More

Iraq Election: Historic Ballot Takes Place Under Tight Security

HAMZA HENDAWI and QASSEM ABDUL-ZAHRA   03/ 6/10 11:32 PM ET   AP

Iraq

BAGHDAD — Under a blanket of tight security designed to thwart insurgent attacks, Iraqis went to the polls Sunday in an election testing the ability of the country's still-fragile democracy to move forward amid uncertainty over a looming U.S. troop drawdown and still jagged sectarian divisions.

Almost 20 million voters are eligible to turn out for the election, only the second vote for a full term of parliament since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion seven years ago this month. About 6,200 candidates are competing for 325 seats in the new parliament.

Insurgents have vowed to disrupt the elections with violence, but security was very tight across the capital where only select authorized vehicles were allowed on the streets and voters headed to the ballot box on foot. The borders have been sealed, the airport closed and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi military and police were on the streets.

Still, at least three explosions could be heard in the early morning hours although there was no information about whether anyone was hurt.

At one polling place in Baghdad's Karradah neighborhood, draconian security measures were in place with the school ringed by barbed wire, armed guards around the perimeter, and police using metal detectors to scan prospective voters.

The election has been viewed by many as a crossroads at which Iraq will decide whether to adhere to the sectarian politics – Shiites aligning with Shiites, Sunnis with Sunnis and Kurds with Kurds – that have defined its short democratic history. Or move away from the sectarian tensions that almost destroyed this Shiite majority country that was held down under Saddam Hussein's Sunni-minority rule.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is fighting for his political future against a coalition led by mainly Shiite religious groups – the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council and a party headed by anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. He also faces a challenge from secular alliance led by former a secular Shiite, Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, who has teamed up with a number of Sunnis in a bid to claim the government.

President Jalal Talabani was among the first to vote Sunday morning in the Kurdish city of Sulamaniyah. Talabani's party, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, is enmeshed in a tight race with an upstart political party called Change which is challenging the two Kurdish parties who have dominated Iraqi politics for years.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BAGHDAD — Under a blanket of tight security designed to thwart insurgent attacks, Iraqis went to the polls Sunday in an election testing the ability of the country's still-fragile democracy to m...
BAGHDAD — Under a blanket of tight security designed to thwart insurgent attacks, Iraqis went to the polls Sunday in an election testing the ability of the country's still-fragile democracy to m...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 50
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:10 AM on 03/07/2010
If we took down SADDAM to bring democracy to Iraq...what was our reason for removing the elected leader of IRAN and putting up the SHAH...Hmmm??? NEOCONS???
07:58 AM on 03/07/2010
Part I

Today's polling is an important event for both the Iraqi people and the Government of the United States. Depending on the results (and the subsequent government-forming process), this election should influence the pace of our military drawdown, the scope of our civilian-diplomatic mission, and the possibility of a residual force past 2011.

For up-to-the-minute reporting, I highly recommend the Election Day "live-blog" being run by the New York Times' Iraq team (IMO, the best English-language Baghdad Bureau in the world).

http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/iraqi-elections-live-blogging-election-day/

The ballot is rather complicated, and there are several parties and lists which will ultimately decide the new ruling coalition. For an overview of the major players, I recommend the following:

http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/special/misc/iraqielections2010/
07:58 AM on 03/07/2010
Part II

Here is my quick analysis:

1) Dawlat al-Kanoon (State of Law) - Mostly Shiite; generally nationalist and secular. This coalition is led by Prime Minister's Dawa Party.

2) Iraqi National Alliance - Generally a religious Shiite coalition. Includes the Supreme Isla.mic Iraqi Council, former Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari's National Reform Movement, and the anti-American Sadrists.

3) Iraq National Movement - The main secular and non-sectarian political alliance in Iraq. Includes former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi's Iraqi National List, Iraqi National Dialogue Front (secular Sunni), and Vice President Tareq Hashemi's Renewal.

4) I'itilaf Wehdat al-Iraq (Unity of Iraq) - Non-sectarian and generally nationalist. Includes Interior Minister Jawad Bolani's Constitution Party (secular Shiite), Ahmad Abu Risha's Awakening of Iraq (Anbar Sunni allies of the US), and the Charter Gathering (secular Sunni).

