iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Health Care Costs: More Americans Trapped In Increasingly Expensive Plans

Health Care Costs

ADAM GELLER   02/15/10 12:00 AM ET   AP

To critics, a 39 percent hike in health insurance for some Californians foretells skyrocketing rates for the rest of us. Not so, says the company, arguing the increase only hits a relatively small number of people and the economy is to blame.

But the rhetoric from both sides distorts the reality.

It's true that hikes like the one by WellPoint Inc. apply only to people who buy individual insurance and are unlikely to spread to the majority of Americans covered through their employers. But such hikes also hit a huge number of Americans who mostly went unmentioned in the furor – the 46 million with no insurance at all.

That's because for most people who don't get insurance through their jobs and do not qualify for government assistance, the only option is buying individual policies like the ones in WellPoint's Anthem Blue Cross plan, often with high deductibles.

Raise prices, and people without insurance are even less likely to buy it – healthy people especially. Meanwhile, older and sicker customers pay more and more, running up high health bills in a shrinking pool.

That conundrum is at the heart of a disagreement that has frozen Democratic health reform efforts in Congress. Reform bills would require most of the uninsured to buy coverage, an idea many Americans detest as heavy-handed government.

But without sharing costs across the broadest cross-section of consumers and prohibiting insurers from charging people different premiums depending on their health status, the result is a scenario very much like Anthem's.

"I know the American people get frustrated in debating something like health care because you get a whole bunch of different claims being made by different groups and different interests," President Barack Obama said earlier this week in addressing the Anthem hike. "But what is also true is that without some action on the part of Congress, it is very unlikely that we see any improvement in the current trajectory ... The current trajectory is more and more people are losing health care."

Only about 5 percent of non-elderly Americans have individual insurance, compared with 60 percent who are covered by their employers. The remainder is almost evenly divided between those whose care is shouldered by government and those without any insurance at all.

The cost of employer-sponsored health insurance at big companies rose 7 to 10 percent this year, said Tom Billet of Towers Watson, a benefits consulting firm. Preliminary estimates for next year call for roughly the same increase – much lower than the ones set out by Anthem and other individual insurers.

"The individual market is sort of its own animal, so to speak," he said.

At first glance, WellPoint's rate hike affects only a small group – some of the 800,000 people in California who buy its individual coverage. But it's also about many more, since just about any American is – or, given the uncertainties of the economy, can be – a candidate for individual coverage at any time.

Millions in group plans have lost jobs and the insurance they count on as a benefit. People in individual plans are trying to keep up with escalating premiums. Some without insurance do so to save money, but as they get older may decide it's not worth the risk.

WellPoint defended the hike as a response to the economy. More consumers are tight on money and, as a result, those who are younger and healthier are dropping out or taking on pass on individual insurance, leaving a pool of less healthy people requiring more costly care. Without younger, healthier consumers, Anthem said, the remaining customers had to shoulder the costs of their own care.

"The result is an insured pool that utilizes significantly more services per individual than under better economic times," the company wrote in a letter sent to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, defending the hike.

"The economic thing makes some sense, no doubt about it," said Gary Claxton, an expert on the private insurance market at the Kaiser Family Foundation. "If people don't have as much money they're not going to be as many people who can afford to buy insurance ... and the ones who are more likely to do that will always be the healthier ones."

But Will Dow, a professor of health economics at the University of California, says the rate hike reflects an individual insurance market that is fundamentally broken. Anthem has a reputation for cherry-picking healthier consumers and trying to shake sicker ones, he said.

"Individuals who are in ill health and don't have access to an employer-provided health insurance policy are subject to the mercies of this market, which does not work well for sick people," Dow said.

That problem is not limited to California or the economic environment of 2010. In Oregon, multiple insurers have convinced state health officials that rising costs justified big jumps in rates the last few years. In Maine, Anthem's request to raise rates for some people by up to 38 percent last year and 24 percent this year have angered some politicians and consumers.

