Snooki Naked: Nude Pic Released (PHOTO)

The first of Snooki's nude photos has hit the Internet.

A photo anonymously posted at nakedSnooki.com shows the 'Jersey Shore' star naked and on all fours. A thought bubble floats above her head reading, "There are no nude pictures nor will there ever be. The tabloids just love snook gossip ;]"

That's what Snooki tweeted when Radaronline.com reported last week that several graphic nude photos her of were on the loose.

If you are wondering whether this is really Snooks, the background appears the same as it has in photos she has tweeted from her bedroom.

PHOTO:

Comments

[THE WATCHER1]

03:15 PM on 02/26/2010

To all the haters,Snookie hasn't always been thick,she was thin not that long ago.So don't go saying it's shopped cause it might not be.

[kaystar]

09:47 AM on 02/16/2010

That is definitely not Snooki. She wished she did look like that. Where's all of the blubber that she has? Okaaaaay!

[abidHussain]

09:44 AM on 02/16/2010

more snookie pics http://bit.ly/a6tYy1

[ShamusNYC]

12:08 AM on 02/16/2010

Astonishingly, one of her classier moments... Get your mind around that for a second.

[2smart2BGOP]

11:08 PM on 02/15/2010

Is that a used condom on the floor in front of her?She is even darker tanned than John Boehner.

[Maxamillionair]

11:01 PM on 02/15/2010

wow! the snookster is much, much fatter then that! it's not her chubby, squshi squizzie little body.

[fausto412]

08:32 PM on 02/15/2010

SHE IS LIKE A FREAKING LOBSTER

[rockyersocksoff]

01:45 PM on 02/15/2010

Mmmmmmm, beef jerky.

[TimLB]

02:10 PM on 02/15/2010

Yeah, that skin tone is bizarre. Are we sure this isn't digitally altered?

[headly66]

01:17 PM on 02/15/2010

Me want to puukki - She has the skin tone of an oompa loompa.

[HardwayAl]

12:48 PM on 02/15/2010

They got you to open the site didn't they. That is the whole point

[Iwpach]

09:49 PM on 02/15/2010

LOL

[Biscuit]

11:29 AM on 02/15/2010

Okay, let's get something straight. "Nude" photos mean that the person in them is nude. Photos where they're covering up their naughty parts don't count as nude.

To review:

Carrie Prejean with her arms over her boobs? Not nude. Miley Cyrus with her arms over her boobs? Not nude. Snooki with her arms over her boobs? Not nude.

I'm tired of all these girls getting bad publicity for "nude" photos that aren't nude. If it could be on the cover of Cosmo, it doesn't count as nude. Nude is nude, covered up is not.

[BodyShotz]

12:43 PM on 02/15/2010

Hmm. They were partially nude during the sh0ot. When the pic was taken, they covered their exposed parts. I'd say they were partially or completely nude in the studio, but the pictures showed them in poses where parts were covered by other parts.

I'd say that was a nude photo sho0t and that they posed nude but the pictures chosen depicted them in less of that state.

You can't have your cake and eat it too.

[Iwpach]

09:51 PM on 02/15/2010

She's just naked,means she ain't got no clothes on
Now if she was nekkid,that'd be different,cos she'd have no clothes on and be up to somethin'

Thank you,Lewis Grizzard. =D

[drkazmd65]

10:59 AM on 02/15/2010

So,... assuming that the photos in question are legit,.... who actually cares & why is it important that particular 'realtiy TV "Star"' get even more undue attention?

The dumbification of America continues,....

[Duncan77]

10:24 AM on 02/15/2010

Who?

[tribal sovereignty]

09:12 AM on 02/15/2010

That's photo-shopped.

[needintell]

10:43 AM on 02/15/2010

yea, thought she had more rolls than that.

[legalies76]

06:00 AM on 02/15/2010

Snooki and no rookie.