iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

E-Verify Immigration System Misses HALF Of Illegal Workers: REPORT

SUZANNE GAMBOA   02/25/10 11:46 AM ET   AP

Everify Illegal Workers

WASHINGTON — The system Congress and the Obama administration want employers to use to help curb illegal immigration is failing to catch more than half of the unauthorized workers it checks, a research company has found.

The online tool E-Verify, now used voluntarily by employers, wrongly clears illegal workers about 54 percent of the time, according to Westat, a research company that evaluated the system for the Homeland Security Department. E-Verify missed so many illegal workers mainly because it can't detect identity fraud, Westat said.

"Clearly it means it's not doing its No. 1 job well enough," said Marc Rosenblum, a researcher at the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan Washington think tank.

E-Verify allows employers to run a worker's information against Department of Homeland Security and Social Security databases to check whether the person is permitted to work in the U.S. The Obama administration has made cracking down on employers who hire people here illegally a central part of its immigration enforcement policy, and there are expectations that some Republicans in Congress will try in coming weeks to make E-Verify mandatory.

Much of the criticism of E-Verify has focused on whether U.S. citizens and legal immigrants with permission to work were falsely flagged as illegal workers. Immigration officials have been taking steps to improve such inaccuracies. Westat reported that 93 percent of the cases checked were legal workers who were accurately identified on first try. Another .7 percent were legal workers who initially were rejected.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, testifying in a House hearing on her agency's proposed budget Thursday, said she doubts the 54 percent inaccuracy rate for illegal workers. She said things are being added to the system to root out identity fraud.

"E-Verify is absolutely where we are going in terms of incentivizing employers and making sure we are using a legal work force," Napolitano said.

Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, who is writing the Democrats' immigration bill and has fought expanding E-Verify because of its flaws, said Wednesday that the fact that E-Verify was inaccurate so often shows that it is not an adequate tool.

"This is a wake-up call to anyone who thinks E-Verify is an effective remedy to stop the hiring of illegal immigrants," Schumer said.

A worker verification process like E-Verify is considered essential for any immigration overhaul proposal to have a chance of approval in Congress.

Westat's report, completed in December using data from 2008, was quietly posted on Homeland Security's Web site Jan. 28 along with a summary that pointed out E-Verify is accurate "almost half of the time."

"While not perfect, it is important to note that E-Verify is much more effective" than the paper forms used by most employers, the summary said.

Rosenblum, who has studied E-Verify, said Westat's evaluation shows it doesn't make sense to substantially expand and invest in E-Verify without fixing the identity theft problem.

Bill Wright, a spokesman for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, said the agency has created an anti-immigrant identity fraud unit in Buffalo, N.Y., to address the issue.

The agency, part of the Homeland Security Department, is developing a way for people to screen themselves through E-Verify so they can show potential employers they can work legally.

About 184,000 of the nation's 7 million to 8 million employers are using E-Verify, according to the Homeland Security Department.

Congress gave DHS about $100 million to spend on E-Verify in its 2010 budget.

___

On the Net:

DHS E-Verify: http://tinyurl.com/yslx4b

Migration Policy Institute: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/

(This version CORRECTS accuracy rate for legal workers.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
01:26 AM on 04/14/2010
EU has had systemwide ID cards, and they use a genetic sample. It works quite well.

We can't even get past having one federal id with a photo, let alone fingerprints.

Folks, if you want to be safe, there has to be a reliable way to ascertain that you are really dealing with the right person. If we can convince the government not to let private industry near the samples, we might just have a shot; but money talks and congress always listens.

Of course, if we demanded public campaign reform, the lobbyists would be 'adversely impacted,' but most of the soft money would go away. As EU has found, it's easier to find corruption when you get rid of private campaign funding, then it tends to stick out like a sore thumb.
08:58 PM on 03/09/2010
The reason eVerify passes a lot of illegal immigrants is because the Social Security Administration does not care and does not police the use of the same SS number by multiple people. When my son discovered that someone was using his number, I reported it to the SSA and didn't even get a letter back. If you go to the SSA website, they refer you to the credit rating agencies, because, I guess, in the view of the SSA there is no reason to be concerned if someone is using your number to work, just a problem if they are using your number to steal your identity to ruin your credit.

If we are ever going to get eVerify to work properly, it must start with a Social Security Administration that takes seriously the fact that it is as close to being the keeper of a national identity card as we have. They should be policing the system, flagging problems, and chasing them down. Get on it! It's a national security issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
01:17 AM on 04/14/2010
My identity has been stolen twice; neither was prosecuted (I found them and proved it), they just made deals (one was a fellow attorney, no joke.)

I don't even bother to check my computerized medical history; last time I looked it was almost totally fiction (which is not uncommon.) Social security is a joke; they don't care at all.
10:13 AM on 02/26/2010
Why don't they try enforcing the tons of laws which have already been on the books for years.
photo
pointyheadprodigy
Let me get this straight
02:51 AM on 02/26/2010
But this was still 400% greater accuracy that was expected. Yuk-yuk. So everyone gets a big bonus!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rottnkid
Do as I say, not as I do-Oh wait that's the 1%
12:13 AM on 02/26/2010
Disregard last post..please.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rottnkid
Do as I say, not as I do-Oh wait that's the 1%
12:12 AM on 02/26/2010
And at the same time some one misspelled.... well have a look:

E-Verify Immigration System Misses HALF Of Illegal Workers: REPORT
SUZANNE GAMBOA | 02/25/10 11:46 AM |

Get spell check - it works.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tribilin219
A Proud progressive, and for the Green party,one o
07:07 PM on 02/25/2010
Man when it comes to big company's in this country everything works great, but when it's for the people in this country, nothing works! And if you think they are going to fix it anytime soon, good luck with that. so what if you don't get a job because your an American? they don't care, as long as they get to keep most of that money with the slave labor they have, it's all that matters, just make sure you let them know how mush you love the job they are doing come Nov.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SouthJerseySteve
I am NOT in a Skim Milk Marriage!
06:35 PM on 02/25/2010
QUICK! Somebody call Lou Dobbs!!!!!!
05:37 PM on 02/25/2010
Add fingerprints.

add it to the patrol cars. If you catch someone say crossing the border, you fingerprint them, add them to the data base, and they can't get work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Al91206
Educating the right on why they are wrong.
05:36 PM on 02/25/2010
Waiting for the hate-based mobs to copy / spew their notes from hate groups aka Numbers USA, etc.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
06:28 PM on 02/25/2010
Are there any "numbers" that concern you? Any limits on the amount of people who can come here? Do you think that a population of 420 million by 2050 is a good thing?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT
04:21 PM on 02/25/2010
It may not work but at least it's expensive.
photo
LightShadow62
The answers are not found in the extremes
03:57 PM on 02/25/2010
This 'study' doesn't take into account the number of illegals that are using stolen identities to beat the system or the employers who would really not want this system to become mandated for fear that it will affect their bottom line.
03:30 PM on 02/25/2010
just curious. on the flip side, I know that IT has mistakenly identified legal residents and Citizens too. Yes, a VERY flawed database.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
06:26 PM on 02/25/2010
It's right in the story. "Another .7 were legal workers who initially were rejected". That's less than one percent. Nor does that mean they get fired or can't work. It means further proof is needed which shouldn't be hard to provide if you are here legally.
03:30 PM on 02/25/2010
Obviously on purpose

how many BILLIONS were saved on labor?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DavidWyld
Professor of Management
03:15 PM on 02/25/2010
Hard to believe - a big miss!

David http://wyld-business.blogspot.com/