Lou Herchenroeder, a pastor in Westfield, Ind., who learned in December that the premium on his Anthem policy would jump 31 percent, is frustrated. He said he's seen increases like this a few times over the past six years. In fact, he got into the high-deductible plan two years ago because premiums in his other plan rose too much.

But the cumulative increases are taking their toll. Herchenroeder said his family is healthy, with no chronic conditions like diabetes or high blood pressure, although he just had his gall bladder removed. But at 53, he yearns for the days when insurance was a choice he could afford.

"If I was in my 20s, I wouldn't have a plan like this," he said. "I'd take my chances."

But the sick don't really have the option of dropping coverage. Pre-existing conditions allow other insurers, who otherwise would provide competition, to decline to cover these individuals.

Jeanne Morales of Encino, Calif., was outraged when United HealthCare Inc. jacked up the premium of the PacifiCare individual plan covering her and her husband. Back-to-back hikes in October and November raised the couple's monthly premium from about $1,450 month to $2,432, a combined increase of 68 percent.

Morales wants to drop the policy, but says there's no where else to go. She had a partial hysterectomy to remove a non-cancerous ovarian cyst a month ago. She said her insurance broker told her she has to wait at least a year to be symptom free before she can even think about finding another individual insurance product.

"That's all there is to do. There's just not any choices," she said. "We have thought about just not carrying insurance at all, but it's scary for us."

___

AP Business Writers Tom Murphy in Indianapolis and Linda A. Johnson in Trenton, N.J. contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
To critics, a 39 percent hike in health insurance for some Californians foretells skyrocketing rates for the rest of us. Not so, says the company, arguing the increase only hits a relatively small num...
To critics, a 39 percent hike in health insurance for some Californians foretells skyrocketing rates for the rest of us. Not so, says the company, arguing the increase only hits a relatively small num...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,552
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
11:34 PM on 02/24/2010
Come on now, the health care costs have just gone through the roof with the citizens united decision. They now have to fully fund all of their interns in congress, and they have to make new high paying jobs for them once they leave. Oh, and then there's health care, but I don't think they really believe that providing health care is their job. They just like the money.

The job description is provide health care to Americans. We gave this job to the corporate personhood of insurance companies, who know nothing of health care, and who just flat out don't want to provide it - they just like the paycheck! They need a pink slip.

We are already paying more than anyone else in the world, several times over when you consider all of the costs to Americans, but we are paying it out primarily to someone who doesn't want to do the job. So the argument should stop at why we aren't getting what we are paying to dearly for and go with the single payer system, like most of the rest of the civilized world. Single payer -- you're already paying for it! d
10:22 PM on 02/19/2010
I just received a 23% increase, but wait there is no insurance involved, it's a self funded employer plan where the fees paid to the administrators fees actually decreased. Could it be that the underlying cost of health care is the real problem?

Insurance company bashing may be fun and make good press but it diverts us from the real issues AND there is nothing in the reform legislation that will lower premiums. The opposite is true.

Http://www.quinnscommentary.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
hardlyhikin
My micro-bio is mt for a reason
02:42 PM on 02/17/2010
Okay, how can individuals form a group? As a small business owner I was inundated for years with "group" insurance plans for groups of five or more.

I think there are restrictions on groups without a common demographic being able to buy group policies but what if we changed that? If there are 800,000 individual policyholders with Anthem/Blue Cross in California what if we could get 8000 (regardless of their health status) of them to agree to negotiate with Anthem/Blue Cross as a group? Could we get the same rates as a corporation with 8000 employees? What if we formed a nonprofit corporation whose sole purpose was to act as a buying service for its shareholders?

If we can't get the government to resolve this issue for us isn't there a away that we, as a separate free market force, could do this ourselves?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnjam101
05:12 PM on 02/17/2010
I have a small business and often ask the same question. How can we start a universal health care insurance group? Negotiate reasonable charges for premiums and services. Let the private insurance companies do their own thing. Every time my premium goes up I consider dropping my $6,000 deductible policy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
hardlyhikin
My micro-bio is mt for a reason
08:19 PM on 02/17/2010
Fanned back JJ101

You go a little further than I suggested but either scenarion would be good - yours is probably better.

