iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Stiglitz, Nobel Prize-Winning Economist, Says Federal Reserve System 'Corrupt'

Stiglitz

First Posted: 05/03/10 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 04:45 PM ET

One of the world's leading economists said Wednesday that the very structure of the Federal Reserve system is so fraught with conflicts that it's "corrupt."

Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, a former chief economist at the World Bank, said that if a country had applied for World Bank aid during his tenure, with a financial regulatory system similar to the Federal Reserve's -- in which regional Feds are partly governed by the very banks they're supposed to police -- it would have raised alarms.

"If we had seen a governance structure that corresponds to our Federal Reserve system, we would have been yelling and screaming and saying that country does not deserve any assistance, this is a corrupt governing structure," Stiglitz said during a conference on financial reform in New York. "It's time for us to reflect on our own structure today, and to say there are parts that can be improved."

Stiglitz made the remarks at a conference held by the Roosevelt Institute. He and other speakers, including Harvard Law Professor and federal bailout watchdog Elizabeth Warren and legendary investor George Soros, had bold ideas about reforming the nation's financial system.

After the conference, Stiglitz said that his remarks on the Fed were "maybe a little hyperbole," but then again made the case that if another country had presented a plan to reform its financial system, and included a regulatory regime that copied the makeup of the Federal Reserve system, "it would have been a big signal that something is wrong."

To Stiglitz, the core issue is that regional Fed banks, such as the New York Fed, have clear conflicts of interest -- a result of the banks being partly governed by a board of directors that includes officers of the very banks they're supposed to be overseeing.

The New York Fed, which was led by current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner during the time leading Wall Street firms like Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, AIG, and Goldman Sachs were given hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer bailouts, presently has on its board of directors Jamie Dimon, the head of JPMorgan Chase. He's been there for three years. He replaced former Citigroup chairman Sanford "Sandy" Weill.

"So, these are the guys who appointed the guy who bailed them out," Stiglitz said. "Is that a conflict of interest?" he asked rhetorically.

"They would say, 'no conflict of interest, we were just doing our job,'" he answered. "But you have to look at the conflicts of interest."

A message left for a New York Fed spokeswoman after regular business hours was not returned.

"The reason you talk about governance is because in a democracy you want people to have confidence," Stiglitz said. "This is a structure that will undermine confidence in a democracy."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
One of the world's leading economists said Wednesday that the very structure of the Federal Reserve system is so fraught with conflicts that it's "corrupt." Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, a former...
One of the world's leading economists said Wednesday that the very structure of the Federal Reserve system is so fraught with conflicts that it's "corrupt." Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, a former...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 438
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
01:50 AM on 03/17/2010
Why is Geithner still around? When will he be investigated for what happened with AIG and Lehman Brothers? Geithner out ... Volcker in! And why, oh why, is Timothy Geithner 5th in line to succeed to the presidency! Help!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:28 PM on 03/15/2010
With three Fed posts open, the Administration has a great opportunity to upgrade the Fed’s policies and bring it back to a level of national service, not self service.

The record of choices of past two decades is not very good. The Administration has a great opportunity to revamp its mission and make it more aligned with the national interest and less with self interest. -- see Lehman's bankruptcy analysis relased a couple of days ago. That said, only Janet Yellen is a good choice for Vice Chairman, the other two: MIT’s Peter A. Diamond, and Maryland commissioner of financial regulation , Sarah Bloom Raskin (lawyer) are not -- same all, same all.

Have we not had enough with cerebral economists already? Think Greenspan, Bernake and all the President’s economic team who are probably advising on these choices -- is their a good record, or even mediocre? This is a great big country and the net must be cast wide and far.
SamEasy
You really don`t want to know.
08:12 PM on 03/16/2010
The FED is a scam, a sham and it was started under more than suspcious, covert circumstances back in 1913. Why can it not be audited? Why should it have this veil that provides it protection from PROPER scrutiny of the govenment? And who owns the FED? Certainly not the government nor the People. It is at least 50% owned by private bankers, that conveniently have never been identified.

