More

Rachel Maddow On Quentin Tarantino's 'Inglourious Basterds': Really 'The Modern Strategic History Of al-Qaeda

First Posted: 04/14/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:30 PM ET

On Thursday night, Quentin Tarantino went on Rachel Maddow to discuss his Oscar nominated film Inglourious Basterds. The film takes place in Nazi-occupied France during World War II and follows a group of Jewish-American soldiers who scalp and brutally kill Nazis. As Maddow points out, the story is "not just a revenge fantasy about World War II.  It's a torture and terrorism fantasy" -- really, Tarantino is writing "the modern strategic history of al-Qaeda."

TRANSCRIPT AND VIDEO BELOW

WATCH

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

MADDOW: Here's one of the things that I think is so interesting about the film. And I'm surprised this isn't the mainstream way it's getting talked about. But it's not just a revenge fantasy about World War II. It's a torture and terrorism fantasy.


I mean, the whole idea behind what Brad Pitt and these soldiers are
doing is that they're not just killing Nazis. They're scalping them,
terrorizing them, humiliating them, doing them in a way that is
supposed to instill even more fear than just death.

TARANTINO: Definitely. You took it right out of my mouth. Yes. I
mean, basically what they're doing - you described it really, really
well. To put in even shorter nutshell, they're actually doing
literally the Apache resistance, but against the Nazis, against the
Germans.

And that was one of the things - one of the reasons I wanted to do
something like that, other than for all the other reasons you said
before about - it's a revenge fantasy and this and that. We've never
seen it before. I was trying to do like a spaghetti western but using
World War II iconography.

So in my re-imagining of this whole thing, I kind of placed the Jews
as the Indians in this scenario. And that is part of the whole thing.
You know, when they say they ambush a German patrol of six guys and
then they scalp them, maybe even take their shoes off, so when they
are found there is even less dignity in the death - all these little
things that they do.

It isn't about the six guys. It's about the 106 Germans in Nazi
occupied France that are going to hear about it. And literally, one
of the ways the Apaches were able to fight both between the Spaniards
and the Mexicans and U.S. Cavalry, they were able to fight people of a
thousand people army with sometimes as little as 40 to 20 people
simply because you were so terrified to be captured by these guys,
that you would kill yourself or even kill women and children if they
were by you for fear.

MADDOW: So it's like a force multiplier that the psychological
warfare component of it makes you much more impressive than the six
guys you really are because of the tactics.

TARANTINO: That's it. To really just get them where they live. And
also, you've got them afraid of a group of people, of Jews, that they
feel they are stronger, who are weaker than them, who they're superior
to.

So if you actually get them, then actually, the German Nazis afraid of
being captured by Jewish males. Well, then now, you've really done
something.

MADDOW: You're also writing the modern strategic history of al-Qaeda.

TARANTINO: Yes.

MADDOW: Right?

(CROSS TALK)

TARANTINO: You are one of the few people that really bring that up.

MADDOW: Yes.

TARANTINO: Now, I've seen people who have seen the movie like three
or four times and it never quite sinks into them. But that was never
something that I necessarily set out to do. I wasn't trying to make a
terrorist Iraq commentary with the film.

It was just what made sense for the characters to do at that time.
Yes they're strapping bombs on themselves.

MADDOW: Yes.

TARANTINO: And they're walking into a theater crowded with evil
civilians and they are prepared to blow it up.

MADDOW: Yes. And it's American suicide bombers making us sort of

sympathize with the suicide bombers, which is -

TARANTINO: Yes. Even the character, Landa, the Jew hunter, the Nazi

character in the film - he even makes a reference to it. He goes your

mission - some would call it a terrorist plot -

MADDOW: Yes.

TARANTINO: Is kaput.

MADDOW: And then, I mean, I don't know if this was - you're saying
that wasn't sort of the thinking behind it. But then, you get the
scene where Brad Pitt, as this heroic terrorist anti-Nazi fighter gets
a bag put over his head when he gets arrested by the Nazis. I'm just
flashing Guantanamo, Guantanamo, Guantanamo on the thing.

TARANTINO: It was funny. Again, I wasn't trying to necessarily make
a political point in there. It literally was just the next step in
the story as far as I was concerned.

However, once I did it, the irony was not lost on me at all. But you
know, that was one of the things that I actually thought that - it was
one of the things that when I was all done. Because I think there are
a lot of things like that - not about that issue, but there's a lot of
things in this movie that are not used to seeing in other World War II
movies.