Surely there are some people out there who have the smarts to start a nonprofit insurance alliance, who know the ins and outs of the business and who would be willing to be national heroes for starting something like this. I have nothing against an organization charging what they need to to cover a risk pool and I have nothing against executives making salaries commensurate with the job they are doing, but I can't, for the life of me, figure out why we need to have our insurance companies be for profit organizations. Why not "mutual" companies where the insureds own the company? In that scenario the "owners" get their "return" by having insurance that actually costs.

Anybody?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
hardlyhikin
My micro-bio is mt for a reason
08:20 PM on 02/17/2010
sorry, ...scenario...
12:06 PM on 02/17/2010
Why is health, a for-profit business?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EastTraveler
Just a guy who always wants to hear the truth...
02:08 PM on 02/17/2010
Why is health, a for-profit business?


Because there isn't an elected official who has the backbone to fight for it that's why...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnjam101
05:26 PM on 02/17/2010
profit is a good motivator for creative invention. not so good for universal health care.
private for profit health insurance is an oxymoron situation.
e.g. let's get all the people that need extra health care and figure out how to make a profit in dealing with their needs. ain't gonna happen my friend.
insurance is shared risk. the larger the pool the more the cost is spread out and shared.
only the government could manage such a huge pool.
let medicare grow with more responsible management.
photo
OpusIsUnderTheBed
This micro-bio has been approved by HuffPost.
10:36 AM on 02/17/2010
Up 68% this year, huh?

Will you be voting Republican in future?
09:44 AM on 02/17/2010
meanwhile in Cuba ,the people have health care.....just saying.....maybe it's a question of priorities.
09:23 AM on 02/17/2010
We need to move our money & walk away.
good articles: http://bertreport.blogspot.com
WonderingNThinking
Think Before We Sink
05:06 AM on 02/17/2010
Anthems rate increases: 39%

Ability of the insured to pay: 0%

Automatic "death panels", because you can't afford the insurance: Priceless
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:01 AM on 02/17/2010
$2,500 per month for health insurance???

Am I ever glad that I am old enough to enroll in Medicare; 96% of the folks on Medicare rate it favorably.

My advice? Get old as fast as you can.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KenKo
10:24 AM on 02/17/2010
Why in that case do so many in Medicare oppose expansion of a similar program to everyone else? You should not need to be "old" to get government supported health care. Either health care is a consumer product or it is not. I don't understand how Americans differentiate it based on age or if you're a parent on welfare. These rules appear discriminatory, no?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
hardlyhikin
My micro-bio is mt for a reason
02:52 PM on 02/17/2010
Americans differentiate because of several factors: most Americans are employed by corporations and corporations are underwriting their health care costs as a benefit, those Americans are not interested in changing the system because it works for them.

Many Americans are young and healthy and don't understand the need for health insurance, they think they are exempt from illness and injury so they won't buy insurance at almost any price.

A lot of Americans really believe that it is fundamentally against American values to have the government assist them with anything in their lives, even to their own detriment.

It's not until they are confronted with some of the harsher realities of life that many of us understand the problem.
WonderingNThinking
Think Before We Sink
04:01 AM on 02/17/2010
Here's a link to the story from the San Francisco Chronicle about legislative review of the Anthem Blue Cross premium increase.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/14/MNEN1C1CAI.DTL
WonderingNThinking
Think Before We Sink
03:56 AM on 02/17/2010
Correction: they ask two questions at the end of the CALL (not survey - it was a notification call, with the survey tacked onto the end). Tricky b@srtds.
WonderingNThinking
Think Before We Sink
03:55 AM on 02/17/2010
The State of CA is requiring Anthem Blue Cross to justify the 39% increase. Anthem is calling its affected customers to notify them of the hold on premium increases because of the State's action.

Interestingly, they ask two questions at the end of the survey. 1) Have you cancelled your policy? 2) Did you request a higher deductible?

