iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Russia Angered By US Missile Defense Plan

VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV   02/26/10 09:44 AM ET   AP

Russia

MOSCOW — Russia has serious concerns about U.S. plans to deploy missile interceptors in Romania, the Foreign Ministry said Friday.

The statement from ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko reflected Moscow's irritation about the U.S. missile defense plans and signaled tensions in relations with Washington.

Nesterenko said that Russia has been annoyed to learn about the move from the media.

"We are worried that we find out about important decisions regarding the U.S. missile defense in Europe from the media rather than our official counterparts in Washington or Bucharest," Nesterenko told a briefing.

Nesterenko wouldn't comment on whether the dispute could affect talks with the United States on a key nuclear arms reduction treaty that expired in December.

But other Russian officials, including the nation's top military officer, recently said the U.S. missile defense plans threaten Russia and have slowed down negotiations on a successor deal to the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.

Russia and the U.S. had hoped to reach agreement before START expired on Dec. 5, but differences persisted. Still, Sergei Prikhodko, President Dmitry Medvedev's foreign policy adviser, said Friday that the Kremlin believes the treaty could be signed in March or April, Russian news agencies reported.

Nesterenko also voiced skepticism about Washington's explanation that the interceptors were needed to protect U.S. troops and NATO allies against the Iranian missile threat.

"Russia has serious questions regarding the true purpose of the U.S. missile defense in Romania," Nesterenko said. "That is why we will consistently oppose any dubious unilateral actions in the missile defense field that could have a negative impact on the international security."

He added that the U.S. plans would make a "fragile European security structure hostage to the imaginary missile threats that are defined unilaterally."

Russia has applauded President Barack Obama's decision to scrap Bush administration plans for missile defense systems in Poland and the Czech Republic. But Moscow has grown increasingly critical of the planned site in Romania and also criticized the U.S. plans to deploy Patriot air defense missiles in Poland.

Gen. Nikolai Makarov, the chief of general staff of the Russian armed forces, said that a revised U.S. plan to place missiles in Europe undermines Russia's national defense, rejecting Obama administration promises that the plan is not directed at his country.

On Tuesday, John Beyrle, the U.S. ambassador to Moscow, tried to reassure Russia that the placement of American missile interceptors in Romania would not threaten Russia's nuclear capability and is designed only to intercept medium-range missiles, which Russia doesn't have.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

MOSCOW — Russia has serious concerns about U.S. plans to deploy missile interceptors in Romania, the Foreign Ministry said Friday. The statement from ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko reflec...
MOSCOW — Russia has serious concerns about U.S. plans to deploy missile interceptors in Romania, the Foreign Ministry said Friday. The statement from ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko reflec...
Filed by Adam Taylor  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chuck prebys
12:32 AM on 03/01/2010
And well it should.
Russia is slowly being encircled by NATO and Amreeka.
Anyone can see this.
This is the goal of the US.
Their fears are justified just as if they had missiles in Cuba, Mexico or Canada.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Albert Amato
05:53 PM on 02/28/2010
If it bothers Putin, the USA must be doing something right.
04:53 PM on 02/28/2010
"U.S. missile defense plans threaten Russia"

How does defense threaten Russia unless they are planning offence?
11:49 AM on 02/28/2010
I guess you can forget about russia going along with iranian sanctions now
10:39 AM on 02/28/2010
Bush was stupid, yup exactly what you expect looking this site. Such big brains here. Really, insipiring...
photo
bridgeman
Jesus was a Jazz fan
08:02 AM on 02/28/2010
"Russia Angered By US Missile Defense Plan"
So!...
Putin has done everything imaginable to embarrass or counter the US Foreign Policy.
He see's himself as the self imposed head of a Multi Polar counter to US FP.
His idea of a level playing ground is to play Obama's heart/inexperience like an old violin while trying to rebuild russia arsenal and prestige. Something tells me that Putin will only be satisfied when the US is gone or completely irrelevant. Obama needs to get credit for seeing into Putins eyes and realizing that what he is looking at nothing more then a glorified KGB agent with narcissistic ambition to be noticed.
Sorry Putin,you cant blackmail us into giving into your ego driven demands by cutting off our oil supply....yet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
09:16 AM on 02/28/2010
bridgeman....read this link, when you get the the bottom page you should have a different opinion of the USA.....if not get back to me...I have more... and last whatever happened to "Live and let Live"

http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/interventions.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
polishlogician
No sugar tonight in my tea..
03:08 AM on 02/28/2010
good for Obama and good for the US defense system, of course it makes about as much sense as Russian putting in missiles in Mexico to protect that nation from a potential Canadian attack, but so be it....but it's a bargaining chip for the US
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bigidea
12:04 AM on 02/28/2010
Ofcourse, we will have to put these systems there. The Lobbyists have already paid the politicians to put them there. The secret to any policy in this country is how much the politicians have been paid by these Lobbyists. Simple. Does anyone think otherwise?
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
10:22 PM on 02/27/2010
Another reason for Russia to deliver to Iran the S-300 air defense system against which the US is hypocritically lobbying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chuck prebys
12:33 AM on 03/01/2010
Lobbying and helpless.
The US has no known defense for this weapon.
05:36 PM on 02/27/2010
No more parties. I am voting against Obama and any other "Democrat" for any real liberal.
03:47 PM on 02/27/2010
terorisme means the paranoiac vision of us and co of communisme! another way to get a involve in war like in vietnam !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
03:47 PM on 02/27/2010
This is so goofy. I find myself agreeing with Putin. The cold war is over the Middle east, after all, is a lot more in Russia's back yard than it is our business.