I thought that was one of the aspects that would actually make the
movie not just seem like a World War II movie that it's like here and
you're looking at it in the eyes of the past.

I wanted the film sort of the way "Bonnie and Clyde" worked when it
came out. It was an old genre took place in the '30s, but it was
actually telling you something about the time today. And that was
what I was trying to do with this in this genre.

MADDOW: What you get - I mean, the movie is 100 percent catharsis.
You know, it's about the ultimate revenge fantasy. And horrible
things happen to the worst people and you cheer for stuff that you've
always dreamed would happen and it does really happen because you
rewrite the history.

That is all happening on this very surface level. But in order to
make it layered, you do have to have the heroic German guy and you do
have to have the vaguely terroristic Americans in that film.

TARANTINO: I mean, it would be easy to just set up a situation where
we just go oh, kill the Nazis, rah, rah. But I don't play it that
easy. Like for instance, on the interrogation scene that you just
saw, under any criteria of bravery in warfare, that German passes the
test under any criteria.

And, yes it would have been easy to make him a cringing coward and it
would have been more rah, rah, rah in the audience. It would be like
watching "Rocky." But you know, that's too easy for what I'm trying
to do.

MADDOW: Yes. Did you watch a bunch of German propaganda films and
like German movies from the '30s in all that (UNINTELLIGIBLE)? It is
a movie about movies at its core. It trumps the core of the plot.

TARANTINO: Yes.

MADDOW: Did you watch a lot of the old German films in order to do this?

TARANTINO: Yes, yes. Both what they called the early Weimar films,
all right, which is - Goebbels has considered the Jewish German
intellectual cinema. I watched a lot of that and I watched a lot of
the actual German propaganda movies made at the time because I was
really excited about the idea that no one has ever actually dealt with
Goebbels as the studio head that he was.

MADDOW: And he made hundreds of films.

TARANTINO: Yes, 800 movies. For about eight years, he ran the German
film industry. And you know, we hear about movies like Jud Sass and
we hear about movies like "The Eternal Jew." We hear all about the
anti-Semitic ones. And if you thought that that was the only thing -
you would think that was the only kind of movies he made.

MADDOW: Yes.

TARANTINO: There were actually very few of those. They made them to
make a couple points at different points in the war. But the majority
of the movies made under Goebbels were like musicals glockenspiel
musicals and romantic comedies and you know, stories of great older
men of German past.

In fact, the idea is if you were watching - the kind of the point
being was if you were a German citizen watching movies in the theaters
and the only - your only knowledge of the war was what you saw in the
movies, you wouldn't even know there was a war going on at all. As
far as you know, just life has never been better than under the
fuhrer.

MADDOW: I will tell you just - the interest that you all flash of a
sex scene involving Goebbels and his interpreter, I (UNINTELLIGIBLE).

TARANTINO: Excellent. Excellent. That's a high compliment.

MADDOW: Thank you just for that and for the rest of it.

Congratulations.

TARANTINO: Thank you.

MADDOW: I hope you win for this. This was at the Oscars. I really
enjoyed it and it's really nice to meet you.

TARANTINO: Oh, it's really nice to meet you. Thanks for having me on.

MADDOW: Quentin Tarantino - oh, my god. OK. All right. Still
ahead. Let's get rid of social security and Medicare. If that sounds
like a good idea to you, there is someone I would like you to meet,
the second mention of Hitler on the show, coming up. That's next.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

On Thursday night, Quentin Tarantino went on Rachel Maddow to discuss his Oscar nominated film Inglourious Basterds. The film takes place in Nazi-occupied France during World War II and follows a gro...
On Thursday night, Quentin Tarantino went on Rachel Maddow to discuss his Oscar nominated film Inglourious Basterds. The film takes place in Nazi-occupied France during World War II and follows a gro...
Filed by Lila Shapiro  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 197
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
captainindustry
just a better con artist
10:15 PM on 02/14/2010
I haven't seen it yet, but i hear it's about certain people profiteering from the war, and that would upset me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:33 PM on 02/13/2010
Brad Pitt was *God-awful* in this movie (& this from someone who is generally pro-Pitt); Christoph Waltz (sp?) was excellent; and the film, generally, was a thumbs down--it's over-indulgent, to no good artistic or political end, on the violence front.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
03:30 PM on 02/13/2010
Tarantino is like an artist who paints with big messy strokes, and many people are entertained. "Enfant terrible" is a good description of him.