5) Jabahat al-Tawafuq (Iraqi Consensus) - A fairly Isla.mist Sunni coalition. Includes the Iraqi Isla.mic Party and the General Council for the People of Iraq

6) Kurdish Alliance - The Kurdish powerbrokers. Includes the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan

7) Change List - a new Kurdish opposition party
08:00 AM on 03/07/2010
I am very interested in what the true turnout will be.
07:37 AM on 03/07/2010
Purple Fingers = Tens of thousands of US soldiers killed/maimed, hundreds of thousands Iraqis dead,
$One Trillion us taxpayer money "gone". Was it worth it???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Foxrocks
Level III Thermographer
07:40 AM on 03/07/2010
"Was it worth it???"


A question you won't have an answer to for 20 years.
08:01 AM on 03/07/2010
In 20 years, so many other variables will come into play, there won't be an answer.
All we know now is that these wars were created from lies and those that prospered were directly linked to those in the White House..Halliburton, etc....and the real prize was 400 Billion Barrels of oil under the Iraqi sands...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SweetestTaboo
08:20 AM on 03/07/2010
How could it be worth it when the whole thing was lie to begin with. Sadaam Hussein should have been left in power and we should have held our course in Afghanistan.
07:31 AM on 03/07/2010
Let's see. Complete turmoil, daily ki_llings and b0mbings, Iraqi's wishing S@dd@m was still in power.

Was that worth the lives of 5000 of our best and brightest as well as billions of dollars.

HEIII NO!
07:48 AM on 03/07/2010
The vast majority of Iraqis are glad Saddam is gone.....Stop it with your ridiculous statments.
07:59 AM on 03/07/2010
Sorry to post facts. I realize it is something you never do.
08:04 AM on 03/07/2010
I'm sure there are many countries around the world that would love the United States to come in and remove their tyrants...but we didn't..Hmmm..I wonder why...Oh yes...I know...
BLACK GOOOOO.
07:56 AM on 03/07/2010
Yeah, those two Iraqi citizens w/ purple fingers in the picture above & up to 20 MILLION of their fellow countrymen (& WOMEN now) are braving possible terrorist attacks & even death to vote for their new hard fought freedoms as they march towards a democratic form a govt......Hopefully forever free @ last from the past terrors of the brutal SH regime....... Will this march to democracy be easy?? Hell No....! Was the United States founding any less violent?!?!? Or our Civil War !?!??! Obviously the Iraqi people have more guts then you or your party does......Funny, how you do not voice similiar 'disapproval' @ the anno1nted one for the "complete turmoil,almost daily civlian Ki_llings from drone/aircraft b0mbings & 'Afghani's' wishing that the Talib@.n was still in power"....So please, stop being a lib. daydream believer, forever living in your own little prog lockbox spinning,spinning, & spinning some more because of your irrational personal hatr.ed for the past administration.... Truly, if you think the majority of Iraqis would EVER want to return to the brutal torture, repression & r@pe rms of the past regime u'r a(n) .........(Insert name which best denotes a lack of intellige.nce).
08:07 AM on 03/07/2010
How nice to be an "armchair" liberator of other countries...that's what we're here for isn't it??
to spend our wealth and soldiers to "liberate" the world from tyrants....I don't remember that in the constitution as a justification for war..quite the opposite I think...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SweetestTaboo
08:44 AM on 03/07/2010
You are the f00l. Iraq had a terrible leader as do many nations. Somalia, Dar fur, Sudan, Zimbabwe all nations with terrible leaders or no leaders at all, mass chaos and genocide far worse than anything happening in Iraq.

So why did we pick Iraq to save when there were so many other nations where the citizens were living in far worse conditions. Oddly enough, Iraq was the only country that also had oil.

This was no humanitarian mission, it was a mission to get the oil and to enrich the war profiteers that our military has been outsourced to.

