fault.

2. You have to believe that those privileged from birth achieve success all on their own.

3. You have to be against all government programs, but expect Social Security checks on time.

4. You have to believe that AIDS victims deserve their disease, but smokers with lung cancer and overweight individuals with heart disease don't deserve theirs.

5. You have to appreciate the power rush that comes with sporting a gun.

6. You have to believe...everything Rush Limbaugh says.
photo
PaiaGirl   01:43 AM on 3/03/2010
Ann Richards is so great! I love her, "That dog won't hunt"

Twitter Edition