I find myself captivated with suspense by the scenes of his movies, but also a little bit overwhelmed by the level of violence.

Being a guy who hasn't watched very many movies in my life, perhaps I'm more easily shocked than the demographic of his audience.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
03:14 PM on 02/13/2010
Have never seen Maddow so silly and star-struck. Really? An autistic genius Peter Pan is what makes you hot? Well, no wonder.
jdrourke
Snark is good for the soul...
03:09 PM on 02/13/2010
I liked the interview very much because basically it was two people who loves movies talking about a movie. It's funny to me those who have a bizarre dislike for Tarantino, as if it were personal. The man makes interesting, well written films. Like everyone, he occasionally missteps, but at least he's bringing something different to the table.

Those who dump on him are probably not that big into film as a medium.

http://jdrourke.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/dear-quentin-tarantino/
photo
Carcinogen
Objectivism isn't a philosophy, it's a cult
01:51 PM on 02/14/2010
Something different? Seriously? Have you never watched a Sergio Leonne film? Tarantino is a great writer, but he lacks in directing by ripping off the works of others. That being said, some of his movies are great but some are just tiresome and an insult to the works of genuine directors. Just my opinion. Hate me if you like.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
InternationalObserver
03:01 PM on 02/13/2010
""I wasn't trying to make a
terrorist Iraq commentary with the film.""

9/11 and Iraq had nothing to do with eachother. Al Qaeda only started up in Iraq AFTER Bush invaded.

I'm disappointed Tarrantino doesn't know this, but then overall he's been pretty disappointing this century. And I was under the impression that the Native American's only started scalping after the practice had been done to them (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalping)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
the pilgrim has landed
02:48 PM on 02/23/2010
You may have missed the point here. In Iraq, we are the terrorists a la Abu Ghraib. Did you not see the pictures? For an expose of heroic terrorism may I suggest "The Baader-Meinhoff Complex" as an antecedent of al-qaida. Never forget what W. T. Sherman said, "War is ALL HELL"
pissedmichael
The name was an accident, please excuse
12:23 PM on 02/13/2010
This show was the one time I was disappointed in Rachel. One, because the whole Tarantino episode did not belong on what is touted as the place politics. Much too long on what amounted to a comic book version of revenge fantasy. Two, because at the beginning of the show, Rachel got way carried away with adjectives and superlatives, spending at least five minutes describing the importance of the filibuster without actually telling us what she was talking about. It was just silly and way over the top for her. Still, I'll trust her views before just about anyone else. I am hoping this was just a one time aberration and she will get back to real issues and a more abbreviated commentary.
Go Rachel
12:08 PM on 02/13/2010
I could tell from the trailer this movie would be a piece of garbage.

Which is what Tarentino seems to specialize in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:42 PM on 02/13/2010
How many Oscars has it been nominated for?
12:51 PM on 02/13/2010
Oscars are generally pieces of cr@p aside from the technical ones.

Just another marketing scheme.
jdrourke
Snark is good for the soul...
03:07 PM on 02/13/2010
Wow, clearly you're not big movie guy. And if I'm wrong, then what are some of your favorites?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:02 PM on 02/13/2010
Al Qaeda are nothing more then freedom fighters for their way of life. Although I don't agree with them, they are no different then what the English called us during the revolutionary war.
12:05 PM on 02/13/2010
Yeah, Washington planned all those bombings of churches and marketplaces. And targeted American civilians of a different religious point of view.