It's all about the correct people in the war-machine business making their fortunes. It's also about not laying off people in probably the only plugging-along sector of the economy.

What we ought to be doing....? We ought to be working with Russia and pointing missiles outward. It's loose asteroids and comets that ought to concern the Earth's population. Growing evidence shows strikes from space has before changed the whole planet's weather for millennia. Heads up! Great jobs program too.
03:04 PM on 02/27/2010
I'm concerned about Obama seeming to be more and more in the grip of the military establishment. He really needs to stop relying so heavily on right-moderates and Bushies and get some diverse opinions in his Cabinet. (I know he still consults with Sam Nunn--that explains a lot to me).

I see it, too, in his reversal on the right-wing government in Israel. First he stood up to Netanyahu. Now....nothing.

He needs broader input than he's getting. The last thing we need is to start a new arms race with the Russians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
08:55 AM on 02/28/2010
NotMcCain...you have been fanned. in addition after getting his (Obama) getting his legs cut off from AIPAC he is now trying to be all things to all people, including the GOP....it won't work
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:28 AM on 02/28/2010
9-1-1 motive: aggressive foreign policy/military spending per Neo-Con’s own manifesto (P.51 immediate change requires a “new Pearl Harbor”): http://www.webcitation.org/5e3est5lT

KSM will be convicted in Cheney’s secretive ‘military’ commission. Why? US involvement in 9-1-1 is an open secret that must not be “proven” in open court.

Citizens will NOT hear these openly published facts from a cover-up commission:

An Islamic radical and Egyptian ex-commando, Ali Mohamed, worked at Fort Bragg in the Pentagon's Special Forces, was an FBI informant and CIA asset, and, Ali Mohamed was also:

- O-sama Bin Laden's personal security chief
- Escorted Al Qaeda’s second-in-command, Al-Zawahiri, in the US on 'fund raising' trips
- Trained the World Trade Center 1993 b*mbing cell
- Took the targeting photos of the b*mbed US African Embassies.

Ali Mohamed has been in US ghost custody since 1998, yet didn’t thwart 9-1-1.

(Source: Triple Cross, Peter Lance–a book that D.A. Patrick Fitzgerald tried to ban. HarperCollins stood by the 5-time Emmy Award-winning investigative reporter and former correspondent for ABC News and published it).

KSM could argue that Ali Mohamed was his liaison to the Americans (the smoking gun link). Ali Mohamed could publicly testify IF KSM has a Constitutional trial.

It is irrelevant whether KSM is a citizen or not, we citizens have a Constitutional right to hear a trial's evidence. Sadly, the goal is to suppress the 9-1-1 plot.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
02:28 PM on 02/27/2010
I bet that Romania's population is really wishing that they hadn't reelected Traian Basescu.
02:19 PM on 02/27/2010
As I understand it, these are defense missiles, not attack missiles. What's the problem? The missiles are designed to shoot down missiles that might be fired on Romania. Say by Iran?
02:20 PM on 02/27/2010
Why on earth would Iran attack Romania?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
02:39 PM on 02/27/2010
Why on earth would Iran attack Israel? Mutually assured destruction has keep nuclear powers from firing on each other. Its worked for over 60 years and there is no reason to believe it will change. Remenber Krushav used to promise to "bury" the US. Nuclear rhetoric and puffery,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
113
Secular Humanist. I have faith in humanity.
03:09 PM on 02/27/2010
How would you feel if Russia placed missiles in Mexico or Cuba (oh wait they did and we had a stronger reaction, rightfully so)......i think we should be working WITH the Russians on missile defense. These are the types of issues that can be resolved with diplomacy. Maybe Russia agrees to put their own missiles in Romania or the US and Russia both put systems there. I'm not sure what the solution would be because i'm not an expect but I can see the Russians point on this issue because I'd be very upset if Russia or China put missiles in our backyard.
03:38 PM on 02/27/2010
The Soviet Union put offensive missiles, potentially nuclear armed, in Cuba. Big, big difference.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:35 AM on 02/28/2010
The power of the US media and untested assumptions:

Hardly any American knows why the Soviets placed missiles in Cuba -- the Soviets retaliated to Americans placing them in Turkey first!!