iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Richard Shelby Senate Hold Puts Spotlight On Defense Contractor Ties

First Posted: 04/07/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:25 PM ET

Shelby

Sen. Richard Shelby's (R-Ala.) decision to place a "blanket hold" on all presidential nominations until a pair of billion-dollar earmarks for his home state are fast-tracked has reignited the debate over the parliamentary tactics being deployed by the Republican Party. It also has thrust into the spotlight the clout that major defense contractors often wield on the political process.

On Thursday evening, news broke that the Alabama Republican has taken the extraordinary measure of holding up at least 70 "nominations on the Senate calendar" -- essentially threatening to filibuster the confirmation processes if they came to a vote. The move has spurred a series of recriminations from Democratic officials who see it as yet another instance of over-the-top obstructionism of the president's agenda.

It also has turned inquisitive eyes towards Shelby himself.

The Senator confirmed that he launched the hold, in part, because he is upset with a tanker contract worth $35 billion that remains unresolved between Northrop Grumman/EADs and Boeing. Shelby favors the Northrop Grummann-EADS bid largely because it would result in tankers being assembled in his home state. The two contractors, in turn, have donated to Shelby's campaign committees, hoping ostensibly to secure favor or at least an audience with the Alabama Republican.

According to a review of campaign finance records, Shelby's political action committee received $7,500 in donations from EADS's PAC during the past two election cycles and an additional $21,500 from Northrop's PAC since 2000.

[UPDATE: The investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity looked at all political action committees associated with Northrop Grumman and concluded that Shelby has received at least $108,233 in contributions since his first Senate election in 1986.]

Airbus Chairman T. Allan McArtor, meanwhile, donated $1,500 to Shelby in May 2009. Samuel Adcock, EADS Senior Vice President of Government Relations, donated $1,000 to Shelby in 2003. A fellow lobbyist and top executive at the company, Ralph Crosby, donated the same amount that same year. One other EADS employee, Bacon Douglas, donated $1,500 in 2003.

The strongest connection between Shelby and EADS, however, may not involve campaign contributions. The senator's former legislative director, Stewart Hall, is a major lobbyist for the defense contractor -- he was signed up by EADS North America in 2006 while a member of the firm the Federalist Group. During that time period, the Federalist Group was given $240,000 to help advance the company's legislative interests. When Hall left for another major lobbying firm, Ogilvy, he brought EADS with him -- receiving $160,000 in compensation for his work for the company.

To be sure, Shelby was just one of many lobbying targets for EADS and Northrop Grumman -- both of whom are major players in the world of money in politics and influence peddling. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), for one, received a series of suspicious donations from the companies after he threw his support behind granting them the $35 billion Pentagon contract. Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), meanwhile, serves on EADS's board.

A host of prominent Democratic lawmakers -- from former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle to current Vice President Joseph Biden -- also had one-time staffers who, at one time, lobbied for EADS.

For Shelby, moreover, there are other compelling interests at play. A major tanker plant in the heart of Alabama could result in hundreds, if not thousands, of jobs for his state. And well before he decided to hold up 70 presidential nominees, he proved he was willing to go to great parliamentary lengths to secure goodies for his state. in 2009, Taxpayers for Common Sense ranked him the second most proficient securer of earmarks, having brought home $114,484,250 worth of pet projects. In addition to the EADS contract, Shelby also is currently attempting to secure a $45 million improvised explosive device testing lab for the FBI, according to CongressDaily.

In April 2009, Shelby held up another Obama nominee -- Ashton Carter to the post of Pentagon acquisition chief -- in order to receive assurances that the competition for the contract between Northrop/EADS and Boeing would be "conducted in an open and transparent manner based on a best value process."

Unlike with that hold, however, Shelby's most recent efforts to stop Obama nominees has earned him the scorn of the president's advisers. Briefing reporters on Friday morning, white House Press Secretary Roberts Gibbs called Shelby's actions to strongest reflection to date of how badly Washington is broken.

"I guess if you needed one example of what's wrong with this town, it might be that one senator can hold up 70 qualified individuals to make government work better because he didn't get his earmarks," Gibbs said. "If that's not the poster child for how this town needs to change the way it works, I fear there won't be a greater example of silliness throughout the entire year of 2010."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,169
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (135 total)
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
07:41 AM on 02/08/2010
shelby must keep the threat of war strong so his little contractors continue to get no-bid contracts to build their weapons. This is the very essence of his reason for being!
03:09 PM on 02/11/2010
He’s also one of the ‘Toyota Senators’ who tried to liquidate the domestic auto industry and eradicate 4 million U.S. jobs.
09:57 PM on 02/07/2010
I have no problem with the filibuster, but this hold "tradition" is ridiculous.
09:25 PM on 02/07/2010
But..but..But.. EADS and Northrop Grumman -- both of whom are major players in the world of money in politics and influence peddling.

Isn't that illegal?

The British company BAE just paid hundreds of millions in fines for corruption and bribery on the grandest scale and no one goes to jail.

Bought..
06:16 PM on 02/07/2010
Wouldn't someone who's taken the Government hostage be considered a...oh, I don't know...TERRORIST?

Just a thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
profmsf
05:21 PM on 02/07/2010
Can the White House instruct the Treasury Department to withhold payments to government contractors working in Alabama until Senator Shelby loosens up? If they can, they should.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
offred
A biocitizen is 3/5 of a corporate citizen
04:56 PM on 02/07/2010
The Senate is no longer providing coolness, but frozen rigidity. Is the Senate necessary?

