More

Obama To Meet Dalai Lama, Despite Continued Objections From China

SCOTT McDONALD   02/ 3/10 03:53 AM ET   AP

Dalai Lama Obama China
China does not want Obama to meet with the Dalai Lama.

BEIJING — China on Wednesday again urged President Barack Obama not to hold a planned meeting with Dalai Lama, saying it would further hurt already strained bilateral relations.

It was the second successive day that China has spoken out against the meeting, and comes after Beijing said ties had been harmed by a U.S. announcement last week that it would sell arms to Taiwan.

"China resolutely opposes the visit by the Dalai Lama to the United States, and resolutely opposes the U.S. leader having contact with the Dalai Lama in any name or any form," Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu said Wednesday.

The United States has already brushed aside previous warnings from China, and White House spokesman Bill Burton said Tuesday the meeting was still planned, although no date has been set.

"The president told ... China's leaders during his trip last year that he would meet with the Dalai Lama, and he intends to do so. The Dalai Lama is an internationally respected religious and cultural leader, and the president will meet with him in that capacity," Burton said.

According to Chhime R. Chhoekyapa, the Dalai Lama's secretary, the Dalai Lama will be in Washington on Feb 17-18. He then will head for California and Florida before returning to India on Feb. 26. He would not give any other details.

Bilateral relations have already been strained by the U.S. announcement Friday that it planned to sell $6.4 billion worth of arms to Taiwan.

Beijing quickly suspended military exchanges with Washington and announced an unprecedented threat of sanctions against the U.S. companies involved in the sale.

China is very sensitive to any meetings that the India-based Dalai Lama, the 1989 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, has with government leaders, calling them interference in its internal affairs.

On Tuesday, the official in charge of the office that deals with recent talks with the Dalai Lama's representatives warned there would be repercussions if Obama met the Dalai Lama.

Ma, responding to Burton's comments, said the United States should not allow its territory to be used by "Tibetan separatist forces."

"We urge the U.S. side to fully recognize the extreme sensitivity of the Tibet issue, and prudently and properly handle relevant issues so as to avoid causing further damage to China-US relations," Ma said in a statement posted on the ministry's Web site.

China maintains that Tibet has been part of its territory for centuries, but many Tibetans say the region was functionally independent for much of its history.

Beijing demonizes the Dalai Lama and says he seeks to destroy China's sovereignty by pushing independence for Tibet. The Dalai Lama has maintained for decades he wants some form of autonomy that would allow Tibetans to freely practice their culture, language and religion under China's rule, not independence.

Tibetan areas have been tense in recent years, with the minority community complaining about restrictions on Buddhism, government propaganda campaigns against their revered Dalai Lama, and an influx of Chinese migrants that leave Tibetans feeling marginalized. Those feelings boiled over in deadly anti-Chinese riots in 2008 that shocked Beijing's leaders.

___

Associated Press writer Muneeza Naqvi contributed to this report from New Delhi.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BEIJING — China on Wednesday again urged President Barack Obama not to hold a planned meeting with Dalai Lama, saying it would further hurt already strained bilateral relations. It was the seco...
BEIJING — China on Wednesday again urged President Barack Obama not to hold a planned meeting with Dalai Lama, saying it would further hurt already strained bilateral relations. It was the seco...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:45 PM on 02/05/2010
I don’t know why people in Tibet want to be independent. Chinese government spends a large amount of money on improving education and technologies there. They are provided with better lives and respect. Tibet’s landscape, weather and many other environmental problems are the barriers to influence their development, so they do not have the ability to form a country right now. The most important thing is that people can live in a better environment, isn’t it? So who actually is in charge of the government is not necessary. It’s the same in US, to consider whom to vote for, the biggest factor in our decisions is that which leader can make sure we, citizens, can have better improved lives. And obviously, Dalai cannot do that. Since he has appeared on the world’s stage, all he does is talking and accusing Chinese government. He talks about peace but has never done anything to actually stop wars. If US welcome him, why doesn’t he try to convince US to stop sending army to Iran?
02:27 PM on 02/05/2010
I can see you are absolutely in the dark to what freedom and self-determination mean. Although it's undoubtedly very nice of China to carry the white mans burden in backwards Tibet, they'd rather be free.
03:36 PM on 02/04/2010
Orianna you make an excellent point Americans do have an interest in and compassion for Tibet. This meeting will conjure goodwill between Tibet and America; however what are both parties wanting to achieve with this meeting? Goodwill is important but so are solutions. The US and China need to address tension and better understand why China has issues with the meeting.
http://www.newsy.com/videos/should-the-u-s-be-scared-of-china
02:42 PM on 02/04/2010
I blame Boooosh
06:28 AM on 02/04/2010
Diplomatic lesson No.1: never pick a fight when you ABSOLUTELY need the other side's cooperation on one of, if not the, most important foreign policy issue of your tenure. Now, the Obama administration could forget about getting cooperation from China on Iran.
07:41 PM on 02/03/2010
If you control TIbet, do you control the headwaters of the Ganges? Or is that Nepal?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WYHKTai-Tai
Wyoming, Hong Kong, Tai-Tai
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
06:09 PM on 02/03/2010
Dalai is going to have to tell his followers that he has now met a leader who presides over large numbers of people who believe that he was born outside the US.
05:13 PM on 02/03/2010
What China's Communist authorities want to do with the spiritual leader of the Tibetan people is first of all to marginalize him from international communities, and then shut him up forever. They would have put him into solitary confinement, as what they had done with many other Tibetan monks, had they been able to do so.
06:34 PM on 02/03/2010
I think they follow our playbook on the Native Americans and Hawaiians.
03:42 PM on 02/03/2010
Doesn't China understand that in order for it to be part of the industrialized world, it has to resolve the Tibetan issue and Taiwan? And not just posture about how we are to relate to them. China itself blindly raises the question time and time again, which begs for a resolution.
Dalai Lama is the most respectable and noble person of our age. He offers compassion and wisdom to the world leaders, he offers solutions.
China would be very well advised to listen to him, show the rest of the world that it has "grown" up as a nation, as a world power.
I congratulate Obama on choosing to meet the Dalai Lama, a step worthy of our president and the country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TStringfellow
Wobbly, politically and literally
03:26 AM on 02/04/2010
I'm pretty sure China is already a "part of the industrialized world". Their human rights record hasn't and won't impede their growth in a Capitalist world (if it did the U.S. would've been broke long ago).