Yeah, al Qaida is EXACTLY like Washington and Jefferson and Adams.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:59 PM on 02/13/2010
they are fighting for their way of life just like we fought for our way of life. Who are we to say our way of life should be theirs? That is that spreading democracy crap
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Albert Fowler
Yep
01:02 PM on 02/13/2010
I think he is saying that England saw the revoulutinaries as al-q. Not that they actually were...
Cmon man think a little deeper.
01:27 PM on 02/13/2010
That is such bull considering that they want to impose their way of life on others, and require those who do not share their extreme views of their religious tradition to accept the extreme views. Not to mention their willingness to kill innocent non-combatants to get their way. I see no comparison whatsoever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:33 PM on 02/13/2010
how do you feel about the palestinians shooting kazam rockets into Israel every day? Or how about the suicide bombers that go into Israel? Do you feel the same then?
03:11 PM on 02/13/2010
"they [al qaeda] want to impose their way of life on others"
i do not believe that is true. they do not want to impose their way of life on to us. they want us to stop impose are way of life on to them. they do not want a secular western influence.
"Not to mention their willingness to kill innocent non-combatants to get their way. "
all through out human history in war (USA is part of that history) non-combatants are targeted. i do not retort about accidents and unintentionally targeted. and dont think if you and your country is on the very short end (no military and another country/culture exporting themselves into your country) that you wouldnt resort to blowing yourself up and conduct other terrorist tactics to free your country.
the crowd in the theater (for IB) where cheering on the torture and terrorist tactics of US soldiers. 11 past t.
10:42 AM on 02/13/2010
good film with a couple gaping plot holes, but not as good as either pulp fiction or reservoir dogs, in my opinion. probably his third best film, overall, if you don't count "true romance" is a tarantino film. if you do, then it's number four.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:10 PM on 02/13/2010
There is a great Tarentino cut of True Romance floating around the web. it includes the trade mark out of sequence story telling and the original not very happy ending.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thelonegunman
10:38 AM on 02/13/2010
i loved all of tarantino's previous films... but this one: 'uggghhh.'

it was sadistic pornography which i switched off after 80 minutes... not only that - apart from the first scene sequence (which was gripping - the tenseness of the french dairy farmer was palpable), the film dragged on and on and on and on... without the typical tarantino-esque crisp dialogue AND some very unrealistic scenarios...

i agree with the reviewer from the guardian who called this a 'glourious mess of a movie... remember when quentin tarantino made good films?'
12:11 PM on 02/13/2010
Actually, No I don't remember.

There may have been something to Pulp Fiction.

But Reservoir Dogs. Sorry can't take all the yelling in support of obvious sadism.

If you want to see how good movies can be watch John Sayles or the Coen Brothers. both strike out at times.

But whatever the film is worth watching. It is not sadistic porn packaged as Hollywood nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alisonv
02:17 PM on 02/13/2010
Everyone I know loved this film, but it really left me cold. So glad to see I'm not the only one. Like you, I loved the opening scene and prepared myself for a great Tarantino film. But the cheerful scalping really got to me. Also, in the days following, I never thought about the film. It was ultimately forgettable. Glad to know it wasn't just me!
10:34 AM on 02/13/2010
Is Rachel Maddow and Cameron Douglas (Micheal's son) related? They look like a clone of each other.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbbbmer
An homage to Dorothy Parker...
10:23 AM on 02/13/2010
Quentin Tarantino has got to be the most overhyped overrated submoronic jerkoff directors EVER! This was a PROFOUNDLY STUPID movie, nothing original, it was kind of a SEVEN SAMURAI with an okie accent.... And then there's that ridiculous black-like-me affectation in his manner -- it just makes me want to retch.... WHAT A PHONY!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:11 PM on 02/13/2010
This is one of my all time favorite films.
03:21 PM on 02/13/2010
chuckle. IB is nothing like 7 samurais. i thought this movie was quite original. i thought the opening scene was done really well. How many movies rewrite history--i thought that was original. There is some really good scenes in this movie; however, the movie is way to violent for me. 21
photo
Passenger57
Keeping Calm And Carrying On...
09:09 AM on 02/13/2010
I think I'll write Tarrantino about MY movie idea...and see how much financing I can get.
Nat Turner is not captured and killed - but escapes to right the wrongs of Slavery in other places.
The Nazis did horrible things to Jews...and I think equally horrific things were done to Black people by White people during Slavery.
12:13 PM on 02/13/2010
And horrible things were done to film by Tarentino.

Did so much cellulose really have to suffer?
10:17 AM on 02/22/2010
Durango,
We might occasionally disagree, but on this issue we are one...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jones
Dances with Weims
08:40 AM on 02/13/2010
Before all the censorship on the web, there used to be pics posted of mutilation done by the Mujahadeen against the Soviet soldiers they captured. I remember them vividly. If I was a Soviet soldier back then, I'd of gone AWOL faster than s&&t!
The Notorious PDF
Keen Observer
12:21 PM on 02/13/2010
Never saw those particular pictures (though I've seen similar brutal, honest, war pictures), but that's a great point---when did the web become so censored? Seems like the thought police were seriously cracking down during the years of the Bush administration