"A key goal of the Framers was to create a Senate differently constituted from the House so it would be less subject to popular passions and impulses. "The use of the Senate," wrote James Madison in Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, "is to consist in its proceedings with more coolness, with more system and with more wisdom, than the popular branch." An oft-quoted story about the "coolness" of the Senate involves George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, who was in France during the Constitutional Convention. Upon his return, Jefferson visited Washington and asked why the Convention delegates had created a Senate. "Why did you pour that coffee into your saucer?" asked Washington. "To cool it," said Jefferson. "Even so," responded Washington, "we pour legislation into the senatorial saucer to cool it."
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/common/briefing/Senate_legislative_process.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
offred
A biocitizen is 3/5 of a corporate citizen
04:58 PM on 02/07/2010
When you think about it, this is kind of backhanded slap, saying "the people" (the House) need to be tempered by the "elite" (the Senate, our version of the House of Lords).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
offred
A biocitizen is 3/5 of a corporate citizen
04:38 PM on 02/07/2010
"The investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity looked at all political action committees associated with Northrop Grumman and concluded that Shelby has received at least $108,233 in contributions since his first Senate election in 1986."

As I see it, the only way Shelby can prove that he's not a kept man is by publicly giving back that $108,233 to Northrup Grumman.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dustee
I h8 the Par. T. N. da BUBBLE.
02:26 PM on 02/07/2010
I'm sure the citizens of Alabama don't won't any of that nasty old government funding.

Did you know that 32 states that pay taxes, they receive more back then they pay out in income taxes 84% of those states are Republicans.

For every dollar the good people in Alabama pay out they get back $1.64 cents.

And they claim to be tired of big Government spending. They need to get up off their lazy a**es and go to work. I'm tired of carrying their load.

http://i44.tinypic.com/2r29j0x.jpg
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lapdogs
Avid News Reader
02:51 PM on 02/07/2010
That's known as being a hypocrite - stand for one thing but gladly accept the same thing.

And they say those "Blue States" are filled with wasteful spenders.

Get out the mirror, folks.
03:12 PM on 02/07/2010
“We always gotta’ hand fulla’ gimme’ and a mouth fulla’ much-obliged. We will rise again. Go tea-bagger nation!!
12:56 PM on 02/07/2010
The only thing that can save this Democratic Republic is the People. Citizens. We have something precious but we don't understand it.. The framers did not know if their blueprint for self-governing could work but they had personal experience of power which comes from money and position. The founding documents gave the ultimate power to the PEOPLE through representative government. The question today is who are the peoples' representatives really representing?
12:15 PM on 02/07/2010
End the filibuster NOW!
photo
mcmutter
A Groover has to expect a few setbacks .....
12:08 PM on 02/07/2010
Shelby is out to ruin Boeing. He demands to see an Airbus assembly plant in Alabama.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:49 PM on 02/07/2010
another American company thrown under the bus so that a foreign company can thrive, all with the help of our patriotic tea-baggers and republicans.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JeanPaulSatire
Wordsmith, liberal, skeptical idealist, 99%er.
03:24 PM on 02/07/2010
That'd be "thrown under the AIRBUS..."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:58 AM on 02/07/2010
Why is that Repugs think that govt. the problem and not corporations?
01:00 PM on 02/07/2010
Because they are being told that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JeanPaulSatire
Wordsmith, liberal, skeptical idealist, 99%er.
03:27 PM on 02/07/2010
Because government doesn't make it as easy for corporations as it possibly can (though we are on the fast track to do just that).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
09:54 AM on 02/07/2010
Shelby is the face of the republican party. He represents corporations and the military industrial complex like Haliburton and defense contractors. It's not about national security it's about blackmailing the democratic process with obstructionism to get work for his state and get reelected.

And he probablly will get reelected now that the conservative supreme court stacked by the Bushes has given corporation unlimited leeway to pour money into thier conservative candidates.
We're screwed!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TC Mits
Cogito ergo democratia sum.
10:36 AM on 02/07/2010
Dwight Eisenhower warned about the Military/Industrial complex. We need to pay attention to this former great General and President.
01:03 PM on 02/07/2010
He was in a position to know as he had been the Supreme Allied Commander (military) and then the Commander-in-Chief (civilian). Also, he was a Republican.
09:27 AM on 02/07/2010
How cheap it is to buy these thugs.
photo
david5000
Detective & Pilot
08:11 AM on 02/07/2010
While they have a majority in both houses, the democrats should change the rules that allow a single senator to hold any nomination.

A minimum of 25 senators should be required to hold up any nomination, which represents 25% of the chamber.

These are the changes that we expected from Obama to repair the corrupt system instead of wasting his political capital on unwinnable projects.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timhere
12:57 PM on 02/07/2010
Obama has no say on senate rules. The head of the executive branch does not control the rules of the legislative branch. If that were the case we would have a dictatorship.
01:15 PM on 02/07/2010
Money is power. Already corporate money influences both houses of Congress. The branches of government are no longer seperate but equal. Only if corporate money is spread equally among the inhabitants of the White House, the Congress and the Supreme Court (and the Press) will they be 'equal'.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
02:27 AM on 02/08/2010
They can only do that at the beginning of each session, so abusive rules that thwart democracy need to be made a major issue in all Senate elections in November.