Me thinks these questions are going to be tallied and presented to the legislature as evidence that customers are ok with the increase. This would be a faulty conculsion because members were just notified of the increase a couple of weeks ago. It doesn't account for those, like me, who are still deciding what to do about it. I wrote to my State Senator and Assembly reps to highlight this. Please do it too, if you are affected. We need to be heard.
photo
Realitylost
Take your ball and go home, whiners.
11:12 PM on 02/16/2010
I live in California. The modest plan I had for me, my wife, and one year old son was 475 last year, then in september the cost went up to to almost 700 in one rate hike. We couldn't afford the difference had to change to a barebones plan that still costs as much as the better plan we had last year.
WonderingNThinking
Think Before We Sink
04:00 AM on 02/17/2010
Please write to your state legislative reps right away. They'll be deciding about this at an upcoming hearing. Here's a link to the story from the San Francisco Chronicle.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/14/MNEN1C1CAI.DTL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William1950
everything I say could be wrong.
11:04 PM on 02/16/2010
I have a grandson who is one year old.. my son and his wife pay over five hundred dollars a month for health care coverage through her employer for the baby... Medcare for all...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KenKo
10:28 AM on 02/17/2010
I live in Ontario, Canada. Contrary to popular belief, we do pay health care premiums (varies by province) on top of a higher taxes. But the premiums are staggered by income, the highest one would pay would be Cdn$900 a year per person. This is as high as it gets in Canada, and it covers everyone. Health care is very expensive, whether it's paid by the state, or by the health care recipient. Especially when you factor in drugs and medical devices. Is it not a question of spending priorities for each government?
10:08 PM on 02/16/2010
Consumer can drive REAL health-care reform; led by activists and chamber of commerce. As healthcare costs affect the viability of many companies in your area, this would be a useful topic for an local aggressive investigative newspaper reporter. Let me give you helpful pointers.

Research local hospitals and healthcare insurance companies in your area. What will you find?

1. Hospitals way over-bill for services delivered; often accepting as payment only about 20% to 30% of what it bills. Do you accept your hospital to be like a bazaar in the Mid East?
2. Do the hospitals have a Quality Improvement and Utilization Review committees? What are their monitoring criteria? What have they found? How does the data compare to national averages?
3. From your insurance companies, (or the state health commissioner's office) what are the COSTS and OUTCOMES among various healthcare providers in your regions for different illnesses? How does the data compare to regional and national averages?
4. What are the above groups doing to monitor and correct the widely reported high incidence of over-treatment, under-treatment and inappropriate-treatment?
5. What is the hospital and the community doing to end unnecessary emergency room visits?
6. What is the community doing to reduce the high cost of end-of-life care?
We need to wake-up and take over the country at the grass-roots. The politicians will not do it for us. This is not a Left or Right issue.
01:42 AM on 02/17/2010
If there's no public option, then it's time for Americans to come together and create our own universal healthcare organization and offer affordable health insurance to anyone, regardless of age or health condition. In other words, Medicare for all, except it wouldn't be run by the government.

If we could get the estimated 37 million Americans without health insurance and those who have insurance but don’t like their coverage and want another provider into a Medicare-like program, we would have a huge pool that would have enough bargaining power to negotiate prices with hospitals, doctors, and drug companies.

Premiums would be paid either by each individual in the pool or 50/50 split between employee and employer. For an individual payer, if everyone in the pool paid $100 a month, and there were 50 million people, that would be $60 billion in annual premiums. That would go towards covering a large percentage of the medical expenses for everyone in a year.

For employee and employer split, the cost would be based on a percentage of the employee’s salary just like we do with Social Security and Medicare and how it's done here in South Korea. My brother-in-law (Korean) has seven people covered under his insurance plan: his wife, two children, mother, father-in-law, mother-in-law, and himself. He pays less than a $170 a month. We could have it where a family of four or more would only have to pay $200 -$250 a month.
01:46 AM on 02/17/2010
Here is my blog about South Korea's healthcare system and what we can do to create our own system without having to rely on politicians.
http://scubadiver-universalhealthcareforall.blogspot.com/