Biggest scam on the planet!!
08:17 PM on 03/10/2010
IT IS corrupt i didn't know they are shredding documents about secretive deals
12:49 PM on 03/10/2010
Stiglitz at it again - "For now, the economics is clear: reducing government spending is a risk not worth taking." http://bit.ly/a9ypa0
holyghostie
Spiritus est qui vivificat
11:18 PM on 03/07/2010
Amen Professor.
09:23 PM on 03/06/2010
The Federal Reserve is corrupt? Say it ain't so Joe!
02:58 AM on 03/06/2010
The Federal Reserve isn't federal. Let's start there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
07:20 PM on 03/05/2010
Money is a medium of exchange. It is an information system.

Today, computers can calculate the value of two things.

Money is obsolete.

We could, for example, use shares of Microsoft as currency..

It would be something that has an intrinsic value.

Services like ShareBuilder can fictionalize (fungigate) purchases.
10:37 AM on 03/07/2010
Wait... 'use shares of Microsoft as currency?

at that point even I would prefer fiat money! LOL
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
porsche996
an inelastic scattering of photons
06:14 PM on 03/05/2010
So who cares what this whacko says....it's not as if he were a credible economist or as if anyone respected his opinions. Right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
07:21 PM on 03/05/2010
"Credible" people have bankrupted America.
07:43 AM on 03/08/2010
I meant "crashed" in my previous comment, of course. But perhaps "cashed" was more appropriate :-)
07:42 AM on 03/08/2010
Well actually, I wouldn't count a nobel prize in economics as a sign of credibility. Myron Scholes got one right before he nearly cashed he world's economy with Long Term Capital Management (an ironic name if ever I heard one). Come to think of it, the nobel prize for peace isn't much better. Henry 'the butcher' Kissinger anyone? Or how about president 'war-is-peace' Obama. Orwell was surely turning in his grave.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
05:46 PM on 03/05/2010
Only one word is needed here:

DUH!
.
07:07 PM on 03/05/2010
I second that! No conspiracy here once you get out of your personal tunnel.
05:22 PM on 03/05/2010
Lol@ conspiracy theorists
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:33 PM on 03/05/2010
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/22/tim-geithners-vogue-inter_n_471196.html

"Despite the criticism, the WSJ reports that Geithner is not going anywhere -- in fact, he's viewed as a standout:

In interviews, top White House officials--including Rahm Emanuel, the president's chief of staff, and senior political adviser David Axelrod--said Mr. Geithner's job is secure. "The president's view is that Tim is one of the stars," Mr. Emanuel said. "Tim was an essential and a key player in developing a strategy that helped restore confidence and turn the whole country around."

having caucused for Obama, emanuel and axelrod are reasons i would vote for anyone but Obama next time around. i am that angry at this bs. this makes bush's bumbling, "atta'boy brownie," pale in comparison to emanuel's and axelrod's calculated serving their wall street brethren. they both know they will be handed whatever they want when they leave, here and in israel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Rautmann
01:40 PM on 03/05/2010
Because of exceptionalsim, the US does not hold itself to the same standards that it holds others to.
Our elections would be called systemically corrupt in any other country.
Our economic regulation is a joke, and rife ewith corruption.
Our press is bought and sold by corporate interests.
Our government depends more on campaign contributions than votes.
And our fiscal policy makes a banana republic (not the store) look like the bedrock of responsibility.

Aren't we supposed to hold ourselves to a HIGHER standard?
01:04 PM on 03/05/2010
There is a solution to debt based private banker currency. Freedom's Vision! Visit and join the Swarm!
http://www.swarmusa.com/vb4/content.php/148-swarm
12:51 PM on 03/05/2010
did you know we the Public owe the Banks interest on EVERY DOLLAR THEY ISSUE OUT OF THIN AIR?

The FED is corruption incarnate.

The 2-party system is completely bought by the bankers and corporate donors.

THERE IS NO HOPE.

THERE IS ONLY REVOLUTION.