So you need to get a clue about your precious previous administration. They duped you just like they duped the rest of us. The only thing we caught on and you still don't get it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Shaffer
50 yo US citizen, 25 year resident in Bilbao Spain
07:04 AM on 03/07/2010
Awww, isn't that cute. We taught those little Iraqi's to have elections just like we do, so they can 'choose' their leaders just like we do, and live in 'freedom' just like we do. Lucky them. Of course when one nation imposes a political system on another, that's not imperialism, nothing like what the Soviets tried unsuccessfully in Afghanistan. There's no question that our presence there is one of self-defense, the terrorists are hiding there, so we have a right to go in there and install any political system we see fit.
The United States of America is a dangerous aggressor nation, it's citizens are zealous dogma repeating robots and/or helpless cowardly victims of a system that demands they be successful or die, in exchange for the promise of more of the same or worse. The 'funny' thing is, this is the same BS we were getting about the Soviets when they tried to do the same with Afghanistan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Foxrocks
Level III Thermographer
07:10 AM on 03/07/2010
Except they are choosing this form of government, and it's no worse than the one we have.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Shaffer
50 yo US citizen, 25 year resident in Bilbao Spain
07:21 AM on 03/07/2010
They are choosing this, eh? Would they be choosing it had we never gone in there, would Saddam ever have established such a hold over his country without the help of the USA? You're right about it being no worse at least. The candidates that will be presented to voters won't represent anyone but themselves and of course they're already bought and paid for. Good job spreading the love USA!
07:50 AM on 03/07/2010
You blew it......You said it yourself that the terrorists are hiding there, so shouldn't our soldiers be there fighting them?.....Or would you prefer we sit back and let them attack us again?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Shaffer
50 yo US citizen, 25 year resident in Bilbao Spain
09:49 AM on 03/07/2010
If you really want terrorists why not fight them in Africa, the Phillipines, Central and South America, etc.. In reality it's never been safer (as far as terrorism's concerned) to be a US citizen at home, and never been more dangerous to be a US citizen abroad. The victims of foreign policy and strategic interests of the USA are bitter and I do believe they have their reasons. The strategic interests in the middle east are obvious. One of the worlds biggest consumers of oil wants 'friendly nations' over one of the worlds largest reserves. Iran's the last piece of the puzzle, so of course they're next. Once again we're told of the dangers of a radical leader with WMD. Wake up, Zombies!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ByersL
What fresh hell is this?
07:00 AM on 03/07/2010
Good luck to the people of Iraq for safe passage to the voting booth!
06:54 AM on 03/07/2010
The Iraqis in the photo sure look happy and proud.......If you libs had your way, they'd still be living under Saddam. I thought you folks were supposed to be for human rights?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
poco767c
07:21 AM on 03/07/2010
We are for human rights, and Saddam was a brutal murd3rer, but since when has that been the reason for the US to go to war?

there are dictators just as ev!l, just as brutal as Saddam who don't get so much as a stern letter.
07:46 AM on 03/07/2010
I agree that there are dictators just as brutal as Saddam, but couldn't you just be happy that the world has one less dictator?........If Clinton had gotten rid of Saddam, he'd be hailed as a great liberator. You "anti-war" people were never anti-war, you were anti-Bush......Where are all the huge anti-war protests now that Obama is in the White House?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
poco767c
06:27 AM on 03/07/2010
make this the main.

They are having a referendum on the State Of Forces Agreement.
03:43 AM on 03/07/2010
Zzz
12:49 AM on 03/07/2010
Yet another "historic" election brought to you by the war profiteer in chief barack hussein obama. 1st it was bush now its obama's war. PATHETIC!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snakecharmer1340
01:04 AM on 03/07/2010
- by the war profiteer in chief barack hussein obama.- wow

there's really people like you out there?
05:00 PM on 03/07/2010
hes richard benedict arnold cheney`s cousin. I dont trust anything spawned from the same blood as that man. you mean to tell me you actually believe this nonsense you read? this is blatant war propaganda.

so yeah there are people like me who dont buy it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DJlaysitup
Seasons don't fear the Reaper...
12:41 AM on 03/07/2010
I feel bad for these duped people...possibly taking their lives into their hands to "vote". "Dip my finger in purple ink?"...."yeah right".

It's just a dog and pony show. Face it Iraqis...you ain't getting that oil back - no matter who you vote for. And we ain't leaving.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:37 AM on 03/07/2010
Iraqi elections? People will be putting in less thought to their choice than the average voter does for American Idol. And THAT's not much thought, let's face it.
Strictly sectarian. Is he in my clan / religious group or not? Done! As for candidates' policies, forget it.
Without a culture of democracy, voting is meaningless. So, in Sunni-populated areas the Sunnis will get in, In Shiite ones the Shia candidate will be victorious.
NB: leave lots of wiggle room for fraud and corruption.
And doubtless at the end of the day the Americans will hail the event as a triumph for the democratic process and a justification for all the corpses.
12:36 AM on 03/07/2010
Watches ,cash,guns in exchange for votes!
Democracy at its best!
photo
JeauxSchmeaux
Don't faze me bro!
12:35 AM on 03/07/2010
Hey man, smell my finger!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:08 AM on 03/07/2010
Preparation H is purple in Iraq?