The Dalai Lama has offered nothing. He's a former slaving owner who wants to return to his feudalist kingdom and retire in luxury. There are better ways to criticize China than by worshipping a U.S. backed sock puppet.
02:51 PM on 02/03/2010
Let me get this straight.

China can do BUSINESS with N. Korea's Kim Jong Il, Sudan's Bashir and Iran's Ahmadinejad but we are the bad guys for TALKING to the Dalai Lama.

Conclusion: China in their hubris has convinced themselves we are brain dead. China is going to learn they can't straddle the fence, either they come on board and help us on Iran, N. Korea, climate change et al... or they are going to end up getting sanctioned for not living up to their obligations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TStringfellow
Wobbly, politically and literally
06:00 PM on 02/03/2010
Oh please. The U.S. has supported the most odious dictators in history. Read up on the civil wars in Guatemala, El Salvador and Nicaragua in the 70's and 80's, then see who was funding it all. Genocide in Guatemala, massive violent supression of Nicaragua's democracy and a campaign of terror and murder in El Salvador.

To say nothing of Saddam Hussein, the Shah of Iran, Suharto in Indonesia, etc.

A couple tiny examples amongst hundreds. Learn your own country's shameful past before condemning China.
01:51 AM on 02/04/2010
Believe me I don't need a history lesson from you. So you readily admit China does business with the world's worst types of dictators.

So, again. Why can't we talk to the Dalai Lama?
09:53 AM on 02/04/2010
...don't forget our corporations washing money for the nazi's before and during wwii
02:10 PM on 02/03/2010
I hope Obama will really stick it this time to China, it was a huge mistake to deny meeting with the Dalai Lama last time, the world looks upon USA's reaction to China!!! China is upset at everything like a little spoiled kid... they tell not to interfere with their internal matters but puts economic pressure to force other nations to act they way they want too..... Its been too long that the world community ignore China's childish behavior, China will never gain any international respect till they deal with Tibet issue and brings some genuine resolution and to show some respect to the Dalai Lama.... In short, I hope Obama will give Dalai Lama the full guest of honor treatment, instead of "drop by" meeting.. after all, they both are noble laureate now...
01:46 PM on 02/03/2010
Thank you Obama!
Granted they own a huge hunk of US but they can't tell us who we can talk to.
01:48 PM on 02/03/2010
BTW buy American!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidwayneosedach
01:42 PM on 02/03/2010
China is trying to control the US in every little way it can. We know it. And they know that we know it!
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
01:33 PM on 02/03/2010
That's my man! I'm proud of President Obama for making this move.

I'm hoping he's beginning to understand just how dangerous China is becoming to us--and to world peace.
01:03 PM on 02/03/2010
Let the bowing begin...
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
01:35 PM on 02/03/2010
Yes, remember that an American President should never bow to anyone, even if that is what the culture he is visiting does and even if others are bowing to him. Just like handshakes: if anyone sticks their hand out at him he should just turn up his nose and refuse to return the gesture. Yeah! That'll teach 'em who's boss.

Stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TStringfellow
Wobbly, politically and literally
03:27 AM on 02/04/2010
Yeah, like Bush never HELD HANDS with Prince Abdullah.
12:46 PM on 02/03/2010
Why does this religious whack get an audience with the president? Do you think that this guy can finance your nation as China is doing? He’s just another religious autocrat living off the beneficence of others –a freeloader!

China doesn’t have the right to say with whom the president can or cannot meet and in this Obama is acting rightly by ignoring them, however, in light of the recent arms sale to Taiwan--an undisputable province of China--we must ask what advantage is there in provoking one’s financier. If China wanted to mess with the U.S. all it has to do is unload a few hundred million or billion of all those dollars they’re holding then sit back and watch the U.S. squirm.